Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Clin Nutr ; 35(4): 912-7, 2016 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26269383

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND & AIM: Patients with intestinal failure (IF) are dependent on parenteral nutrition delivered through central access such as Hickman™ catheters. The peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) is becoming increasingly popular for the purpose. The aim of the present study was to compare complication rates between the two types of catheters. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Over a six-year period (2008-2014), we included 136 patients with IF receiving home parenteral nutrition (HPN). These patients had a total of 295 catheters (169 Hickman™ catheters and 126 PICCs). Data were collected by reviewing their medical records. Incidences are given per 1000 catheter days. Data are given as means ± standard deviation (SD) and compared using independent student's t-tests, Mann-Whitney-Wilcoxon, and X(2)-tests. A survival analysis for time to the first infection was conducted using Cox regression. RESULTS: The total number of catheter days was 54,912 days for Hickman™ catheters (mean dwell time 325 ± 402) and 15,974 days for PICCs (mean dwell time 127 ± 121), respectively. The incidence of catheter-related blood stream infection (CRBSI) per 1000 catheter days was significantly lower for Hickman™ catheters compared to PICCs (0.56 vs. 1.63, p < 0.05). The mean time to first CRBSI was significantly shorter for PICCs compared to Hickman™ catheters (84 ± 94 days vs. 297 ± 387 days, p < 0.05), which was confirmed with a cox analysis corrected for age and gender. A total of 75 catheters were removed due to CRBSI, 49 Hickman™ catheters and 26 PICCs respectively. In addition, PICCs were more often removed due to local infection/phlebitis and mechanical causes (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: We found a higher risk and shorter time to first CRBSI in PICCs compared to Hickman catheters supporting that PICCs should mainly be chosen for planned HPN up to 3-6 months. We therefore conclude that the choice of catheter must still be determined on an individual basis.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/epidemiología , Cateterismo Venoso Central/efectos adversos , Cateterismo Periférico/efectos adversos , Enfermedades Intestinales/terapia , Nutrición Parenteral en el Domicilio/efectos adversos , Anciano , Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/sangre , Cateterismo Venoso Central/métodos , Cateterismo Periférico/métodos , Catéteres Venosos Centrales/efectos adversos , Comorbilidad , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento
2.
JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr ; 40(7): 989-94, 2016 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25852128

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Tunneled, cuffed, central venous catheters, including Hickman catheters and peripherally inserted central venous catheters (PICCs), are the most commonly used venous access for home parenteral nutrition (HPN) therapy. Catheter-related bloodstream infection is the most prevalent and severe complication. This study investigated whether environmental risk factors, including smoking, catheter management by a home care nurse, colectomy with stoma, number of infusion days per week, and C-reactive protein at catheter insertion day, influenced the time to first catheter-related bloodstream infection (CRBSI). MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this 6-year (2008-2014) observational cohort study, adult patients with intestinal failure receiving HPN through either Hickman catheters or PICCs were included. Data were obtained by reviewing medical records, and the environmental risk factors were analyzed with the Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS: A total of 295 catheters (Hickman catheters: n = 169 and PICCs: n = 126) inserted into 136 patients were registered. Using the PICCs, 1 additional infusion day per week showed to significantly decrease the time to first CRBSI by a factor of 2.47. Hickman catheters managed by a home care nurse had a significantly increased mean (SD) incidence of CRBSI of 1.45 (0.68) per 1000 catheter days. Hickman catheters not managed by a home care nurse had a mean (SD) incidence of 0.56 (0.24). CONCLUSION: Using the PICC, 1 additional infusion day per week decreased the time to first CRBSI, while having the Hickman catheter managed by a home care nurse increased the mean CRBSI incidence. No other risk factors were found.


Asunto(s)
Bacteriemia/epidemiología , Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/epidemiología , Nutrición Parenteral en el Domicilio/efectos adversos , Anciano , Bacteriemia/etiología , Proteína C-Reactiva/metabolismo , Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/etiología , Cateterismo Periférico/efectos adversos , Catéteres Venosos Centrales/efectos adversos , Catéteres Venosos Centrales/microbiología , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Prevalencia , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA