Platelet P2Y12 Inhibitors Reduce Systemic Inflammation and Its Prothrombotic Effects in an Experimental Human Model.

OBJECTIVE: Clinical studies suggest that platelet P2Y12 inhibitors reduce mortality from sepsis, although the underlying mechanisms have not been clearly defined in vivo. We hypothesized that P2Y12 inhibitors may improve survival from sepsis by suppressing systemic inflammation and its prothrombotic effects. We therefore determined whether clopidogrel and the novel, more potent P2Y12 inhibitor, ticagrelor, modify these responses in an experimental human model. APPROACH AND RESULTS: We randomized 30 healthy volunteers to ticagrelor (n=10), clopidogrel (n=10), or no antiplatelet medication (controls; n=10). We examined the effect of P2Y12 inhibition on systemic inflammation, which was induced by intravenous injection of Escherichia coli endotoxin. Both P2Y12 inhibitors significantly reduced platelet-monocyte aggregate formation and peak levels of major proinflammatory cytokines, including tumor necrosis factor α, interleukin-6, and chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 2. In contrast to clopidogrel, ticagrelor also significantly reduced peak levels of IL-8 and growth colony-stimulating factor and increased peak levels of the anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-10. In addition, ticagrelor altered leukocyte trafficking. Both P2Y12 inhibitors suppressed D-dimer generation and scanning electron microscopy revealed that ticagrelor also suppressed prothrombotic changes in fibrin clot ultrastructure. CONCLUSIONS: Potent inhibition of multiple inflammatory and prothrombotic mechanisms by P2Y12 inhibitors demonstrates critical importance of platelets as central orchestrators of systemic inflammation induced by bacterial endotoxin. This provides novel mechanistic insight into the lower mortality associated with P2Y12 inhibitors in patients with sepsis in clinical studies.

PAR1 antagonists inhibit thrombin-induced platelet activation whilst leaving the PAR4-mediated response intact.

Thrombin-induced platelet activation is initiated by PAR1 and PAR4 receptors. Vorapaxar, a PAR1 antagonist, has been assessed in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) and stable atherosclerotic disease in addition to standard-of-care treatment. In clinical trials, vorapaxar has been observed to reduce the frequency of ischaemic events in some subgroups though in others has increased the frequency of bleeding events. Among patients undergoing CABG surgery, which is associated with excess thrombin generation, bleeding was not increased. The aim of these studies was to investigate the effects of selective PAR1 antagonism on thrombin-induced platelet activation in patients receiving vorapaxar or placebo in the TRACER trial and to explore the roles of PAR1 and PAR4 in thrombin-induced platelet activation in healthy volunteers. ACS patients receiving vorapaxar or placebo in the TRACER trial were studied at baseline and 4 hours, 1 and 4 months during drug administration. Thrombin-induced calcium mobilisation in platelet-rich plasma was assessed by flow cytometry. In vitro studies were performed in healthy volunteers using the PAR1 antagonist SCH79797 or PAR4 receptor desensitisation. Vorapaxar treatment significantly inhibited thrombin-induced calcium mobilisation, leaving a residual, delayed response. These findings were consistent with calcium mobilisation mediated via the PAR4 receptor and were reproduced in vitro using SCH79797. PAR4 receptor desensitization, in combination with SCH79797, completely inhibited thrombin-induced calcium mobilisation confirming that the residual calcium mobilisation was mediated via PAR4. In conclusion vorapaxar selectively antagonises the PAR1-mediated component of thrombin-induced platelet activation, leaving the PAR4-mediated response intact, which may explain why vorapaxar is well tolerated in patients undergoing CABG surgery since higher thrombin levels in this setting may override the effects of PAR1 antagonism through PAR4 activation, thus preserving haemostasis. Further assessment may be warranted.

Evolving pattern of platelet P2Y12 inhibition in patients with acute coronary syndromes.

Dual antiplatelet therapy consisting of clopidogrel in addition to aspirin has previously been the standard of care for patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) but international guidelines have been evolving over the last 4 years with the introduction of prasugrel and ticagrelor. In October 2009, prasugrel was approved in the UK by the National Institute of Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) for use in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), diabetic patients with non-ST-elevation (NSTE) ACS undergoing PCI and patients with stent thrombosis while other ACS patients were to continue receiving clopidogrel. Ticagrelor was approved in October 2011 by NICE for use in patients with moderate-to-high risk NSTE ACS and STEMI undergoing primary PCI and was recommended in preference to clopidogrel in European guidelines. These recommendations were adopted in our region, constituting a population of 1.8 million. We studied the effect of changing patterns of P2Y12 inhibitor usage on levels of platelet inhibition during maintenance therapy. Patients admitted to Northern General Hospital, Sheffield, with NSTE ACS or STEMI managed with primary PCI were enrolled over two periods of time: May 2010 to November 2011 (T1); and October 2012 to February 2013 (T2). Venous blood samples were obtained at 1 month after the onset of ACS. Light transmittance aggregometry (LTA) was performed and maximum aggregation response to ADP 20 µM was determined. A total of 116 patients were enrolled in T1 of whom 82 were receiving clopidogrel and 34 were receiving prasugrel. Twenty-nine patients were enrolled in T2, all of whom were receiving ticagrelor. Mean LTA results according to treatment with clopidogrel, prasugrel and ticagrelor were 57 ± 18%, 41 ± 20%, and 31 ± 12%, respectively. Prasugrel was associated with significantly lower platelet aggregation responses than clopidogrel (p < 0.001) and ticagrelor was associated with significantly lower platelet aggregation responses than both prasugrel (p = 0.015) and clopidogrel (p < 0.001). We conclude that international guidelines and NICE approval have led to increasing levels of P2Y12 inhibition in ACS patients in this UK centre between May 2010 and February 2013. Ticagrelor was associated with significantly greater P2Y12 inhibition than both clopidogrel and prasugrel during maintenance therapy.

Hirudin anticoagulation allows more rapid determination of P2Y12 inhibition by the VerifyNow P2Y12 assay.

VerifyNow (VN) P2Y12 is a point-of-care assay used to assess response to P2Y12 inhibitors. Sodium citrate (citrate) is the standard anticoagulant used for this assay but requires a pre-incubation period. Hirudin is an alternative anticoagulant for platelet function studies that maintains physiological divalent cation levels. We investigated whether hirudin anticoagulation might allow more rapid testing of P2Y12 inhibition at the time of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Blood was collected from the arterial sheath of aspirin-treated patients undergoing elective, urgent or emergency coronary angiography±PCI and aliquots were anticoagulated with either citrate or hirudin. For each anticoagulant, VN P2Y12 was performed both immediately and after 20 minutes. A total of 98 patients were included in this study following pre-treatment with clopidogrel (n=88), prasugrel (n=6) or no P2Y12 inhibitor (n=4). PRU with hirudin immediately (PRU_H_Imm) and PRU with citrate 20 minutes post sampling (PRU_C_20) were very strongly correlated (R=0.95) though PRU_H_Imm tended to be lower than PRU_C_20 so that optimal correlation was estimated by the equation PRU_H_Imm=0.95xPRU_C_20 (p<0.001). Bland-Altman plots showed good agreement between PRU_H_Imm and (0.95xPRU_C_20). Platelet reactivity was more stable over the studied time course with hirudin as compared to citrate. We therefore conclude that VN P2Y12 with hirudin anticoagulation can be performed more rapidly and results are strongly correlated with delayed citrate measurements. Further studies are warranted to assess the utility of this method for improving clinical outcomes in patients undergoing PCI.

Inhibitory effects of ticagrelor compared with clopidogrel on platelet function in patients with acute coronary syndromes: the PLATO (PLATelet inhibition and patient Outcomes) PLATELET substudy.

OBJECTIVES: The PLATO (PLATelet inhibition and patient Outcomes) PLATELET substudy aimed to compare the antiplatelet effects of clopidogrel and ticagrelor in patients with acute coronary syndromes. BACKGROUND: The PLATO study demonstrated superiority of ticagrelor over clopidogrel in the prevention of ischemic events in patients with acute coronary syndromes. METHODS: Patients were randomized to receive either clopidogrel (300- to 600-mg loading dose [LD], 75 mg/day) or ticagrelor (180-mg LD, 90 mg twice daily). The effects of maintenance therapy were studied in 69 patients pre- and 2 to 4 h post-dose after at least 28 days. The LD effect was studied in 24 clopidogrel-naive patients. Light transmittance aggregometry (adenosine diphosphate 5 to 20 µM), VerifyNow P2Y12, and VASP phosphorylation assays were performed. RESULTS: During maintenance therapy, ticagrelor achieved greater suppression of platelet reactivity compared with clopidogrel. The mean maximum light transmittance aggregometry responses (adenosine diphosphate 20 µM) post-maintenance dose were 44±15% for clopidogrel and 28±10% for ticagrelor (p<0.001). High platelet reactivity was seen more frequently in the clopidogrel group. Proton pump inhibitor use was associated with higher platelet reactivity with clopidogrel but not ticagrelor. The ticagrelor LD also achieved greater inhibition of platelet aggregation compared with the clopidogrel LD. CONCLUSIONS: Ticagrelor achieves greater antiplatelet effect than clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes, both in the first hours of treatment and during maintenance therapy.

Incidence of dyspnea and assessment of cardiac and pulmonary function in patients with stable coronary artery disease receiving ticagrelor, clopidogrel, or placebo in the ONSET/OFFSET study.

OBJECTIVES: We prospectively assessed cardiac and pulmonary function in patients with stable coronary artery disease (CAD) treated with ticagrelor, clopidogrel, or placebo in the ONSET/OFFSET (A Multi-Centre Randomised, Double-Blind, Double-Dummy Parallel Group Study of the Onset and Offset of Antiplatelet Effects of AZD6140 Compared With Clopidogrel and Placebo With Aspirin as Background Therapy in Patients With Stable Coronary Artery Disease) study. BACKGROUND: Ticagrelor reduces cardiovascular events more effectively than clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes. Dyspnea develops in some patients treated with ticagrelor, and it is not known whether this is associated with changes in cardiac or pulmonary function. METHODS: In all, 123 stable aspirin-treated CAD patients randomly received either ticagrelor (180 mg load, then 90 mg twice daily; n=57), clopidogrel (600 mg load, then 75 mg daily; n=54), or placebo (n=12) for 6 weeks in a double-blind, double-dummy design. Electrocardiography, echocardiography, serum N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide, and pulmonary function tests were performed before (baseline) and 6 weeks after drug administration and/or after development of dyspnea. RESULTS: After drug administration, dyspnea was reported by 38.6%, 9.3%, and 8.3% of patients in the ticagrelor, clopidogrel, and placebo groups, respectively (p<0.001). Most instances were mild and/or lasted<24 h, although 3 patients discontinued ticagrelor because of dyspnea. Eight of 22 and 17 of 22 ticagrelor-treated patients experiencing dyspnea did so within 24 h and 1 week, respectively, after drug administration. In all treatment groups, and in ticagrelor-treated patients with dyspnea, there were no significant changes between baseline and 6 weeks in any of the cardiac or pulmonary function parameters. CONCLUSIONS: Dyspnea is commonly associated with ticagrelor therapy, but was not associated in this study with any adverse change in cardiac or pulmonary function. (A Multi-Centre Randomised, Double-Blind, Double-Dummy Parallel Group Study of the Onset and Offset of Antiplatelet Effects of AZD6140 Compared With Clopidogrel and Placebo With Aspirin as Background Therapy in Patients With Stable Coronary Artery Disease [ONSET/OFFSET]; NCT00528411).