Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Support Care Cancer ; 32(5): 285, 2024 Apr 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38607568

RESUMEN

CONTEXT: Pain is a common experience in people living with cancer. Concerns around opioid prescribing have seen a move toward a multi-modality management approach, which includes interventional pain procedures. PURPOSE: In this paper we discuss the interventional pain procedures used to treat cancer pain at two major tertiary centers in Australia. METHODS AND RESULTS: This expert review provides practical insights on cancer pain management from healthcare providers in different specialties. These insights can be used to guide the management of a wide range of cancer pain types. CONCLUSIONS: Furthermore, this review identifies the need for a systematic and comprehensive approach to the management of cancer pain that is broader than that of a single specialty. With recent advances in pain management procedures, an interdisciplinary approach is essential in order to provide an up to date, patient tailored approach to pain management. This review will help inform the development of a cancer pain intervention registry.


Asunto(s)
Dolor en Cáncer , Neoplasias , Humanos , Dolor en Cáncer/etiología , Dolor en Cáncer/terapia , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapéutico , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina , Dolor/tratamiento farmacológico , Dolor/etiología , Neoplasias/complicaciones
2.
Cancer Rep (Hoboken) ; 3(5): e1265, 2020 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32687682

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Coeliac plexus block (CPB) is an interventional pain management option for patients with pancreatic or other upper abdominal malignancy. AIMS: To assess the safety, utilization, and outcomes of CPBs in the local context. METHODS AND RESULTS: We conducted a retrospective case series of all patients with cancer who underwent CPB at 4 Sydney teaching hospitals from March 2010 to February 2016. We recorded baseline demographic data, details of the injectate, procedural approach and survival, as well as pain scores and analgesic use at 4 time points of interest. Thirty-nine procedures were performed during the study period. Twenty-four were performed endoscopically, 14 were performed via a bilateral percutaneous posterior approach by Pain Specialists or Radiologists and 1 was performed intraoperatively by a Surgeon. Patients had experienced pain for a mean of 17 weeks prior to CPB. Prior to CPB, the mean pain score was 8.8 out of 10. The mean pain score was reduced at 48 hours, 2 weeks, and 4 weeks following CPB (P < .01). The mean oral morphine equivalent daily dose prior to CPB was 362 mg which was reduced at 48 hours and 2 weeks but increased at the 4 weeks following CPB. One patient developed a bacteremia but otherwise no complications were observed. CONCLUSION: CPB is performed by a number of approaches and is well tolerated. The approach selected appears to depend on patient anatomy, preference, and availability of local expertise. Local clinicians could consider CPB earlier in the management of malignant epigastric pain.


Asunto(s)
Dolor Abdominal/terapia , Bloqueo Nervioso Autónomo/métodos , Dolor en Cáncer/terapia , Plexo Celíaco/efectos de los fármacos , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/complicaciones , Dolor Abdominal/diagnóstico , Dolor Abdominal/etiología , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Analgésicos/uso terapéutico , Bloqueo Nervioso Autónomo/efectos adversos , Bloqueo Nervioso Autónomo/estadística & datos numéricos , Dolor en Cáncer/diagnóstico , Dolor en Cáncer/etiología , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Dimensión del Dolor/estadística & datos numéricos , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/mortalidad , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/terapia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...