RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Surgery is the cornerstone of ovarian cancer treatment. However, surgery and perioperative inflammation have been described as potentially pro-metastagenic. In various animal models and other human cancers, intraoperative administration of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) appears to have a positive impact on patient outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this unicentric retrospective study, we provide an exploratory analysis of the safety and potential benefit of intraoperative administration of ketorolac on the outcome of patients undergoing surgery for ovarian cancer. The study population included all patients who were given a diagnosis of ovarian, fallopian tube or peritoneal cancer by the multidisciplinary oncology committee (MOC) of the Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc between 2015 and 2020. RESULTS: We included 166 patients in our analyses, with a median follow-up of 21.8 months. Both progression-free survival and overall survival were superior in patients who received an intraoperative injection of ketorolac (34.4 months of progression-free survival in the ketorolac group versus 21.5 months in the non-ketorolac group (p = 0.002), and median overall survival was not reached in either group but there was significantly higher survival in the ketorolac group (p = 0.004)). We also performed subgroup analyses to minimise bias due to imbalance between groups on factors that could influence patient survival, and the group of patients receiving ketorolac systematically showed a better outcome. Uni- and multivariate analyses confirmed that administration of ketorolac intraoperatively was associated with better progression-free survival (HR = 0.47 on univariate analysis and 0.43 on multivariate analysis, p = 0.003 and 0.023, respectively). In terms of complications, there were no differences between the two groups, either intraoperatively or postoperatively. CONCLUSION: Our study has shown a favourable association between the use of ketorolac during surgery and the postoperative progression of ovarian cancer in a group of 166 patients, without any rise in intra- or postoperative complications. These encouraging results point to the need for a prospective study to confirm the benefit of intraoperative administration of ketorolac in ovarian cancer surgery.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: In Belgium there is no centralization of surgery for ovarian cancer, with more than 100 centers treating around 800 cases per year. In 2017 a network with several collaborating hospitals was established to centralize surgery for ovarian cancer (UCLouvain Network of Gynecological Oncology; UNGO) following publication of the European Society of Gynecological Oncology (ESGO) recommendations and quality criteria for surgery of advanced ovarian cancer. We obtained ESGO accreditation in 2019. METHODS: We retrospectively collected data associated with patients undergoing surgery in our institution from 2007 to 2016, before the creation of the network (cohort 1) and, following the establishment of UNGO (2017-2021), patients undergoing surgery were prospectively registered in a REDCap database (cohort 2). The outcomes of the two cohorts were compared. RESULTS: A total of 314 patients underwent surgery in our institution from 2007 and 2021: 7.5 patients/year in cohort 1 (retrospective, 2007-2016) and 40.8 patients/year in cohort 2 (after network creation, 2017-2021). Median disease-free survival was increased from 16.5 months (range 13.2-20.4) in cohort 1 to 27.1 months (range 21.5-33.2) in cohort 2 (p=0.0004). In cohort 2, the rate of patients with residual disease at the end of the surgery was significantly less (18.7% vs 8.8%, p=0.023), although more patients in cohort 1 received neoadjuvant chemotherapy (89% vs 54%, p<0.001). However, there was a higher rate of complications in the patients in cohort 2 (18.8% vs 30%, p=0.041). CONCLUSION: Our study shows that, with the help of ESGO and its recommendations, we have been able to create an efficient advanced ovarian cancer centralized network and this may provide an improvement in the quality of care.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of the lymph node dissection (LND) in the disease-free (DFS) and overall survival (OS) of the women treated surgically of uterine leiomyosarcoma (ULMS). MATERIAL AND METHODS: A multicentric retrospective study was conducted among European countries collecting patients diagnosed of uterine sarcoma (SARcoma of the UTerus - SARCUT study). A total of 390 ULMS were selected for the present study to compare patients who underwent LND and those who did not. A further matched-pair subanalysis identified 116 women, 58 pairs (58 with LND and 58 without it) comparable in age, tumor size, surgical procedures, extrauterine disease and adjuvant treatment. Demographic data, pathology results and follow-up were abstracted from medical records and analyzed. Disease-free (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were studied using Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox regression analysis. RESULTS: Among the 390 patients, the 5-year DFS was significantly higher in no-LDN group comparing to the LDN group (57.7% vs. 33.0%; HR 1.75, 95% CI 1.19-2.56; p = 0.007), but not the 5-year OS (64.6% vs. 64.3%; HR 1,10 95% CI 0,77-1,79; p = 0.704). In the matched-pair subanalysis, there were no statistical differences between the study groups. The 5- year DFS was 50.5% in the no-LND and 33.0% in the LND group (HR 1.38; 95% CI 0,83-2.31; p = 0,218) and the 5-year OS was 59.7% and 64.3% respectively (HR 0.81; 95% CI 0,45-1,49; p = 0,509). CONCLUSIONS: LND performed in women diagnosed of ULMS have no impact neither in the disease-free nor in the overall survival compared to patients without LDN in a complete homogeneous group.
