Respiratory outcomes and survival after unplanned extubation in the NICU: a prospective cohort study from the SEPREVEN trial.

OBJECTIVE: To compare reintubation rates after planned extubation and unplanned extubation (UE) in patients in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs), to analyse risk factors for reintubation after UE and to compare outcomes in patients with and without UE. DESIGN: Prospective, observational study nested in a randomised controlled trial (SEPREVEN/Study on Epidemiology and PRevention of adverse EVEnts in Neonates). Outcomes were expected to be independent of the intervention tested. SETTING: 12 NICUs in France with a 20-month follow-up, starting November 2015. PATIENTS: n=2280 patients with a NICU stay >2 days, postmenstrual age ≤42 weeks on admission. INTERVENTIONS/EXPOSURE: Characteristics of UE (context, timing, sedative administration in the preceding 6 hours, weaning from ventilation at time of UE) and patients. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Healthcare professional-reported UE rates, reintubation/timing after extubation, duration of mechanical ventilation, mortality and bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD). RESULTS: There were 162 episodes of UE (139 patients, median gestational age (IQR) 27.3 (25.6-31.7) weeks). Cumulative reintubation rates within 24 hours and 7 days of UE were, respectively, 50.0% and 57.5%, compared with 5.5% and 12.3% after a planned extubation. Independent risk factors for reintubation within 7 days included absence of weaning at the time of UE (HR, 95% CI) and sedatives in the preceding 6 hours (HR 1.93, 95% CI 1.04 to 3.60). Mortality at discharge did not differ between patients with planned extubation or UE. UE was associated with a higher risk of BPD. CONCLUSION: In the SEPREVEN trial, reintubation followed UE in 58% of the cases, compared with 12% after planned extubation. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02598609.

Pulmonary hypertension among preterm infants born at 22 through 32 weeks gestation in France: Prevalence, survival, morbidity and management in the EPIPAGE-2 cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence, short-term prognosis and pharmacologic management of pulmonary hypertension (PH) among very preterm infants born before 32 weeks gestation (WG). STUDY DESIGN: In the EPIPAGE-2 French national prospective population-based cohort of preterm infants born in 2011, those presenting with PH were identified and prevalence was estimated using multiple imputation. The primary outcome was survival without severe morbidity at discharge and was compared between infants with or without PH after adjusting for confounders, using generalized estimating equations models. Subgroup analysis was performed according to gestational age (GA) groups. RESULTS: Among 3383 eligible infants, 3222 were analyzed. The prevalence of PH was 6.0 % (95 % CI, 5.2-6.9), 14.5 % in infants born at 22-27+6 WG vs 2.7 % in infants born at 28-31+6 WG (P < .001). The primary outcome (survival without severe morbidity at discharge) occurred in 30.2 % of infants with PH vs 80.2 % of infants without PH (P < .001). Adjusted incidence rate ratios for survival without severe morbidity among infants with PH were 0.42 (0.32-0.57) and 0.52 (0.39-0.69) in infants born at 22-27+6 weeks gestation and those born at 28-31+6 weeks, respectively. Among infants with PH, 92.2 % (95 % CI, 87.7-95.2) received sedation and/or analgesia, 63.5 % (95 % CI, 56.6-69.9) received inhaled NO and 57.6 % (95 % CI, 50.9-64.0) received hemodynamic treatments. CONCLUSION: In this population-based cohort of very preterm infants, the prevalence of PH was 6 %. PH was associated with a significant decrease of survival without severe morbidity in this population.

Curriculum and assessment tool for less invasive surfactant administration: an international Delphi consensus study.

BACKGROUND: Training and assessment of operator competence for the less invasive surfactant administration (LISA) procedure vary. This study aimed to obtain international expert consensus on LISA training (LISA curriculum (LISA-CUR)) and assessment (LISA assessment tool (LISA-AT)). METHODS: From February to July 2022, an international three-round Delphi process gathered opinions from LISA experts (researchers, curriculum developers, and clinical educators) on a list of items to be included in a LISA-CUR and LISA-AT (Round 1). The experts rated the importance of each item (Round 2). Items supported by more than 80% consensus were included. All experts were asked to approve or reject the final LISA-CUR and LISA-AT (Round 3). RESULTS: A total of 153 experts from 14 countries participated in Round 1, and the response rate for Rounds 2 and 3 was >80%. Round 1 identified 44 items for LISA-CUR and 22 for LISA-AT. Round 2 excluded 15 items for the LISA-CUR and 7 items for the LISA-AT. Round 3 resulted in a strong consensus (99-100%) for the final 29 items for the LISA-CUR and 15 items for the LISA-AT. CONCLUSIONS: This Delphi process established an international consensus on a training curriculum and content evidence for the assessment of LISA competence. IMPACT: This international consensus-based expert statement provides content on a curriculum for the less invasive surfactant administration procedure (LISA-CUR) that may be partnered with existing evidence-based strategies to optimize and standardize LISA training in the future. This international consensus-based expert statement also provides content on an assessment tool for the LISA procedure (LISA-AT) that can help to evaluate competence in LISA operators. The proposed LISA-AT enables standardized, continuous feedback and assessment until achieving proficiency.

Humidity during high-frequency oscillatory ventilation compared to intermittent positive pressure ventilation in extremely preterm neonates: An in vitro and in vivo observational study.

BACKGROUND: Inappropriate humidification of inspired gas during mechanical ventilation can impair lung development in extremely low birthweight (ELBW) infants. Humidification depends on multiple factors, such as the heater-humidifier device used, type of ventilation, and environmental factors. Few studies have examined inspired gas humidification in these infants, especially during high-frequency oscillatory ventilation (HFOV). Our objective was to compare humidity during HFOV and intermittent positive pressure ventilation (IPPV), in vitro and in vivo. METHODS: In vitro and in vivo studies used the same ventilator during both HFOV and IPPV. The bench study used a neonatal test lung and two heater-humidifiers with their specific circuits; the in vivo study prospectively included preterm infants born before 28 weeks of gestation. RESULTS: On bench testing, mean absolute (AH) and relative (RH) humidity values were significantly lower during HFOV than IPPV (RH = 79.4 ± 8.1% vs. 89.0 ± 6.2%, p < 0.001). Regardless of the ventilatory mode, mean RH significantly differed between the two heater-humidifiers (89.6 ± 6.7% vs 78.7 ± 6.8%, p = 0.003). The in vivo study included 10 neonates (mean ± SD gestational age: 25.7 ± 0.9 weeks and birthweight: 624.4 ± 96.1 g). Mean RH during HFOV was significantly lower than during IPPV (74.6 ± 5.7% vs. 83.0 ± 6.7%, p = 0.004). CONCLUSION: RH was significantly lower during HFOV than IPPV, both in vitro and in vivo. The type of heater-humidifier also influenced humidification. More systematic measurements of humidity of inspired gas, especially during HFOV, should be considered to optimize humidification and consequently lung protection in ELBW infants.

In-hospital Outcomes and Early Hemodynamic Management According to Echocardiography Use in Hypotensive Preterm Infants: A National Propensity-Matched Cohort Study.

Background: Hypotension is a common condition during the first postnatal days of very preterm infants and has been associated with an increased risk of adverse outcomes but its management remains controversial. There is a consensus to promote the use of neonatologist-performed echocardiography (NPE) in hypotensive very preterm infants, although no clinical trial ever assessed this practice. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from the French national EPIPAGE-2 cohort to evaluate the association of NPE with survival, severe morbidity, and therapeutic management in very preterm infants with early hypotension. Reasons for administering antihypotensive treatments were also analyzed. We included infants born before 30 weeks of gestation with hypotension within 72 h of birth. Infants managed with (NPE group) or without (no-NPE group) NPE use were compared after matching on gestational age and a propensity score, reflecting each patient's probability of having an NPE based on his/her baseline covariates. This matching procedure intended to control for the indication bias of NPE. Results: Among 966 eligible infants, 809 were included (NPE group, n = 320; no-NPE group, n = 489), and 229 from each group could be matched. The NPE group did not differ significantly from the no-NPE group for survival (OR 1.01, 95% CI 0.64 to 1.60; p = 0.95) or survival without severe morbidity at discharge (OR 0.92, 95% CI 0.63 to 1.34; p = 0.66), but received more antihypotensive treatments [144/229 (62.9%) vs. 99/229 (43.0%), p < 0.001]. Isolated hypotension was the main reason for treatment in both groups. Among treated infants, volume expansion was administered at equal rates to the NPE and no-NPE groups [118/144 (82.1%) vs. 79/99 (80.1%), p = 0.67], but the NPE group received inotropic drugs more often [77/144 (53.7%) vs. 37/99 (37.8%), p = 0.023]. Conclusion: NPE use in hypotensive preterm infants was not associated with in-hospital outcomes and had little influence on the nature of and reasons for antihypotensive treatments. These results suggest the need to optimize NPE use.

Frequencies, Modalities, Doses and Duration of Computerized Prescriptions for Sedative, Analgesic, Anesthetic and Paralytic Drugs in Neonates Requiring Intensive Care: A Prospective Pharmacoepidemiologic Cohort Study in 30 French NICUs From 2014 to 2020.

Objectives: No consensus exists about the doses of analgesics, sedatives, anesthetics, and paralytics used in critically ill neonates. Large-scale, detailed pharmacoepidemiologic studies of prescription practices are a prerequisite to future research. This study aimed to describe the detailed prescriptions of these drug classes in neonates hospitalized in neonatal intensive care units (NICU) from computerized prescription records and to compare prescriptions by gestational age. Materials and Methods: We included all neonates requiring intensive care in 30 French level III units from 2014 through 2020 with a computerized prescription for an analgesic, sedative, anesthetic, or paralytic agent. We described frequencies of prescription, methods of administration, concomitant drug prescriptions, and dosing regimen, and compared them across gestational ages. Results: Among 65,555 neonates, 29,340 (44.8%) were prescribed at least one analgesic (acetaminophen in 37.2% and opioids in 17.8%), sedative (9.8%), anesthetic (8.5%), and/or paralytic agent (1%). Among preterm infants born before 28 weeks, 3,771/4,283 (88.0%) were prescribed at least one of these agents: 69.7% opioids, 41.2% sedatives, 32.5% anesthetics, and 5.8% paralytics. The most frequently prescribed agents were sufentanil (in 10.3% of neonates) and morphine (in 8.0% of neonates) for opioids, midazolam (9.3%) for sedatives, ketamine (5.7%) and propofol (3.3%) for anesthetics. In most neonates, opioids and sedatives were prescribed as continuous infusion, whereas anesthetics were prescribed as single doses. Opioids, sedatives and paralytics were mostly prescribed in association with another agent. Doses varied significantly by gestational age but within a limited range. Gestational age was inversely related to the frequency, cumulative dose and duration of prescriptions. For example, morphine prescriptions showed median (IQR) cumulative doses of 2601 (848-6750) vs. 934 (434-2679) µg/kg and median (IQR) durations of 7 (3-15) vs. 3 (2-5) days in infants born <28 vs. ≥ 37 weeks of gestation, respectively (p-value<0.001). Conclusion: The prescriptions of analgesic, sedative, anesthetic, or paralytic agent were frequent and often combined in the NICU. Lower gestational age was associated with higher frequencies, longer durations and higher cumulative doses of these prescriptions. Dose-finding studies to determine individualized dosing regimens and studies on long-term neurodevelopmental outcome according to received cumulative doses are required.

Patient-Ventilator Synchrony in Extremely Premature Neonates during Non-Invasive Neurally Adjusted Ventilatory Assist or Synchronized Intermittent Positive Airway Pressure: A Randomized Crossover Pilot Trial.

INTRODUCTION: Synchronization of non-invasive ventilation is challenging in extremely premature infants. We compared patient-ventilator synchrony between non-invasive neurally adjusted ventilatory assist (NIV-NAVA) using transdiaphragmatic (Edi) catheter and synchronized intermittent positive airway pressure (SiPAP) using an abdominal trigger. METHODS: This study was a monocentric, randomized, crossover trial in premature infants born before 28 weeks of gestation, aged 3 days or more, and below 32 weeks postmenstrual age. NIV-NAVA and SiPAP were applied in a random order for 2 h with analysis of data from the second hour. The primary outcome was the asynchrony index. RESULTS: Fourteen patients were included (median [IQR] gestational age at birth 25.6 (25.3-26.4) weeks, median [IQR] birth weight 755 [680-824] g, median [IQR] postnatal age 26.5 [19.8-33.8] days). The median (IQR) asynchrony index was significantly lower in NIV-NAVA versus SiPAP (49.9% [44.1-52.6] vs. 85.8% [74.2-90.9], p < 0.001). Ineffective efforts and auto-triggering were significantly less frequent in NIV-NAVA versus SiPAP (3.0% vs. 32.0% p < 0.001 and 10.0% vs. 26.6%, p = 0.004, respectively). Double triggering was significantly less frequent in SiPAP versus NIV-NAVA (0.0% vs. 9.0%, p < 0.001). No significant difference was observed for premature cycling and late cycling. Peak Edi and swing Edi were significantly lower in NIV-NAVA as compared to SiPAP (7.7 [6.1-9.9] vs. 11.0 [6.7-14.5] µV, p = 0.006; 5.4 [4.2-7.6] vs. 7.6 [4.3-10.8] µV, p = 0.007, respectively). No significant difference was observed between NIV-NAVA and SiPAP for heart rate, respiratory rate, COMFORTneo scores, apnoea, desaturations, or bradycardias. DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION: NIV-NAVA markedly improves patient-ventilator synchrony as compared to SiPAP in extremely premature infants.

An educational programme in neonatal intensive care units (SEPREVEN): a stepped-wedge, cluster-randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Patients in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) are at high risk of adverse events. The effects of medical and paramedical education programmes to reduce these have not yet been assessed. METHODS: In this multicentre, stepped-wedge, cluster-randomised controlled trial done in France, we randomly assigned 12 NICUs to three clusters of four units. Eligible neonates were inpatients in a participating unit for at least 2 days, with a postmenstrual age of 42 weeks or less on admission. Each cluster followed a 4-month multifaceted programme including education about root-cause analysis and care bundles. The primary outcome was the rate of adverse events per 1000 patient-days, measured with a retrospective trigger-tool based chart review masked to allocation of randomly selected files. Analyses used mixed-effects Poisson modelling that adjusted for time. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02598609. FINDINGS: Between Nov 23, 2015, and Nov 2, 2017, event rates were analysed for 3454 patients of these 12 NICUs for 65 830 patient-days. The event rate per 1000 patient-days reduced significantly from the control to the intervention period (33·9 vs 22·6; incidence rate ratio 0·67; 95% CI 0·50-0·88; p=0·0048). INTERPRETATION: A multiprofessional safety-promoting programme in NICUs reduced the rate of adverse events and severe and preventable adverse events in highly vulnerable patients. This programme could significantly improve care offered to critically ill neonates. FUNDING: Solidarity and Health Ministry, France.

Patent ductus arteriosus, tracheal ventilation, and the risk of bronchopulmonary dysplasia.

BACKGROUND: An increased risk for bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) exists when moderate-to-large patent ductus arteriosus shunts (hsPDA) persist beyond 14 days. GOAL: To examine the interaction between prolonged exposures to tracheal ventilation (≥10 days) and hsPDA on the incidence of BPD in infants <28 weeks gestation. STUDY DESIGN: Predefined definitions of prolonged ventilation (≥10 days), hsPDA (≥14 days), and BPD (room air challenge test at 36 weeks) were used to analyze deidentified data from the multicenter TRIOCAPI RCT in a secondary analysis of the trial. RESULTS: Among 307 infants who survived >14 days, 41 died before 36 weeks. Among survivors, 93/266 had BPD. The association between BPD and hsPDA depended on the length of intubation. In multivariable analyses, prolonged hsPDA shunts were associated with increased BPD (odds ratio (OR) (95% confidence interval (CI)) = 3.00 (1.58-5.71)) when infants required intubation for ≥10 days. In contrast, there was no significant association between hsPDA exposure and BPD when infants were intubated <10 days (OR (95% CI) = 1.49 (0.98-2.26)). A similar relationship between prolonged hsPDA and length of intubation was found for BPD/death (n = 307): infants intubated ≥10 days: OR (95% CI) = 2.41 (1.47-3.95)); infants intubated <10 days: OR (95% CI) = 1.37 (0.86-2.19)). CONCLUSIONS: Moderate-to-large PDAs were associated with increased risks of BPD and BPD/death-but only when infants required intubation ≥10 days. IMPACT: Infants with a moderate-to-large hsPDA that persist beyond 14 days are only at risk for developing BPD if they also receive prolonged tracheal ventilation for ≥10 days. Infants who receive less ventilatory support (intubation for <10 days) have the same incidence of BPD whether the ductus closes shortly after birth or whether it persists as a moderate-to-large shunt for several weeks. Early PDA closure may be unnecessary in infants who require short durations of intubation since the PDA does not seem to alter the incidence of BPD in infants who require intubation for <10 days.

Premedication before laryngoscopy in neonates: Evidence-based statement from the French society of neonatology (SFN).

Context: Laryngoscopy is frequently required in neonatal intensive care. Awake laryngoscopy has deleterious effects but practice remains heterogeneous regarding premedication use. The goal of this statement was to provide evidence-based good practice guidance for clinicians regarding premedication before tracheal intubation, less invasive surfactant administration (LISA) and laryngeal mask insertion in neonates. Methods: A group of experts brought together by the French Society of Neonatology (SFN) addressed 4 fields related to premedication before upper airway access in neonates: (1) tracheal intubation; (2) less invasive surfactant administration; (3) laryngeal mask insertion; (4) use of atropine for the 3 previous procedures. Evidence was gathered and assessed on predefined questions related to these fields. Consensual statements were issued using the GRADE methodology. Results: Among the 15 formalized good practice statements, 2 were strong recommendations to do (Grade 1+) or not to do (Grade 1-), and 4 were discretionary recommendations to do (Grade 2+). For 9 good practice statements, the GRADE method could not be applied, resulting in an expert opinion. For tracheal intubation premedication was considered mandatory except for life-threatening situations (Grade 1+). Recommended premedications were a combination of opioid + muscle blocker (Grade 2+) or propofol in the absence of hemodynamic compromise or hypotension (Grade 2+) while the use of a sole opioid was discouraged (Grade 1-). Statements regarding other molecules before tracheal intubation were expert opinions. For LISA premedication was recommended (Grade 2+) with the use of propofol (Grade 2+). Statements regarding other molecules before LISA were expert opinions. For laryngeal mask insertion and atropine use, no specific data was found and expert opinions were provided. Conclusion: This statement should help clinical decision regarding premedication before neonatal upper airway access and favor standardization of practices.

Association Between Early Amino Acid Intake and Full-Scale IQ at Age 5 Years Among Infants Born at Less Than 30 Weeks' Gestation.

Importance: An international expert committee recently revised its recommendations on amino acid intake for very preterm infants, suggesting that more than 3.50 g/kg/d should be administered only to preterm infants in clinical trials. However, the optimal amino acid intake during the first week after birth in these infants is unknown. Objective: To evaluate the association between early amino acid intake and cognitive outcomes at age 5 years. Design, Setting, and Participants: Using the EPIPAGE-2 (Epidemiologic Study on Small-for-Gestational-Age Children-Follow-up at Five and a Half Years) cohort, a nationwide prospective population-based cohort study conducted at 63 neonatal intensive care units in France, a propensity score-matched analysis was performed comparing infants born at less than 30 weeks' gestation who had high amino acid intake (3.51-4.50 g/kg/d) at 7 days after birth with infants who did not. Participants were recruited between April 1 and December 31, 2011, and followed up from September 1, 2016, to December 31, 2017. Full-scale IQ (FSIQ) was assessed at age 5 years. A confirmatory analysis used neonatal intensive care unit preference for high early amino acid intake as an instrumental variable to account for unmeasured confounding. Statistical analysis was performed from January 15 to May 15, 2021. Exposures: Amino acid intake at 7 days after birth. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was an FSIQ score greater than -1 SD (ie, ≥93 points) at age 5 years. A complementary analysis was performed to explore the association between amino acid intake at day 7 as a continuous variable and FSIQ score at age 5 years. Data from cerebral magnetic resonance imaging at term were available for a subgroup of preterm infants who participated in the EPIRMEX (Cerebral Abnormalities Detected by MRI, Realized at the Age of Term and the Emergence of Executive Functions) ancillary study. Results: Among 1789 preterm infants (929 boys [51.9%]; mean [SD] gestational age, 27.17 [1.50] weeks) with data available to determine exposure to amino acid intake of 3.51 to 4.50 g/kg/d at 7 days after birth, 938 infants were exposed, and 851 infants were not; 717 infants from each group could be paired. The primary outcome was known in 396 of 646 exposed infants and 379 of 644 nonexposed infants who were alive at age 5 years and was observed more frequently among exposed vs nonexposed infants (243 infants [61.4%] vs 206 infants [54.4%], respectively; odds ratio [OR], 1.33 [95% CI, 1.00-1.71]; absolute risk increase in events [ie, the likelihood of having an FSIQ score >-1 SD at age 5 years] per 100 infants, 7.01 [95% CI, 0.06-13.87]; P = .048). In the matched cohort, correlation was found between amino acid intake per 1.00 g/kg/d at day 7 and FSIQ score at age 5 years (n = 775; ß = 2.43 per 1-point increase in FSIQ; 95% CI, 0.27-4.59; P = .03), white matter area (n = 134; ß = 144 per mm2; 95% CI, 3-285 per mm2; P = .045), anisotropy of the corpus callosum (n = 50; ß = 0.018; 95% CI, 0.016-0.021; P < .001), left superior longitudinal fasciculus (n = 42; ß = 0.018; 95% CI, 0.010-0.025; P < .001), and right superior longitudinal fasciculus (n = 42; ß = 0.014 [95% CI, 0.005-0.024; P = .003) based on magnetic resonance imaging at term. Confirmatory and sensitivity analyses confirmed these results. For example, the adjusted OR for the association between the exposure and the primary outcome was 1.30 (95% CI, 1.16-1.46) using the instrumental variable approach among 978 participants in the overall cohort, and the adjusted OR was 1.35 (95% CI, 1.05-1.75) using multiple imputations among 1290 participants in the matched cohort. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study, high amino acid intake at 7 days after birth was associated with an increased likelihood of an FSIQ score greater than -1 SD at age 5 years. Well-designed randomized studies with long-term follow-up are needed to confirm the benefit of this nutritional approach.

Association of Continuous Opioids and/or Midazolam During Early Mechanical Ventilation with Survival and Sensorimotor Outcomes at Age 2 Years in Premature Infants: Results from the French Prospective National EPIPAGE 2 Cohort.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the association of early continuous infusions of opioids and/or midazolam with survival and sensorimotor outcomes at age 2 years in very premature infants who were ventilated. STUDY DESIGN: This national observational study included premature infants born before 32 weeks of gestation intubated within 1 hour after birth and still intubated at 24 hours from the French EPIPAGE 2 cohort. Infants only treated with bolus were excluded. Treated infants received continuous opioid and/or midazolam infusion started before 7 days of life and before the first extubation. Naive infants did not receive these treatments before the first extubation, or received them after the first week of life, or never received them. This study compared treated (n = 450) vs naive (n = 472) infants by using inverse probability of treatment weighting after multiple imputation in chained equations. The primary outcomes were survival and survival without moderate or severe neuromotor or sensory impairment at age 2 years. RESULTS: Survival at age 2 years was significantly higher in the treated group (92.5% vs 87.9%, risk difference, 4.7%; 95% CI, 0.3-9.1; P = .037), but treated and naive infants did not significantly differ for survival without moderate or severe neuromotor or sensory impairment (86.6% vs 81.3%; risk difference, 5.3%; 95% CI -0.3 to 11.0; P = .063). These results were confirmed by sensitivity analyses using 5 alternative models. CONCLUSIONS: Continuous opioid and/or midazolam infusions in very premature infants during initial mechanical ventilation that continued past 24 hours of life were associated with improved survival without any difference in moderate or severe sensorimotor impairments at age 2 years.

Premedication practices for neonatal tracheal intubation: Results from the EPIPPAIN 2 prospective cohort study and comparison with EPIPPAIN 1.

To describe the frequency and nature of premedication practices for neonatal tracheal intubation (TI) in 2011; to identify independent risk factors for the absence of premedication; to compare data with those from 2005 and to confront observed practices with current recommendations. Data concerning TI performed in neonates during the first 14 days of their admission to participating neonatal/pediatric intensive care units were prospectively collected at the bedside. This study was part of the Epidemiology of Procedural Pain in Neonates study (EPIPPAIN 2) conducted in 16 tertiary care units in the region of Paris, France, in 2011. Multivariate analysis was used to identify factors associated with premedication use and multilevel analysis to identify center effect. Results were compared with those of the EPIPPAIN 1 study, conducted in 2005 with a similar design, and to a current guidance for the clinician for this procedure. One hundred and twenty-one intubations carried out in 121 patients were analyzed. The specific premedication rate was 47% and drugs used included mainly propofol (26%), sufentanil (24%), and ketamine (12%). Three factors were associated with the use of a specific premedication: nonemergent TI (Odds ratio (OR) [95% CI]: 5.3 [1.49-20.80]), existence of a specific written protocol in the ward (OR [95% CI]:4.80 [2.12-11.57]), and the absence of a nonspecific concurrent analgesia infusion before TI (OR [95% CI]: 3.41 [1.46-8.45]). No center effect was observed. The specific premedication rate was lower than the 56% rate observed in 2005. The drugs used were more homogenous and consistent with the current recommendations than in 2005, especially in centers with a specific written protocol. Premedication use prior to neonatal TI was low, even for nonemergent procedures. Scientific consensus, implementation of international or national recommendations, and local written protocols are urgently needed to improve premedication practices for neonatal intubation.

Trust and consent: a prospective study on parents' perspective during a neonatal trial.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to describe how parents and physicians experienced the informed consent interview and to investigate the aspects of the relationship that influenced parents' decision during the consent process for a randomised clinical trial in a tertiary neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). The secondary objective was to describe the perspectives of parents and physicians in the specific situation of prenatal informed consent. SETTING: Single centre study in NICU of the Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal de Créteil, France, using a convenience period from February to May 2016. DESIGN: Ancillary study to a randomised clinical trial: Prettineo. Records of interviews for consent. POPULATION: parents and physicians. Mixed study including qualitative and quantitative interview data about participants' recall and feelings about the consent process. Interviews were reviewed using thematic discourse analysis. RESULTS: Parents' recall and understanding of the study's main goal and design was good. Parents and physicians had a positive experience, and trust was one of the main reasons for parents to consent. Misunderstanding (bad comprehension) was the main reason for refusal.Before birth, three situations can compromise parents' consent: the mother already consented to participate in other studies, the absence of the father during the interview and the feeling that the baby's birth is not an imminent possibility. CONCLUSIONS: Confronting parents and physicians' perspectives in research can help us reach answers to sensitive issues such as content and timing of information. Each different types of study raises different ethical dilemmas for consent that might be discussed in a more individual way.

Neurodevelopmental Outcomes after Premedication with Atropine/Propofol vs Atropine/Atracurium/Sufentanil for Neonatal Intubation: 2-Year Follow-Up of a Randomized Clinical Trial.

This study followed 173 newborn infants in the PREmedication Trial for Tracheal Intubation of the NEOnate multicenter, double-blind, randomized controlled trial of atropine-propofol vs atropine-atracurium-sufentanil for premedication before nonemergency intubation. At 2 years of corrected age, there was no significant difference between the groups in death or risk of neurodevelopmental delay assessed with the Ages and Stages Questionnaire. Trial registration Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT01490580.

Effect of Early Targeted Treatment of Ductus Arteriosus with Ibuprofen on Survival Without Cerebral Palsy at 2 Years in Infants with Extreme Prematurity: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the effects of early echocardiography-targeted ibuprofen treatment of large patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) on survival without cerebral palsy at 24 months of corrected age. STUDY DESIGN: We enrolled infants born at <28 weeks of gestation with a large PDA on echocardiography at 6-12 hours after birth to ibuprofen or placebo by 12 hours of age in a multicenter, double blind, randomized-controlled trial. Open-label ibuprofen was allowed for prespecified criteria of a hemodynamically significant PDA. The primary outcome was survival without cerebral palsy at 24 months of corrected age. RESULTS: Among 337 enrolled infants, 109 had a small or closed ductus and constituted a reference group; 228 had a large PDA and were randomized. The primary outcome was assessed at 2 years in 108 of 114 (94.7%) and 102 of 114 (89.5%) patients allocated to ibuprofen or placebo, respectively. Survival without cerebral palsy occurred in 77 of 108 (71.3%) after ibuprofen, 73 of 102 (71.6%) after placebo (adjusted relative risk 0.98, 95% CI 0.83-1.16, P = .83), and 77 of 101 (76.2%) in reference group. Infants treated with ibuprofen had a lower incidence of PDA at day 3. Severe pulmonary hemorrhage during the first 3 days occurred in 2 of 114 (1.8%) infants treated with ibuprofen and 9 of 114 (7.9%) infants treated with placebo (adjusted relative risk 0.22, 95% CI 0.05-1.00, P = .05). Open-label rescue treatment with ibuprofen occurred in 62.3% of infants treated with placebo and 17.5% of infants treated with ibuprofen (P < .001), at a median (IQR) age of 4 (3, 5) and 4 (4, 12) days, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Early echocardiography-targeted ibuprofen treatment of a large PDA did not change the rate of survival without cerebral palsy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Eudract 2011-003063-30 and ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01630278.

Propofol versus placebo (with rescue with ketamine) before less invasive surfactant administration: study protocol for a multicenter, double-blind, placebo controlled trial (PROLISA).

BACKGROUND: One major limitation for less invasive surfactant administration (LISA) is the difficulty in providing sedation before this procedure and the competitive risk of respiratory depression versus avoidance of intubation for most sedative or analgesic drugs used in this context. The objective of this study is to compare the need for mechanical ventilation within 72 h of life following premedication with propofol, versus placebo (rescue with ketamine), for the LISA procedure in preterm neonates born before 32 weeks gestational age (wGA). METHODS: ProLISA is a phase III, non-inferiority, multicenter, double blind, randomized, placebo controlled trial designed according to the SPIRIT Statement. Neonates born before 32 wGA in 12 geographically dispersed Neonatal Intensive Care Units in France needing surfactant will be included from September 2019 to September 2022. A sample of 542 patients is needed. The neonate is randomized to the intervention (propofol) or control placebo group. Open label rescue treatment with ketamine is possible in both groups if FANS (Faceless Acute Neonatal pain Scale) is ≥6. To guide drug administration, FANS is scored before attempting laryngoscopy. Once an adequate score has been obtained, LISA is performed according to a standardized protocol. The primary outcome is the need for mechanical ventilation within 72 h of life. Secondary outcomes are tolerance of the procedure, pain evaluation, hemodynamic and neurologic parameters after the intervention, morbidities before discharge and neurodevelopmental assessment at 2 years of age. DISCUSSION: This paper describes the first multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial on this topic and will provide crucial information to support implementation of the LISA procedure. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04016246. Registered 06 June 2019, N°EUDRACT: 2018-002876-41.

Perceived maternal information on premature infant's pain during hospitalization: the French EPIPAGE-2 national cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Parents of preterm neonates wish greater involvement in pain management; little is known about factors associated with this involvement. We aim to describe perceived maternal information on infants' pain during hospitalization (PMIP), to study associations between PMIP and mothers' attitudes during painful procedures, and to identify individual and contextual factors associated with PMIP. METHODS: Analyses of questionnaires from the French national cohort study of preterm neonates, EPIPAGE-2. PMIP was derived from mothers' answers to questions about information perceived on both pain assessment and management. RESULTS: Among 3056 eligible neonates born before 32 weeks, 1974, with available maternal reports, were included in the study. PMIP was classified as "sufficient," "little, not sufficient," or "insufficient, or none" for 22.7, 45.9, and 31.3% of neonates, respectively. Mothers reporting PMIP as "sufficient" were more frequently present and more likely comforting their child during painful procedures. Factors independently associated with "sufficient" PMIP were high maternal education, gestational age <29 weeks, daily maternal visits, perception of high team support, and implementation of the neonatal and individualized developmental care and assessment program. CONCLUSION: Perceived maternal information on premature infants' pain reported as sufficient increased maternal involvement during painful procedures and was associated with some units' policies.