Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 28
Filtrar
1.
Scand J Work Environ Health ; 49(3): 211-221, 2023 04 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36807489

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Heat exposure and heat stress/strain is a concern for many workers. There is increasing interest in potential chronic health effects of occupational heat exposure, including cancer risk. We examined potential associations of occupational heat exposure and colorectal cancer (CRC) risk in a large Spanish multi-case--control study. METHODS: We analyzed data on 1198 histologically confirmed CRC cases and 2690 frequency-matched controls. The Spanish job-exposure matrix, MatEmEsp, was used to assign heat exposure estimates to the lifetime occupations of participants. Three exposure indices were assessed: ever versus never exposed, cumulative exposure and duration (years). We estimated odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) using unconditional logistic regression adjusting for potential confounders. RESULTS: Overall, there was no association of ever, compared with never, occupational heat exposure and CRC (OR 1.09, 95% CI 0.92-1.29). There were also no associations observed according to categories of cumulative exposure or duration, and there was no evidence for a trend. There was no clear association of ever occupational heat exposure and CRC in analysis conducted among either men or women when analyzed separately. Positive associations were observed among women in the highest categories of cumulative exposure (OR 1.81, 95% CI 1.09-3.03) and duration (OR 2.89, 95% CI 1.50-5.59) as well as some evidence for a trend (P<0.05). CONCLUSION: Overall, this study provides no clear evidence for an association between occupational heat exposure and CRC.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Colorrectales , Enfermedades Profesionales , Exposición Profesional , Masculino , Humanos , Femenino , España/epidemiología , Exposición Profesional/efectos adversos , Modelos Logísticos , Neoplasias Colorrectales/epidemiología , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Enfermedades Profesionales/epidemiología , Factores de Riesgo
2.
Cancer Causes Control ; 33(1): 125-136, 2022 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34817770

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: The variation in breast cancer (BC)-risk factor associations between screen-detected (SD) and non-screen-detected (NSD) tumors has been poorly studied, despite the interest of this aspect in risk assessment and prevention. This study analyzes the differences in breast cancer-risk factor associations according to detection method and tumor phenotype in Spanish women aged between 50 and 69. METHODS: We examined 900 BC cases and 896 controls aged between 50 and 69, recruited in the multicase-control MCC-Spain study. With regard to the cases, 460 were detected by screening mammography, whereas 144 were diagnosed by other means. By tumor phenotype, 591 were HR+, 153 were HER2+, and 58 were TN. Lifestyle, reproductive factors, family history of BC, and tumor characteristics were analyzed. Logistic regression models were used to compare cases vs. controls and SD vs. NSD cases. Multinomial regression models (controls used as a reference) were adjusted for case analysis according to phenotype and detection method. RESULTS: TN was associated with a lower risk of SD BC (OR 0.30 IC 0.10-0.89), as were intermediate (OR 0.18 IC 0.07-0.44) and advanced stages at diagnosis (OR 0.11 IC 0.03-0.34). Nulliparity in postmenopausal women and age at menopause were related to an increased risk of SD BC (OR 1.60 IC 1.08-2.36; OR 1.48 IC 1.09-2.00, respectively). Nulliparity in postmenopausal women was associated with a higher risk of HR+ (OR 1.66 IC 1.15-2.40). Age at menopause was related to a greater risk of HR+ (OR 1.60 IC 1.22-2.11) and HER2+ (OR 1.59 IC 1.03-2.45) tumors. CONCLUSION: Reproductive risk factors are associated with SD BC, as are HR+ tumors. Differences in BC-risk factor associations according to detection method may be related to prevailing phenotypes among categories.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama , Anciano , Neoplasias de la Mama/diagnóstico , Neoplasias de la Mama/epidemiología , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Detección Precoz del Cáncer , Femenino , Humanos , Mamografía , Persona de Mediana Edad , Factores de Riesgo , España/epidemiología
3.
J Surg Oncol ; 123(1): 32-36, 2021 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33078425

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: We evaluate the impact of COVID-epidemic in colorectal cancer (CRC) diagnosis during Spain's state of emergency. METHODS: We compared newly diagnosed patients with patients diagnosed in the same period of 2019. RESULTS: A new diagnosis of CRC decreased 48% with a higher rate of patients diagnosed in the emergency setting (12.1% vs. 3.6%; p = .048) and a lower rate diagnosed in the screening program (5.2% vs. 33.3%; p = .000). CONCLUSIONS: Fewer patients have been diagnosed with CRC, with a higher rate of patients diagnosed in an emergency setting.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19/epidemiología , Neoplasias Colorrectales/diagnóstico , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , SARS-CoV-2 , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , España/epidemiología
5.
Nutrients ; 11(6)2019 Jun 21.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31234427

RESUMEN

Inflammation and antioxidant capacity have been associated with colorectal and breast cancer. We computed the dietary inflammatory index (DII®), and the total dietary non-enzymatic antioxidant capacity (NEAC) and associated them with colorectal and breast cancer risk in the population-based multi case-control study in Spain (MCC-Spain). We included 1852 colorectal cancer and 1567 breast cancer cases, and 3447 and 1486 population controls, respectively. DII score and NEAC were derived using data from a semi-quantitative validated food frequency questionnaire. Unconditional logistic regression models were used to estimate odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (95%CI) for energy-adjusted DII (E-DII), and a score combining E-DII and NEAC. E-DII was associated with colorectal cancer risk (OR = 1.93, highest quartile versus lowest, 95%CI:1.60-2.32; p-trend: <0.001); this increase was observed for both colon and rectal cancer. Less pronounced increased risks were observed for breast cancer (OR = 1.22, highest quartile versus lowest, 95%CI:0.99-1.52, p-trend: >0.10). The combined score of high E-DII scores and low antioxidant values were associated with colorectal cancer risk (OR = 1.48, highest quartile versus lowest, 95%CI: 1.26-1.74; p-trend: <0.001), but not breast cancer. This study provides evidence that a pro-inflammatory diet is associated with increased colorectal cancer risk while findings for breast cancer were less consistent.


Asunto(s)
Antioxidantes/administración & dosificación , Neoplasias de la Mama/epidemiología , Neoplasias Colorrectales/epidemiología , Dieta/efectos adversos , Inflamación/epidemiología , Neoplasias de la Mama/diagnóstico , Neoplasias de la Mama/prevención & control , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Neoplasias Colorrectales/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Colorrectales/prevención & control , Femenino , Humanos , Inflamación/diagnóstico , Inflamación/prevención & control , Masculino , Oxidación-Reducción , Pronóstico , Factores Protectores , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , España/epidemiología
6.
Maturitas ; 117: 57-63, 2018 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30314562

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Mammographic density (MD) is a strong risk factor for breast cancer. The present study evaluates the association between relative caloric intake and MD in Spanish women. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a cross-sectional study in which 3517 women were recruited from seven breast cancer screening centers. MD was measured by an experienced radiologist using craniocaudal mammography and Boyd's semi-quantitative scale. Information was collected through an epidemiological survey. Predicted calories were calculated using linear regression models, including the basal metabolic rate and physical activity as explanatory variables. Overeating and caloric restriction were defined taking into account the 99% confidence interval of the predicted value. Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (95%CI) were estimated using center-specific mixed ordinal logistic regression models, adjusted for age, menopausal status, body mass index, parity, tobacco use, family history of breast cancer, previous biopsies, age at menarche and adherence to a Western diet. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Mammographic density. RESULTS: Those women with an excessive caloric intake (>40% above predicted) presented higher MD (OR = 1.41, 95%CI = 0.97-2.03; p = 0.070). For every 20% increase in relative caloric consumption the probability of having higher MD increased by 5% (OR = 1.05, 95%CI = 0.98-1.14; p = 0.178), not observing differences between the categories of explanatory variables. Caloric restriction was not associated with MD in our study. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study exploring the association between MD and the effect of caloric deficit or excessive caloric consumption according to the energy requirements of each woman. Although caloric restriction does not seem to affect breast density, a caloric intake above predicted levels seems to increase this phenotype.


Asunto(s)
Densidad de la Mama , Ingestión de Energía , Hiperfagia , Detección Precoz del Cáncer , Femenino , Humanos , Mamografía , Persona de Mediana Edad , Oportunidad Relativa , Factores de Riesgo , España
7.
Sci Rep ; 8(1): 3036, 2018 02 14.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29445177

RESUMEN

A breast-risk score, published in 2016, was developed in white-American women using 92 genetic variants (GRS92), modifiable and non-modifiable risk factors. With the aim of validating the score in the Spanish population, 1,732 breast cancer cases and 1,910 controls were studied. The GRS92, modifiable and non-modifiable risk factor scores were estimated via logistic regression. SNPs without available genotyping were simulated as in the aforementioned 2016 study. The full model score was obtained by combining GRS92, modifiable and non-modifiable risk factor scores. Score performances were tested via the area under the ROC curve (AUROC), net reclassification index (NRI) and integrated discrimination improvement (IDI). Compared with non-modifiable and modifiable factor scores, GRS92 had higher discrimination power (AUROC: 0.6195, 0.5885 and 0.5214, respectively). Adding the non-modifiable factor score to GRS92 improved patient classification by 23.6% (NRI = 0.236), while the modifiable factor score only improved it by 7.2%. The full model AUROC reached 0.6244. A simulation study showed the ability of the full model for identifying women at high risk for breast cancer. In conclusion, a model combining genetic and risk factors can be used for stratifying women by their breast cancer risk, which can be applied to individualizing genetic counseling and screening recommendations.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama/epidemiología , Tamizaje Masivo/métodos , Medición de Riesgo/métodos , Área Bajo la Curva , Neoplasias de la Mama/genética , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Femenino , Predisposición Genética a la Enfermedad/genética , Pruebas Genéticas/métodos , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Modelos Estadísticos , Polimorfismo de Nucleótido Simple/genética , Curva ROC , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Factores de Riesgo , España/epidemiología , Población Blanca/genética
8.
Occup Environ Med ; 75(2): 124-131, 2018 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29074552

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: The association between occupational exposures and mammographic density (MD), a marker of breast cancer risk, has not been previously explored. Our objective was to investigate the influence of occupational exposure to chemical, physical and microbiological agents on MD in adult women. METHODS: This is a population-based cross-sectional study based on 1476 female workers aged 45-65 years from seven Spanish breast cancer screening programmes. Occupational history was surveyed by trained staff. Exposure to occupational agents was assessed using the Spanish job-exposure matrix MatEmESp. Percentage of MD was measured by two radiologists using a semiautomatic computer tool. The association was estimated using mixed log-linear regression models adjusting for age, education, body mass index, menopausal status, parity, smoking, alcohol intake, type of mammography, family history of breast cancer and hormonal therapy use, and including screening centre and professional reader as random effects terms. RESULTS: Although no association was found with most of the agents, women occupationally exposed to perchloroethylene (eß=1.51; 95% CI 1.04 to 2.19), ionising radiation (eß=1.23; 95% CI 0.99 to 1.52) and mould spores (eß=1.44; 95% CI 1.01 to 2.04) tended to have higher MD. The percentage of density increased 12% for every 5 years exposure to perchloroethylene or mould spores, 11% for every 5 years exposure to aliphatic/alicyclic hydrocarbon solvents and 3% for each 5 years exposure to ionising radiation. CONCLUSIONS: Exposure to perchloroethylene, ionising radiation, mould spores or aliphatic/alicyclic hydrocarbon solvents in occupational settings could be associated with higher MD. Further studies are needed to clarify the accuracy and the reasons for these findings.


Asunto(s)
Densidad de la Mama , Contaminantes Ambientales/efectos adversos , Sustancias Peligrosas/efectos adversos , Exposición Profesional/efectos adversos , Anciano , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Mamografía , Persona de Mediana Edad , Ocupaciones/estadística & datos numéricos , Análisis de Regresión
9.
Environ Res ; 159: 355-361, 2017 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28843166

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: High mammographic density is one of the main risk factors for breast cancer. Although several occupations have been associated with breast cancer, there are no previous occupational studies exploring the association with mammographic density. Our objective was to identify occupations associated with high mammographic density in Spanish female workers. METHODS: We conducted a population-based cross-sectional study of occupational determinants of high mammographic density in Spain, based on 1476 women, aged 45-68 years, recruited from seven screening centers within the Spanish Breast Cancer Screening Program network. Reproductive, family, personal, and occupational history data were collected. The latest occupation of each woman was collected and coded according to the 1994 National Classification of Occupations. Mammographic density was assessed from the cranio-caudal mammogram of the left breast using a semi-automated computer-assisted tool. Association between mammographic density and occupation was evaluated by using mixed linear regression models, using log-transformed percentage of mammographic density as dependent variable. Models were adjusted for age, body mass index, menopausal status, parity, smoking, alcohol intake, educational level, type of mammography, first-degree relative with breast cancer, and hormonal replacement therapy use. Screening center and professional reader were included as random effects terms. RESULTS: Mammographic density was higher, although non-statistically significant, among secondary school teachers (eß = 1.41; 95%CI = 0.98-2.03) and nurses (eß = 1.23; 95%CI = 0.96-1.59), whereas workers engaged in the care of people (eß = 0.81; 95%CI = 0.66-1.00) and housewives (eß = 0.87; 95%CI = 0.79-0.95) showed an inverse association with mammographic density. A positive trend for every 5 years working as secondary school teachers was also detected (p-value = 0.035). CONCLUSIONS: Nurses and secondary school teachers were the occupations with the highest mammographic density in our study, showing the latter a positive trend with duration of employment. Future studies are necessary to confirm if these results are due to chance or are the result of a true association whose causal hypothesis is, for the moment, unknown.


Asunto(s)
Densidad de la Mama , Ocupaciones/clasificación , Anciano , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Modelos Lineales , Mamografía , Persona de Mediana Edad , España
10.
Scand J Work Environ Health ; 43(3): 250-259, 2017 05 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28251241

RESUMEN

Objectives Shift work that involves circadian disruption has been associated with a higher cancer risk. Most epidemiological studies to date have focused on breast cancer risk and evidence for other common tumors is limited. We evaluated the risk for colorectal cancer (CRC) in relation to shift work history in a population-based case-control study in Spain. Methods This analysis included 1626 incident CRC cases and 3378 randomly selected population controls of both sexes, enrolled in 11 regions of Spain. Sociodemographic and lifestyle information was assessed in face-to-face interviews. Shift work was assessed in detail throughout lifetime occupational history. We estimated the risk of colon and rectal cancer associated with rotating and permanent shift work (ever, cumulative duration, age of first exposure) using unconditional logistic regression analysis adjusting for potential confounders. Results Having ever performed rotating shift work (morning, evening and/or night) was associated with an increased risk for CRC [odds ratio (OR) 1.22, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.04-1.43], as compared to day workers. Having ever worked permanent night shifts (≥3 nights/month) was not associated with CRC risk (OR 0.79, 95% CI 0.62-1.00). OR increased with increasing lifetime cumulative duration of rotating shift work (P-value for trend 0.005) and were highest among subjects in the top quartiles of exposure (3 rdquartile, 20-34 years, OR 1.38, 95%CI 1.06-1.81; 4 thquartile, ≥35 years, OR 1.36, 95% CI 1.02-1.79). Conclusions These data suggest that rotating shift work may increase the risk of CRC especially after long-term exposures.


Asunto(s)
Ritmo Circadiano , Neoplasias Colorrectales/epidemiología , Tolerancia al Trabajo Programado , Adulto , Anciano , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Neoplasias Colorrectales/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Colorrectales/prevención & control , Femenino , Humanos , Estilo de Vida , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Salud Laboral , Factores de Riesgo , España/epidemiología , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
11.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev ; 26(6): 905-913, 2017 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28336582

RESUMEN

Background: Night-shift work (NSW) has been suggested as a possible cause of breast cancer, and its association with mammographic density (MD), one of the strongest risk factors for breast cancer, has been scarcely addressed. This study examined NSW and MD in Spanish women.Methods: The study covered 2,752 women aged 45-68 years recruited in 2007-2008 in 7 population-based public breast cancer screening centers, which included 243 women who had performed NSW for at least one year. Occupational data and information on potential confounders were collected by personal interview. Two trained radiologist estimated the percentage of MD assisted by a validated semiautomatic computer tool (DM-scan). Multivariable mixed linear regression models with random screening center-specific intercepts were fitted using log-transformed percentage of MD as the dependent variable and adjusting by known confounding variables.Results: Having ever worked in NSW was not associated with MD [Formula: see text]:0.96; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.86-1.06]. However, the adjusted geometric mean of the percentage of MD in women with NSW for more than 15 years was 25% higher than that of those without NSW history (MD>15 years:20.7% vs. MDnever:16.5%;[Formula: see text]:1.25; 95% CI,1.01-1.54). This association was mainly observed in postmenopausal participants ([Formula: see text]:1.28; 95% CI, 1.00-1.64). Among NSW-exposed women, those with ≤2 night-shifts per week had higher MD than those with 5 to 7 nightshifts per week ([Formula: see text]:1.42; 95% CI, 1.10-1.84).Conclusions: Performing NSW was associated with higher MD only in women with more than 15 years of cumulated exposure. These findings warrant replication in futures studies.Impact: Our findings suggest that MD could play a role in the pathway between long-term NSW and breast cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 26(6); 905-13. ©2017 AACR.


Asunto(s)
Densidad de la Mama , Ritmo Circadiano/fisiología , Mamografía/métodos , Tolerancia al Trabajo Programado/fisiología , Femenino , Humanos , Factores de Riesgo , España
12.
Br J Nutr ; 116(4): 734-42, 2016 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27374250

RESUMEN

The objective of the present study was to assess the reproducibility of data-driven dietary patterns in different samples extracted from similar populations. Dietary patterns were extracted by applying principal component analyses to the dietary information collected from a sample of 3550 women recruited from seven screening centres belonging to the Spanish breast cancer (BC) screening network (Determinants of Mammographic Density in Spain (DDM-Spain) study). The resulting patterns were compared with three dietary patterns obtained from a previous Spanish case-control study on female BC (Epidemiological study of the Spanish group for breast cancer research (GEICAM: grupo Español de investigación en cáncer de mama)) using the dietary intake data of 973 healthy participants. The level of agreement between patterns was determined using both the congruence coefficient (CC) between the pattern loadings (considering patterns with a CC≥0·85 as fairly similar) and the linear correlation between patterns scores (considering as fairly similar those patterns with a statistically significant correlation). The conclusions reached with both methods were compared. This is the first study exploring the reproducibility of data-driven patterns from two studies and the first using the CC to determine pattern similarity. We were able to reproduce the EpiGEICAM Western pattern in the DDM-Spain sample (CC=0·90). However, the reproducibility of the Prudent (CC=0·76) and Mediterranean (CC=0·77) patterns was not as good. The linear correlation between pattern scores was statistically significant in all cases, highlighting its arbitrariness for determining pattern similarity. We conclude that the reproducibility of widely prevalent dietary patterns is better than the reproducibility of more population-specific patterns. More methodological studies are needed to establish an objective measurement and threshold to determine pattern similarity.


Asunto(s)
Encuestas sobre Dietas/estadística & datos numéricos , Dieta/estadística & datos numéricos , Análisis de Componente Principal , Adulto , Neoplasias de la Mama , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Encuestas sobre Dietas/métodos , Femenino , Humanos , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , España
13.
Menopause ; 23(5): 556-64, 2016 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26731688

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The use of some forms of hormone therapy (HT) is associated with an increase in mammographic density-a major risk factor for breast cancer. The role of isoflavones, however, is unclear. Here, we quantify the prevalence of HT and isoflavone use among postmenopausal Spanish women, determine associated risk factors, and explore the relationship between these therapies and mammographic density. METHODS: This cross-sectional study included 2,754 postmenopausal women who underwent breast cancer screening in seven geographical areas. Mammographic density was evaluated using Boyd's semiquantitative scale. Multinomial logistic regression models were adjusted to assess risk factors associated with both therapies. Ordinal regression models were fitted to study the association between HT and isoflavone consumption with mammographic density. RESULTS: The prevalence of ever-use of HT was 12%, whereas that of the current use was 2.3%. Isoflavone lifetime prevalence was 3.7%, and current use was 1.7%. The most common HT types were tibolone and estrogens. Surgical menopause, oral contraceptive use, educational level, population density, and years since menopause were positively associated with HT, whereas body mass index and parity were inversely associated. Mammographic density was not associated with current or past HT use. However, women who reported having consumed isoflavones in the past and those who started their use after menopause had a higher mammographic density when compared with never-users (odds ratio 1.98, 95% CI 1.21-3.25, P = 0.007; and odds ratio 1.60, 95% CI 1.01-2.53, P = 0.045 respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Our results show a low prevalence of HT and isoflavone use in postmenopausal Spanish women. In this population, HT use was not associated with mammographic density, whereas some categories of isoflavone users had higher density.


Asunto(s)
Densidad de la Mama/efectos de los fármacos , Terapia de Reemplazo de Estrógeno/efectos adversos , Isoflavonas/efectos adversos , Mamografía/métodos , Posmenopausia/efectos de los fármacos , Anciano , Neoplasias de la Mama/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias de la Mama/etiología , Estudios Transversales , Detección Precoz del Cáncer/métodos , Estrógenos/efectos adversos , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Norpregnenos/efectos adversos , España
14.
Cancer Epidemiol ; 40: 22-30, 2016 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26613540

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Accumulated exposure to hormones and growth factors during early life may influence the future risk of breast cancer (BC). This study examines the influence of childhood-related, socio-demographic and anthropometric variables on BC risk, overall and by specific pathologic subtypes. METHODS: This is a case-control study where 1539 histologically-confirmed BC cases (23-85 years) and 1621 population controls, frequency matched by age, were recruited in 10 Spanish provinces. Perinatal and childhood-related characteristics were directly surveyed by trained staff. The association with BC risk, globally and according to menopausal status and pathologic subtypes, was evaluated using logistic and multinomial regression models, adjusting for tumor specific risk factors. RESULTS: Birth characteristics were not related with BC risk. However, women with high socioeconomic level at birth presented a decreased BC risk (OR=0.45; 95% CI=0.29-0.70), while those whose mothers were aged over 39 years at their birth showed an almost significant excess risk of hormone receptor positive tumors (HR+) (OR=1.35; 95% CI=0.99-1.84). Women who were taller than their girl mates before puberty showed increased postmenopausal BC risk (OR=1.26; 95% CI=1.03-1.54) and increased HR+ BC risk (OR=1.26; 95% CI=1.04-1.52). Regarding prepubertal weight, while those women who were thinner than average showed higher postmenopausal BC risk (OR=1.46; 95% CI=1.20-1.78), associated with HR+ tumors (OR=1.34; 95% CI=1.12-1.61) and with triple negative tumors (OR=1.56; 95% CI=1.03-2.35), those who were heavier than average presented lower premenopausal BC risk (OR=0.64; 95% CI=0.46-0.90) and lower risk of epidermal growth factor receptor positive tumors (OR=0.61; 95% CI=0.40-0.93). CONCLUSION: These data reflect the importance of hormones and growth factors in the early stages of life, when the mammary gland is in development and therefore more vulnerable to proliferative stimuli.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama/epidemiología , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estatura , Peso Corporal , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Femenino , Humanos , Edad Materna , Persona de Mediana Edad , Embarazo , Factores de Riesgo , Factores Socioeconómicos , Adulto Joven
15.
PLoS One ; 10(7): e0132684, 2015.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26208331

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Mammographic density (MD) is considered a strong predictor of Breast Cancer (BC). The objective of the present study is to explore the association between MD and the compliance with the World Cancer Research Fund and the American Institute for Cancer Research (WCRF/AICR) recommendations for cancer prevention. METHODS: Data of 3584 women attending screening from a population-based multicenter cross-sectional study (DDM-Spain) collected from October 7, 2007 through July 14, 2008, was used to calculate a score that measures the level of compliance with the WCRF/AICR recommendations: R1)Maintain adequate body weight; R2)Be physically active; 3R)Limit the intake of high density foods; R4)Eat mostly plant foods; R5)Limit the intake of animal foods; R6)Limit alcohol intake; R7)Limit salt and salt preserved food intake; R8)Meet nutritional needs through diet. The association between the score and MD (assessed by a single radiologist using a semi-quantitative scale) was evaluated using ordinal logistic models with random center-specific intercepts adjusted for the main determinants of MD. Stratified analyses by menopausal status and smoking status were also carried out. RESULTS: A higher compliance with the WCRF/AICR recommendations was associated with lower MD (OR1-unit increase = 0.93 95%CI:0.86;0.99). The association was stronger in postmenopausal women (OR = 0.91 95%CI:0.84;0.99) and nonsmokers (OR = 0.87;95%CI:0.80;0.96 for nonsmokers, OR = 1.01 95%CI:0.91;1.12 for smokers, P-interaction = 0.042). Among nonsmokers, maintaining adequate body weight (OR = 0.81 95%CI:0.65;1.01), practicing physical activity (OR = 0.68 95%CI:0.48;0.96) and moderating the intake of high-density foods (OR = 0.58 95%CI:0.40;0.86) and alcoholic beverages (OR = 0.76 95%CI:0.55;1.05) were the recommendations showing the strongest associations with MD. CONCLUSIONS: postmenopausal women and non-smokers with greater compliance with the WCRF/AICR guidelines have lower MD. These results may provide guidance to design specific recommendations for screening attendants with high MD and therefore at higher risk of developing BC.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama/prevención & control , Glándulas Mamarias Humanas/anomalías , Cooperación del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Densidad de la Mama , Neoplasias de la Mama/diagnóstico , Neoplasias de la Mama/epidemiología , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Tamizaje Masivo , Posmenopausia , Factores de Riesgo , España/epidemiología
16.
Int J Cancer ; 136(10): 2427-36, 2015 May 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25353672

RESUMEN

Mammographic density (MD) is an intermediate phenotype for breast cancer. Previous studies have identified genetic variants associated with MD; however, much of the genetic contribution to MD is unexplained. We conducted a two-stage genome-wide association analysis among the participants in the "Determinants of Density in Mammographies in Spain" study, together with a replication analysis in women from the Australian MD Twins and Sisters Study. Our discovery set covered a total of 3,351 Caucasian women aged 45 to 68 years, recruited from Spanish breast cancer screening centres. MD was blindly assessed by a single reader using Boyd's scale. A two-stage approach was employed, including a feature selection phase exploring 575,374 SNPs in 239 pairs of women with extreme phenotypes and a verification stage for the 183 selected SNPs in the remaining sample (2,873 women). Replication was conducted in 1,786 women aged 40 to 70 years old recruited via the Australian Twin Registry, where MD were measured using Cumulus-3.0, assessing 14 SNPs with a p value <0.10 in stage 2. Finally, two genetic variants in high linkage disequilibrium with our best hit were studied using the whole Spanish sample. Evidence of association with MD was found for variant rs11205277 (OR = 0.74; 95% CI = 0.67-0.81; p = 1.33 × 10(-10) ). In replication analysis, only a marginal association between this SNP and absolute dense area was found. There were also evidence of association between MD and SNPs in high linkage disequilibrium with rs11205277, rs11205303 in gene MTMR11 (OR = 0.73; 95% CI = 0.66-0.80; p = 2.64 × 10(-11) ) and rs67807996 in gene OTUD7B (OR = 0.72; 95% CI = 0.66-0.80; p = 2.03 × 10(-11)). Our findings provide additional evidence on common genetic variations that may contribute to MD.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama/genética , Cromosomas Humanos Par 1/genética , Endopeptidasas/genética , Estudio de Asociación del Genoma Completo/métodos , Glándulas Mamarias Humanas/anomalías , Proteínas/genética , Adulto , Anciano , Australia , Densidad de la Mama , Neoplasias de la Mama/etnología , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Predisposición Genética a la Enfermedad , Variación Genética , Humanos , Desequilibrio de Ligamiento , Mamografía , Persona de Mediana Edad , Polimorfismo de Nucleótido Simple , España , Estudios en Gemelos como Asunto
17.
Eur J Cancer ; 50(1): 185-92, 2014 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24041876

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: There is concern about detection of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) in screening mammography. DCIS accounts for a substantial proportion of screen-detected lesions but its effect on breast cancer mortality is debated. The International Cancer Screening Network conducted a comparative analysis to determine variation in DCIS detection. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data were collected during 2004-2008 on number of screening examinations, detected breast cancers, DCIS cases and Globocan 2008 breast cancer incidence rates derived from national or regional cancer registers. We calculated screen-detection rates for breast cancers and DCIS. RESULTS: Data were obtained from 15 screening settings in 12 countries; 7,176,050 screening examinations; 29,605 breast cancers and 5324 DCIS cases. The ratio between highest and lowest breast cancer incidence was 2.88 (95% confidence interval (CI) 2.76-3.00); 2.97 (95% CI 2.51-3.51) for detection of breast cancer; and 3.49 (95% CI 2.70-4.51) for detection of DCIS. CONCLUSIONS: Considerable international variation was found in DCIS detection. This variation could not be fully explained by variation in incidence nor in breast cancer detection rates. It suggests the potential for wide discrepancies in management of DCIS resulting in overtreatment of indolent DCIS or undertreatment of potentially curable disease. Comprehensive cancer registration is needed to monitor DCIS detection. Efforts to understand discrepancies and standardise management may improve care.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama/diagnóstico por imagen , Carcinoma Ductal de Mama/diagnóstico por imagen , Carcinoma Intraductal no Infiltrante/diagnóstico por imagen , Anciano , Neoplasias de la Mama/diagnóstico , Neoplasias de la Mama/epidemiología , Carcinoma Ductal de Mama/diagnóstico , Carcinoma Ductal de Mama/epidemiología , Carcinoma Intraductal no Infiltrante/diagnóstico , Carcinoma Intraductal no Infiltrante/epidemiología , Recolección de Datos , Detección Precoz del Cáncer/métodos , Europa (Continente)/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Mamografía/métodos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
18.
Med. clín (Ed. impr.) ; 141(1): 13-23, jul. 2013. tab, ilus
Artículo en Español | IBECS | ID: ibc-113517

RESUMEN

Fundamento y objetivo: Describir a nivel nacional y por Comunidades Autónomas (CCAA) indicadores de proceso y resultado de los programas de cribado de cáncer de mama españoles. Pacientes y método: Se describen los resultados globales y desagregados por CCAA correspondientes al período 2007-2008, de resultado (participación, tasa de detección de cáncer y características de los tumores detectados) y de proceso (pruebas adicionales y revisiones intermedias), clasificados por tipos de mujeres cribadas (iniciales y sucesivas regulares e irregulares) y por grupos de edad. Los resultados se comparan con los valores de referencia establecidos en la Guía Europea. Resultados: La cobertura del cribado de cáncer de mama es del 100% en el territorio nacional. La participación global fue del 69,68%, con una adherencia del 91,35%. Se realizaron pruebas adicionales de cualquier tipo en el 4,93% de mujeres y de carácter invasivo en un 0,66%. En el 3,56% se indicó una revisión intermedia. La tasa de detección fue del 3,49‰ (5,35‰ ajustada por edad). Un 14,29% de los tumores fueron intraductales. El 29,49% de los invasivos resultaron ≤ 1 cm y un 62,22% no presentaron afectación ganglionar axilar. Conclusiones: A pesar de evidenciarse la variabilidad en los datos aportados por las distintas CCAA, así como la necesidad de mejorar la homogeneidad de los sistemas de información, en su conjunto, los indicadores evaluados de los programas de cribado de cáncer de mama alcanzan los estándares especificados en las directrices europeas (AU)


Background and objective: To describe national and regional indicators of process and outcome of breast cancer screening programs in Spain. Patients and method: Overall results and broken down by regions are studied for the period 2007-2008. Outcome indicators (participation, cancer detection rate and characteristics of tumors detected) and process indicators (and intermediate mammograms), classified by types of women screened (initial and consequent regular and irregular) and age groups, are analyzed. Results are compared with reference values established in the European Guidelines. Results: Breast cancer screening coverage is 100% in the country. The overall participation was 69.68% with an adherence of 91.35%. Further assessments of any procedure were performed in 4.93% and invasive further assessments in 0.66%. Intermediate mammograms were indicated in 3.56%. The detection rate was 3.49‰ (5.35‰ age-adjusted); 14.29% of the tumors were intraductal. The 29.49% of the invasive tumors were ≤ 1 cm in diameter with 62.22% showing no axillary lymph node involvement. Conclusions: Despite the variability evident in the data provided by the different autonomous communities and the need to improve the homogeneity of information systems as a whole, the assessed indicators meet the standards specified in the European guidelines (AU)


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Femenino , Detección Precoz del Cáncer/métodos , Tamizaje Masivo/métodos , Neoplasias de la Mama/prevención & control , Evaluación de Resultados de Acciones Preventivas
19.
Breast Cancer Res Treat ; 138(1): 249-59, 2013 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23378108

RESUMEN

The Gail model for predicting the absolute risk of invasive breast cancer has been validated extensively in US populations, but its performance in the international setting remains uncertain. We evaluated the predictive accuracy of the Gail model in 54,649 Spanish women aged 45-68 years who were free of breast cancer at the 1996-1998 baseline mammographic examination in the population-based Navarre Breast Cancer Screening Program. Incident cases of invasive breast cancer and competing deaths were ascertained until the end of 2005 (average follow-up of 7.7 years) through linkage with population-based cancer and mortality registries. The Gail model was tested for calibration and discrimination in its original form and after recalibration to the lower breast cancer incidence and risk factor prevalence in the study cohort, and compared through cross-validation with a Navarre model fully developed from this cohort. The original Gail model overpredicted significantly the 835 cases of invasive breast cancer observed in the cohort (ratio of expected to observed cases 1.46, 95 % CI 1.36-1.56). The recalibrated Gail model was well calibrated overall (expected-to-observed ratio 1.00, 95 % CI 0.94-1.07), but it tended to underestimate risk for women in low-risk quintiles and to overestimate risk in high-risk quintiles (P = 0.01). The Navarre model showed good cross-validated calibration overall (expected-to-observed ratio 0.98, 95 % CI 0.92-1.05) and in different cohort subsets. The Navarre and Gail models had modest cross-validated discrimination indexes of 0.542 (95 % CI 0.521-0.564) and 0.544 (95 % CI 0.523-0.565), respectively. Although the original Gail model cannot be applied directly to populations with different underlying rates of invasive breast cancer, it can readily be recalibrated to provide unbiased estimates of absolute risk in such populations. Nevertheless, its limited discrimination ability at the individual level highlights the need to develop extended models with additional strong risk factors.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama/epidemiología , Modelos Estadísticos , Riesgo , Población Blanca , Factores de Edad , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Invasividad Neoplásica , Vigilancia de la Población , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , España
20.
Breast Cancer Res ; 15(1): R9, 2013 Jan 29.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23360535

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: It is not clear whether high mammographic density (MD) is equally associated with all subtypes of breast cancer (BC). We investigated the association between MD and subsequent BC, considering invasiveness, means of detection, pathologic subtype, and the time elapsed since mammographic exploration and BC diagnosis. METHODS: BC cases occurring in the population of women who attended screening from 1997 through 2004 in Navarre, a Spanish region with a fully consolidated screening program, were identified via record linkage with the Navarre Cancer Registry (n = 1,172). Information was extracted from the records of their first attendance at screening in that period. For each case, we randomly selected four controls, matched by screening round, year of birth, and place of residence. Cases were classified according to invasiveness (ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) versus invasive tumors), pathologic subtype (considering hormonal receptors and HER2), and type of diagnosis (screen-detected versus interval cases). MD was evaluated by a single, experienced radiologist by using a semiquantitative scale. Data on BC risk factors were obtained by the screening program in the corresponding round. The association between MD and tumor subtype was assessed by using conditional logistic regression. RESULTS: MD was clearly associated with subsequent BC. The odds ratio (OR) for the highest MD category (MD >75%) compared with the reference category (MD <10%) was similar for DCIS (OR = 3.47; 95% CI = 1.46 to 8.27) and invasive tumors (OR = 2.95; 95% CI = 2.01 to 4.35). The excess risk was particularly high for interval cases (OR = 7.72; 95% CI = 4.02 to 14.81) in comparison with screened detected tumors (OR = 2.17; 95% CI = 1.40 to 3.36). Sensitivity analyses excluding interval cases diagnosed in the first year after MD assessment or immediately after an early recall to screening yielded similar results. No differences were seen regarding pathologic subtypes. The excess risk associated with MD persisted for at least 7 to 8 years after mammographic exploration. CONCLUSIONS: Our results confirm that MD is an important risk factor for all types of breast cancer. High breast density strongly increases the risk of developing an interval tumor, and this excess risk is not completely explained by a possible masking effect.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama/epidemiología , Carcinoma Intraductal no Infiltrante/epidemiología , Glándulas Mamarias Humanas/anomalías , Mamografía , Anciano , Densidad de la Mama , Neoplasias de la Mama/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Carcinoma Intraductal no Infiltrante/diagnóstico por imagen , Carcinoma Intraductal no Infiltrante/patología , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Femenino , Humanos , Glándulas Mamarias Humanas/patología , Tamizaje Masivo , Persona de Mediana Edad , Factores de Riesgo , España , Población Blanca
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...