Virtual multi-institutional tumor board: a strategy for personalized diagnoses and management of rare CNS tumors.

PURPOSE: Multidisciplinary tumor boards (MTBs) integrate clinical, molecular, and radiological information and facilitate coordination of neuro-oncology care. During the COVID-19 pandemic, our MTB transitioned to a virtual and multi-institutional format. We hypothesized that this expansion would allow expert review of challenging neuro-oncology cases and contribute to the care of patients with limited access to specialized centers. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed records from virtual MTBs held between 04/2020-03/2021. Data collected included measures of potential clinical impact, including referrals to observational or therapeutic studies, referrals for specialized neuropathology analysis, and whether molecular findings led to a change in diagnosis and/or guided management suggestions. RESULTS: During 25 meetings, 32 presenters discussed 44 cases. Approximately half (n = 20; 48%) involved a rare central nervous system (CNS) tumor. In 21% (n = 9) the diagnosis was changed or refined based on molecular profiling obtained at the NIH and in 36% (n = 15) molecular findings guided management. Clinical trial suggestions were offered to 31% (n = 13), enrollment in the observational NCI Natural History Study to 21% (n = 9), neuropathology review and molecular testing at the NIH to 17% (n = 7), and all received management suggestions. CONCLUSION: Virtual multi-institutional MTBs enable remote expert review of CNS tumors. We propose them as a strategy to facilitate expert opinions from specialized centers, especially for rare CNS tumors, helping mitigate geographic barriers to patient care and serving as a pre-screening tool for studies. Advanced molecular testing is key to obtaining a precise diagnosis, discovering potentially actionable targets, and guiding management.

Practical guidance for direct oral anticoagulant use in the treatment of venous thromboembolism in primary and metastatic brain tumor patients.

Management of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients with primary and metastatic brain tumors (BT) is challenging because of the risk of intracranial hemorrhage (ICH). There are no prospective clinical trials evaluating safety and efficacy of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), specifically in patients with BT, but they are widely used for VTE in this population. A group of neuro-oncology experts convened to provide practical clinical guidance for the off-label use of DOACs in treating VTE in patients with BT. We searched PubMed for the following terms: BTs, glioma, glioblastoma (GBM), brain metastasis, VTE, heparin, low-molecular-weight heparin (LWMH), DOACs, and ICH. Although prospective clinical trials are needed, the recommendations presented aim to assist clinicians in making informed decisions regarding DOACs for VTE in patients with BT.

A Novel Approach to Determining Tumor Progression Using a Three-Site Pilot Clinical Trial of Spectroscopic MRI-Guided Radiation Dose Escalation in Glioblastoma.

Glioblastoma (GBM) is a fatal disease, with poor prognosis exacerbated by difficulty in assessing tumor extent with imaging. Spectroscopic MRI (sMRI) is a non-contrast imaging technique measuring endogenous metabolite levels of the brain that can serve as biomarkers for tumor extension. We completed a three-site study to assess survival benefits of GBM patients when treated with escalated radiation dose guided by metabolic abnormalities in sMRI. Escalated radiation led to complex post-treatment imaging, requiring unique approaches to discern tumor progression from radiation-related treatment effect through our quantitative imaging platform. The purpose of this study is to determine true tumor recurrence timepoints for patients in our dose-escalation multisite study using novel methodology and to report on median progression-free survival (PFS). Follow-up imaging for all 30 trial patients were collected, lesion volumes segmented and graphed, and imaging uploaded to our platform for visual interpretation. Eighteen months post-enrollment, the median PFS was 16.6 months with a median time to follow-up of 20.3 months. With this new treatment paradigm, incidence rate of tumor recurrence one year from treatment is 30% compared to 60-70% failure under standard care. Based on the delayed tumor progression and improved survival, a randomized phase II trial is under development (EAF211).

A multi-institutional pilot clinical trial of spectroscopic MRI-guided radiation dose escalation for newly diagnosed glioblastoma.

Background: Glioblastomas (GBMs) are aggressive brain tumors despite radiation therapy (RT) to 60 Gy and temozolomide (TMZ). Spectroscopic magnetic resonance imaging (sMRI), which measures levels of specific brain metabolites, can delineate regions at high risk for GBM recurrence not visualized on contrast-enhanced (CE) MRI. We conducted a clinical trial to assess the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of sMRI-guided RT dose escalation to 75 Gy for newly diagnosed GBMs. Methods: Our pilot trial (NCT03137888) enrolled patients at 3 institutions (Emory University, University of Miami, Johns Hopkins University) from September 2017 to June 2019. For RT, standard tumor volumes based on T2-FLAIR and T1w-CE MRIs with margins were treated in 30 fractions to 50.1 and 60 Gy, respectively. An additional high-risk volume based on residual CE tumor and Cho/NAA (on sMRI) ≥2× normal was treated to 75 Gy. Survival curves were generated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Toxicities were assessed according to CTCAE v4.0. Results: Thirty patients were treated in the study. The median age was 59 years. 30% were MGMT promoter hypermethylated; 7% harbored IDH1 mutation. With a median follow-up of 21.4 months for censored patients, median overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival were 23.0 and 16.6 months, respectively. This regimen appeared well-tolerated with 70% of grade 3 or greater toxicity ascribed to TMZ and 23% occurring at least 1 year after RT. Conclusion: Dose-escalated RT to 75 Gy guided by sMRI appears feasible and safe for patients with newly diagnosed GBMs. OS outcome is promising and warrants additional testing. Based on these results, a randomized phase II trial is in development.

Practical guidance for telemedicine use in neuro-oncology.

While the COVID-19 pandemic has catalyzed the expansion of telemedicine into nearly every specialty of medicine, few articles have summarized current practices and recommendations for integrating virtual care in the practice of neuro-oncology. This article identifies current telemedicine practice, provides practical guidance for conducting telemedicine visits, and generates recommendations for integrating virtual care into neuro-oncology practice. Practical aspects of telemedicine are summarized including when to use and not use telemedicine, how to conduct a virtual visit, who to include in the virtual encounter, unique aspects of telehealth in neuro-oncology, and emerging innovations.

Phase 0 Clinical Trial of Everolimus in Patients with Vestibular Schwannoma or Meningioma.

Inhibition of mTORC1 signaling has been shown to diminish growth of meningiomas and schwannomas in preclinical studies, and clinical data suggest that everolimus, an orally administered mTORC1 inhibitor, may slow tumor progression in a subset of patients with neurofibromatosis type 2 (NF2) with vestibular schwannoma. To assess the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and potential mechanisms of treatment resistance, we performed a presurgical (phase 0) clinical trial of everolimus in patients undergoing elective surgery for vestibular schwannoma or meningiomas. Eligible patients with meningioma or vestibular schwannoma requiring tumor resection enrolled on study received everolimus 10 mg daily for 10 days immediately prior to surgery. Everolimus blood levels were determined immediately before and after surgery. Tumor samples were collected intraoperatively. Ten patients completed protocol therapy. Median pre- and postoperative blood levels of everolimus were found to be in a high therapeutic range (17.4 ng/mL and 9.4 ng/mL, respectively). Median tumor tissue drug concentration determined by mass spectrometry was 24.3 pg/mg (range, 9.2-169.2). We observed only partial inhibition of phospho-S6 in the treated tumors, indicating incomplete target inhibition compared with control tissues from untreated patients (P = 0.025). Everolimus led to incomplete inhibition of mTORC1 and downstream signaling. These data may explain the limited antitumor effect of everolimus observed in clinical studies for patients with NF2 and will inform the design of future preclinical and clinical studies targeting mTORC1 in meningiomas and schwannomas.

The state of neuro-oncology during the COVID-19 pandemic: a worldwide assessment.

BACKGROUND: It remains unknown how the COVID-19 pandemic has changed neuro-oncology clinical practice, training, and research efforts. METHODS: We performed an international survey of practitioners, scientists, and trainees from 21 neuro-oncology organizations across 6 continents, April 24-May 17, 2020. We assessed clinical practice and research environments, institutional preparedness and support, and perceived impact on patients. RESULTS: Of 582 respondents, 258 (45%) were US-based and 314 (55%) international. Ninety-four percent of participants reported changes in their clinical practice. Ninety-five percent of respondents converted at least some practice to telemedicine. Ten percent of practitioners felt the need to see patients in person, specifically because of billing concerns and pressure from their institutions. Sixty-seven percent of practitioners suspended enrollment for at least one clinical trial, including 62% suspending phase III trial enrollments. More than 50% believed neuro-oncology patients were at increased risk for COVID-19. Seventy-one percent of clinicians feared for their own personal safety or that of their families, specifically because of their clinical duties; 20% had inadequate personal protective equipment. While 69% reported increased stress, 44% received no psychosocial support from their institutions. Thirty-seven percent had salary reductions and 63% of researchers temporarily closed their laboratories. However, the pandemic created positive changes in perceived patient satisfaction, communication quality, and technology use to deliver care and mediate interactions with other practitioners. CONCLUSIONS: The pandemic has changed treatment schedules and limited investigational treatment options. Institutional lack of support created clinician and researcher anxiety. Communication with patients was satisfactory. We make recommendations to guide clinical and scientific infrastructure moving forward and address the personal challenges of providers and researchers.

Phase II study of rituximab given in conjunction with standard chemotherapy in primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL): a trial of the ECOG-ACRIN cancer research group (E1F05).

BACKGROUND: Therapy of primary CNS lymphoma (PCNSL) has focused on multi-agent chemotherapy designed to cross the blood brain barrier. Rituximab has demonstrated activity in PCNSL. E1F05 is an ECOG-ACRIN multicenter phase 2 prospective trial of rituximab with high-dose methotrexate (HD-MTX)-based chemotherapy similar to the RTOG 93-10 regimen, omitting radiotherapy. METHODS: Immunocompetent patients with newly diagnosed PCNSL received HD-MTX 3.5g/m2 with vincristine every two weeks for 5 doses; procarbazine for 7 days in weeks 1, 5, and 9; cytarabine 3g/m2/day IV for 2 days in weeks 11 and 14; a dexamethasone taper over 6 weeks; and rituximab 375mg/m2 IV infusion 3 times per week for weeks 1-4. Subjects with CSF involvement received intrathecal methotrexate 12mg every two weeks. RESULTS: Twenty-six patients were enrolled; median age was 57. Sixteen subjects (65%) completed treatment per protocol; the most common reason for discontinuation was adverse events, and 2 subjects discontinued due to progressive disease (PD). Complete response (CR) + unconfirmed CR (CRu) was 16/25 (64%), overall response rate was 20/25 (80%), and 4/25(16%) had PD as best response. Median progression free survival (PFS) was 34 months, and median overall survival has not been reached at 40 months' median follow up. Two year PFS was 63%. The most common grade 3-4 toxicities were hematologic. CONCLUSION: The addition of rituximab to multi-agent chemotherapy is well tolerated. Outcomes are comparable to or better than those seen in RTOG 93-10, which included RT. These and other results suggest rituximab has activity in the CNS. [ECOG-ACRIN E1F05]. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT00335140, clinicaltrials.gov.

Genetic counseling and tumor predisposition in neuro-oncology practice.

Tumor predisposition syndromes may be under-recognized in neuro-oncology practice. Identifying patients with a hereditary tumor predisposition permits appropriate tumor management as well as surveillance and risk-reduction measures for patients and their families. The American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the National Society of Genetic Counselors recently published referral guidelines for tumor predisposition assessment, providing an impetus to review the use of genetic counseling in neuro-oncology and to describe features of the less stereotypic conditions from the perspective of neuro-oncology practice. This review also provides a framework for the identification and management of these conditions, as well as references to guidelines and resources for providers and patients.

Phase 1/2 trials of Temozolomide, Motexafin Gadolinium, and 60-Gy fractionated radiation for newly diagnosed supratentorial glioblastoma multiforme: final results of RTOG 0513.

PURPOSE: The purpose of phase 1 was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of motexafin gadolinium (MGd) given concurrently with temozolomide (TMZ) and radiation therapy (RT) in patients with newly diagnosed supratentorial glioblastoma multiforme (GBM). Phase 2 determined whether this combination improved overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in GBM recursive partitioning analysis class III to V patients compared to therapies for recently published historical controls. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Dose escalation in phase 1 progressed through 3 cohorts until 2 of 6 patients experienced dose-limiting toxicity or a dose of 5 mg/kg was reached. Once MTD was established, a 1-sided 1-sample log-rank test at significance level of .1 had 85% power to detect a median survival difference (13.69 vs 18.48 months) with 60 deaths over a 12-month accrual period and an additional 18 months of follow-up. OS and PFS were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: In phase 1, 24 patients were enrolled. The MTD established was 5 mg/kg, given intravenously 5 days a week for the first 10 RT fractions, then 3 times a week for the duration of RT. The 7 patients enrolled in the third dose level and the 94 enrolled in phase 2 received this dose. Of these 101 patients, 87 were eligible and evaluable. Median survival time was 15.6 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 12.9-17.6 months), not significantly different from that of the historical control (P=.36). Median PFS was 7.6 months (95% CI: 5.7-9.6 months). One patient (1%) experienced a grade 5 adverse event possibly related to therapy during the concurrent phase, and none experience toxicity during adjuvant TMZ therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment was well tolerated, but median OS did not reach improvement specified by protocol compared to historical control, indicating that the combination of standard RT with TMZ and MGd did not achieve a significant survival advantage.

The future of glioma treatment: stem cells, nanotechnology and personalized medicine.

The development of novel therapies, imaging techniques and insights into the processes that drive growth of CNS tumors have allowed growing enthusiasm for the treatment of CNS malignancies. Despite this energized effort to investigate and treat brain cancer, clinical outcomes for most patients continue to be dismal. Recognition of diverse tumor subtypes, behaviors and outcomes has led to an interest in personalized medicine for the treatment of brain tumors. This new paradigm requires evaluation of the tumor phenotype at the time of diagnosis so that therapy can be specifically tailored to each individual patient. Investigating novel therapies involving stem cells, nanotechnology and molecular medicine will allow diversity of therapeutic options for patients with brain cancer. These exciting new therapeutic strategies for brain tumors are reviewed in this article.

Unexpectedly durable palliation of metastatic olfactory neuroblastoma using anti-angiogenic therapy with Bevacizumab.

Olfactory neuroblastomas (ONBs) are rare malignant tumors that arise from olfactory epithelium and typically present with symptoms attributable to locally invasive disease. Kadish radiographic staging and Hyams' histopathologic grading are prognostic. Overall survival rates, averaging 60-70% at 5 years, remain limited by high rates of delayed loco-regional and distant progression. At initial presentation, the available evidence supports the use of multimodality therapy, historically surgery and radiation, to improve disease-free and overall survival. At recurrence/progression, the available evidence supports the use of therapy to improve disease control and symptoms (palliation), but patient heterogeneity dictates individualization of modalities. Although the ideal use of chemotherapy as a modality remains undefined, the available evidence supports it use, historically platinum-based, for palliation. However, recent insights into the molecular-genetic aberrations of ONBs, coupled with the emergence chemotherapeutic agents capable of targeting such aberrations, suggest an expanded role. The authors report a case of a 60 years-old man, heavily pre-treated for metastatic ONB, presenting with profound central-nerve-system and head-and-neck symptoms. He experienced unexpectedly durable palliation with Bevacizumab anti-angiogenic therapy. Additionally, he experienced localized palliation with an Ommaya reservoir. The authors review the literature regarding historical and emerging therapies for ONB to emphasize the needs for individualization and translational-clinical studies.

Ethynyldeoxyuridine (EdU) suppresses in vitro population expansion and in vivo tumor progression of human glioblastoma cells.

Thymidine analogs (TAs) are synthetic nucleosides that incorporate into newly synthesized DNA. Halogenated pyrimidines (HPs), such as bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU), are a class of TAs that can be detected with antibodies and are commonly used for birthdating individual cells and for assessing the proliferative index of cell populations. It is well established that HPs can act as radiosensitizers when incorporated into DNA chains, but they are generally believed not to impair normal cell function in the absence of secondary stressors. However, we and others have shown that HP incorporation leads to a sustained suppression of cell cycle progression in mammalian cells, resulting in cellular senescence in somatic cells. In addition, we have shown that HP incorporation results in delayed tumor progression in a syngeneic rat model of glioma. Here we examine ethynyldeoxyuridine (EdU), a newly developed and alkylated TA, for its anti-cancer activity, both in vitro and in vivo. We show that EdU, like HPs, leads to a severe reduction in the proliferation rate of normal and transformed cells in vitro. Unlike HPs, however, EdU incorporation also causes DNA damage resulting in the death of a substantial subset of treated cells. When administered over an extended time as a monotherapy to mice bearing subcutaneous xenografts of human glioblastoma multiforme tumors, EdU significantly reduces tumor volume and increases survival without apparent significant toxicity. These results, combined with the fact that EdU readily crosses the blood-brain barrier, support the continued investigation of EdU as a potential therapy for malignant brain tumors.

Modern multidisciplinary management of brain metastases.

Ideal management of brain metastases (BMs) requires simultaneous control of the existing brain metastasis (local brain control), prevention of future BMs (distant brain control), and control of the systemic cancer (systemic control). Available tools include whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT), surgery, stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), and systemic therapies, such as chemotherapies, biologic agents, and radiosensitizing agents. Selecting the combination of these tools is highly individualized and is impacted by numerous factors involving the tumor, patient, provider, and evolving evidence. Historically, patients received WBRT, either alone or with local treatments (surgery or SRS). However, concern about the effects of WBRT, coupled with improvements in local control and survival in select patients, with the combination treatment, has led to a reconsideration of the role of WBRT. Additionally, there have been advancements in the efficacy and tolerance of systemic therapies and clarification regarding the relative risks and symptoms of tumor recurrence versus treatment complications. Thankfully, individualizing modern multidisciplinary management for patients with BMs is being aided by numerous recently completed, ongoing, and planned prospective series.

The role of chemotherapy for pure and mixed anaplastic oligodendroglial tumors.

Pure and mixed anaplastic oligodendrogliomas (AO/mixed-AOs) remain terminal primary brain tumors, without a defined optimal initial therapy, and without sufficiently active and tolerable therapies at recurrence/progression (R/P). Very heterogeneous international therapy recommendations remain. Historical advances have resulted in only modest improvements in outcome. AO/mixed-AOs with 1p/19q co-deletion are prognostically favorable, regardless of therapy, and must be identified as early as possible. Following resection, outcome data on initial therapy with radiation (RT) remain the most mature, although controversies regarding its true toxicities and optimal timing continue. Recently, the landmark RTOG 9402 and EORTC 26951 trials showed that the addition of Procarbazine, CCNU, Vincristine chemotherapy to RT, at anytime during initial therapy, prolongs progression-free survival, but not survival, and not without moderate toxicity. Despite a lack of definitive evidence, this strategy has commonly been extrapolated to Temozolomide. Chemo-sensitivity of AO/mixed-AOs provides the rationale for the chemotherapy-only strategies being explored. In the setting of recurrence/progression (R/P), chemotherapy, small molecule (targeted), biologic, and other strategies have been relatively disappointing, toxic, and cumbersome. Partly secondary to biases regarding the relative toxicities of tumor burden vs. treatment effect, therapy remains highly individualized. Future international research must prospectively evaluate health-related quality of life, toxicity, and molecular genetic markers.

The relationship between circulating natural killer cells after reduced intensity conditioning hematopoietic stem cell transplantation and relapse-free survival and graft-versus-host disease.

BACKGROUND: Natural killer cells are known to have anti-tumor activity in haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. We hypothesized that reconstituted circulating natural killer cells may be associated with improved relapse-free survival after HLA-matched hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. DESIGN AND METHODS: Serial peripheral blood absolute natural killer cell counts were prospectively measured by flow cytometry of lymphocytes expressing CD56 and CD16 in 167 patients. Cluster analysis was used at engraftment and 60 days post-transplant to distinguish patients with high and low absolute natural killer cell counts. At engraftment 80 patients had high counts (> 22.2/mm3) and 43 had low counts. At 60 days post-transplant 84 patients had high counts (> 18.2/mm3) and 38 had low counts. The primary study end-points were death, relapse and acute graft-versus-host disease. The median follow-up was 373 days (range, 67-1767). RESULTS: Among patients given reduced intensity conditioning, a low absolute natural killer cell count at 60 days post-transplant was independently associated with relapse [adjusted hazard ratio (AHR) = 28.4, 95% confidence interval (CI) 4.3-186.4] and death (AHR = 17.5, 95% CI 4.3-71.3). Furthermore, patients given reduced intensity conditioning who had a high absolute natural killer cell count at 60 days had a significantly better 1-year survival than those with a low count by Kaplan-Meier analysis (83% vs. 11%, p<0.001). Multivariate analysis confirmed that low 60-day absolute natural killer count in patients given reduced intensity conditioning was independently associated with an increase in relapse or death (AHR = 20.22, 95% CI 4.76-85.40). In contrast, there was no significant association between 60-day absolute natural killer cell counts and clinical outcomes in patients receiving myeloablative conditioning. There was no significant association between absolute natural killer cell count and graft-versus-host disease. CONCLUSIONS: High natural killer cell reconstitution is associated with reduced relapse and death without an increased incidence of graft-versus-host-disease after reduced intensity conditioning allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Measuring reconstituted natural killer cells expressing CD56(+)/CD16(+) post-transplant may have novel prognostic and therapeutic implications.

Cancer pain management in the 21st century.

Cancer causes pain as it invades bone, compresses nerves, produces obstructive symptoms in the pulmonary, gastrointestinal, and genitourinary systems, and distends involved visceral organs. This manuscript reviews progress in cancer pain management during the past 2 decades. Since the 1980s, we have seen (1) genuine advances in research on the biology of pain, (2) new approaches to the treatment of cancer pain, and (3) important changes in the health-care system to ensure that pain is appropriately assessed and managed. Currently, clinicians have the appropriate diagnostic and therapeutic tools to ensure that the vast majority of patients with cancer pain can be comfortable during their illness. Nevertheless, too many patients with terminal malignancies continue to die in pain in nations around the globe. An effective strategy to make alleviating pain a major health-care priority remains the primary challenge to effectively palliating patients with cancer pain.