Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Cerebrovasc Dis ; 51(4): 517-524, 2022.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35350011

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Timely recognition and management of transient ischemic attack (TIA) offer the greatest opportunity to prevent subsequent stroke. But variability of TIA management quality exists across hospitals. Under the impetus of national plans, measures were adopted to improve TIA management, including a structured local pathway. Our objective was to compare TIA management between two periods over 10 years, before and after the implementation of these measures. METHODS: A before-and-after study was conducted with two identical population-based cohort studies in 2006-2007 (AVC69) and 2015-2016 (STROKE69) including all patients with TIA diagnosis over a 7-month period in six public and private hospitals in the Rhône county in France. The primary outcome was the adequate TIA management defined as brain and vessel imaging within 24 h of admission and the prescription of antithrombotic treatment at discharge. RESULTS: We identified 109 patients TIA patients in 2006-2007, and 458 over the same period in 2015-2016. A higher proportion of patients were adequately managed in 2015-2016 compared to 2006-2007 (14/96 [15%] in 2006-2007 vs. 306/452 [68%] in 2015-2016, p < 0.001). This difference was mainly driven by a marked increase of vessel imaging performed within 24 h of admission, most often by computed tomography angiography. Furthermore, patients called more often emergency medical dispatch before admission, were admitted with a shorter delay after symptom onset, and were more likely discharged to home in 2015-2016 compared to 2006-2007. CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrated an increasing rate of adequate TIA management, mainly driven by a marked increase of vessel imaging within 24 h of admission, over a 10-year period in the Rhône county in France.


Asunto(s)
Ataque Isquémico Transitorio , Accidente Cerebrovascular , Angiografía por Tomografía Computarizada , Hospitalización , Humanos , Ataque Isquémico Transitorio/diagnóstico por imagen , Ataque Isquémico Transitorio/epidemiología , Alta del Paciente , Accidente Cerebrovascular/diagnóstico por imagen , Accidente Cerebrovascular/epidemiología
2.
Cerebrovasc Dis ; 49(1): 110-118, 2020.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32097908

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: In patients with suspected stroke, brain imaging is recommended in the acute phase for appropriate management and treatment. Both computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are considered reasonable choices for initial brain imaging. When both techniques are available, choosing one or the other might be associated with specific factors related either to patients, stroke symptoms, and severity or management organization. METHODS: The study was performed within the STROKE 69 database, a population-based cohort of all adult patients with suspected stroke admitted in one of the emergency departments (ED), primary stroke center, or stroke center of the Rhône County, from November 2015 to December 2016. Patients were included if they were admitted within 24 h following either symptom onset or last known normal. To identify factors potentially associated with the choice of initial brain imaging, a multivariate logistic regression was performed. RESULTS: Among the 3,244 patients with suspected stroke enrolled in the STROKE69 cohort, 3,107 (95.8%) underwent brain imaging within the first 24 h after admission. Among those 74.6% underwent CT as initial imaging while 25.4% had an MRI. In multivariate analyses, several factors were associated with a lower probability of having an MRI as initial brain imaging versus CT. These were either patient characteristics: older age (>80 years old, OR 0.39 [95% CI 0.28-0.54]), preexisting disability (OR 0.55 [95% CI 0.36-0.84]), use of anticoagulants (OR 0.52 [95% CI 0.33-0.81]), stroke characteristics: stroke of unknown onset (OR 0.42 [95% CI 0.31-0.58]) or factors associated with overall management: onset-to-door time (>6 h, OR 0.38 [95% CI 0.23-0.60]), initial admission to ED (OR 0.02 [95% CI 0.02-0.04]) or intensive care unit (OR 0.01 [95% CI 0.001-0.08]), personal transport (OR 0.66 [95% CI 0.45-0.96]), and admission during working hours (OR 0.65 [95% CI 0.51-0.84]). CONCLUSIONS: Besides CT or MRI availability, a number of other parameters could influence the choice of first imaging in case of stroke suspicion. These are related to patient characteristics, type of stroke symptoms, and type of organization.


Asunto(s)
Angiografía Cerebral , Conducta de Elección , Angiografía por Tomografía Computarizada , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Imagen de Perfusión , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina , Accidente Cerebrovascular/diagnóstico por imagen , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Toma de Decisiones Clínicas , Bases de Datos Factuales , Femenino , Francia/epidemiología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Selección de Paciente , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Accidente Cerebrovascular/epidemiología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...