Impact of C-reactive protein levels on lipoprotein(a)-associated aortic stenosis incidence and progression.

Aims: Elevated lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] levels are associated with the risk of coronary artery disease (CAD) and calcific aortic valve stenosis (CAVS). Observational studies revealed that Lp(a) and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels, a biomarker of systemic inflammation, may jointly predict CAD risk. Whether Lp(a) and CRP levels also jointly predict CAVS incidence and progression is unknown. Methods and results: We investigated the association of Lp(a) with CAVS according to CRP levels in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC)-Norfolk study (n = 18 226, 406 incident cases) and the UK Biobank (n = 438 260, 4582 incident cases), as well as in the ASTRONOMER study (n = 220), which assessed the haemodynamic progression rate of pre-existing mild-to-moderate aortic stenosis. In EPIC-Norfolk, in comparison to individuals with low Lp(a) levels (<50 mg/dL) and low CRP levels (<2.0 mg/L), those with elevated Lp(a) (>50 mg/dL) and low CRP levels (<2.0 mg/L) and those with elevated Lp(a) (>50 mg/dL) and elevated CRP levels (>2.0 mg/L) had a higher CAVS risk [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.86 (95% confidence intervals, 1.30-2.67) and 2.08 (1.44-2.99), respectively]. A comparable predictive value of Lp(a) in patients with vs. without elevated CRP levels was also noted in the UK Biobank. In ASTRONOMER, CAVS progression was comparable in patients with elevated Lp(a) levels with or without elevated CRP levels. Conclusion: Lp(a) predicts the incidence and possibly progression of CAVS regardless of plasma CRP levels. Lowering Lp(a) levels may warrant further investigation in the prevention and treatment of CAVS, regardless of systemic inflammation.

ApoCIII-Lp(a) complexes in conjunction with Lp(a)-OxPL predict rapid progression of aortic stenosis.

OBJECTIVE: This study assessed whether apolipoprotein CIII-lipoprotein(a) complexes (ApoCIII-Lp(a)) associate with progression of calcific aortic valve stenosis (AS). METHODS: Immunostaining for ApoC-III was performed in explanted aortic valve leaflets in 68 patients with leaflet pathological grades of 1-4. Assays measuring circulating levels of ApoCIII-Lp(a) complexes were measured in 218 patients with mild-moderate AS from the AS Progression Observation: Measuring Effects of Rosuvastatin (ASTRONOMER) trial. The progression rate of AS, measured as annualised changes in peak aortic jet velocity (Vpeak), and combined rates of aortic valve replacement (AVR) and cardiac death were determined. For further confirmation of the assay data, a proteomic analysis of purified Lp(a) was performed to confirm the presence of apoC-III on Lp(a). RESULTS: Immunohistochemically detected ApoC-III was prominent in all grades of leaflet lesion severity. Significant interactions were present between ApoCIII-Lp(a) and Lp(a), oxidised phospholipids on apolipoprotein B-100 (OxPL-apoB) or on apolipoprotein (a) (OxPL-apo(a)) with annualised Vpeak (all p<0.05). After multivariable adjustment, patients in the top tertile of both apoCIII-Lp(a) and Lp(a) had significantly higher annualised Vpeak (p<0.001) and risk of AVR/cardiac death (p=0.03). Similar results were noted with OxPL-apoB and OxPL-apo(a). There was no association between autotaxin (ATX) on ApoB and ATX on Lp(a) with faster progression of AS. Proteomic analysis of purified Lp(a) showed that apoC-III was prominently present on Lp(a). CONCLUSION: ApoC-III is present on Lp(a) and in aortic valve leaflets. Elevated levels of ApoCIII-Lp(a) complexes in conjunction with Lp(a), OxPL-apoB or OxPL-apo(a) identify patients with pre-existing mild-moderate AS who display rapid progression of AS and higher rates of AVR/cardiac death. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT00800800.

ApoB/ApoA-I Ratio is Associated With Faster Hemodynamic Progression of Aortic Stenosis: Results From the PROGRESSA (Metabolic Determinants of the Progression of Aortic Stenosis) Study.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies reported that middle-aged patients with atherogenic lipoprotein-lipid profile exhibit faster progression of aortic valve stenosis (AS). The ratio of apolipoprotein B/apolipoprotein A-I (apoB/apoA-I) reflects the balance between atherogenic and anti-atherogenic lipoproteins. The aim of this study was to examine the association between apoB/apoA-I ratio and AS hemodynamic progression and to determine whether this association varies according to age. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 159 patients (66±13 years, 73% men) with AS were prospectively recruited in the PROGRESSA (Metabolic Determinants of the Progression of Aortic Stenosis) study. Hemodynamic progression of AS was determined by the change in peak aortic jet velocity (Vpeak) measured by Doppler-echocardiography between baseline and 2-year follow-up. Patients in the top tertile of apoB/apoA-I ratio (≥0.62) had a faster progression rate of AS compared with those in the bottom/mid tertiles (Vpeak progression: 0.30 [0.09-0.49] versus 0.16 [0.01-0.36] m/s, P=0.02). There was a significant interaction (P=0.007) between apoB/apoA-I ratio and age. Among younger patients (ie, aged <70 years; median value of the cohort), those in the top tertile of apoB/apoA-I ratio had a 3.4-fold faster AS progression compared with those in the bottom/mid tertiles (Vpeak progression: 0.34 [0.13-0.69] versus 0.10 [-0.03-0.31] m/s, P=0.002), whereas there was no significant difference between tertiles in the subgroup of older patients (P=0.83). After comprehensive adjustment, higher apoB/apoA-I ratio was significantly associated with faster AS progression in the subset of younger patients (all, standardized ß≥0.36; P≤0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Higher apoB/apoA-I ratio is significantly associated with faster hemodynamic progression of AS in the younger patients. These findings suggest that atherogenic lipid factors may play a crucial role in the pathogenesis of AS in younger patients, but may be are less important in older patients. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01679431.

B-Type Natriuretic Peptide and High-Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin for Risk Stratification in Low-Flow, Low-Gradient Aortic Stenosis: A Substudy of the TOPAS Study.

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to determine the prognostic value of combined measures of B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) and high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hsTnT) in patients with low-flow, low-gradient aortic stenosis (LF-LG AS) who had either a preserved or reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). BACKGROUND: An elevated BNP level is associated with increased risk of mortality in patients with LF-LG AS. The incremental prognostic value of hsTnT in these patients is unknown. METHODS: Ninety-eight patients (74 ± 10 years; 75% men) with LF-LG AS (LVEF <50% and/or stroke volume index <35 ml/m2, mean gradient <40 mm Hg, indexed aortic valve area <0.6 cm2/m2) who were prospectively enrolled in the TOPAS (Truly or Pseudo-Severe Aortic Stenosis) study were included. The cohort was divided into 3 groups according to BNP and hsTnT levels: group A: BNP <550 pg/ml and hsTnT <15 ng/l; group B: BNP ≥550 pg/ml or hsTnT ≥15 ng/l; and group C: BNP ≥550 pg/ml and hsTnT ≥15 ng/l. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality. RESULTS: Twenty-seven patients (27%) were in group A, 39 (40%) were in group B, and 32 (33%) were in group C. During a median follow-up of 2.8 years, 43 patients died. Two-year mortality was higher in group C (41 ± 9%) than in group B (23 ± 7%) and group A (5 ± 4%) (p = 0.002). In group B, there was no significant difference in 2-year mortality rates between the subgroup with hsTnT ≥15 ng/l (n = 29) and the subgroup with BNP ≥550 pg/ml (n = 10) (26 ± 9% vs. 11 ± 10%, respectively; p = 0.21). In multivariable analysis adjusted for age, type of treatment (aortic valve replacement vs. conservative therapy), coronary artery disease, and LVEF, being in group C remained independently associated with an increased risk of mortality (hazard ratio [HR]: 4.25; p = 0.023), and group B tended to have higher mortality (HR: 3.63; p = 0.058) compared with group A. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated the usefulness of combined measures of BNP and hsTnT to enhance risk stratification in patients with LF-LG AS. Patients with elevation of both BNP and hsTnT had a markedly increased risk of mortality. (Multicenter Prospective Study of Low-Flow Low-Gradient Aortic Stenosis [TOPAS]; NCT01835028).

Forward Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction: A Simple Risk Marker in Patients With Primary Mitral Regurgitation.

BACKGROUND: The timing of mitral valve surgery in asymptomatic patients with primary mitral regurgitation (MR) is controversial. We hypothesized that the forward left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (LVEF; ie, LV outflow tract stroke volume divided by LV end-diastolic volume) is superior to the total LVEF to predict outcomes in MR. The objective of this study was to examine the association between echocardiographic parameters of MR severity and LV function and outcomes in patients with MR. METHODS AND RESULTS: The clinical and Doppler-echocardiographic data of 278 patients with ≥mild MR and no class I indication of mitral valve surgery at baseline were retrospectively analyzed. The primary study end point was the composite of mitral valve surgery or death. During a mean follow-up of 5.4±3.2 years, there were 147 (53%) events: 96 (35%) MV surgeries and 66 (24%) deaths. Total LVEF and global longitudinal strain were not associated with the occurrence of events, whereas forward LVEF (P<0.0001) and LV end-systolic diameter (P=0.0003) were. After adjustment for age, sex, MR severity, Charlson probability, coronary artery disease, and atrial fibrillation, forward LVEF remained independently associated with the occurrence of events (adjusted hazard ratio: 1.09, [95% confidence interval]: 1.02-1.17 per 5% decrease; P=0.01), whereas LV end-systolic diameter was not (P=0.48). CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study suggest that the forward LVEF may be superior to the total LVEF and LV end-systolic diameter to predict outcomes in patients with primary MR. This simple and easily measurable parameter may be useful to improve risk stratification and select the best timing for intervention in patients with primary MR.

Autoantibodies and immune complexes to oxidation-specific epitopes and progression of aortic stenosis: Results from the ASTRONOMER trial.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Elevated levels of lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] and oxidized phospholipids on apolipoprotein B-100 (OxPL-apoB) predict the progression of pre-existing mild-to-moderate calcific aortic valve stenosis (CAVS). Whether indirect markers of oxidation-specific epitopes (OSE) are also predictive is not known. The association between IgG and IgM autoantibodies and malondialdehyde-modified low density lipoprotein (MDA-LDL) and IgG and IgM apolipoprotein B immune complexes (apoB-IC), and the hemodynamic progression rate of CAVS was determined in the ASTRONOMER (Aortic Stenosis Progression Observation: Measuring Effects of Rosuvastatin, NCT00800800) trial. METHODS: Plasma levels of IgG and IgM MDA-LDL and apoB-IC were measured in 220 patients with mild-to-moderate CAVS from the ASTRONOMER trial. The endpoint of this study was the progression rate of CAVS, measured by the annualized increase in peak aortic jet velocity (Vpeak) over a median follow-up of 3.5 [2.9-4.5] years. RESULTS: There was no difference in the progression rate of CAVS across tertiles of IgG and IgM MDA-LDL and apoB-IC levels (all p > 0.05). After multivariable analysis, no marker reached significance level to predict faster CAVS progression or need for aortic valve replacement (all p > 0.05). There was no interaction between the OSE antibody titers and plasma levels of Lp(a) or OxPL-apoB, as well as age, with regards to the progression rate of CAVS. CONCLUSIONS: Autoantibody titers to MDA-LDL and apoB-IC, which are an indirect measurement of OSE, unlike direct measurements of OxPL-apoB or their major lipoprotein carrier Lp(a), do not predict the progression of CAVS or need for AVR.

Impact of left ventricular remodelling patterns on outcomes in patients with aortic stenosis.

AIMS: The objective of this study was to examine the association between the different patterns of left ventricular (LV) remodelling/hypertrophy on all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in patients with aortic stenosis (AS). METHODS AND RESULTS: In total, 747 consecutive patients (69 ± 14 years, 57% men) with AS and preserved LV ejection fraction were included in this study. According to LV mass index and relative wall thickness, patients were classified into four LV patterns: normal, concentric remodelling (CR), concentric hypertrophy (CH), and eccentric hypertrophy (EH). One hundred and sixteen patients (15%) had normal pattern, 66 (9%) had EH, 169 (23%) had CR, and 396 (53%) had CH. During a median follow-up of 6.4 years, 339 patients died (242 from cardiovascular causes). CH was associated with higher risk of all-cause mortality compared with the three other LV patterns (all P < 0.05). After multivariable adjustment, CH remained associated with higher risk of mortality (HR = 1.27, 95% CI 1.01-1.61, P = 0.046). There was a significant interaction (P < 0.05) between sex and CH with regards to the impact on mortality: CH was associated with worse outcome in women (P = 0.0001) but not in men (P = 0.22). In multivariable analysis, CH remained associated with higher risk of worse outcome in women (HR = 1.56, 95% CI 1.08-2.24, P = 0.018). CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that CH was independently associated with increased risk of mortality in AS patients with preserved ejection fraction. This association was observed in women but not in men. The pattern of LV remodelling/hypertrophy should be integrated in the risk stratification process in patients with AS.

Systolic hypertension and progression of aortic valve calcification in patients with aortic stenosis: results from the PROGRESSA study.

AIMS: Hypertension is highly prevalent in patients with aortic stenosis (AS) and is associated with worse outcomes. The current prospective study assessed the impact of systolic hypertension (SHPT) on the progression of aortic valve calcification (AVC) measured by multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) in patients with AS. METHODS AND RESULTS: The present analysis includes the first series of 101 patients with AS prospectively recruited in the PROGRESSA study. Patients underwent comprehensive Doppler echocardiography and MDCT exams at baseline and after 2-year follow-up. AVC and coronary artery calcification (CAC) were measured using the Agatston method. Patients with SHPT at baseline (i.e. systolic blood pressure ≥140 mmHg; n = 37, 37%) had faster 2-year AVC progression compared with those without SHPT (i.e. systolic blood pressure <140 mmHg) (AVC median [25th percentile-75th percentile]: +370 [126-824] vs. +157 [58-303] AU; P = 0.007, respectively). Similar results were obtained with the analysis of AVC progression divided by the cross-sectional area of the aortic annulus (AVCdensity: +96 [34-218] vs. +45 [14-82] AU/cm2, P = 0.01, respectively). In multivariable analysis, SHPT remained significantly associated with faster progression of AVC or AVCdensity (all P = 0.001). There was no significant difference between groups with respect to progression of CAC (+39 [3-199] vs. +41 [0-156] AU, P = 0.88). CONCLUSION: This prospective study shows for the first time that SHPT is associated with faster AVC progression but not with CAC progression in AS patients. These findings provide further support for the elaboration of randomized clinical trials to assess the efficacy of antihypertensive medication to slow the stenosis progression in patients with AS.

Effect of age and aortic valve anatomy on calcification and haemodynamic severity of aortic stenosis.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of age and aortic valve anatomy (tricuspid (TAV) vs bicuspid (BAV) aortic valve) on the relationship between the aortic valve calcification (AVC) and the haemodynamic parameters of aortic stenosis (AS) severity. METHODS: Two hundred patients with AS and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction were prospectively recruited in the PROGRESSA (Metabolic Determinants of the Progression of Aortic Stenosis) study and underwent a comprehensive Doppler echocardiography and multidetector CT (MDCT). Mean transvalvular gradient (MG) measured by Doppler echocardiography was used to assess AS haemodynamic severity and AVC was evaluated by MDCT using the Agatston method and indexed to the left ventricular outflow tract area to obtain AVC density (AVCd). All analyses were adjusted for sex. RESULTS: Thirty-nine patients had a BAV and 161 a TAV. Median age was 51 and 72 years for BAV and TAV patients, respectively. There was a modest correlation between MG and AVCd (ρ=0.51, p<0.0001) in the whole cohort. After dichotomisation for valve anatomy, there was a good correlation between AVCd and MG in the TAV group (ρ=0.61, p<0.0001) but weak correlation in the BAV group (ρ=0.32, p=0.046). In the TAV group, the strength of the AVCd-MG correlation was similar in younger (<72 years old; ρ=0.59, p<0.0001) versus older (≥72 years old; ρ=0.61, p<0.0001) patients. In the BAV group, there was no correlation between AVCd and MG in younger patients (<51 years old; ρ=0.12, p=0.65), whereas there was a good correlation in older patients (≥51 years old; ρ=0.55, p=0.009). AVCd (p=0.005) and age (p=0.02) were both independent determinants of MG in BAV patients while AVCd (p<0.0001) was the only independent determinant of MG in TAV patients. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with TAV as well as in older patients with BAV, AVCd appears to be the main factor significantly associated with the haemodynamic severity of AS and so it may be used to corroborate AS severity in case of uncertain or discordant findings at echocardiography. However, among younger patients with BAV, some may have a haemodynamically significant stenosis with minimal AVCd. The results of MDCT AVCd should thus be interpreted cautiously in this subset of patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01679431; Pre-results.

Relationship Between QT Interval and Outcome in Low-Flow Low-Gradient Aortic Stenosis With Low Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction.

BACKGROUND: QT interval has been shown to be associated with cardiovascular events. There is no data regarding the association between QT interval and left ventricular (LV) function and prognosis in patients with low LV ejection fraction (LVEF), low-flow, low-gradient aortic stenosis (LF-LG AS). We aimed to examine the relationship between corrected QT interval (QTc) and LV function and outcome in these patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: Ninety-three patients (73±10 years; 74% men) with LF-LG AS (mean gradient <40 mm Hg and indexed aortic valve area ≤0.6 cm2/m2) and reduced LVEF (≤40%) were prospectively included in this analysis and 63 of them underwent aortic valve replacement within 3 months following inclusion. Prolonged QTc was defined as QTc >450 ms in men and >470 ms in women. LV global longitudinal strain was measured by speckle tracking and expressed in absolute value |%|. QTc correlated with the following: global longitudinal strain (r=-0.40, P=0.005), LVEF (r=-0.27, P=0.02), stroke volume (r=-0.35, P=0.007), and B-type natriuretic peptide (r=0.45, P=0.0006). During a median follow-up of 2.0 years, 49 patients died. Prolonged QTc was associated with a 2-fold increase in all-cause mortality (hazard ratio=2.05; P=0.01) and cardiovascular mortality (hazard ratio=1.89; P=0.04). In multivariable analysis adjusted for EuroSCORE, aortic valve replacement, previous myocardial infarction, LVEF, and ß-blocker medication, prolonged QTc was independently associated with all-cause mortality (hazard ratio=2.56; P=0.008) and cardiovascular mortality (hazard ratio=2.50; P=0.02). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with LF-LG AS and reduced LVEF, longer QTc interval was associated with worse LV function and increased risk of death. Assessment of QTc may provide a simple and inexpensive tool to enhance risk stratification in LF-LG AS patients. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT 01835028.

Discordant Grading of Aortic Stenosis Severity: Echocardiographic Predictors of Survival Benefit Associated With Aortic Valve Replacement.

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to assess the survival benefit associated with aortic valve replacement (AVR) according to different strata of echocardiographic parameters of aortic stenosis (AS) severity, and especially in patients with an aortic valve area (AVA) comprised between 0.8 cm(2) and 1 cm(2). BACKGROUND: Discordant findings between AVA (≤1.0 cm(2)) and mean gradient (MG) (<40 mm Hg) raise uncertainty regarding the actual severity of AS. Some studies suggested that the AVA threshold value to define severe AS should be decreased to 0.8 cm(2) to reconcile these discordances. METHODS: A total of 1,710 patients with documented moderate to severe AS by Doppler echocardiography were separated into 4 strata of AS severity based alternatively on AVA, indexed AVA, MG, or peak aortic jet velocity (Vpeak). We compared the survival rates of medically versus surgically treated patients. To eliminate covariate differences that may lead to biased estimates of treatment effect, a propensity matching with a greedy 5-to-1 digit-matching algorithm was used. RESULTS: Mean AVA was 0.9 ± 0.3 cm(2), mean MG 33 ± 18 mm Hg, and mean Vpeak 3.6 ± 0.9 m/s. A total of 1,030 (60%) patients underwent AVR within 3 months following echocardiographic evaluation. During a mean follow-up of 4.4 ± 3.0 years there were 469 deaths. Patients with an AVA between 0.8 cm(2) and 1.0 cm(2) had a significant observed survival benefit with AVR (hazard ratio: 0.37 [95% confidence interval: 0.21 to 0.63]; p = 0.0002). AVR was also associated with improved survival in patients with MG between 25 mm Hg and 40 mm Hg or Vpeak between 3 m/s and 4 m/s, but only in patients with concomitant AVA ≤1 cm(2) (p = 0.001 vs. p = 0.46 in patients with AVA >1 cm(2)). CONCLUSIONS: These results do not support decreasing the AVA threshold value for severity to 0.8 cm(2) and they confirm that AVR is associated with improved survival in a substantial number of patients with discordant aortic grading.

Echocardiographic predictors of outcomes in adults with aortic stenosis.

OBJECTIVE: The study purpose was to assess the usefulness of echocardiographic parameters of aortic stenosis (AS) severity and left ventricular (LV) systolic function to predict mortality in AS. The main hypothesis is that parameters of LV systolic function are the most important independent predictors of mortality, whereas parameters of stenosis severity are not. METHODS: 1065 consecutive patients with AS referred to the echocardiography laboratory and meeting the inclusion/exclusion criteria were included and followed during 5.7 years. The end points were aortic valve replacement (AVR) (n=584), composite of AVR or death (n=932), all-cause mortality (n=550) and cardiovascular mortality (n=398). RESULTS: The most powerful echocardiographic predictors of valve-related events were parameters of AS severity, such as peak aortic jet velocity (VPeak), mean gradient (MG) and aortic valve area (AVA) (all p<0.001). Regarding mortality, the main predictors were LV ejection fraction (LVEF) and stroke volume index (SVi) (p<0.05). After multivariable adjustment, LVEF (p<0.001) and SVi (p=0.02) remained the only echocardiographic predictors of mortality, even after adjustment for symptomatic status. AVA was also associated with mortality, whereas VPeak and MG were not. CONCLUSIONS: The most powerful echocardiographic predictors of mortality are low LVEF and low flow, whereas AS severity parameters predict valve-related events but not overall mortality. Hence, low flow should be integrated in the risk stratification and therapeutic decision-making in patients with AS.

Right ventricular longitudinal strain for risk stratification in low-flow, low-gradient aortic stenosis with low ejection fraction.

BACKGROUND: Left ventricular global longitudinal strain (LVLS) is a powerful predictor of outcome in patients with low-flow, low-gradient aortic stenosis (LF-LG AS) and low LV ejection fraction (LVEF). However, the impact of right ventricular (RV) function on the outcome of these patients remains unknown. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to examine the impact of RV function as evaluated by RV free wall longitudinal strain (RVLS) on mortality in patients with LF-LG AS and low LVEF. METHODS: 211 patients with LF-LG AS (mean gradient < 40 mm Hg and indexed aortic valve area (AVA) ≤ 0.6 cm²/m²) and low LVEF (≤ 40%)) were prospectively recruited in the True or Pseudo-severe Aortic Stenosis study. AS severity was assessed using the projected AVA (AVAproj) at normal flow rate. Among the 211 patients, 128 had RVLS measurement available at rest and were included in this analysis. RVLS measurement at dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE) was available in 58 of the 128 patients. RESULTS: Two-year survival was lower in patients with RVLS < |13|% (53% ± 9%) compared with those with RVLS > |13|% (69% ± 5%) (p = 0.04). In multivariable Cox analysis stratified for the type of treatment (aortic valve replacement vs conservative) and adjusted for age, AS severity, previous myocardial infarction and LVLS, rest RVLS < |13|% (HR = 2.70; 95% CI 1.19 to 6.11; p = 0.018) was independently associated with all-cause mortality. RVLS had incremental prognostic value over baseline risk factors and LVLS (χ² = 20.13 vs 13.56; p = 0.01). Reduced stress RVLS was also associated with increased risk of mortality (stress RVLS <| 14|%: HR = 2.98; 95% CI 1.30 to 6.52; p = 0.01). In multivariable Cox analysis, stress RVLS < |14|% remained independently associated with mortality (HR = 2.94; 95% CI 1.23 to 7.02; p = 0.015). After further adjustment for rest RVLS, stress RVLS < |14|% remained independently associated with mortality (HR = 3.29; 95% CI 1.17 to 9.25; p = 0.024), whereas rest RVLS was not (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In this series of patients with LF-LG AS and low LVEF, reduced RVLS was independently associated with increased risk of mortality. Furthermore, stress RVLS provided incremental prognostic value beyond that obtained from rest RVLS. Thus, RVLS measurement at rest and at DSE may be helpful to enhance risk stratification in this high-risk population. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01835028; Results.

Oxidized Phospholipids, Lipoprotein(a), and Progression of Calcific Aortic Valve Stenosis.

BACKGROUND: Elevated lipoprotein(a) (Lp[a]) is associated with aortic stenosis (AS). Oxidized phospholipids (OxPL) are key mediators of calcification in valvular cells and are carried by Lp(a). OBJECTIVES: This study sought to determine whether Lp(a) and OxPL are associated with hemodynamic progression of AS and AS-related events. METHODS: OxPL on apolipoprotein B-100 (OxPL-apoB), which reflects the biological activity of Lp(a), and Lp(a) levels were measured in 220 patients with mild-to-moderate AS. The primary endpoint was the progression rate of AS, measured by the annualized increase in peak aortic jet velocity in m/s/year by Doppler echocardiography; the secondary endpoint was need for aortic valve replacement and cardiac death during 3.5 ± 1.2 years of follow-up. RESULTS: AS progression was faster in patients in the top tertiles of Lp(a) (peak aortic jet velocity: +0.26 ± 0.26 vs. +0.17 ± 0.21 m/s/year; p = 0.005) and OxPL-apoB (+0.26 ± 0.26 m/s/year vs. +0.17 ± 0.21 m/s/year; p = 0.01). After multivariable adjustment, elevated Lp(a) or OxPL-apoB levels remained independent predictors of faster AS progression. After adjustment for age, sex, and baseline AS severity, patients in the top tertile of Lp(a) or OxPL-apoB had increased risk of aortic valve replacement and cardiac death. CONCLUSIONS: Elevated Lp(a) and OxPL-apoB levels are associated with faster AS progression and need for aortic valve replacement. These findings support the hypothesis that Lp(a) mediates AS progression through its associated OxPL and provide a rationale for randomized trials of Lp(a)-lowering and OxPL-apoB-lowering therapies in AS. (Aortic Stenosis Progression Observation: Measuring Effects of Rosuvastatin [ASTRONOMER]; NCT00800800).

Relationship Between Insulin-Like Growth Factor Binding Protein-2 and Left Ventricular Stroke Volume in Patients With Aortic Stenosis.

BACKGROUND: Lower plasma insulin-like growth factor binding protein (IGFBP)-2 levels have been associated with altered metabolism linked to visceral obesity. These abnormalities have been linked with worsening of left ventricle (LV) remodelling and dysfunction in patients with aortic stenosis (AS). Whether IGFBP-2 is involved in these relationships is currently unknown. The objective of this study was to examine the relationship between circulating IGFBP-2 and LV pump function measured according to stroke volume index in AS patients with preserved LV ejection fraction. METHODS: Two hundred eight patients with mild to moderate AS were prospectively recruited in the Metabolic Determinants of the Progression of Aortic Stenosis (PROGRESSA) study and underwent Doppler-echocardiography. Stroke volume index (SVi) was calculated using Doppler in the LV outflow tract and was indexed to body surface area. Plasma circulating IGFBP-2 levels were measured using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. RESULTS: Patients with lower IGFBP-2 levels were younger (P < 0.0001), had a higher body mass index (P = 0.0003), larger waist circumference (P = 0.01), higher homeostatic assessment model index (P = 0.0005), and lower high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (P = 0.01). Moreover, SVi was decreased in patients with low IGFBP-2 (P = 0.009). After multivariable adjustment for age, sex, LV mass index, aortic valve area, and LV ejection fraction, a lower plasma IGFBP-2 level was independently related with lower SVi (P < 0.001). After further adjustment for other traditional cardiometabolic risk factors, plasma IGFBP-2 remained independently associated with SVi (all P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In this study, we documented that lower IGFBP-2 levels are independently associated with lower SVi, a powerful predictor of worse outcomes in the mild to moderate AS population.

Evolution and prognostic impact of low flow after transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

OBJECTIVE: Low flow (LF), defined as stroke volume index (SVi) <35 mL/m(2), prior to the procedure has been recently identified as a powerful independent predictor of early and late mortality in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). The objectives of this study were to determine the evolution of SVi following TAVR and to assess the determinants and impact on mortality of early postprocedural SVi (EP-SVi). METHODS: We retrospectively analysed the clinical, Doppler echocardiographic and outcome data prospectively collected in 255 patients who underwent TAVR. Echocardiograms were performed before (baseline), within 5 days after procedure (early post procedure) and 6 months to 1 year following TAVR (late post procedure). RESULTS: Patients with EP-SVi <35 mL/m(2) (n=138; 54%) had increased mortality (HR 1.97, p=0.003) compared with those with EP-SVi ≥35 mL/m(2) (n=117; 46%). Furthermore, patients with baseline SVi (B-SVi) <35 mL/m(2) and EP-SVI ≥35 mL/m(2), that is, normalised flow, had better survival (HR 0.46, p=0.03) than those with both B-SVi and EP-SVi <35 mL/m(2), that is, persistent LF, and similar survival compared with those with both B-SVi and EP-SVi ≥35 mL/m(2), that is, maintained normal flow. In a multivariable model analysis, EP-SVi was independently associated with increased risk of mortality (HR 1.41 per 10 mL/m(2) decrease, p=0.03). The preprocedural/intraprocedural factors associated with lower EP-SVi were lower B-SVi (standardised ß [ß] 0.36, p<0.001) atrial fibrillation (ß -0.13, p=0.02) and transapical approach (ß -0.22, p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The measurement of EP-SVi is useful to assess the immediate haemodynamic benefit of TAVR and to predict the risk of late mortality.

Echocardiographic evaluation of prosthetic heart valves.

The specific flow pattern and imaging features of prosthetic heart valves poses major challenges for the Doppler echocardiographic assessment of prosthetic valve structure and function. A comprehensive approach that integrates several semi-quantitative and quantitative parameters obtained from multiple views is key to appropriately detect and quantitate prosthetic valve dysfunction and complications. In patients with prosthetic valves, and particularly in those with mitral prostheses, transesophageal echocardiography is often required to confirm and/or complement information obtained by transthoracic echocardiography. Three-dimensional echocardiography may provide incremental information for the identification of the underlying etiology of prosthetic valve stenosis or regurgitation. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation has rapidly expanded in the past 10 years and paravalvular regurgitation is frequent following this procedure. Given that paravalvular regurgitant jets are often multiple, irregular, and eccentric, the grading of this type of regurgitation is particularly challenging and requires an integrative multiwindow, multiplane, multiparametric approach.

Tricuspid Regurgitation Is Associated With Increased Risk of Mortality in Patients With Low-Flow Low-Gradient Aortic Stenosis and Reduced Ejection Fraction: Results of the Multicenter TOPAS Study (True or Pseudo-Severe Aortic Stenosis).

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to examine the impact of tricuspid regurgitation (TR) on mortality in patients with low-flow, low-gradient (LF-LG) aortic stenosis (AS) and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). BACKGROUND: TR is often observed in patients with LF-LG AS and low LVEF, but its impact on prognosis remains unknown. METHODS: A total of 211 patients (73±10 years of age; 77% men) with LF-LG AS (mean gradient<40 mm Hg and indexed aortic valve area [AVA]≤0.6 cm2/m2) and reduced LVEF (≤40%) were prospectively enrolled in the TOPAS (True or Pseudo-Severe Aortic Stenosis) study and 125 (59%) of them underwent aortic valve replacement (AVR) within 3 months following inclusion. The severity of AS was assessed by the projected AVA (AVAproj) at normal flow rate (250 ml/s), as previously described and validated. The severity of TR was graded according to current guidelines. RESULTS: Among the 211 patients included in the study, 22 (10%) had no TR, 113 (54%) had mild (grade 1), 50 (24%) mild-to-moderate (grade 2), and 26 (12%) moderate-to-severe (grade 3) or severe (grade 4) TR. During a mean follow-up of 2.4±2.2 years, 104 patients (49%) died. Univariable analysis showed that TR≥2 was associated with increased risk of all-cause mortality (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.82, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.22 to 2.71; p=0.004) and cardiovascular mortality (HR: 1.85, 95% CI: 1.20 to 2.83; p=0.005). After adjustment for age, sex, coronary artery disease, AVAproj, LVEF, stroke volume index, right ventricular dysfunction, mitral regurgitation, and type of treatment (AVR vs. conservative), the presence of TR≥2 was an independent predictor of all-cause mortality (HR: 1.88, 95% CI: 1.08 to 3.23; p=0.02) and cardiovascular mortality (HR: 1.92, 95% CI: 1.05 to 3.51; p=0.03). Furthermore, in patients undergoing AVR, TR≥3 was an independent predictor of 30-day mortality compared with TR=0/1 (odds ratio [OR]: 7.24, 95% CI: 1.56 to 38.2; p=0.01) and TR=2 (OR: 4.70, 95% CI: 1.00 to 25.90; p=0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with LF-LG AS and reduced LVEF, TR is independently associated with increased risk of cumulative all-cause mortality and cardiovascular mortality regardless of the type of treatment. In patients undergoing AVR, moderate/severe TR is associated with increased 30-day mortality. Further studies are needed to determine whether TR is a risk marker or a risk factor of mortality and whether concomitant surgical correction of TR at the time of AVR might improve outcomes for this high-risk population.

Usefulness of global left ventricular longitudinal strain for risk stratification in low ejection fraction, low-gradient aortic stenosis: results from the multicenter True or Pseudo-Severe Aortic Stenosis study.

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to examine the impact of left ventricular (LV) global longitudinal strain (GLS) measured at rest and at dobutamine stress echocardiography on the outcome of patients with low LV ejection fraction and low-gradient aortic stenosis. METHODS AND RESULTS: Among the 202 patients with low LV ejection fraction (≤40%), low-gradient aortic stenosis (mean transvalvular gradient <40 mm Hg and indexed aortic valve area ≤0.6 cm(2)/m(2)) prospectively enrolled in the multicenter True or Pseudo-Severe Aortic Stenosis study, 126 patients with resting GLS and 73 patients with stress GLS available were included in this substudy. Three-year survival rate was 49% in patients with rest GLS <|9|% compared with 68% in patients with GLS >|9|% (P=0.02). In a multivariable Cox model adjusted for age, coronary artery disease, projected aortic valve area at a normal flow rate and type of treatment (aortic valve replacement versus conservative), rest GLS <|9|% (hazard ratio, 2.18; P=0.015) remained independently associated with all-cause mortality. GLS <|10|% measured during dobutamine stress echocardiography was also independently associated with mortality (hazard ratio, 2.67; P=0.01). In the subset of patients with stress GLS (n=73), the χ(2) of the multivariable model to predict all-causes mortality was 21.96 for stress GLS versus 17.78 for rest GLS. CONCLUSIONS: GLS is independently associated with mortality in patients with low LV ejection fraction, low-gradient aortic stenosis. Stress GLS measured during dobutamine stress echocardiography may provide incremental prognostic value beyond GLS measured at rest. Hence, measurement of GLS at rest and during dobutamine stress echocardiography may be helpful to enhance risk stratification in low LV ejection fraction, low-gradient aortic stenosis. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01835028.