Role of antibiotic treatment after surgical debridement of superficial hand infections in 180 patients.

Considering the rising prevalence of antimicrobial resistance and the lack of recommendations on antibiotic treatment, the present study evaluated the necessity of local and systemic antibiotic therapy in addition to surgical debridement in superficial hand infections. Superficial hand infections were defined as not involving tendons, joints or bone. Data were analyzed for 180 patients, assigned to three study groups according to postoperative antimicrobial treatment. Patients in group I were treated with both systemic and local antibiotics; in group II antimicrobial therapy was limited to local antibiotics in the form of subcutaneous gentamicin bead chains; group III did not receive any antibiotic treatment after surgical debridement. Patients were followed up at two weeks and at three months. Immobilization time and length of stay were longer in group I, but there were no significant differences between the groups in terms of revision rate or recovery of hand function assessed by measurement of finger mobility, grip strength and the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score at follow-up. Antibiotic treatment of hand infections should be considered carefully and reserved for specific indications: e.g., severe infections and selected patients such as those with diabetes or immunocompromising diseases.

Anesthesia of the conditioned limb does not abolish the remote ischemic conditioning stimulus on cutaneous microcirculation in humans.

BACKGROUND: Mechanism of remote ischemic conditioning (RIC) remain not fully understood yet. Thus, a clinical trial was performed to assess the neuronal influence on its signal induction. METHODS: RIC was conducted on 45 patients who were randomized into 3 groups. Group A and B underwent brachial plexus anesthesia while RIC was performed on the blocked (A) and non-blocked side (B), respectively. In group C, RIC was conducted before regional anesthesia, thus serving as control group. All measurements were taken contralateral to RIC. The relative increase of microcirculatory parameters compared to baseline was evaluated and compared between the groups. RESULTS: Superficial blood flow (sBF) significantly increased in group A and C but values were higher among group C. Compared to group A, group C showed a significant increase of sBF during the initial 5 minutes of reperfusion (1.75; CI 1.139 - 2.361 vs. 0.97, CI 0.864 - 1.076, p < 0.05). Deep blood flow, tissue oxygen saturation and relative hemoglobin content were marginally influenced by RIC irrespectively of the presence of regional anesthesia. CONCLUSION: Despite regional anesthesia a significant RIC stimulus can be induced although its microcirculatory response is attenuated compared to control. Hence, RIC induction does not merely depend on neuronal signaling.