Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 19 de 19
Filtrar
1.
Perspect Biol Med ; 66(1): 129-144, 2023.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38662012

RESUMEN

Recent clinical trials of psychedelic drugs aim to treat a range of psychiatric conditions in adults. MDMA and psilocybin administered with psychotherapy have received FDA designation as "breakthrough therapies" for post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and treatment-resistant depression (TRD) respectively. Given the potential benefit for minors burdened with many of the same disorders, calls to expand experimentation to minors are inevitable. This essay examines psychedelic research conducted on children from 1959 to 1974, highlighting methodological and ethical flaws. It provides ethics and policy recommendations for psychedelics research involving children and adolescents, including recognizing that the psychedelic experience is an ineffable one that makes informed proxy consent for parents, guardians, and others especially challenging. Psychedelic experiences are associated with novel benefits and risks, such as significant personality changes, shifts in fundamental values, and possible re-exposure to traumatic memories. These effects may alter the process of personality development in minors. Recommendations for ethically sound psychedelics research in minors include strict adherence to eligibility criteria, including a comprehensive family and individual psychiatric, substance use, and trauma history. An age-appropriate assent process that includes considerations related to the use of therapeutic touch should be developed. In addition, oversight by data safety monitoring boards and patient and family advocates, coupled with the adoption of pharmacoequity best practices, will help to ensure safety and fairness of psychedelics research in children.


Asunto(s)
Alucinógenos , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático , Humanos , Alucinógenos/uso terapéutico , Alucinógenos/administración & dosificación , Niño , Adolescente , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/tratamiento farmacológico , Psilocibina/uso terapéutico , Psilocibina/administración & dosificación , Consentimiento Informado/ética , Trastorno Depresivo Resistente al Tratamiento/tratamiento farmacológico , N-Metil-3,4-metilenodioxianfetamina/administración & dosificación
2.
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry ; 61(1): 34-36, 2022 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34311036

RESUMEN

Child and adolescent psychiatrists have company as they wrestle with clinical decision making regarding when it is appropriate to prescribe an antipsychotic. Pediatricians face a similar challenge in trying to determine under what circumstances to prescribe an antibiotic. Both classes of medications are powerful and can be lifesaving, but they are not without the risk of associated adverse events and cumulative exposure. Concerns regarding the widespread use of antipsychotics in children and adolescents have been supported by national trends indicating predominance of prescriptions for conditions (attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, conduct disorder, oppositional defiant disorder, and impulsive aggression)1,2 other than those approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (psychotic disorders, bipolar disorder with mania, irritability associated with autism spectrum disorder, and tic disorders); the risks of weight gain, diabetes mellitus, and other adverse effects to which youths appear to be more vulnerable than adults3; and potential disparities related to the absence of race and ethnicity in large administrative datasets.4 Previous studies of antipsychotic prescribing patterns predate the widespread use of the diagnosis of disruptive mood dysregulation disorder. A recent study found that 58.9% of youths given a diagnosis of disruptive mood dysregulation disorder were prescribed antipsychotics compared with 51% of youths with a diagnosis of bipolar disorder.5 In this issue of the Journal, Penfold et al.6 report on a novel approach to antipsychotic prescribing focused on symptoms rather than diagnoses developed as the initial phase of a pragmatic clinical trial, Targeted and Safer Use of Antipsychotics in Youth (SUAY), funded by the National Institute of Mental Health and designed to test the effectiveness of targeted interventions on the use of antipsychotics for youth 4 to 17 years old in large health care systems. We offer some perspectives on differences that distinguish this approach; the process used in its development; and its promise, potential pitfalls, and policy and clinical implications.


Asunto(s)
Antipsicóticos , Trastorno por Déficit de Atención con Hiperactividad , Trastorno del Espectro Autista , Trastorno de la Conducta , Adolescente , Antipsicóticos/efectos adversos , Trastorno por Déficit de Atención con Hiperactividad/tratamiento farmacológico , Trastorno por Déficit de Atención con Hiperactividad/epidemiología , Déficit de la Atención y Trastornos de Conducta Disruptiva/tratamiento farmacológico , Déficit de la Atención y Trastornos de Conducta Disruptiva/epidemiología , Trastorno del Espectro Autista/tratamiento farmacológico , Niño , Preescolar , Humanos
3.
Child Adolesc Psychiatr Clin N Am ; 30(4): 697-712, 2021 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34538442

RESUMEN

The significant and ongoing shortage of child and adolescent psychiatrists has limited access to mental health care in the pediatric population. In response to this problem, integrated/collaborative care models have been established. These models, as all imperfect things in medicine, have their own set of challenges. A careful ethical analysis of integrated/collaborative care models is essential to protect the social and emotional health and safety of children with mental illness. To this end, ethical assessment supports the use of integrated/collaborative care models, and recent studies have demonstrated the benefits of their implementation.


Asunto(s)
Prestación Integrada de Atención de Salud , Trastornos Mentales , Servicios de Salud Mental , Psiquiatría , Adolescente , Niño , Humanos , Trastornos Mentales/terapia , Salud Mental
4.
Front Psychiatry ; 12: 658283, 2021.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34093273

RESUMEN

Background: Concomitant pharmacotherapy has become increasingly common in the treatment of youth, including in psychiatric residential treatment facilities (PRTF) despite limited efficacy and safety data. Research is reported on the prevalence of any class and interclass concomitant pharmacotherapy, specific class combinations of psychotropics, and changes in number of medications from admission to discharge for Medicaid insured youth treated in PRTFs in one mid-Atlantic state. Methods: Medicaid administrative claims data were examined for youth under age 18 years who were discharged from one of 21 PRTFs during calendar year 2019. Descriptive statistics were calculated to examine patterns of service utilization 90 days prior to admission. The rates of concomitant psychotropic use at admission were compared to the rates at discharge. Logistic regression models were used to examine covariates associated with discharging on 4 or more medications. Results: Fifty-four % of youth were admitted on either two or three psychotropics, while 25% were admitted on four or more psychotropics. The proportion of youth admitting and discharging on 2 or 3 medications was stable. There was a 27% increase in number of youth discharging on 4 medications with a 24% decrease in those on a 5- drug regimen. Only the number of medications prescribed at admission was found to be significant (p < 0.001), with more medications at admission contributing to probability of discharging on 4 or more medications. Conclusions: Concomitant pharmacotherapy is common in PRTFs. These findings support the practice of deprescribing and underscore the need for further research.

5.
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry ; 60(3): 332-335, 2021 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33338576

RESUMEN

The practice of child and adolescent psychiatry is evolving during an unprecedented global health catastrophe, the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. As child and adolescent psychiatrists grapple with COVID-19's enormous medical, educational, social, and economic toll, a mental health crisis is co-occurring. Pre-existing disparities are recognized as contributors to the disproportionate impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on racial and ethnic minorities.1 The magnitude of COVID-19's effects on child and family mental health has yet to be fully revealed. child and adolescent psychiatrists are in a unique position to address this mental health crisis. Child and adolescent psychiatrists must stay up-to-date regarding federal, state, local, and institutional mandates, regulations, and policies informed by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention2 and other public health institutions, while also navigating the ethical dilemmas unique to child and adolescent psychiatry during the coronavirus era.


Asunto(s)
Psiquiatría del Adolescente/ética , COVID-19/psicología , Psiquiatría Infantil/ética , Salud Mental , Pandemias , Adolescente , Niño , Salud de la Familia , Disparidades en el Estado de Salud , Humanos
6.
Front Psychiatry ; 11: 559263, 2020.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33192675

RESUMEN

Introduction: Parents/legal guardians are medical decision-makers for their minor children. Lack of parental capacity to appreciate the implications of the diagnosis and consequences of refusing recommended treatment may impede pediatric patients from receiving adequate medical care. Child and adolescent psychiatrists (CAPs) need to appreciate the ethical considerations relevant to overriding parental medical decision-making when faced with concerns for medical neglect. Methods: Two de-identified cases illustrate the challenges inherent in clinical and ethical decision-making reflected in concerns for parental capacity for medical decision-making. Key ethical principles are reviewed. Case 1: Treatment of an adolescent with an eating disorder ethically complex due to the legal guardian's inability to adhere with treatment recommendations leading to the patient's recurrent abrupt weight loss. Case 2: Questions of parental decisional capacity amid treatment of an adolescent with schizoaffective disorder raised due to parental mistrust of diagnosis, disagreement with treatment recommendations, and lack of appreciation of the medical severity of the situation with repeated discharges against medical advice and medication nonadherence. Discussion: Decisions to question parental capacity for medical decision-making when risk of imminent harm is low but concern for medical neglect exists are controversial. Systematic review of cases concerning for medical neglect benefits from the assessment of parental decisional capacity, review of ethical standards and principles. Conclusion: Recognition of the importance of parental decision-making capacity as relates to parental autonomy and medical neglect and understanding key ethical principles will enhance the CAP's capacity in medical decision-making when stakes are high and absolute recommendations are lacking.

7.
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry ; 58(11): 1051-1053, 2019 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30928730

RESUMEN

Minimizing the duration of untreated psychosis and providing comprehensive early intervention including the use of antipsychotics reflects best practice in the treatment of first-episode psychosis (FEP).1 The adverse effects of second-generation antipsychotics (SGAs) are well known, namely, weight gain, hyperglycemia, and dyslipidemia that are associated with an increased risk of obesity, type 2 diabetes, and cardiovascular disease. Youth appear to be more vulnerable to deleterious cardiometabolic effects than adults.2 Child and adolescent psychiatrists (CAPs) treating FEP have an ethical duty to carefully select an effective antipsychotic medication, being cognizant of the metabolic profile of the considered SGAs and of the likelihood of prolonged antipsychotic exposure. Which is the "right" antipsychotic medication for the young person in front of me? What is known about the adverse effects of available antipsychotics and how do they compare to each other, not just to placebo? Does information exist to help me anticipate whether my patient is more or less susceptible to adverse cardiometabolic effects?


Asunto(s)
Antipsicóticos , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 , Trastornos Psicóticos , Adolescente , Adulto , Aripiprazol , Niño , Toma de Decisiones Clínicas , Humanos , Fumarato de Quetiapina
8.
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry ; 56(1): 59-66, 2017 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27993230

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To examine trends in the use of antipsychotic medication in Medicaid-eligible youth from 2008 to 2013 and the factors associated with this use. METHOD: Youth aged 0 to 17 years with at least one claim indicating antipsychotic medication use were identified from the network of a behavioral health managed care organization (BHMCO). Demographic and clinical variables were derived from state eligibility data and service claims data from the BHMCO. Overall and specific prevalence rates of antipsychotic drug use were calculated over the course of 6 years (2008-2013). The probability of antipsychotic use during 2013 was further explored with logistic regression that included demographic and diagnostic groups. RESULTS: The overall trend in prevalence for antipsychotics for youth decreased from 49.52 per 1,000 members in 2008 to 30.54 in 2013 (p < .0001). Although rates decreased for all age groups, the rate per 1,000 members in 2013 for the youngest children was 3.79, versus 39.23 for 6- to 12-year-olds and 64.33 for 13- to 17-year-olds. Controlling for demographic and clinical variables, children 0 to 5 years old were 79% less likely to be prescribed antipsychotic medications compared to the oldest youth, 13 to 17 years of age (p < .0001). Rates were higher for males versus females regardless of age (odds ratio [95% CI] =1.48 [1.36-1.62], p < .0001). Children with a diagnosis of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder were less likely to be prescribed antipsychotics compared to those with diagnoses of autism spectrum disorder, bipolar disorder, psychoses, and depression. CONCLUSION: Prevalence rates decreased significantly over time for all socio-demographic groups. The largest decrease was observed for the youngest children, ages 0 to 5 years, with a rate in 2013 under half the rate for 2008. Clinical, policy, and managed care implications are discussed.


Asunto(s)
Antipsicóticos/uso terapéutico , Prescripciones de Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Medicaid/estadística & datos numéricos , Trastornos Mentales/tratamiento farmacológico , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Masculino , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/tendencias , Estados Unidos
10.
J Manag Care Spec Pharm ; 21(9): 769-77, 777a-777cc, 2015 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26308224

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Individuals being treated with first- and second-generation antipsychotics (FGAs and SGAs) are at risk for a variety of adverse cardiometabolic effects. Although consensus guidelines that recommend metabolic monitoring for patients receiving SGAs have been in place since 2004, the rate of monitoring remains low, especially in the pediatric population. OBJECTIVES: To (a) examine differences in rates of laboratory monitoring for glucose and lipids for adults and youth prescribed FGAs and SGAs; (b) look at factors associated with the likelihood of metabolic testing; and (c) describe cohort effects that may have had an impact on the rates of laboratory testing.  METHODS: This is a retrospective study examining the rates of glucose and lipid testing for 3 separate cohorts of Medicaid recipients who were prescribed antipsychotics during 3 measurement periods-2008, 2010, and 2012-using paid Medicaid pharmacy and laboratory claims data. The sample included adults aged 18 years and older and children aged 17 years and younger. For each measurement period, we identified the rate of metabolic monitoring and the demographic characteristics for each individual, including race, age, and gender. The proportion of laboratory monitoring was assessed using chi square tests for each of the outcomes. Logistic regression models for each time point were used to determine the characteristics of individuals who were more likely to receive monitoring. RESULTS: The proportion of individuals receiving glucose and lipid tests increased for both age groups across all measurement periods. For individuals aged 18 years and over, glucose monitoring increased from 56.6%-72.6%. Testing for lipids remained constant, ranging from 38.3%-41.2% for each of the 3 measurement periods. During the first measurement period, in 2008, females were 41% and 15% more likely to receive glucose and lipid laboratory monitoring, respectively, compared with males. Females continued to be more likely to receive glucose monitoring during the measurement periods in 2010 and 2012, although there was no significant difference between females and males for lipid monitoring during these time periods. Individuals aged 17 years and younger were 59%-68% less likely to receive glucose monitoring than adults (aged ≥ 18 years) for all time points. Across all measurement periods, individuals aged ≤ 17 years were also 44%-58% less likely to receive lipid monitoring compared with adults (aged ≥ 18 years). While there was no significant difference between Caucasians and non-Caucasians in the first measurement period, Caucasians were about 30% less likely to receive glucose monitoring and about 50% less likely to receive lipid monitoring during the measurement periods covering 2010 and 2012.   CONCLUSIONS: Metabolic monitoring in adults improved substantially over the time periods studied; however, rates remained suboptimal, especially in the pediatric population. This finding suggests that interventions to increase metabolic monitoring in adults and children using FGAs and SGAs are necessary.


Asunto(s)
Antipsicóticos/administración & dosificación , Glucemia/metabolismo , Monitoreo de Drogas/métodos , Lípidos/sangre , Adolescente , Adulto , Antipsicóticos/efectos adversos , Niño , Preescolar , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Medicaid , Persona de Mediana Edad , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Tiempo , Estados Unidos , Adulto Joven
11.
Psychiatr Serv ; 65(2): 201-7, 2014 Feb 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24233105

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Prescribing patterns of psychotropic medication over a five-year period for Medicaid recipients (adults and children) with codiagnoses of an intellectual disability and a mental disorder were compared with patterns for those with sole mental disorder diagnoses. METHODS: Each group was identified through paid behavioral health services claims. Four classes of medications (antidepressants, antipsychotics, benzodiazepines, and mood stabilizers) were examined in paid pharmacy claims. Diagnostic categories, rates of psychotropic prescription, and polypharmacy (three or more medications concurrently for 90 days or more) were compared by age group (child or adult). RESULTS: Adults with mental disorders only (N=793 to 883; the range reflects the five study years) were prescribed antidepressants at a significantly higher rate compared with adults in the codiagnosis group (N=184 to 217). For three of the five study years, antipsychotics were prescribed to the sole-diagnosis group of adults at a significantly higher rate than to those with codiagnoses. Children in the group with codiagnoses (N=108 to 141) were prescribed mood stabilizers at a significantly higher rate than the comparison group (N=638 to 728) in all five study years. Rates of antipsychotics prescribed were not statistically different between the two groups of children. Polypharmacy rates for both adults and children were higher for the codiagnosis group compared with the group with a sole mental disorder, but the difference did not reach statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS: Psychotropic prescribing patterns in the two groups studied varied by class of medication and age. Although evidence exists for using psychotropics to treat psychopathology and challenging behaviors among individuals with intellectual disabilities, consideration of behavioral intervention alternatives and careful monitoring of psychotropic effectiveness and side effects are recommended.


Asunto(s)
Utilización de Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Discapacidad Intelectual/tratamiento farmacológico , Trastornos Mentales/tratamiento farmacológico , Psicotrópicos/uso terapéutico , Adolescente , Adulto , Niño , Comorbilidad , Prescripciones de Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Humanos , Discapacidad Intelectual/epidemiología , Masculino , Medicaid/estadística & datos numéricos , Trastornos Mentales/epidemiología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Polifarmacia , Psicotrópicos/clasificación , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
13.
Gen Hosp Psychiatry ; 30(3): 269-76, 2008.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18433660

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: We investigated the influence of race/ethnicity in diagnostic and disposition decision-making for children and adolescents presenting to an urban psychiatric emergency service (PES). METHOD: Medical records were reviewed for 2991 child and adolescent African-American, Hispanic/Latino and white patients, treated in an urban PES between October 2001 and September 2002. A series of bivariate and binomial logistic regression analyses were used to delineate the role of race in the patterns and correlates of psychiatric diagnostic and treatment disposition decisions. RESULTS: Binomial logistic regression analyses reveal that African-American (OR=2.28, P<.001) and Hispanic/Latino (OR=2.35, P<.05) patients are more likely to receive psychotic disorders and behavioral disorders diagnoses (African American: OR=1.66, P<.001; Hispanic/Latino: OR=1.36, P<.05) than white children/adolescents presenting to PES. African-American youth compared to white youth are also less likely to receive depressive disorder (OR=0.78, P<.05), bipolar disorder (OR=.44, P<.001) and alcohol/substance abuse disorder (OR=.18, P<.01) diagnoses. African-American pediatric PES patients are also more likely to be hospitalized (OR=1.50, P<.05), controlling for other sociodemographic and clinical factors (e.g., Global Assessment of Functioning). CONCLUSIONS: The results highlight that nonclinical factors such as race/ethnicity are associated with clinical diagnostic decisions as early as childhood suggesting the pervasiveness of such disparities.


Asunto(s)
Población Negra/psicología , Servicios de Urgencia Psiquiátrica/estadística & datos numéricos , Hispánicos o Latinos/psicología , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Trastornos Mentales/etnología , Población Blanca/psicología , Adolescente , Adulto , Alcoholismo/diagnóstico , Alcoholismo/etnología , Alcoholismo/terapia , Trastorno Bipolar/diagnóstico , Trastorno Bipolar/etnología , Trastorno Bipolar/terapia , Población Negra/estadística & datos numéricos , Niño , Preescolar , Trastorno Depresivo/diagnóstico , Trastorno Depresivo/etnología , Trastorno Depresivo/terapia , Femenino , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Hispánicos o Latinos/estadística & datos numéricos , Hospitales Psiquiátricos/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Trastornos Mentales/diagnóstico , Trastornos Mentales/terapia , Philadelphia , Trastornos Psicóticos/diagnóstico , Trastornos Psicóticos/etnología , Trastornos Psicóticos/terapia , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/diagnóstico , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/etnología , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/terapia , Población Blanca/estadística & datos numéricos
15.
Adolesc Med Clin ; 17(1): 183-204, 2006 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16473300

RESUMEN

The spectrum of psychiatric emergencies in adolescents may be best appreciated using the broad framework of urgency. ED physicians and staff using such a framework will be in a better position to triage and to tailor the evaluation assessment and target the intervention and disposition. Understanding the range of urgency can minimize frustration, enhance the clinician's ability to accurately assess complex situations, and make a tremendous difference in the patient's receipt of future services. This article reviews the epidemiology, risk factors, and critical elements of emergency evaluation and treatment of a variety of juvenile psychiatric emergencies. Factors influencing presentation, disposition,and consideration of local treatment resources are reviewed.


Asunto(s)
Urgencias Médicas , Tratamiento de Urgencia/normas , Trastornos Mentales/diagnóstico , Trastornos Mentales/terapia , Adolescente , Psiquiatría del Adolescente/métodos , Intervención en la Crisis (Psiquiatría)/métodos , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Tratamiento de Urgencia/tendencias , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Medición de Riesgo
16.
Curr Psychiatry Rep ; 7(3): 180-8, 2005 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15935131

RESUMEN

Clinicians need to consider a wide range of differential diagnoses when children and adolescents present with hallucinations. This includes considering whether it is a developmentally normal phenomenon or if there is a psychiatric, medical, or neurologic diagnosis. Nonpsychotic children with hallucinations can be differentiated from psychotic children. Nonpsychotic children who are at risk (or prodromal) for future psychosis can be differentiated from nonprodromal healthier children. We examine the epidemiology, prognosis, and neurobiological research. Lastly, we discuss treatment approaches, including medication and cognitive behavioral therapy.


Asunto(s)
Alucinaciones/etiología , Adolescente , Niño , Terapia Cognitivo-Conductual , Cultura , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Alucinaciones/psicología , Alucinaciones/terapia , Humanos , Pronóstico , Trastornos Psicóticos/diagnóstico , Trastornos Psicóticos/psicología , Trastornos Psicóticos/terapia , Factores de Riesgo
18.
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry ; 42(10): 1197-202, 2003 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14560169

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To test the hypothesis that youth present to a psychiatric emergency service (PES) at least 25% of the time for nonurgent reasons, to examine the demographic characteristics that distinguish urgent from nonurgent visits, and to develop a model to predict urgency. METHOD: Psychiatric emergency visits of all patients under 18 years from July 1, 1997, through June 30, 1998, were ed and coded as to level of urgency using Rosenn's classification system. Age, gender, ethnicity, arrival status, social service involvement, violence, substance abuse, and diagnosis were examined with respect to urgency in bivariate and multivariable analyses. RESULTS: Forty percent of visits to the PES were not urgent. Demographic factors distinguished urgent from nonurgent visits. Independent predictors of urgency for the entire sample were age, diagnosis, arrival status, social service involvement, and violence. Only violence remained an independent predictor of urgency for the attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder subgroup. CONCLUSIONS: A large percentage of pediatric visits to the PES were for nonurgent reasons. This suggests that there are considerable unmet mental health needs of children and adolescents. These findings can be applied to improve and design appropriate services.


Asunto(s)
Trastorno por Déficit de Atención con Hiperactividad/terapia , Psiquiatría Infantil , Servicios de Urgencia Psiquiátrica/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Trastorno por Déficit de Atención con Hiperactividad/psicología , Niño , Preescolar , Demografía , Femenino , Predicción , Humanos , Masculino , Evaluación de Necesidades , Factores de Riesgo , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad
19.
Ann N Y Acad Sci ; 1008: 261-4, 2003 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14998892

RESUMEN

Sixty-two cases of children with hallucinations but without psychosis were identified in a psychiatric emergency service. Auditory hallucinations were more frequent than visual ones. There were positive trends between the content of auditory hallucinations and diagnosis. Recognition of this clinical phenomenon of hallucinations in children in the absence of psychosis and awareness of underlying psychopathology and precipitating factors is necessary in evaluating hallucinations in nonpsychotic children. Children with such presentations run the risk of being misdiagnosed as having psychosis or schizophrenia and being subjected to the inherent risks of treatment with antipsychotics.


Asunto(s)
Servicios de Urgencia Psiquiátrica , Alucinaciones/psicología , Adolescente , Concienciación , Niño , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...