Hepatitis A virus subgenotypes in Latvia, 2008-2021.

BACKGROUND: In Latvia outbreaks of the HAV were observed between 2008 and early 2010 and again in 2017-2018. However, the risks of introducing and spreading infection still exist, as the virus spreads easily when personal hygiene is not followed. METHODS: To determine the spread of HAV subgenotypes in the territory of Latvia the VP1/P2A genomic region of HAV was amplified and sequenced for 259 case serum samples. The study carried out a molecular biological investigation and molecular epidemiological investigation. Demographic data (sex, age), disease data (hepatitis symptoms, hospitalization, vaccination) and epidemiology data (part of the outbreak, possible source of infection, recent travel) were collected. Based on the obtained sequences, the phylogenetic tree was built and analyzed for the homology and belonging to different isolated HAV clusters from other countries. RESULTS: From the obtained data, it was concluded that HAV subgenotype IA had 13 clusters and 12 sporadic cases, HAV subgenotype IB had eight clusters and 11 sporadic cases, HAV subgenotype IIIA had one cluster and nine sporadic cases. It was found that the sources of infection among the investigated cases were different, they were mostly associated with contact with a patient with HAV, travel, as well as between persons who inject drugs and men who have sex with men, and the prevalence of HAV similar sequences was observed in different years. It was concluded that patients with HAV subgenotype IA had the longest hospitalization duration and averaged 9.3 days, while patients with subgenotype IB - 7.3 days, subgenotype IIIA - 7.7 days. Analyzing the data on vaccination, it was found that mostly all were not vaccinated or had an unknown vaccination status. CONCLUSIONS: All of this has led to the conclusion that the application of molecular biological methods of the HAV and a careful analysis of epidemiological data can help to better understand the ways of spreading the infection, investigate local outbreaks, detect cases of imported infection and track the recirculation of the virus.

HIV drug resistance tendencies in Latvia.

The treatment of HIV infection in Latvia by using highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) was started in 1996. The prevalence and tendencies of HIV drug resistance among treated and treatment-naive patients in Latvia in the years 2006-2007 were evaluated in this study. Data of HIV genotyping, performed in 132 HIV-1 infected during years 2006-2007 by TRUGENE HIV-1 genotyping assay (BayerHealthCare-diagnostics) are included in the study. Analysis of data showed that in the group of treatment-naive individuals majority carried wild type virus. Prevalence of resistance-associated mutations (RAMs) in the treatment-naive group according to IAS list was 28%. In most cases it was NRTI mutation A62V that is associated with multinucleoside resistance caused by Q151M, its effect in the absence of Q151M is not known. By many authors A62V is supposed to be a result of polymorphism in RT gene and is excluded from the list of resistance mutations. High prevalence of A62V is typical for HIV-1 subtype A. As majority of treatment-naive cases (89%) in this study were with HIV-1 subtypes A or AE, we excluded A62V mutation and estimated RAMs prevalence in group of treatment-naive HIV-infected individuals as 7%. Minor PI mutations were not included in analyses. In Europe published rates generally very between 5% and 15%. In the group of treatment-experienced HIV infected people 25/75 were with HIV-1 subtype B, the rest part--with non-B subtypes: A/AE (35/75), CRF-01AE (7/75), B/AE (4/75) and others. In treatment-experienced patients RAMs prevalence was estimated as 58.6%. Most frequently RAMs were found for nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTI) (49.3%) followed by non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTI) (22.6%) and protease inhibitors (PI) (16%). In the group of NRTI mutations M184V (26/75; 34.6%), A62V (12/75; 16.0%) and T215Y (8/75; 10.6%), in NNRTI mutations K103N (10/75; 13.3%), G190S (6/75; 8.0%), in PI group mutations L90M (6/75; 8.0%) and M461/L (6/75; 8.0%) occurred most frequently. The following drug susceptibility was predicted according to the Trugen expert interpretations: in 33/75 (44%) patients no evidence of resistance, in 21/75 (28%) patients resistance to 1 drug class (NRTI--16/75, NNRTI--4/75, PI--1/75), in 17 patients (22.6%) resistance to 2 drug classes (NRTI+NNRTI--9/75, NRTI+PI--7/75, NNRTI+PI--1/75) and in 3/75 (4%) patients resistance to all 3 classes of drugs (NRTI+NNRTI+PI). We conclude, that prevalence of RAMs in treatment-naive HIV infected persons in Latvia is comparable with prevalence in Europe. The origin of predominated mutation A62V associated with NRTI at present is not clear. In more than half of treated HIV infected patients HIV resistance to at least one HAART class was predicted.