The Predictive Role of Lactate in the Emergency Department in Patients with Severe Dyspnea.

Objective: An accurate identification of patients at the need for prioritized diagnostics and care are crucial in the emergency department (ED). Blood gas (BG) analysis is a widely available laboratory test, which allows to measure vital parameters, including markers of ventilation and perfusion. The aim of our analysis was to assess whether blood gas parameters in patients with dyspnea at an increased risk of respiratory failure admitted to the ED can predict short-term outcomes. Methods: The study group eventually consisted of 108 patients, with available BG analysis. The clinical and laboratory parameters were retrospectively evaluated, and three groups were distinguished-arterial blood gas (ABG), venous blood gas (VBG), and mixed blood gas. The primary endpoint was short-term, all-cause mortality during the follow-up of median (quartile 1-quartile 3) 2 (1-4) months. The independent risk factors for mortality that could be obtained from blood gas sampling were evaluated. Results: The short-term mortality was 35.2% (38/108). Patients who died were more frequently initially assigned to the red triage risk group, more burdened with comorbidities, and the median SpO2 on admission was significantly lower than in patients who survived the follow-up period. In the multivariable analysis, lactate was the strongest independent predictor of death, with 1 mmol/L increasing all-cause mortality by 58% in ABG (95% CI: 1.01-2.47), by 80% in VBG (95% CI: 1.13-2.88), and by 68% in the mixed blood gas analysis (95% CI: 1.22-2.31), what remained significant in VBG and mixed group after correction for base excess. In each group, pH, pO2, and pCO2 did not predict short-term mortality. Conclusions: In patients admitted to the ED due to dyspnea, at risk of respiratory failure, lactate levels in arterial, venous, and mixed blood samples are independent predictors of short-term mortality.

Sacubitril/valsartan for cardioprotection in breast cancer (MAINSTREAM): design and rationale of the randomized trial.

AIMS: In recent years, survival in patients with breast cancer has increased. Despite the improvement in outcomes of those patients, the risk of treatment-related cardiotoxicity remains high, and its presence has been associated with a higher risk of treatment termination and thus lower therapeutic efficacy. Prior trials demonstrated that a preventive initiation of heart failure drugs, including the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone inhibitors, might reduce the risk of treatment-related cardiotoxicity. However, to date, no study investigated the efficacy of sacubitril/valsartan, a novel antineurohormonal drug shown to be superior to the previous therapies, in the prevention of cardiotoxicity in patients with early-stage breast cancer, which is the aim of the trial. METHODS AND RESULTS: MAINSTREAM is a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, multicentre, clinical trial. After the run-in period, a total of 480 patients with early breast cancer undergoing treatment with anthracyclines and/or anti-human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 drugs will be randomized to the highest tolerated dose of sacubitril/valsartan, being preferably 97/103 mg twice daily or placebo in 1:1 ratio. The patients will be monitored, including routine transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) and laboratory biomarker monitoring, for 24 months. The primary endpoint of the trial will be the occurrence of a decrease in left ventricular ejection fraction by ≥5% in TTE within 24 months. The key secondary endpoints will be the composite endpoint of death from any cause or hospitalization for heart failure, as well as other imaging, laboratory, and clinical outcomes, including the occurrence of the cancer therapy-related cardiac dysfunction resulting in the necessity to initiate treatment. The first patients are expected to be recruited in the coming months, and the estimated completion of the study and publication of the results are expected in December 2027, pending recruitment. CONCLUSIONS: The MAINSTREAM trial will determine the efficacy and safety of treatment with sacubitril/valsartan as a prevention of cardiotoxicity in patients with early breast cancer (ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT05465031).

Efficacy of oral amantadine among patients hospitalised with COVID-19: A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre study.

BACKGROUND: Amantadine has been proposed as a treatment for COVID-19 because it shows anti-SARS-CoV-2 activity in vitro. However, to date, no controlled study has assessed the safety and efficacy of amantadine in COVID-19. RESEARCH QUESTION: Whether amantadine is effective and safe among patients with different COVID-19 severity classifications. STUDY DESIGN: and Methods: This was multi-centre, randomised, placebo-controlled study.Patients with oxygen saturation ≤94% and no need for high-flow oxygen or ventilatory support were randomly allocated to receive oral amantadine or placebo (1:1) for 10 days in addition to standard care. The primary endpoint was time to recovery assessed over 28 days since randomisation, defined as discharge from hospital or no need for supplemental oxygen. RESULTS: The study was terminated early due to a lack of efficacy after an interim analysis. Final data from 95 patients who received amantadine (mean age, 60.2 years; 65% male; 66% with comorbidities) and 91 patients who received placebo (mean age, 55.8 years; 60% male; 68% with comorbidities) were obtained. The median (95% CI) time to recovery was 10 days both in the amantadine (9-11) and placebo arms (8-11; subhazard ratio = 0.94 [95%CI 0.7-1.3]). The percentage of deaths and percentage of patients who required intensive care at 14 and 28 days did not significantly differ between the amantadine and placebo groups. INTERPRETATION: Adding amantadine to standard care in patients hospitalised with COVID-19 did not increase the likelihood of recovery. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov; No.: NCT04952519; www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov.

Mallampati Score Is an Independent Predictor of Active Oxygen Therapy in Patients with COVID-19.

Mallampati score has been identified and accepted worldwide as an independent predictor of difficult intubation and obstructive sleep apnea. We aimed to determine whether Mallampati score assessed on the first patient medical assessment allowed us to stratify the risk of worsening of conditions in patients hospitalized due to COVID-19. A total of 493 consecutive patients admitted between 13 November 2021 and 2 January 2022 to the temporary hospital in Pyrzowice were included in the analysis. The clinical data, chest CT scan, and major, clinically relevant laboratory parameters were assessed by patient-treating physicians, whereas the Mallampati score was assessed on admission by investigators blinded to further treatment. The primary endpoints were necessity of active oxygen therapy (AOT) during hospitalization and 60-day all-cause mortality. Of 493 patients included in the analysis, 69 (14.0%) were in Mallampati I, 57 (11.6%) were in Mallampati II, 78 (15.8%) were in Mallampati III, and 288 (58.9%) were in Mallampati IV. There were no differences in the baseline characteristics between the groups, except the prevalence of chronic kidney disease (p = 0.046). Patients with Mallampati IV were at the highest risk of AOT during the hospitalization (33.0%) and the highest risk of death due to any cause at 60 days (35.0%), which significantly differed from other scores (p = 0.005 and p = 0.03, respectively). Mallampati IV was identified as an independent predictor of need for AOT (OR 3.089, 95% confidence interval 1.65−5.77, p < 0.001) but not of all-cause mortality at 60 days. In conclusion, Mallampati IV was identified as an independent predictor of AOT during hospitalization. Mallampati score can serve as a prehospital tool allowing to identify patients at higher need for AOT.

Transcatheter Versus Surgical Valve Replacement: A 24-months Propensity-matched Analysis of the SILCARD Registry.

BACKGROUND: Data concerning the comparison between transcatheter aortic valve implantation and surgical aortic valve replacement in a real-world setting are scarce and in Central and Eastern Europe no such data exist. In this study, we aimed at analyzing retrospectively the characteristics and outcome of patients with aortic stenosis treated either with surgical aortic valve replacement or transcatheter aortic valve implantation between 2006 and 2016 in the Silesian Province, Poland in a representative real-world cohort. METHODS: In the Silesian Cardiovascular Database we retrospectively identified 5186 patients who received either transcatheter aortic valve implantation or surgical aortic valve replacement in 1 of 3 tertiary cardiovascular centers. Baseline characteristics, including relevant clinical history, and outcomes were compared before and after propensity-score matching of both groups, with 348 pairs of patients constituting the propensity-matched study cohort. The primary end-point was 24-month all-cause mortality. RESULTS: Preoperative characteristics of propensity-matched groups were similar. There was no difference between transcatheter aortic valve implantation and surgical aortic valve replacement groups with respect to the death rate at 2 years (19.9% vs. 15.6%; P =.479). In the transcatheter aortic valve implantation group, cardiac resynchronization therapy devices were more frequently implanted after the procedure (3.7% vs. 0.0, P <.001). The groups had similar rates of myocardial infarction, stroke, and re-hospitalization. Hospital stay in the matched groups was shorter after transcatheter aortic valve implantation: 14.1 versus 15.7 days (P <.001). CONCLUSIONS: At 24 months, transcatheter aortic valve implantation patients had similar outcomes as surgical aortic valve replacement except for a higher rate of cardiac resynchronization therapy device implantation and shorter hospital stay.

Is the last before-death alert remote monitoring transmission in patients with heart failure life-threatening?

BACKGROUND: Remote monitoring (RM) of cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED) allows for a regular analysis of the occurrence of arrhythmias and functioning of the devices. AIMS: To date, no study investigated the characteristics of the alert-triggered ultimate transmissions before death, which was the aim of the present analysis. METHODS: Patients monitored remotely in our center, whose baseline characteristics were obtained from the COMMIT-HF Registry (NCT02536443) were analyzed and divided according to the occurrence of alert transmissions during the RM. In patients who had an alert transmission, the last transmission was analyzed. All RM data were obtained from the software provided by four RM manufacturers. RESULTS: Of 1271 patients with CIEDs which transmitted at least one message to the RM center, 198 (15.6%) had no alert transmissions, while 1073 (84.4%) had at least one alert transmission. Respective mortality in patients with and without alerts during RM was 29.7% and 12.6%, respectively. In patients who had ever an alert, the last recorded transmission before death was scheduled in 166 patients and alert-triggered in 152 patients. The most frequent alert-triggered last transmissions were atrial fibrillation/flutter (39.4%) and ventricular tachyarrhythmias (26.8%). The median period from the last alert-triggered transmission to death was 10 days. CONCLUSION: This is the first analysis of the ultimate RM transmissions delivered by CIEDs before death. In approximately 85% of RM patients with CIEDs, at least one alert transmission occurred during the RM, and in patients who had ever an alert, almost half of the last transmissions before death were alert-triggered.

Serum uric acid is an independent risk factor of worse mid- and long-term outcomes in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes.

BACKGROUND: The data on the association between serum uric acid (sUA) concentration and outcomes in patients with an ACS are inconsistent and do not focus on patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTE-ACS). The aim of this study was to analyze an association of sUA concentration on admission and outcomes in those patients. METHODS: Data from the prospective, single-center registry of patients hospitalized due to NSTE-ACS from January 2006 to December 2016 were analyzed retrospectively. The population was divided into quartiles according to the baseline sUA. The primary outcome was the incidence of all-cause death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, stroke and ACS-driven revascularization at 36 months. RESULTS: Total of 2,824 patients with sUA measured on admission were included in this analysis with a median sUA of 352 µmol/L (5.92 mg/dL). Patients with higher sUA were older and more burdened with cardiovascular risk factors and history of coronary events. The prevalence of multivessel coronary artery disease and left main stenosis was significantly higher in patients with higher sUA. Elevated sUA concentration was associated with significantly worse short-, mid- and long-term outcomes. All-cause mortality was significantly higher in each analyzed period. In the multivariable analysis, sUA elevation was identified as an independent predictor of all-cause mortality at 12-month and 36-month follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Elevated baseline sUA concentration was independently associated with worse mid- and long-term outcomes in patients with NSTE-ACS. Baseline sUA concentration could identify patients with NSTE-ACS at higher risk of more dismal prognosis.

The role of optical coherence tomography and other intravascular imaging modalities in cardiac allograft vasculopathy.

Orthotopic heart transplantation (OHT) is the standard-of-care for end-stage heart disease. Although a significant improvement in the prognosis of patients after OHT has been observed in recent years, their overall mortality remains relatively high, with a median survival of approximately 10 years after transplantation. One of the primary causes of death in patients after OHT is cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV), the condition developing specifically in the coronary vasculature after OHT, the pathophysiology of which is still inadequately known. It is estimated that CAV development and progression is responsible for approximately 30% of deaths within five years post-OHT. According to the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT) Nomenclature for CAV, its presence should be assessed primarily by the coronary angiography performed routinely after OHT, mostly due to its wide availability, reproducibility, and low complication rate. However, the analysis of CAV in coronary angiography has limitations, mostly concerning its - sometimes inadequate - sensitivity and specificity. Hence, there is a growing need for the introduction of more accurate methods of CAV assessment, such as intravascular imaging, which through a thorough evaluation of the arterial wall structure and thickness allows the drawbacks of routine angiography to be minimised. The aim of the article was to critically summarise the current findings derived from the analysis of CAV by optical coherence tomography, the other intravascular imaging modalities, such as intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) and IVUS-derived virtual histology, along with physiological assessment with the use of the fractional flow reserve.