Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Molecules ; 27(7)2022 Apr 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35408767

RESUMEN

The adenosine A2A receptor subtype is recognized as a non-dopaminergic pharmacological target for the treatment of neurodegenerative disorders, notably Parkinson's disease (PD). The selective A2A receptor antagonist istradefylline is approved in the US and Japan as an adjunctive treatment to levodopa/decarboxylase inhibitors in adults with PD experiencing OFF episodes or a wearing-off phenomenon; however, the full potential of this drug class remains to be explored. In this article, we review the pharmacology of adenosine A2A receptor antagonists from the perspective of the treatment of both motor and non-motor symptoms of PD and their potential for disease modification.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedad de Parkinson , Adenosina/farmacología , Adenosina/uso terapéutico , Antagonistas del Receptor de Adenosina A2/farmacología , Antagonistas del Receptor de Adenosina A2/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Humanos , Levodopa/uso terapéutico , Enfermedad de Parkinson/tratamiento farmacológico , Receptor de Adenosina A2A
2.
CNS Drugs ; 32(5): 443-454, 2018 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29637529

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Subcutaneous apomorphine is used for the treatment of Parkinson's disease (PD); however, infusion site reactions are a common adverse event (AE), which can lead to treatment discontinuation. Apomorphine formulations that are more tolerable and convenient for use are needed. OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to compare the toxicity and bioavailability of ND0701, a new concentrated formulation of apomorphine free base, with one of the commercially available apomorphine HCl formulations (APO-go®, Britannia Pharmaceuticals Ltd). METHODS: (1) Preclinical study: 16 minipigs were randomly assigned to placebo, APO-go®, and ND0701 groups, and treated for 28 days. Pharmacokinetic, clinical, and pathological assessments were performed. (2) Phase I study: 18 healthy volunteers participated in an open-label, two-sequence, randomized, three single-dose, partial crossover study to compare the pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability of ND0701 with APO-go® (1%). RESULTS: (1) Preclinical study: No systemic toxicity was observed in apomorphine-treated minipigs, but local skin reactions were observed at the infusion sites. These effects were less frequent and less severe and recovery was more rapid for ND0701 compared with APO-go®. (2) Phase I study: Both formulations were safe and well tolerated under the conditions of the study and no severe or serious treatment-emergent AEs were reported. Infusion site nodules were reported more frequently, with higher severity, and recovered slower at APO-go®-treated sites compared with ND0701-treated sites. Bioavailability of apomorphine was comparable between the two formulations. CONCLUSION: Based on these pilot studies, ND0701 appears to be superior to APO-go® in terms of tolerability and safety, while maintaining comparable bioavailability with APO-go®, and shows promise as a future treatment for PD.


Asunto(s)
Apomorfina/farmacología , Agonistas de Dopamina/farmacología , Adulto , Animales , Apomorfina/efectos adversos , Apomorfina/farmacocinética , Disponibilidad Biológica , Estudios Cruzados , Agonistas de Dopamina/efectos adversos , Agonistas de Dopamina/farmacocinética , Femenino , Humanos , Infusiones Subcutáneas , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Proyectos Piloto , Distribución Aleatoria , Piel/efectos de los fármacos , Piel/patología , Porcinos , Porcinos Enanos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA