Prognostic Value of Tumor Budding in Urothelial Carcinoma: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review.

Recently, tumor budding (TB) has been suggested as a strong prognostic marker in urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UC). The aim of this systematic review is to test the prognostic value of TB in UC by a meta-analysis of previously published studies. We systematically reviewed the literature related to TB by using the databases of Scopus, PubMed, and Web of Science. The search was limited to publications in the English language up to July 2022. There were 790 patients from 7 retrospective studies in which TB has been evaluated in UC. Two authors independently extracted the results from eligible studies. The meta-analysis of eligible studies revealed that TB is a significant prognosticator for progression-free survival in UC, with a hazard ratio (HR) of 3.51 (95% CI, 1.86-6.62; P < .001) in univariate analysis and a HR of 2.78 (95% CI, 1.57-4.93; P < .001) in multivariate analysis; a significant prognosticator for overall survival and cancer-specific survival in UC, with a HR of 3.07 (95% CI, 2.04-4.64; P < .001) and a HR of 2.18 (95% CI, 1.11-4.29; P = .02) respectively in univariate analysis. Our findings confirm that UC with a high TB count is at a high risk of progress. TB could be considered as an element in pathology reports and future oncologic staging systems.

Predictive value of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in diagnosis of early prostate cancer among men who underwent robotic transperineal prostate biopsy.

ABSTRACT: To evaluate the predicted value of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) in the diagnosis of early prostate cancer by using standardized Full blood count (FBC) performed within 4 weeks before biopsy and histology results from transperineal prostate biopsy (RTPB).Patients who underwent RTPB under general anesthesia (GA), at Urology Department, Singapore General Hospital between September 2006 and Febuary 2016 were retrospectively reviewed.NLR was calculated using full blood count (FBC) that was done as a pre-admission test before GA within 4 weeks before the biopsy. Statistical analyses were done to establish the correlation of NLR and different clinical parameters such as biopsy histology, pre-biopsy PSA, and prostate volume.A total of 652 patients who underwent RTPB for diagnostic purposes with a valid PSA level were included in this study. There was total of 409 (62.7%) benign histology and 243 (37.3%) prostate cancer. There was no significant difference in median NLR between the benign and prostate cancer group (2.00 vs 1.99; P = .29).In the subgroups analysis, there was also no significant difference of median NLR value in clinical significant cancer (defined as Gleason 3 + 4 and above) and benign histology group (NLR 2.00 vs 2.01, P = .41), as well as prostate cancer and benign group according to different pre-biopsy PSA levels: PSA (ug/l) < 4, 4 to 10, 10 to 20, and >20, respectively. (Median NLR 1.34 vs 1.76; 1.97 vs 1.97; 1.97 vs 2.18; 2.18 vs 1.98, P > .05). NLR is neither associated with prostate cancer using logestic regression model nor a strong predictor of the Gleason grade group and D'Amico risk stratification group using ordinal regression model. (P > .05)There was no statistically significant difference of NLR between the benign and prostate cancer group as a whole or in the subgroup analyses for patients who underwent robotic transperineal prostate biopsy. NLR may have a limited role in predicting early-stage prostate cancer.