RESUMEN
Macroenzymes, formed by polymerization of physiological enzymes with immunoglobulins, have slower renal clearance rates due to their higher molecular mass. They are usually incidentally detected, have no pathophysiological importance, and can potentially lead to over-treatment and iatrogenic morbidity. We present, possibly for the first time, a macro-lipasemia variant of macroenzyme, detected in a 14-year-old girl with type-1 diabetes admitted with severe hyperglycaemia and pain abdomen. Raised lipase levels (414 U/L), initially raised the suspicion of underlying pancreatitis, which was ruled out by the clinical symptoms and normal ultrasound and CT imaging of the pancreas. Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy revealed pangastritis, which could explain the mild upper abdominal pain in the child. She improved with proton pump inhibitor therapy and was discharged after 5 days of hospital admission after good glycaemic control using multiple subcutaneous injections of insulin. Post-polyethylene glycol (PEG) precipitation, the recovery of lipase activity in PEG treated serum sample was 30.6% (127 U/L), which confirmed the presence of macrolipase. An increased clinical suspicion and performing a cheap reliable test (PEG precipitation), whenever there is clinical biochemical discordance can help us in diagnosing more patients with macroenzymes and macrolipasemia.
Asunto(s)
Lipasa , Humanos , Femenino , Adolescente , Lipasa/sangre , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/tratamiento farmacológico , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/diagnóstico , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/sangreRESUMEN
No meta-analysis has holistically analysed and summarized the efficacy and safety of osilodrostat, a novel dual 11ß-hydroxylase (cytochrome P450 family 11 subfamily B member 1 [CYP11B1]) and 18-hydroxylase (aldosterone synthase, CYP11B2) inhibitor in managing Cushing's syndrome (CS). We undertook this meta-analysis to address this knowledge gap. Electronic databases were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving patients with CS receiving osilodrostat in the intervention arm. The primary outcome was to evaluate changes in urine free cortisol (UFC) levels. Secondary outcomes were to evaluate alterations in cortisol levels, androgen levels, mineralocorticoid levels, and adverse events. From initially screened 109 articles, data from 2 RCTs involving 144 patients was analysed. After 8-12 weeks of therapy, the odds of achieving a normal 24-hour UFC was higher in patients receiving oslidrostat as compared to placebo. [odds ratio (OR) 21.94 (95% CI: 8.53-56.43); P < 0.00001; I2 = 0%]. The occurrence of adverse events [OR 1.35 (95% CI: 0.52-3.53); P = 0.54; I2 = 0%; low heterogeneity (LH); High certainty of evidence (HCE)], serious adverse events (SAEs) [OR 1.32 (95% CI: 0.30-5.79); P = 0.72; I2 = 0%; LH; HCE], adrenal insufficiency [OR 5.38 (95% CI: 0.91-31.78); P = 0.06; I2 = 0%; LH; HCE], headache [OR 0.98 (95% CI: 0.35-2.76); P = 0.97; I2 = 0%; LH; HCE], hyperandrogenism [OR 3.68 (95% CI: 0.59-22.80); P = 0.16; I2 = 0%; LH; HCE] and deaths [OR 0.32 (95% CI: 0.01-8.00); P = 0.48; I2 = 0%; LH; HCE] was comparable among the groups. The occurrence of nausea [OR 4.25 (95% CI: 1.26-14.30); P = 0.02; I2 = 0%; LH] and arthralgia [OR 6.54 (95% CI: 1.64-26.13); P = 0.008; I2 = 0%; LH; HCE] was significantly higher in the osilodrostat group as compared to placebo. Osilodrostat has good efficacy and safety in CS and was well tolerated over 48 weeks of use.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: No comprehensive meta-analysis has examined and consolidated the effectiveness and safety of anagliptin in treating type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D). To bridge this knowledge gap, we undertook this meta-analysis. METHODS: Randomized controlled trials involving patients with T2D receiving anagliptin were sought after through electronic databases. The control arm consisted of either an active comparator (active control group [ACG]) or a placebo (passive control group [PCG]). The primary outcome was glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), with secondary outcomes including fasting plasma glucose (FPG) and lipid profiles and adverse events. RESULTS: From the 226 articles first examined, 10 randomized controlled trials with 970 participants were analyzed. Reductions in HbA1c (mean difference [MD]: -0.03%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.14 to 0.14, Pâ =â .51, I2 = 9%) and FPG (MD: 0.03 mmol/L, 95% CI: -0.30 to 0.35, Pâ =â .87, I2 = 42%) were similar in the anagliptin group and ACG. Anagliptin reduced FPG better than placebo (MD: -1.25 mmol/L, 95% CI: -1.87 to -0.64, Pâ <â .0001, I2 = 0%). Sufficient data were unavailable to analyze the HbA1c lowering with anagliptin versus placebo. Among the lipid parameters, changes in total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, apolipoprotein B48, and apolipoprotein B100 were identical between the anagliptin and control groups (PCG and ACG). Anagliptin was better than ACG at lowering low-density lipoprotein cholesterol but not as good at lowering triglyceride. Adverse events were infrequent and similar in the anagliptin and control groups (PCG and ACG). CONCLUSION: Anagliptin positively affects glucose control and is safe for managing T2D. Its low-density lipoprotein cholesterol-lowering effect warrants further investigation.
Asunto(s)
Glucemia , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 , Inhibidores de la Dipeptidil-Peptidasa IV , Hemoglobina Glucada , Pirimidinas , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/tratamiento farmacológico , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/sangre , Humanos , Inhibidores de la Dipeptidil-Peptidasa IV/uso terapéutico , Pirimidinas/uso terapéutico , Hemoglobina Glucada/efectos de los fármacos , Hemoglobina Glucada/análisis , Glucemia/efectos de los fármacos , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Lípidos/sangreRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: No meta-analysis has holistically analyzed and summarized the therapeutic efficacy and safety of albiglutide in type 2 diabetes (T2D). This meta-analysis addresses this knowledge gap. METHODS: Randomized controlled trials involving patients with T2D receiving albiglutide in the intervention arm and either a placebo or an active comparator in the control arm were searched through electronic databases. The primary outcome was the change from baseline (CFB) in glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c); secondary outcomes included CFB in fasting plasma glucose, body weight, and adverse events (AE). RESULTS: From 443 initially screened articles, data from 12 randomized controlled trials involving 6423 subjects were analyzed. Albiglutide, at both doses, outperformed placebo in terms of HbA1c reductions (for albiglutide 30 mg: mean differences -1.04%, 95% confidence interval [CI] [-1.37--0.72], Pâ <â .00001, I2â =â 89%; and for albiglutide 50 mg: mean differences -1.10%, 95% CI [-1.45--0.75], Pâ <â .00001, I2â =â 90%). Higher proportions of subjects achieved HbA1câ <â 7% in the albiglutide arm than in placebo (for albiglutide 30 mg: odds ratio 6.26, 95% CI [2.50-15.70], Pâ <â .0001, I2â =â 82%; and for albiglutide 50 mg: odds ratio 5.57, 95% CI [2.25-13.80], Pâ =â .0002, I2â =â 84%). Albiglutide had glycemic efficacy comparable to other glucose-lowering drugs. CFB in body weight was similar with albiglutide and placebo. AE profile, including gastrointestinal AE, was identical with albiglutide and placebo, except for higher drug-related AE and injection-site reaction with albiglutide. CONCLUSION: Albiglutide provides reassuring data on good glycemic efficacy, tolerability, and safety over an extended period of clinical use in patients with T2D. Albiglutide 30 mg has comparable efficacy and safety profiles to albiglutide 50 mg.
Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 , Péptido 1 Similar al Glucagón , Receptor del Péptido 1 Similar al Glucagón , Hipoglucemiantes , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Humanos , Glucemia/efectos de los fármacos , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/tratamiento farmacológico , Péptido 1 Similar al Glucagón/análogos & derivados , Péptido 1 Similar al Glucagón/administración & dosificación , Péptido 1 Similar al Glucagón/uso terapéutico , Receptor del Péptido 1 Similar al Glucagón/agonistas , Hemoglobina Glucada/efectos de los fármacos , Hipoglucemiantes/uso terapéutico , Hipoglucemiantes/administración & dosificación , Hipoglucemiantes/efectos adversos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Flibanserin, approved for the treatment of hypoactive sexual desire disorder (HSDD) in females, has demonstrated diverse therapeutic and adverse effect (AE) prospects in the extant randomized controlled trials (RCTs). This meta-analysis aimed to characterize the outcomes of flibanserin use in these patients comprehensively. METHODS: RCTs involving women with HSDD receiving flibanserin in the intervention arm and placebo in the control arm were sought after throughout the electronic databases. The primary outcomes were the changes from baseline in satisfying sexual events (SSE) per month and sexual desire score per month measured using an electronic diary (eDiary). RESULTS: From 478 initially screened articles, data from 8 RCTs involving 7906 women with HSDD were analyzed. In premenopausal women, flibanserin 100 mg was superior to placebo in improving the number of SSE per month (mean difference, MD 0.69, 95% CI [0.39, 0.99]), eDiary sexual desire score (MD 1.71, 95% CI [0.43, 2.98]), Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) desire domain (FSFI-d) score (MD 0.30, 95% CI [0.29, 0.31]), FSFI total score (MD 2.51, 95% CI [1.47, 3.55]), Female Sexual Distress Scale-Revised (FSDS-R) Item 13 score (MD -0.30, 95% CI [-0.31, -0.29]), and FSDS-R total score (MD -3.30, 95% CI [-3.37, -3.23]). Compared to placebo, a higher number of premenopausal women using flibanserin 100 mg achieved improvements in the Patient's Global Impression of Improvement score (OR 1.93, 95% CI [1.58, 2.36], Pâ <â .00001) and responded positively at Patient Benefit Evaluation (PBE) (odds ratio, OR 1.76, 95% CI [1.34, 2.31], Pâ <â .0001). Postmenopausal women receiving flibanserin 100 mg also benefited in terms of the number of SSE per month, FSFI-d and total scores, FSDS-R Item 13 and total scores, and PBE response. Although flibanserin use was associated with higher risks of dizziness, fatigue, nausea, somnolence, and insomnia, these adverse events were mild in nature; the serious AEs and severe AEs were comparable between the flibanserin and placebo groups. CONCLUSION: While flibanserin has demonstrated efficacy in the treatment of HSDD in both pre- and postmenopausal women, its therapeutic advantages may be overshadowed by the higher likelihood of AEs.
Asunto(s)
Bencimidazoles , Disfunciones Sexuales Psicológicas , Femenino , Humanos , Bencimidazoles/uso terapéutico , Bencimidazoles/efectos adversos , Libido/efectos de los fármacos , Premenopausia , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Disfunciones Sexuales Psicológicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Data are scant on the impact of metformin use in gestational diabetes mellitus/diabetes in pregnancy on long-term outcomes in children and mothers beyond 5 years of childbirth. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the long-term impact of metformin use in pregnancy on children and their mothers. METHODS: Electronic databases were searched for studies evaluating metformin compared with insulin for managing gestational diabetes mellitus/diabetes in pregnancy. The primary outcome was the change in body mass index (BMI) in children at the ages of 5 to 11 years. The secondary outcomes were alterations in other anthropometric measures, obesity, and changes in the levels of lipids and adipocytokines in children and mothers. RESULTS: Children at the age of 9 years born to mothers who were treated with metformin during pregnancy had similar BMI (mean difference [MD], 1.09 kg/m2 [95% confidence interval {CI}, -0.44 to 2.62]; P = .16; I2 = 16%), waist circumference-to-height ratio (MD, 0.13 [95% CI, -0.05 to 0.30]; P = .16; I2 = 94%), dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) total fat mass (MD, 0.68 kg [95% CI, -2.39 to 3.79]; P = .66; I2 = 70%), DXA total fat percent (MD, 0.04% [95% CI, -3.44 to 3.51]; P = .98; I2 = 56%), DXA total fat-free mass (MD, 0.81 kg [95% CI, -0.96 to 2.58]; P = .37; I2 = 55%), magnetic resonance imaging visceral adipose tissue volume (MD, 80.97 cm3 [95% CI, -136.47 to 298.41]; P = .47; I2 = 78%), and magnetic resonance spectroscopy liver fat percentage (MD, 0.27% [95% CI, -1.26 to 1.79]; P = .73; I2 = 0%) to those born to mothers who were treated with insulin. Serum adiponectin, leptin, alanine aminotransferase, and ferritin were comparable among groups. In children between the ages of 9 and 11 years, the occurrence of obesity, diabetes, or challenges in motor and social development were comparable between the 2 groups. After 9 years of childbirth, BMI and the risk of developing diabetes were similar between the 2 groups of women. CONCLUSION: Metformin use in pregnancy did not show any adverse effects compared with insulin on long-term outcomes in children and their mothers.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The implication of intermediately elevated fasting plasma glucose (FPG) in the first trimester of pregnancy is uncertain. PURPOSE: The primary outcome of the meta-analysis was to analyze if intermediately elevated first-trimester FPG could predict development of GDM at 24-28 weeks. The secondary outcomes were to determine if the commonly used FPG cut-offs 5.1 mmol/L (92 mg/dL), 5.6 mmol/L (100 mg/dL), and 6.1 mmol/L (110 mg/dL) correlated with adverse pregnancy events. DATA SOURCES: Databases were searched for articles published from 2010 onwards for studies examining the relationship between first-trimester FPG and adverse fetomaternal outcomes. STUDY SELECTION: A total of sixteen studies involving 115,899 pregnancies satisfied the inclusion criteria. DATA EXTRACTION AND DATA SYNTHESIS: Women who developed GDM had a significantly higher first-trimester FPG than those who did not [MD 0.29 mmoL/l (5 mg/dL); 95 % CI: 0.21-0.38; P < 0.00001]. First-trimester FPG ≥5.1 mmol/L (92 mg/dL) predicted the development of GDM at 24-28 weeks [RR 3.93 (95 % CI: 2.67-5.77); P < 0.0000], pre-eclampsia [RR 1.55 (95%CI:1.14-2.12); P = 0.006], gestational hypertension [RR1.47 (95%CI:1.20-1.79); P = 0.0001], large-for-gestational-age (LGA) [RR 1.32 (95%CI:1.13-1.54); P = 0.0004], and macrosomia [RR1.29 (95%CI:1.15-1.44); P < 0.001]. However, at the above threshold, the rates of preterm delivery, lower-segment cesarean section (LSCS), small-for gestational age (SGA), and neonatal hypoglycemia were not significantly higher. First-trimester FPG ≥5.6 mmol/L (100 mg/dL) correlated with occurrence of macrosomia [RR1.47 (95 % CI:1.22-1.79); P < 0.0001], LGA [RR 1.43 (95%CI:1.24-1.65); P < 0.00001], and preterm delivery [RR1.51 (95%CI:1.15-1.98); P = 0.003], but not SGA and LSCS. LIMITATIONS: Only one study reported outcomes at first-trimester FPG of 6.1 mmol/L (110 mg/dL), and hence was not analyzed. CONCLUSION: The risk of development of GDM at 24-28 weeks increased linearly with higher first-trimester FPG. First trimester FPG cut-offs of 5.1 mmol/L (92 mg/dL) and 5.6 mmol/L (100 mg/dL) predicted several adverse pregnancy outcomes.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Resmetirom, a liver-directed, thyroid hormone receptor beta-selective agonist, has recently been approved to treat nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). This meta-analysis aimed to summarize the efficiency and safety of resmetirom in treating NASH. METHODS: Electronic databases were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of resmetirom vs placebo in patients with NASH. The primary outcomes were the changes from baseline in hepatic fat content, liver histology, including NASH resolution, and noninvasive markers of hepatic fibrosis. RESULTS: Three randomized controlled trials (n = 2231) met the inclusion criteria. Compared to placebo, resmetirom achieved greater reductions from baseline in hepatic fat content assessed by magnetic resonance imaging proton density fat fraction (for resmetirom 80 mg: MD -27.76% [95%CI: -32.84, -22.69]; for resmetirom 100 mg: MD -36.01% [95%CI: -41.54, -30.48]; P < .00001 for both) and FibroScan controlled attenuation parameter (for resmetirom 80 mg: MD -21.45 dBm [95%CI: -29.37, -13.52]; for resmetirom 100 mg: MD -25.51 dBm [95%CI: -33.53, -17.49]; P < .00001 for both). Resmetirom 80 mg outperformed placebo in NASH resolution and ≥2-point nonalcoholic fatty liver disease activity score reduction. Moreover, resmetirom 80 mg and 100 mg were superior to placebo in cytokeratin-18 (M30) reduction. Greater reductions in liver enzymes, lipids, and reverse triiodothyronine were observed in the resmetirom arms with no impact on triiodothyronine. Nausea and diarrhea were more common with resmetirom than with placebo; other adverse events were comparable. CONCLUSION: Resmetirom improves hepatic fat content, liver enzymes, and fibrosis biomarkers in NASH patients. Resmetirom generally does not affect thyroid function and is well-tolerated.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedad del Hígado Graso no Alcohólico , Receptores beta de Hormona Tiroidea , Humanos , Enfermedad del Hígado Graso no Alcohólico/tratamiento farmacológico , Receptores beta de Hormona Tiroidea/agonistas , Hígado/efectos de los fármacos , Hígado/diagnóstico por imagen , Hígado/patología , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Piridazinas , Uracilo/análogos & derivadosRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Preclinical and animal studies have suggested that excess catecholamines can lead to bone mineral loss. However, to date, no systematic review is available that has analyzed the impact of catecholamine excess in the context of pheochromocytoma/paraganglioma (PPGL) on bone metabolism. We conducted this meta-analysis to address this knowledge gap. METHODS: Electronic databases were searched for studies evaluating bone metabolism, including assessments of bone mineral density (BMD), quantitative computed tomography (qCT), trabecular bone score (TBS), or bone turnover markers in patients with PPGL. These markers included those of bone resorption, such as tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase 5b (TRACP-5b) and cross-linked C-telopeptide of type I collagen (CTx), as well as markers of bone formation, such as bone-specific alkaline phosphatase (BS ALP). RESULTS: Out of the initially screened 1614 articles, data from six studies published in four different patient cohorts with PPGL that met all criteria were analysed. Individuals with PPGL had significantly lower TBS [Mean Difference (MD) -0.04 (95% CI: -0.05--0.03); p < 0.00001; I2â¯=â¯0%], higher serum CTx [MD 0.13 ng/ml (95% CI: 0.08-0.17); p < 0.00001; I2â¯=â¯0%], and higher BS-ALP [MD 1.47 U/L (95% CI: 0.30-2.64); pâ¯=â¯0.01; I2â¯=â¯1%]. TBS at 4-7 months post-surgery was significantly higher compared to baseline [MD 0.05 (95% CI: 0.02-0.07); p < 0.0001]. A decrease in CTx has been documented post-surgery. CONCLUSION: Bone health deterioration is a major concern in patients with PPGL. In addition to providing a definitive cure for catecholamine excess, monitoring and treating osteoporosis is essential for individuals with secondary osteoporosis due to PPGL. Long-term studies on bone health outcomes in PPGL are warranted.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de las Glándulas Suprarrenales , Densidad Ósea , Remodelación Ósea , Paraganglioma , Feocromocitoma , Humanos , Neoplasias de las Glándulas Suprarrenales/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias de las Glándulas Suprarrenales/metabolismo , Feocromocitoma/diagnóstico por imagen , Feocromocitoma/metabolismo , Paraganglioma/diagnóstico por imagen , Fosfatasa Alcalina/sangre , Hueso Esponjoso/diagnóstico por imagen , Resorción Ósea/diagnóstico por imagen , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Huesos/metabolismo , Huesos/diagnóstico por imagen , Colágeno Tipo I/sangre , Fosfatasa Ácida Tartratorresistente/sangre , Fosfatasa Ácida Tartratorresistente/metabolismo , PéptidosRESUMEN
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Postprandial hyperglycemia, or elevated blood glucose after meals, is associated with the development and progression of various diabetes-related complications. Prandial insulins are designed to replicate the natural insulin release after meals and are highly effective in managing post-meal glucose spikes. Currently, different types of prandial insulins are available such as human regular insulin, rapid-acting analogs, ultra-rapid-acting analogs, and inhaled insulins. Knowledge about diverse landscape of prandial insulin will optimize glycemic management. RECENT FINDINGS: Human regular insulin, identical to insulin produced by the human pancreas, has a slower onset and extended duration, potentially leading to post-meal hyperglycemia and later hypoglycemia. In contrast, rapid-acting analogs, such as lispro, aspart, and glulisine, are new insulin types with amino acid modifications that enhance their subcutaneous absorption, resulting in a faster onset and shorter action duration. Ultra-rapid analogs, like faster aspart and ultra-rapid lispro, offer even shorter onset of action, providing better meal-time flexibility. The Technosphere insulin offers an inhaled route for prandial insulin delivery. The prandial insulins can be incorporated into basal-bolus, basal plus, or prandial-only regimens or delivered through insulin pumps. Human regular insulin, aspart, lispro, and faster aspart are recommended for management of hyperglycemia during pregnancy. Ongoing research is focused on refining prandial insulin replacement and exploring newer delivery methods. The article provides a comprehensive overview of various prandial insulin options and their clinical applications in the management of diabetes.
Asunto(s)
Hipoglucemiantes , Humanos , Hipoglucemiantes/administración & dosificación , Hipoglucemiantes/uso terapéutico , Insulina/administración & dosificación , Insulina/uso terapéutico , Periodo Posprandial , Hiperglucemia/tratamiento farmacológico , Femenino , Glucemia/efectos de los fármacos , Glucemia/análisis , Diabetes Mellitus/tratamiento farmacológico , EmbarazoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Teplizumab has emerged as a potential disease-modifying drug in type 1 diabetes (T1D). This meta-analysis sought to summarize the therapeutic effect of teplizumab in newly diagnosed patients with T1D. METHODS: Randomized controlled trials involving patients with T1D receiving teplizumab in the intervention arm and placebo (or no active intervention) in the control arm were searched throughout the electronic databases. The primary outcome was the change in area under the curve of C-peptide levels from baseline. RESULTS: Seven reports from 6 studies involving 834 subjects met the inclusion criteria. Compared to teplizumab, greater reductions in area under the curve of C-peptide from the baseline values were observed in the control group after 6 months (mean difference [MD] 0.07 nmol/L [0.01, 0.13], P = .02), after 12 months (MD 0.07 nmol/L [0.04, 0.11], P = .0001), after 18 months (MD 0.10 nmol/L [0.06, 0.14], P < .00001), and after 24 months (MD 0.07 nmol/L [0.01, 0.14], P = .03) of interventions. Moreover, fewer patients treated with teplizumab had a decreased C-peptide response after 6 months (odds ratio [OR] 0.21), after 12 months (OR 0.17), after 18 months (OR 0.30), and after 24 months (OR 0.12) of treatment. The preservation of endogenous insulin production was supported by reduced use of exogenous insulin with maintenance of comparable glycemic control for up to 18 months post-treatment. Teplizumab imparted higher risks of grade 3 or higher adverse events, adverse events leading to study medication discontinuation, nausea, rash, and lymphopenia. CONCLUSION: The results of the meta-analysis support teplizumab as a promising disease-modifying therapy for newly diagnosed T1D.
Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1 , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/tratamiento farmacológico , Humanos , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/uso terapéutico , Complejo CD3/inmunología , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Péptido C/sangreRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: A significant number of patients face the issue of weight gain (WG) or inadequate weight loss (IWL) post-bariatric surgery for obesity. Several studies have been published evaluating the role of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP1RA) for weight loss post-bariatric surgery. However, no systematic review and meta-analysis (SRM) till date has evaluated the efficacy, safety and tolerability of GLP1RA in this clinical scenario. Hence, this SRM aimed to address this knowledge gap. METHODS: Databases were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs), case-control, cohort and observational studies involving use of GLP1RA in the intervention arm post-bariatric surgery. Primary outcome was weight loss post at least 3 months of therapy. Secondary outcomes were evaluation of body composition parameters, total adverse events (TAEs) and severe adverse events (SAEs). RESULTS: From initially screened 1759 articles, 8 studies (557 individuals) were analysed. Compared to placebo, patients receiving liraglutide had significantly greater weight loss after 6-month therapy [MD - 6.0 kg (95% CI, - 8.66 to - 3.33); P < 0.001; I2 = 79%]. Compared to liraglutide, semaglutide had significantly greater percent reduction in body weight after 6-month [MD - 2.57% (95% CI, - 3.91 to - 1.23); P < 0.001; I2 = 0%] and 12-month [MD - 4.15% (95% CI, - 6.96 to - 1.34); P = 0.004] therapy. In study by Murvelashvili et al. (2023), after 12-month therapy, semaglutide had significantly higher rates of achieving > 15% [OR 2.15 (95% CI, 1.07-4.33); P = 0.03; n = 207] and > 10% [OR 2.10 (95% CI, 1.19-3.71); P = 0.01; n = 207] weight loss. A significant decrease in fat mass [MD - 4.78 kg (95% CI, - 7.11 to - 2.45); P < 0.001], lean mass [MD - 3.01 kg (95% CI, - 4.80 to - 1.22); P = 0.001] and whole-body bone mineral density [MD - 0.02 kg/m2 (95% CI, - 0.04 to - 0.00); P = 0.03] was noted with liraglutide. CONCLUSION: Current data is encouraging regarding use of GLP1RAs for managing WG or IWL post-bariatric surgery. Deterioration of bone health and muscle mass remains a concern needing further evaluation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The predefined protocol has been registered in PROSPERO having registration number of CRD42023473991.
Asunto(s)
Cirugía Bariátrica , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 , Obesidad Mórbida , Humanos , Liraglutida/farmacología , Liraglutida/uso terapéutico , Agonistas Receptor de Péptidos Similares al Glucagón , Obesidad Mórbida/cirugía , Pérdida de Peso , Hipoglucemiantes/uso terapéutico , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/tratamiento farmacológico , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/cirugíaRESUMEN
Background: Orforglipron is a novel once-daily oral non-peptide glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist with several recently published randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating its role in diabetes and obesity. No meta-analysis has analyzed the efficacy and safety of orforglipron; this meta-analysis aimed to address this knowledge gap. Methods: A systematic search was conducted in electronic databases to identify RCTs that included individuals with obesity who were administered orforglipron and compared to either a placebo or an active comparator. The primary outcome of interest was the percent change in body weight. Results: From 12 initially screened articles, data from three RCTs involving 774 people were analyzed with a follow-up duration of up to 36 weeks. Compared to placebo, patients receiving orforglipron 12 mg/day (mean difference (MD), MD -5.48%, 95% CI [-7.64, -3.33], p < 0.01), 24 mg/day (MD -8.51%, 95% confidence interval (CI) [-9.88, -7.14], p < 0.01), 36 mg/day (MD -8.84%, 95% CI [-11.68, -6.00], p < 0.01) and 45 mg/day (MD -8.24%, 95% CI [-12.84, -3.63], p < 0.01) had a significantly greater percent reduction in body weight. The percentage of patients being able to achieve >15% weight loss from baseline was significantly higher with orforglipron 24 mg/day [Odds ratio (OR) 21.90 (95% CI [4.06, 118.15], p = 0.0003), 36 mg/day (OR 17.43, 95% CI [3.18, 95.66], p = 0.001) and 45 mg/day (OR 23.17, 95% CI [4.37, 123.03], p = 0.0002). Total but not severe adverse events were significantly higher with all the doses of orforglipron compared to placebo, with the hazard ratios being higher with higher doses. Gastrointestinal side-effects were predominant side effects, being dose-dependent, with nausea, vomiting, constipation, and gastroesophageal reflux being the predominant ones. Conclusion: Orforglipron at 24-45 mg/day doses is an effective weight loss medication. The efficacy versus side effect profile suggests that 24-36 mg/day is the most optimal dose for orforglipron as an anti-obesity medicine.
RESUMEN
BACKGRUOUND: No recent meta-analysis has holistically analyzed and summarized the efficacy and safety of omarigliptin in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). We conducted a meta-analysis to address this knowledge gap. METHODS: Electronic databases were searched to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that included patients with T2DM who received omarigliptin in the intervention arm. The control arm consisted of either a placebo (passive control group [PCG]) or an active comparator (active control group [ACG]). The primary outcome assessed was changes in hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), while secondary outcomes included variations in glucose levels, achievement of glycemic targets, adverse events (AEs), and hypoglycemic events. RESULTS: From 332 initially screened articles, data from 16 RCTs involving 8,804 subjects were analyzed. Omarigliptin demonstrated superiority over placebo in reducing HbA1c levels (mean difference, -0.58%; 95% confidence interval, -0.75 to -0.40; P<0.00001; I2=91%). Additionally, omarigliptin outperformed placebo in lowering fasting plasma glucose, 2-hour postprandial glucose, and in the percentage of participants achieving HbA1c levels below 7.0% and 6.5%. The glycemic efficacy of omarigliptin was similar to that of the ACG across all measures. Although the omarigliptin group experienced a higher incidence of hypoglycemic events compared to the PCG, the overall AEs, serious AEs, hypoglycemia, and severe hypoglycemia were comparable between the omarigliptin and control groups (PCG and ACG). CONCLUSION: Omarigliptin has a favorable glycemic efficacy and safety profile for managing T2DM.
Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 , Inhibidores de la Dipeptidil-Peptidasa IV , Compuestos Heterocíclicos con 2 Anillos , Hipoglucemia , Piranos , Humanos , Inhibidores de la Dipeptidil-Peptidasa IV/efectos adversos , Hemoglobina Glucada , Glucemia/análisis , Hipoglucemiantes/efectos adversos , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/complicaciones , Hipoglucemia/inducido químicamente , Hipoglucemia/epidemiología , Dipeptidil-Peptidasas y Tripeptidil-Peptidasas/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Scant data is available on the efficacy and safety of adding ezetimibe to high-intensity statin therapy for early and rapid reduction of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) within 4-12 weeks of an acute-event in acute coronary syndrome (ACS). We undertook this meta-analysis to address this knowledge-gap. METHODS: Electronic databases were searched for RCTs involving patients with ACS receiving ezetimibe in intervention arm, and placebo/active comparator in control arm. Primary outcome was to evaluate changes in LDL-C levels post-ACS. Secondary outcomes were to evaluate alterations in other lipid parameters and adverse events. RESULTS: From initially screened 4561 articles, data from 11 studies (20,291 patients) were analyzed. Compared to controls, patients receiving ezetimibe had significantly lower LDL-C at 7-days [MD -19.55 mg/dl(95 %CI:-36.46 to -2.63);P = 0.02;I2 = 91 %], 1-month [MD-24.67 mg/dl (95 %CI:-34.59 to -14.76);P < 0.001;I2 = 81 %], 3-months [MD -18.01 mg/dl(95 %CI:-24.11 to -11.90);P < 0.001;I2 = 92 %] and 10-12 months [MD -16.90 mg/dl (95 % CI: -17.67 to -16.12); P < 0.001; I2 = 0 %] of treatment. Compared to controls, patients receiving ezetimibe had significantly lower total cholesterol at 7-days [MD-21.05 mg/dl(95 %CI:-26.73 to -15.37);P < 0.001;I2 = 0 %], 1-month [MD-25.56 mg/dl(95 %CI:-38.29 to -12.83);P < 0.001;I2 = 85 %], 3-months [MD-22.54 mg/dl(95 %CI:-36.90 to -8.19);P = 0.002;I2 = 22 %] and 12-months [MD-19.68 mg/dl(95 %CI:-20.78 to -18.59);P < 0.001;I2 = 0 %] of treatment. Death from any cause, ACS and non-fatal stroke [OR0.89(95 %CI:0.83-0.96);P = 0.002;I2 = 0 %], non-fatal myocardial infarction [OR0.86(95 %CI:0.79-0.94);P = 0.001;I2 = 0 %] and ischemic stroke [OR0.80(95 %CI:0.68-0.94);P = 0.009;I2 = 0 %] was significantly reduced in patients receiving ezetimibe. CONCLUSION: Addition of ezetimibe to high-intensity statin therapy at the time of ACS event is associated with significantly better cholesterol reduction at day-7,1-month, 3- months and 1-year of follow-up, which translates into a significantly lower recurrent cardiovascular events post an index event of ACS. CONCISE SUMMARY OF FINDINGS: Addition of ezetimibe to high-intensity statin therapy at the time of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) index event is associated with significantly better low density lipoprotein cholesterol and total cholesterol reduction at day-7, 1-month, 3-months and 1-year of follow-up, which translates into a significantly lower recurrent cardiovascular events (death from any cause, major ACS, non-fatal stroke, non-fatal myocardial infarction, and ischemic stroke) post an index event of ACS.
Asunto(s)
Síndrome Coronario Agudo , Anticolesterolemiantes , LDL-Colesterol , Ezetimiba , Humanos , Síndrome Coronario Agudo/tratamiento farmacológico , Síndrome Coronario Agudo/sangre , Ezetimiba/uso terapéutico , Anticolesterolemiantes/uso terapéutico , Anticolesterolemiantes/administración & dosificación , LDL-Colesterol/sangre , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Inhibidores de Hidroximetilglutaril-CoA Reductasas/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de Hidroximetilglutaril-CoA Reductasas/administración & dosificación , Quimioterapia Combinada , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Sodium glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) have been evaluated in children with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM), and several other nondiabetic conditions. Potential tolerability issues have prevented the routine use of SGLT2i in children with diabetes. However, no meta-analysis to date has evaluated the safety and tolerability of SGLT2i in children. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to address this knowledge gap. METHODS: Databases were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs), case control, and cohort studies involving children receiving SGLT2i in the intervention-arm. Primary outcome was occurrence of treatment emergent adverse events (TAEs). Secondary outcomes were evaluation of glycemic efficacy and occurrence of severe adverse events (SAEs), hypoglycemia, ketosis, genital or urinary infections, and any other adverse events. RESULTS: From the 27 articles initially screened, data from 4 RCTs (258 children) were analyzed. In children with T2DM, occurrence of TAEs (odds ratio [OR], 1.77; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.93-3.36; P=0.08; I2=0%), SAEs (OR, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.08-2.54; P=0.37; I2=0%), ketoacidosis (OR, 0.33; 95% CI, 0.01-8.37; P=0.50), urinary tract infections (OR, 2.34; 95% CI, 0.44-12.50; P=0.32; I2=0%), and severe hypoglycemia (OR, 4.47; 95% CI, 0.21-96.40; P=0.34) were comparable among the SGLTi group and placebo. Compared to placebo, T2DM children receiving SGLTi had significantly lower glycosylated hemoglobin at 24-26 weeks (mean difference [MD], -0.79%; 95% CI, -1.33 to -0.26; P=0.004; I2=0%). In T1DM children, ß-hydroxybutyrate levels were significantly higher in the SGLTi group than the placebo group (MD, 0.11 mmol/L; 95% CI, 0.05-0.17; P=0.0005; I2=53%). In T1DM, there was not a single report of an SAE, ketoacidosis, or severe hypoglycemia in either the placebo or treatment groups, but time-in-range was considerably greater in the SGLT2i group than the placebo group (68%±6% vs. 50%±13%, P<0.001). CONCLUSION: SGLT2i use in children and young adults appears to be both safe and tolerable based on our meta-analyses and review of the literature.
RESUMEN
Type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) is associated with a disproportionately high fracture rate despite a minimal decrease in bone mineral density. Though trabecular bone score (TBS), an indirect measure of bone architecture, is lower in adults with T1DM, the modest difference is unlikely to account for the large excess risk and calls for further exploration. INTRODUCTION: Fracture rates in type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) are disproportionately high compared to the modestly low bone mineral density (BMD). Distortion of bone microarchitecture compromises bone quality in T1DM and is indirectly measured by trabecular bone score (TBS). TBS could potentially be used as a screening tool for skeletal assessment; however, there are inconsistencies in the studies evaluating TBS in T1DM. We performed this meta-analysis to address this knowledge gap. METHODS: An electronic literature search was conducted using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science resources (all-year time span) to identify studies relating to TBS in T1DM. Cross-sectional and retrospective studies in adults with T1DM were included. TBS and BMD data were extracted for pooled analysis. Fracture risk could not be analyzed as there were insufficient studies reporting it. RESULT: Data from six studies were included (T1DM: n = 378 and controls: n = 286). Pooled analysis showed a significantly lower TBS [standardized mean difference (SMD) = - 0.37, 95% CI - 0.52 to - 0.21; p < 0.00001] in T1DM compared to controls. There was no difference in the lumbar spine BMD (6 studies, SMD - 0.06, 95% CI - 0.22 to 0.09; p = 0.43) and total hip BMD (6 studies, SMD - 0.17, 95% CI - 0.35 to 0.01; p = 0.06) in the case and control groups. CONCLUSIONS: Adults with T1DM have a lower TBS but similar total hip and lumbar spine BMD compared to controls. The risk attributable to the significant but limited difference in TBS falls short of explaining the large excess propensity to fragility fracture in adults with T1DM. Further studies on clarification of the mechanism and whether TBS is suited to screen for fracture risk in adults with T1DM are necessary.