Outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy with continuous infusion of meropenem: A retrospective analysis of three years of clinical experience / Tratamiento antimicrobiano domiciliario endovenoso con infusión continua de meropenem: un análisis restrospectivo de tres años de experiencia clínica

Introduction: Data regarding outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) with continuous infusion of meropenem (CIM) remain scarce and controversial. We aimed to analyze its outcomes. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of a cohort of patients who received OPAT with CIM during a three-year period at a single center in northwest Spain. Demographics, clinical data and OPAT outcomes were recorded. Results: Since January 2017–December 2019, 34 patients received 35 OPAT episodes with CIM. The median age was 75 years, and 18 (51.4%) had a Charlson comorbidity index>2. Twelve (34.3%) had respiratory infection, 11 (31.4%) urinary tract infection, and 12 (34.3%) other infections. Twenty-one (60%) received a dose of 6g/day, and 27 (77.1%) received combined antibiotic therapy. The duration of OPAT with CIM was 10 median days. Pseudomonas aeruginosa was the most frequently (34.3%) isolated microorganism and 10 (28.6%) infections were polymicrobial. During OPAT and hospital at home unit admission, 4 (11.4%) patients had any adverse reaction that required CIM withdrawal, 2 (5.7%) were readmitted, and 3 (8.8%) died (2 infection-related deaths). After 30 days from discharge 6 (18.8%) of 32 not-censored patients had unplanned readmissions (2 infection-related), 6 (18.8%) developed recurrence (3 relapses, 3 reinfections) and 1 (3.1%) died (none-infection-related death). Twenty-three (71.9%) of these 32 patients did not experience unplanned readmission, recurrence or death. Conclusion: CIM can be an option to be administrated in OPAT programs in selected patients. Further studies are warranted to increase evidence regarding its use, and to externally validate our findings.(AU)

Introducción: Los datos sobre el tratamiento antimicrobiano domiciliario endovenoso (TADE) con infusión continua de meropenem (ICM) son escasos y controvertidos. Nuestro objetivo fue analizar sus resultados. Métodos: Realizamos un análisis retrospectivo de una cohorte de pacientes que recibieron TADE con ICM durante tres años en un centro del noroeste de España. Se registraron datos demográficos, clínicos y resultados. Resultados: Desde enero de 2017 a diciembre de 2019, 34 pacientes recibieron 35 episodios de TADE con ICM. La mediana de edad fue de 75 años y 18 (51,4%) tenían un índice de comorbilidad de Charlson>2. Doce (34,3%) tenían infección respiratoria, 11 (31,4%) urinaria y 12 (34,3%) otras infecciones. Veintiuno (60%) recibieron una dosis de 6g/día y 27 (77,1%) antibioterapia combinada. La duración mediana del TADE con ICM fue de 10 días. Pseudomonas aeruginosa fue el microorganismo aislado más frecuentemente (34,3%) y 10 (28,6%) infecciones fueron polimicrobianas. Durante el TADE, 4 (11,4%) pacientes presentaron alguna reacción adversa que requirió retirada de ICM, 2 (5,7%) reingresaron y 3 (8,8%) fallecieron (2 muertes relacionadas con infección). Tras 30 días desde el alta, 6 (18,8%) de 32 pacientes tuvieron reingresos no programados (2 relacionados con infección), 6 (18,8%) desarrollaron recurrencia (3 recidivas, 3 reinfecciones) y 1 (3,1%) falleció (sin relación con infección). Veintitrés (71,9%) de 32 pacientes no experimentaron reingreso no programado, recidiva o muerte. Conclusión: La ICM puede ser una opción para ser administrada en programas de TADE en pacientes seleccionados. Se necesitan más estudios para aumentar la evidencia sobre su uso y validar externamente nuestros hallazgos.(AU)

Outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy with continuous infusion of meropenem: A retrospective analysis of three years of clinical experience.

INTRODUCTION: Data regarding outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) with continuous infusion of meropenem (CIM) remain scarce and controversial. We aimed to analyze its outcomes. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of a cohort of patients who received OPAT with CIM during a three-year period at a single center in northwest Spain. Demographics, clinical data and OPAT outcomes were recorded. RESULTS: Since January 2017-December 2019, 34 patients received 35 OPAT episodes with CIM. The median age was 75 years, and 18 (51.4%) had a Charlson comorbidity index>2. Twelve (34.3%) had respiratory infection, 11 (31.4%) urinary tract infection, and 12 (34.3%) other infections. Twenty-one (60%) received a dose of 6g/day, and 27 (77.1%) received combined antibiotic therapy. The duration of OPAT with CIM was 10 median days. Pseudomonas aeruginosa was the most frequently (34.3%) isolated microorganism and 10 (28.6%) infections were polymicrobial. During OPAT and hospital at home unit admission, 4 (11.4%) patients had any adverse reaction that required CIM withdrawal, 2 (5.7%) were readmitted, and 3 (8.8%) died (2 infection-related deaths). After 30 days from discharge 6 (18.8%) of 32 not-censored patients had unplanned readmissions (2 infection-related), 6 (18.8%) developed recurrence (3 relapses, 3 reinfections) and 1 (3.1%) died (none-infection-related death). Twenty-three (71.9%) of these 32 patients did not experience unplanned readmission, recurrence or death. CONCLUSION: CIM can be an option to be administrated in OPAT programs in selected patients. Further studies are warranted to increase evidence regarding its use, and to externally validate our findings.

Deep vein thrombosis symptoms and 30-day mortality in acute pulmonary embolism.

BACKGROUND: In patients with acute symptomatic pulmonary embolism (PE), the presence of concomitant lower-limb deep vein thrombosis (DVT) has been associated with a higher mortality rate. The prognostic significance of DVT symptoms among these patients remains uncertain. METHODS: We used the RIETE (Registro Informatizado de Enfermedad TromboEmbólica) registry to compare the 30-day mortality rate in patients with PE and concomitant lower-limb DVT, according to the presence or absence of DVT symptoms. Primary outcomes were all-cause death and PE-related death within the first 30 days. RESULTS: Since March 2001 to June 2021, there were 17,742 patients with acute symptomatic PE and objectively proven concomitant lower-limb DVT. Of these, 11,984 (68%) had DVT symptoms. Most patients with or without DVT symptoms (82% vs. 81%) received low-molecular-weight heparin initially. Then, most (61% vs. 58%) switched to vitamin K antagonists. During the first 30 days of therapy, 497 patients with DVT symptoms (4.1%) and 164 (2.8%) with no DVT symptoms died (rate ratio [RR]: 1.48; 95%CI: 1.23-1.77). The rates of PE-related death were: 1.0% vs. 0.7%, respectively (RR: 1.50; 95%CI: 1.04-2.16). On multivariable analysis, patients with DVT symptoms were at increased risk for all-cause death (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR]: 1.49; 95%CI: 1.24-1.78), and PE-related death (aHR: 1.52; 95%CI: 1.05-2.20). CONCLUSION: Among patients with acute symptomatic PE and concomitant lower-limb DVT, those with DVT symptoms had an increased all-cause and PE-related mortality within 30 days. Assessment of DVT symptoms would assist with risk stratification of these patients.

Prognostic Significance of Concomitant Superficial Vein Thrombosis in Patients with Deep Vein Thrombosis of the Lower Limbs.

BACKGROUND: The prognostic significance of concomitant superficial vein thrombosis (SVT) in patients with lower-limb deep vein thrombosis (DVT) has not been consistently evaluated. METHODS: We used the RIETE (Registro Informatizado de Enfermedad TromboEmbólica) registry to compare the rates of subsequent pulmonary embolism (PE), recurrent DVT, major bleeding or death in patients with lower-limb DVT, according to the presence or absence of concomitant SVT. RESULTS: From March 2015 to May 2020, there were 8,743 patients with lower-limb DVT. Of these, 745 (8.5%) had concomitant SVT. Most patients (97.4% in both subgroups) received anticoagulant therapy (median duration: 138 vs. 147 days). During follow-up (median: 193 vs. 210 days), 156 (1.8%) patients developed subsequent PE, 336 (3.8%) had recurrent DVT, 201 (2.3%) had major bleeding and 844 (9.7%) died. Patients with concomitant SVT had a higher rate of subsequent PE (rate ratio [RR]: 2.11; 95% confidence interval [95%CI]: 1.33-3.24) than those with isolated DVT, with no significant differences in the rates of recurrent DVT (RR: 0.80; 95%CI: 0.50-1.21), major bleeding (RR: 0.77; 95%CI: 0.41-1.33) or death (RR: 0.81; 95%CI: 0.61-1.06). On multivariable analysis, patients with DVT and SVT concomitantly were at increased risk of subsequent PE during anticoagulation (adjusted hazard ratio [HR]: 2.23; 95%CI: 1.22-4.05) and also during the entire follow-up period (adjusted HR: 2.33; 95%CI: 1.49-3.66). CONCLUSION: Patients with lower-limb DVT and SVT concomitantly are at increased risk of developing PE. Further studies are needed to externally validate our findings and to determine if these patients could benefit from a different management strategy.