Structural valve deterioration in mitral replacement surgery: comparison of Carpentier-Edwards supra-annular porcine and perimount pericardial bioprostheses.

BACKGROUND: Bioprostheses preserved with glutaraldehyde, both porcine and pericardial, have been available as second-generation prostheses for valve replacement surgery. The performance with regard to structural valve deterioration with the Carpentier-Edwards supra-annular (CE-SAV) porcine bioprosthesis and the Carpentier-Edwards Perimount (CE-P) pericardial bioprosthesis (Baxter Healthcare Corp, Edwards Division, Santa Ana, Calif) was evaluated to determine whether there was a difference in mitral valve replacement. METHODS: The CE-SAV bioprosthesis was implanted in 1266 overall mitral valve replacements (isolated mitral, 1066; mitral in multiple, 200) and the CE-P bioprosthesis in 429 overall mitral valve replacements (isolated mitral, 328; mitral in multiple, 101). The mean age of the CE-SAV population was 64.2 +/- 12.2 years and that of the CE-P population, 60.7 +/- 11.7 years (P =.0001). For the study, structural valve deterioration was diagnosed at reoperation for explantation. RESULTS: The freedom from structural valve deterioration was evaluated to 10 years, and the freedom rates reported are at 10 years. For the overall mitral valve replacement groups, the actuarial freedom from deterioration was significant (P =.0001): CE-P > CE-SAV for 40 years or younger, 80% versus 60%; 41 to 50 years, 91% versus 61%; 51 to 60 years, 84% versus 69%; 61 to 70 years, 95% versus 75%. The older than 70-year group was 100% versus 92% (no significant difference). The actual freedom from structural valve deterioration also demonstrated the same pattern at 10 years: 40 years or younger, CE-P 82% versus CE-SAV 68%; 41 to 50 years, 92% versus 70%; 51 to 60 years, 90% versus 80%; 61 to 70 years, 97% versus 88%; and older than 70 years, 100% versus 97%. The independent risk factors of structural valve deterioration for the overall mitral valve replacement group were age and age groups and prosthesis type (CE-SAV > CE-P). The prosthesis type either in isolated replacement or in multiple replacement was not predictive of structural valve deterioration. The pathology of structural valve deterioration was different: 70% of CE-P failures were due to calcification and 57% of CE-SAV failures were due to combined calcification and leaflet tear. CONCLUSION: The actuarial and actual freedom from structural valve deterioration, diagnosed at reoperation, is greater at 10 years for CE-P than for CE-SAV bioprostheses. The mode of failure is different, and the cause remains obscure. Long-term evaluation is recommended, because the different modes of failure may alter the clinical performance by 15 and 20 years.

Pericarbon pericardial valve prosthesis: midterm results of the aortic valve replacement.

This clinical study was undertaken to verify the encouraging results of experimental studies regarding a new pericardial bioprosthesis. From May 1989 to November 1993, 204 patients underwent an aortic valve replacement with the Pericarbon (Sorin Biomedica Cardio S.p.A., Saluggia, Italy) prosthesis. A follow-up was 100% complete and extended to 65 months (total 408 patient-years, average 2.0+/-1.4 years). Mean age at the operation was 75.1+/-5.5 years and 96% were in NYHA clinical stage III or IV. There were 86 men and 118 women; 73 patients had an isolated aortic valve disease, 131 had a concomitant cardiosurgical procedure (coronary artery bypass grafting in 106 patients). The operative mortality (30-day mortality) rate was 11.8% (24/204). There were 24 late deaths (5.9+/-1.2% patient-year). The actuarial probability of survival was 68+/-5% at 5 years. Four patients died of valve-related causes (one thromboembolic complication, two endocarditis, one anticoagulant-related hemorrhage). Actuarial rate of freedom from valve-related death was 95+/-3% at 5 years. Valve-related morbidity included seven thromboembolic episodes (1.7% patient-year), four anticoagulant-related complications (0.9% patient-year), three endocarditis (0.7% patient-year) and one reoperation (0.2% patient-year). After 5 years freedom from thromboembolic events was 83+/-7%, from anticoagulant-related hemorrhage 96+/-2%, from endocarditis 97+/-2%, and from reoperation 99+/-1%. Echocardiographic study performed in 30 patients showed a paraprosthetic leak in four patients, a central leak in two, and cusp thickening in another three. The clinical data showed that the Pericarbon prosthesis has valve-related morbidity. The echocardiographic results suggest that the prosthesis can undergo a pathologic process during the first 5 years after implantation. This makes it necessary to continue the follow-up and include the larger number of patients in the echocardiographic investigation.

Mitral valve prosthetic implantation with preservation of native mitral valve apparatus.

To avoid postoperative morbidity and mortality often associated with left ventricular dysfunction after mitral valve replacement (MVR) for chronic mitral insufficiency, reconstruction or preservation of the native mitral valve apparatus may be attempted during mitral prosthetic implantation (MPI). The effects of mitral surgery on heart function, studied with echocardiography and radionuclide angiography, were compared in seven patients with MPI (study group) and five with MVR (control group) who underwent complete preoperative, early postoperative and 3-6 months follow-up examinations. Preoperatively there was significant intergroup difference only in right ventricular ejection fraction measured at radionuclide angiography, which was lower in the MPI group (p < 0.05). At follow-up the MPI group had improved as regards this fraction (p < 0.005) and stroke volume index (p < 0.05). The number of patients with improved NYHA class at follow-up was significantly greater in the MPI group. Our preliminary experience with preservation of the native mitral valve apparatus thus suggests that the method offers haemodynamic advantages for postoperative right ventricular function.

Persistent cardiac failure after mitral valve replacement due to free-floating intracardiac thrombus formation. Case report.

A case of free-floating left atrial-ventricular thrombus early after mitral valve replacement (Carpentier-Edwards pericardial bioprosthesis) is presented. Successful surgical removal was performed. The diagnostic and therapeutic efforts are discussed.