Continuous and intermittent heat acclimation and decay in team sport athletes.

The aim of this study was to compare the impact of continuous (CON) and intermittent (INT) heat acclimation protocols on repeat-sprint performance, and to also assess the degree of performance decay following acclimation. Using a pair-matched, between subjects design, 16 trained male team sport athletes were allocated to either INT (8 sessions over 15 days) or CON acclimation (8 sessions over 8 days) groups. Participants performed a heat tolerance test (HTT) involving 60-min of repeat-sprint cycling with a 10-min half time break (in 35.3 ± 0.7°C, 60.1 ± 4.0%; RH) two days pre- (pre-HTT) and post-acclimation (post-HTT1). Decay was investigated with two further HTT's completed over the next two weeks (post-HTT2 and post-HTT3). Results showed the post-HTT1 performance variables [mean power (pre-HTT; INT = 1002.07 ± 173.74, CON = 1057.10 ± 180.07 / post-HTT1; INT = 1097.11 ± 186.85, CON = 1163.77 ± 184.65 W), mean power (W.kg-1), total work (kJ) and work (J.kg-1)] were greater than pre-HHT (p < 0.001) after acclimation, with no differences between INT and CON. No differences in final core and mean skin temperatures or heart rate existed after INT or CON acclimation, however 30 min measures for thermal sensation, perceived thirst and ratings of perceived exertion (as well as the final measure) were lower in post-HTT1 (p < 0.05) in CON. Performance and thermoregulatory responses in post-HTT2 and 3 were similar to post-HTT1 in both INT and CON. These results indicate that prolonged repeat-sprint exercise in the heat is improved after acclimation involving short, high-intensity cycling sessions using either CON or INT protocols, with performance well-maintained over the subsequent 2 weeks, despite removal of the heat stimulus.

Effect of caffeine on reactive agility time when fresh and fatigued.

PURPOSE: This study examined the effects of acute caffeine ingestion on agility performance and decision-making accuracy after simulated team-sport exercise. METHODS: Using a randomized, double-blinded, counterbalanced design, 10 moderately trained male team-sport athletes ingested either caffeine (6 mg·kg(-1)) or placebo (dextrose) 60 min before completing an 80-min (4 × 20 min) simulated team-game, intermittent running protocol. Interspersed between each exercise quarter was a reactive agility test (RAT) consisting of five trials where measures of total time (TT), reactive agility (RA) time, decision time (DT), movement time (MT), and decision-making accuracy were obtained. RESULTS: Although there were no significant differences between trials for TT (P = 0.54), RA time (P = 0.84), MT (P = 0.89), or DT (P = 0.91), caffeine ingestion resulted in consistently faster TT (2.3%), RA time (3.9%), MT (2.7%), and DT (9.3%) scores compared with placebo (significant main effect for condition for RA time, TT, DT, and MT; P < 0.05). These faster times were supported by qualitative analyses of "almost certain benefit" and large effect size (ES) for RA (quarter 3) and "likely" to "very likely benefits" and moderate to large ES for TT (precircuit and quarters 1, 2, and 4) and RA time (precircuit and quarters 1, 2 and 4). A "likely benefit" and moderate ES was found for MT (quarters 1 and 3), but the effect of caffeine on DT was largely "unclear," with small ES and only a "likely" chance of benefit (quarters 2 and 3). Improved decision-making accuracy (3.8%) after caffeine ingestion was supported by a "likely benefit" (quarter 1) and large ES (quarters 1 and 4). CONCLUSION: Caffeine ingestion may be beneficial to RA performance when athletes are fresh and fatigued.