Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Malar J ; 22(1): 21, 2023 Jan 19.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36658578

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Mass screening and treatment (MSAT) for malaria elimination lacks an ideal diagnostic tool to allow sensitive and affordable test of the target population in the field. This study evaluated whether Capture and Ligation Probe-PCR (CLIP-PCR) could be used in a field MSAT in Laiza City, Myanmar. METHODS: On day 0, two dried blood spots were collected from each participant. On day 1, all samples were screened for Plasmodium in a 20 m2 laboratory with workbench, a biosafety cabinet, a refrigerator, a benchtop shaking incubator and a qPCR machine, by four technicians using CLIP-PCR with sample pooling, at a health clinic of the Chinese bordering town of Nabang. On day 2, all positives were followed up and treated. RESULTS: Of 15,038 persons (65% of the total population) screened, 204 (1.36%) were CLIP-PCR positives. Among them, 188, 14, and 2 were infected with Plasmodium vivax, Plasmodium falciparum, and P. vivax/P. falciparum mix, respectively. The testing capacity was 538 persons/day, with a cost of US$0.92 /person. The proportion of submicroscopic infection was 64.7%. All positive individuals received treatment within 72 h after blood collection. CONCLUSION: Using CLIP-PCR in MSAT in low transmission settings can support the malaria elimination efforts in the China-Myanmar border region.


Asunto(s)
Malaria Falciparum , Malaria Vivax , Malaria , Humanos , Mianmar , Malaria/diagnóstico , Malaria/prevención & control , Plasmodium falciparum/genética , Plasmodium vivax/genética , Reacción en Cadena de la Polimerasa/métodos , China/epidemiología , Malaria Vivax/diagnóstico , Malaria Vivax/prevención & control , Malaria Vivax/epidemiología , Malaria Falciparum/epidemiología
2.
Adv Parasitol ; 116: 33-67, 2022.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35752449

RESUMEN

To understand how malaria could be eliminated in the original hyperendmic area for malaria along international borders in Yunnan Province, malaria situation and control were described on the basis of seven phases. At last the experiences and lessons of the program that reduced border malaria from hyperendmicity to malaria-free status were summarized. Malaria control and elimination area were particularly difficult in the Yunnan border. The achievement can be attributed to high political commitment, strategic and technical innovations based on the actual locality, effective collaboration and communication with neighbouring countries to carry out cross border interventions. Other border areas might perform their own pilot interventions based on their local context, including malaria burden, governing system, health service structure contextualized based on their socioeconomic development and ecology, and then a local decision could be made according to their own trial results.


Asunto(s)
Malaria , China/epidemiología , Ecología , Humanos , Malaria/epidemiología , Malaria/prevención & control
3.
BMC Infect Dis ; 21(1): 1246, 2021 Dec 14.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34906092

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Cross-border malaria in Laiza City of Myanmar seriously affected Yingjiang County of China and compromised reaching the goal of malaria elimination by 2020. Since 2017, a pilot project on 3 + 1 strategy of joint cross-border malaria prevention and control was carried out for building a malaria buffer in these border areas. Here, 3 were the three preventive lines in China where different focalized approaches of malaria elimination were applied and + 1 was a defined border area in Myanmar where the integrated measures of malaria control were adopted. METHODS: A 5-year retrospective analysis (2015 to 2019) was conducted that included case detection, parasite prevalence and vector surveillance. Descriptive statistics was used and the incidence or rates were compared. The annual parasite incidence and the parasite prevalence rate in + 1 area of Myanmar, the annual importation rate in Yingjiang County of China and the density of An. minimus were statistically significant indictors to assess the effectiveness of the 3 + 1 strategy. RESULTS: In + 1 area of Myanmar from 2015 to 2019, the averaged annual parasite incidence was (59.11 ± 40.73)/1000 and Plasmodium vivax accounted for 96.27% of the total confirmed cases. After the pilot project, the annual parasite incidence dropped 89% from 104.77/1000 in 2016 to 12.18/1000 in 2019, the microscopic parasite prevalence rate dropped 100% from 0.34% in 2017 to zero in 2019 and the averaged density of An. Minimus per trap-night dropped 93% from 1.92 in June to 0.13 in September. The submicroscopic parasite prevalence rate increased from 1.15% in 2017 to 1.66% in 2019 without significant difference between the two surveys (P = 0.084). In Yingjiang County of China, neither indigenous nor introduced case was reported and 100% cases were imported from Myanmar since 2017. The averaged annual importation rate from 2015 to 2019 was (0.47 ± 0.15)/1000. After the pilot project, the annual importation rate dropped from 0.59/1000 in 2016 to 0.28/1000 in 2019 with an overall reduction of 53% in the whole county. The reduction was 67% (57.63/1000 to 18.01/1000) in the first preventive line, 52% (0.20/1000 to 0.10/1000) in the second preventive line and 36% (0.32/1000 to 0.22/1000) in the third preventive line. The averaged density of An. Minimus per trap-night in the first preventive line dropped 94% from 2.55 in June to 0.14 in September, without significant difference from that of + 1 area of Myanmar (Z value = - 1.18, P value = 0.24). CONCLUSION: The pilot project on 3 + 1 strategy has been significantly effective in the study areas and a buffer zone of border malaria was successfully established between Laiza City of Myanmar and Yingjiang County of China.


Asunto(s)
Malaria , China/epidemiología , Humanos , Malaria/epidemiología , Malaria/prevención & control , Mianmar/epidemiología , Proyectos Piloto , Estudios Retrospectivos
4.
Malar J ; 20(1): 396, 2021 Oct 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34627264

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Eliminating malaria and preventing re-establishment of malaria transmission in border areas requires universal coverage of malaria surveillance and a rapid response to any threats (i.e. malaria cues) of re-establishing transmission. MAIN TEXT: Strategy 1: Intensive interventions within 2.5 km-wide perimeter along the border to prevent border-spill malaria. The area within 2.5 km along the international border is the travel radius of anopheline mosquitoes. Comprehensive interventions should include: (1) proactive and passive case detection, (2) intensive vector surveillance, (3) evidence-based vector control, and (4) evidence-based preventative treatment with anti-malarial drugs. Strategy 2: Community-based malaria detection and screening of migrants and travellers in frontier townships. Un-permitted travellers cross borders frequently and present in frontier townships. Maintenance of intensified malaria surveillance should include: (1) passive malaria detection in the township hospitals, (2) seek assistance from villager leaders and health workers to monitor cross border travellers, and refer febrile patients to the township hospitals and (3) the county's Centre for Disease Control and Prevention maintain regular proactive case detection. Strategy 3: Universal coverage of malaria surveillance to detect malaria cues. Passive detection should be consolidated into the normal health service. Health services personnel should remain vigilant to ensure universal coverage of malaria detection and react promptly to any malaria cues. Strategy + 1: Strong collaborative support with neighbouring countries. Based on the agreement between the two countries, integrated control strategies should be carried out to reduce malaria burden for both countries. There should be a clear focus on the border areas between neighbouring countries. CONCLUSION: The 3 + 1 strategy is an experience summary of border malaria control and elimination, and then contributed to malaria elimination in Yunnan's border areas, China. Nevertheless, Yunnan still has remaining challenges of re-establishment of malaria transmission in the border areas, and the 3 + 1 strategy should still be carried out.


Asunto(s)
Transmisión de Enfermedad Infecciosa/prevención & control , Malaria/prevención & control , China , Emigración e Inmigración , Humanos , Malaria/diagnóstico , Malaria/transmisión
5.
Artículo en Chino | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30130034

RESUMEN

Objective: To understand the control status of malaria at hotspots in Yingjiang County and provide measures for malaria elimination in the China-Myanmar border areas of Yunnan Province. Methods: A survey was made in 4 villages with indigenous malaria cases or imported cases in Nabang and Tongbiguan of Yingjiang County in Yunnan Province in June and July 2015. Peripheral blood samples were collected from the neighboring residents around patients and examined by malaria rapid diagnostic test (RDT). The results were further verified by nested-PCR. Mosquitoes were collected by overnight trapping with light traps in Jingpo, Lilisu, Jiema, and Mengxiangyang villages or by human landing catches in Jingpo and Lisu villages. Nested-PCR was performed on part of the captured Anopheles minimus to detect the malaria parasites. Results: One hundred and ninety-four filter blood samples were collected from 11 malaria cases in two sites. All were detected to be negative for Plasmodium by RDT. In contrast, two samples originated from Jingpo and Lisu villages with indigenous cases were detected to be positive for Plasmodium vivax by nested-PCR. A total of 2 374 mosquitoes were captured, belonging to 22 species of 4 genera: Anopheles, Culex, Aedes and Armigeres. The mosquitoes were predominated by genus Culex, followed by genus Anopheles(11.33%, 269/2 374) which was dominated by A. minimus(49.07%, 132/269), then was A. sinensis(4.09%, 11/269), A. maculatus(2.23%, 6/269), A. jeyporiensis(0.74%, 2/269)and so on. The mean indoor man-biting rate of mosquitoes was 5.78 and 3.20 per person per hour for Jingpo and Lisu villages, and the mean outdoor man-biting rate of mosquitoes was 2.30 per person per hour for Lisu Village. The 14 A. minimus were negative for sporozoite infection as detected by nested-PCR. Conclusion: Nested-PCR showed that there are asymptomatic Plasmodium carriers in Yingjiang's border area of Yunnan Province. Four major mosquito species as malaria vectors exist with A. minimus as the dominant one.


Asunto(s)
Malaria , Animales , Anopheles , China , Ambiente , Humanos , Mosquitos Vectores , Plasmodium , Reacción en Cadena de la Polimerasa , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...