A pharmacoscintigraphic evaluation of oral budesonide given as controlled-release (Entocort) capsules.

AIMS: To investigate the gastrointestinal pharmacokinetics of controlled-release (Entocort) and standard budesonide capsules. METHODS: Six Crohn's disease patients and eight healthy controls were given controlled-release capsules containing budesonide and an inert 111In label, following breakfast. In the patients, a standard capsule containing deuterium-labelled budesonide was given simultaneously. In the controls, on a separate occasion, the controlled-release capsules were given in the fasting state. Gastrointestinal transit was recorded by a gamma camera. Plasma budesonide and deuterium-labelled budesonide were used to estimate drug release, and urine cortisol was used to assess systemic effects. RESULTS: Budesonide delivery to the ileo-colonic region was significantly greater after the intake of the controlled-release capsules [69%; 95% confidence interval (CI), 54-84] than after the standard capsules (30%; 95% CI, 15-45) (P = 0.005). Fasting had little impact on uptake. The transit and pharmacokinetics of budesonide were similar in both subject groups, although systemic availability was higher in patients (21%; 95% CI, 13-33) than in controls (12%; 95% CI, 10-14) (P = 0.009). Urinary cortisol was, however, similar in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: A major fraction of budesonide is released in the ileum and throughout the colon, the intended target for the controlled-release formulation. The prandial state has little effect on budesonide uptake.

Pharmacokinetics of budesonide controlled-release capsules when taken with omeprazole.

AIM: To investigate whether omeprazole affects the pharmacokinetics and systemic effects of budesonide controlled-release capsules when the two medications are taken together. METHODS: Thirteen healthy volunteers were enrolled into a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, cross-over study. Participants received omeprazole, 20 mg/day, or placebo every morning for 5 days, with three 3-mg budesonide controlled-release capsules being given with omeprazole or placebo on day 5. After a 12-day washout period, participants were switched from omeprazole to placebo, or vice versa, and the trial was repeated. Blood samples for pharmacokinetic evaluation and urine samples for cortisol assessments were collected before and after the budesonide doses. RESULTS: No statistically significant differences were seen between omeprazole and placebo treatment with regard to any of the parameters analysed, including the maximum budesonide plasma concentration, time to concentration maximum, area under the concentration-time curve, mean residence time and urinary excretion of cortisol. Very few adverse events were reported during the trial, and the majority were of mild to moderate severity. CONCLUSION: Omeprazole treatment does not affect the pharmacokinetics or systemic effects of budesonide controlled-release capsules when the two medications are taken simultaneously.

Pharmacokinetics of budesonide controlled ileal release capsules in children and adults with active Crohn's disease.

BACKGROUND: Systemic glucocorticosteroid therapy is effective in Crohn's disease, but is associated with side-effects. Budesonide has high topical anti-inflammatory activity, but considerably lower systemic activity than other oral glucocorticosteroids. AIM: To evaluate the systemic exposure to budesonide (controlled ileal release capsules) in children and adults with active Crohn's disease, and to assess the suppression of plasma cortisol. METHODS: In an open label study, patients (eight children and six adults) with active Crohn's disease received 9 mg budesonide (Entocort capsules) orally once daily for 7 days. Plasma concentrations were determined on the seventh day of administration, and pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated. For reference, 0.5 mg budesonide was given intravenously separately. Plasma cortisol levels were compared with the pre-treatment baseline values. RESULTS: Systemic exposure to budesonide (AUC0-24 h) after 1 week of oral administration was 41 +/- 21 nmol/L x h (mean +/- s.d.) in children and 35 +/- 20 nmol/L x h in adults. The estimated systemic availability in children was 9 +/- 5% and in adults 11 +/- 7%. The mean plasma cortisol (AUC0-24 h) decreased by 64 +/- 18% in children and by 50 +/- 27% in adults. CONCLUSIONS: The systemic exposure, systemic availability and cortisol suppression after oral administration of 9 mg budesonide were similar in children and adults with active Crohn's disease. Budesonide was well tolerated and no clinically important safety-related findings were identified.

Pharmacokinetics and systemic activity of fluticasone via Diskus and pMDI, and of budesonide via Turbuhaler.

AIMS: To determine the basal pharmacokinetics, lung uptake and plasma cortisol suppression for two commonly prescribed inhaled corticosteroids. METHODS: Twenty-one subjects (13 healthy and 8 mild asthmatic patients) received fluticasone propionate via a chlorofluorocarbon-propelled pressurized metered-dose inhaler (pMDI) (healthy subjects only) and Diskus and budesonide via Turbuhaler, 1000 microg twice daily for 7 days. Intravenous doses (200 microg) of both compounds were used as references. Plasma concentrations of fluticasone and budesonide were determined during 48 h by liquid chromatography plus tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS-MS). Plasma concentrations of cortisol were determined by LC-MS every second hour for 24 h at baseline, and following each treatment. RESULTS: The volume of distribution was found to be larger and the elimination half-life and mean absorption time longer for fluticasone than for budesonide. The systemic availability of budesonide via Turbuhaler (39%) was significantly higher than that of fluticasone via Diskus (13%) (ratio 3.0 [2.5, 3.6] with 95% confidence interval [CI]), and via pMDI (21%) (ratio 1.8 [1.3, 2.3]). In addition, at steady state the systemic availability of fluticasone via pMDI was significantly higher than via Diskus (ratio 1.6 [1.1, 2.2]). The lung deposition of budesonide via Turbuhaler was 2.2-fold [1.7, 2.9] higher than that of fluticasone pMDI and 3.4-fold [2.8, 4.0] higher than that of fluticasone Diskus. In addition, the lung deposition of fluticasone via pMDI was 1.5-fold [1.1, 2.9] higher than that via the Diskus inhaler. Plasma cortisol (24 h) was significantly reduced vs baseline for all three treatments. The cortisol concentration vs baseline was 12% for fluticasone pMDI, which was significantly lower (ratio 0.32 [0.24, 0.42]) than that for fluticasone Diskus (39%), and for budesonide Turbuhaler (46%) (ratio 0.27 [0.21, 0.37]). The plasma cortisol concentration did not differ significantly between treatments with fluticasone Diskus and budesonide Turbuhaler (ratio 0.87 [0.65; 1.15]). CONCLUSIONS: Budesonide and fluticasone differ in their pharmacokinetic properties in that although clearance is the same, the rate of uptake and elimination is slower for fluticasone. Despite a significantly higher pulmonary availability of budesonide via Turbuhaler, the plasma cortisol suppression is less than that of fluticasone via pMDI and similar to that of fluticasone via Diskus. There is no indication of any difference between healthy subjects and mild asthmatic patients in the pharmacokinetics and plasma cortisol suppression of fluticasone and budesonide.

Pharmacokinetics of budesonide and its major ester metabolite after inhalation and intravenous administration of budesonide in the rat.

Fatty acid esterification of budesonide (BUD) has previously been documented in vitro as well as in large airway tissues after in vivo administration. This reversible esterification has the potential to prolong the anti-inflammatory effect of BUD and improve its airway selectivity. In the present study we characterized the plasma and tissue kinetics of BUD in the rat after inhalation and intravenous administration, and fitted a semiphysiological compartment model to the data. After inhalation, BUD half-life was longer (8.2 h) in trachea than in plasma (3.7 h), with similar data after intravenous dosing. BUD-oleate was formed in all tissues and had a longer half-life than BUD in trachea (18-20 h) but a similar half-life in plasma and muscle. Although the major fraction of BUD and BUD-oleate in the body was found in muscle, the airways, especially trachea, possessed a high capacity to form BUD-oleate. According to steady-state simulations, BUD-oleate accumulated in trachea, giving rise to persistent and higher concentrations of active BUD as compared with a situation wherein esters were not formed. BUD esters had no effect on plasma levels of BUD at steady state, however. BUD and BUD-oleate were shown to have a 2-fold and 10- to 50-fold selectivity, respectively, in airways as compared with muscle tissue after intravenous administration. After inhalation, the corresponding figures for selectivity were 10 and 50 to 1000, respectively.

Nasal retention of budesonide and fluticasone in man: formation of airway mucosal budesonide-esters in vivo.

AIMS: The efficacy of topical glucocorticosteroids in rhinitis and asthma is likely to depend on drug retention in the airway mucosa. With fluticasone propionate, retention may be achieved exclusively by lipophilicity, whereas for budesonide an additional possibility may be provided by its ability to form fatty acid esters in the airway mucosa that release the active drug. The aim of the present study was to determine the nasal mucosal retention of budesonide and fluticasone propionate, and the occurrence of budesonide-esters (budesonide-oleate, budesonide-palmitate) in the nasal mucosa. METHODS: In the present study, involving 24 healthy subjects, we have examined nasal mucosal drug retention of single doses of topical budesonide (256 microg) and fluticasone propionate (200 microg). Treatments were given consecutively and the administration sequence was randomised. Subjects were randomised into four parallel groups and two nasal biopsies were taken from each subject, i.e. before and at 2 h, at 2 and 6 h, at 6 and 24 h, or before and at 24 h after drug administration, resulting in 12 biopsies/time point. The measurement of unesterified budesonide, budesonide-oleate, budesonide-palmitate, and fluticasone propionate was based on microwave extraction procedures combined with liquid-chromatography/tandem mass-spectrometry. RESULTS: Neither of the analytes was detected in samples taken before glucocorticosteroid administration. After administration, unesterified budesonide, budesonide-esters, and fluticasone propionate were detected in the tissue from 23, 20, and 19 subjects, respectively. The mean tissue levels of budesonide at 2 and 6 h were 1051 and 176 pmol g(-1); the mean levels of fluticasone propionate at these time points were 237 and 10 pmol g(-1). The dose-corrected budesonide/fluticasone propionate tissue concentration ratios were 3.5 (P = 0.07) and 13.7 (P < 0.0002), respectively. At 24 h, budesonide and fluticasone propionate were detected in 8/12 and 3/12 of the biopsies, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The present study demonstrates the formation of budesonide-esters in the human nasal mucosa in vivo, and that budesonide is retained in the nasal mucosa to a greater extent than fluticasone propionate. It is suggested that the formation of budesonide-esters and their subsequent release of budesonide contributes to an extended retention of budesonide in the airway mucosa.

Effect of food on the pharmacokinetics of budesonide controlled ileal release capsules in patients with active Crohn's disease.

AIM: To study the influence of food on the systemic availability of budesonide in patients with active Crohn's disease. METHODS: Eight patients with an established diagnosis of Crohn's disease each received 9 mg budesonide controlled ileal release (CIR) capsules (Entocort capsules) orally on two separate occasions: once in a fasting state and once after a heavy breakfast. For reference, deuterium-labelled ((2)H(8)) budesonide, 0.5 mg, was given intravenously. Plasma concentrations of budesonide and (2)H(8)-budesonide were determined for 12 h, and their pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated. RESULTS: Average systemic availability of budesonide during fasting conditions was 10.7%, area under the curve was 27.5 nmol/L x h and peak plasma concentration was 4.1 nmol/L. Corresponding postprandial values were 13.2%, 27.0 nmol/L x h and 3. 8 nmol/L. Food increased the mean absorption time from 4.5 to 6.8 h (P=0.0012). Body clearance of budesonide was about 25% higher after eating (P=0.0015). CONCLUSIONS: Food had little influence on systemic availability and peak plasma concentrations of budesonide administered in CIR capsules. Absorption was retarded postprandially, likely due to delayed gastric emptying. Budesonide in CIR capsules can be administered at the same dose regardless of prandial status in patients with Crohn's disease.

Effect of an oral contraceptive on the plasma levels of budesonide and prednisolone and the influence on plasma cortisol.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether the use of an oral contraceptive would influence plasma levels of budesonide (Entocort capsules) or prednisolone (plain tablets) during repeated oral administration of these glucocorticosteroids. Plasma concentrations of cortisol and ethinyl estradiol (INN, ethinylestradiol) were also compared. METHODS: Forty healthy women took part in this single-blind, randomized placebo-controlled study with two parallel groups, where a three-way crossover design was applied within groups. One group was taking an oral contraceptive (150 microg desogestrel and 30 microg ethinyl estradiol); the other group (control) was not. On seven consecutive mornings, oral doses of 4.5 mg budesonide, 20 mg prednisolone, or placebo were administered. There was a washout period of at least one menstrual cycle between administration periods. RESULTS: In the oral contraceptive users, the average plasma concentration of prednisolone was 131% higher than in the control group (P < .001), whereas the average plasma concentration of budesonide was only 22% higher (not significant). Mean plasma cortisol levels were suppressed by 90% and 82% with prednisolone and by 22% and 28% with budesonide in oral contraceptive users and the control subjects, respectively. The group difference was significant with prednisolone (P < .001) but not with budesonide. Ethinyl estradiol levels in plasma were not affected by administration of either glucocorticosteroid. CONCLUSION: No difference was found in plasma levels of budesonide or in cortisol suppression after administration of budesonide capsules in women taking the oral contraceptive and those who were not. The oral contraceptive users had much higher plasma levels of prednisolone and greater cortisol suppression. This result suggests that oral budesonide can be used with maintained safety in women using oral contraceptives.

Dose-proportional pharmacokinetics of budesonide inhaled via Turbuhaler.

AIMS: The present pharmacokinetic study was undertaken to determine the dose proportionality of three different doses of budesonide-400 microg, 800 microg or 1600 microg administered twice daily by a dry-powder inhaler (Turbuhaler ) in adult patients with mild asthma. METHODS: A total of 38 patients received budesonide by inhalation, 13 received 400 microg twice daily, 12 received 800 microg twice daily and 13 received 1600 microg twice daily. Mean FEV1 at inclusion was 3.4, 4.0 and 3.9 l min-1 in the three groups, respectively. Blood samples were taken after a single dose, and after 3 weeks of daily treatment, for pharmacokinetic evaluation. Plasma concentrations of budesonide were determined by liquid chromatography plus mass spectrometry. RESULTS: Eleven evaluable patients remained in each dose group. Mean time to peak budesonide plasma concentration (tmax ) was short (0.28-0.40 h) and did not differ between treatment groups. Budesonide concentrations declined rapidly thereafter, indicating efficient pulmonary absorption and rapid elimination with a half-life of approximately 3 h. Cmax was 1. 4(2.0) nmol l-1 (single (repeated) doses), 2.6(3.6) nmol l-1 and 5. 4(6.4) nmol l-1 after 400, 800 and 1600 microg twice daily, respectively. The corresponding results for the area under the plasma concentration vs time curve (AUC) were 271(325), 490(628) and 915(1096) nmol l-1 min. Ninety percent confidence intervals for pairwise dose-normalized Cmax and AUC comparisons between groups were large but contained unity in all cases, thus indicating dose-proportional pharmacokinetics. Regression on analysis supported these findings. Mean AUC after repeated doses (AUC(0,12 h,RD)) was on average 23% higher than the mean AUC after single doses (AUC(0, infinity,SD)(P=0.04) with no significant differences between doses, indicating slight accumulation following bid dosing. CONCLUSIONS: In this relatively small study, budesonide inhaled via Turbuhaler appeared to have dose-proportional pharmacokinetics, both within and above the clinically recommended dose range for asthmatic patients.

Systemic availability of budesonide after nasal administration of three different formulations: pressurized aerosol, aqueous pump spray, and powder.

AIMS: The present study was undertaken to determine the absolute systemic availability of budesonide from three different devices for nasal administration: pressurized aerosol, aqueous pump spray, and powder. METHODS: Sixteen healthy, non-smoking, volunteers participated in this open, randomized, and crossover study. All subjects received budesonide as an intravenous dose of 400 microg, and as three, single-dose, intranasal administrations: pressurized aerosol 800 microg, aqueous pump spray 400 microg, and powder 800 microg. Blood was sampled for 10 h after each administration and budesonide was assayed in plasma by liquid chromatography plus mass spectrometry. RESULTS: The mean [95% CI] systemic availability of budesonide with reference to the metered dose was: 13 [10; 15]%, 29 [23; 37]%, and 20 [16; 23]%, and the maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) was attained at (tmax) 2.0, 0.7, and 0.4 h after administration for the pressurized aerosol, aqueous pump spray, and powder, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The uptake of budesonide was more rapid and more complete, and the systemic availability of the drug was significantly higher from the aqueous pump spray and powder than from the pressurized aerosol.

A cortisol suppression dose-response comparison of budesonide in controlled ileal release capsules with prednisolone.

AIM: To assess the systemic effect of oral budesonide, given as Entocort controlled ileal release capsules, over a dose range of 3-15 mg/day, compared with that of a moderate dose (20 mg/day) of prednisolone. METHODS: Twenty four healthy subjects were given 3, 9 or 15 mg budesonide or 20 mg prednisolone once daily, or 4.5 mg budesonide b.d., or placebo for 5 days in a randomized, double-blind crossover study. The area under the curve (AUC) of plasma cortisol concentration and the amount of cortisol excreted in the urine were monitored. RESULTS: Both plasma and urine cortisol suppression showed a dose-response for the daily doses of budesonide. Prednisolone, 20 mg, suppressed plasma cortisol (AUC) statistically significantly more than 15 mg budesonide (P = 0.014), and 3 mg budesonide statistically significantly more than placebo (P = 0.010). No difference in AUC was detected between 9 mg and 4.5 mg budesonide b.d. Similar results for budesonide vs. placebo were obtained from urine cortisol excretion data. However, prednisolone affected urine cortisol less than it affected plasma cortisol. CONCLUSION: After 5 days of administration, budesonide controlled ileal release capsules, in both clinical (9 mg/day) and high doses (15 mg/day), affected plasma cortisol less than a moderate (20 mg/day) dose of prednisolone.

Pharmacological factors that influence the choice of inhaled corticosteroids.

Local therapeutic effect relative to the risk of adverse effects of inhaled drugs, i.e. airway selectivity, is determined by the efficiency of the delivery system and the physicochemical and pharmacokinetic properties of the drug molecule. For the inhaled corticosteroid formulations, many of the pharmacokinetic prerequisites for airway selectivity have been fulfilled, but there are still differences that may influence the choice of treatment regimens. This choice should be based on disease severity, age, inhalation technique, preference and expected compliance, together with a knowledge of individual features of different corticosteroid formulations. Simple to use, hand-held pressurised or breath-actuated inhalers have favourable lung deposition properties and are appropriate for most patients. For small children or severely ill patients, nebulised treatment or spacers may be advocated. A corticosteroid formulation with a high intrinsic activity and long duration of action allows for once-daily administration in some patient groups. These properties may also partly compensate for noncompliance when more frequent administration schemes are used. The risk of adverse effects is reduced if systemic exposure is held to a minimum by rapid elimination and low tissue distribution.

Lung deposition of budesonide from a pressurized metered-dose inhaler attached to a spacer.

The absolute systemic availability and pulmonary deposition of budesonide inhaled from a pressurized metered-dose inhaler (pMDI) attached to a Nebuhaler spacer was determined in 15 healthy subjects. The study was of an open cross-over design. Each subject randomly received three single doses of budesonide on separate days: 0.5 mg given intravenously and 1.0 mg (0.2 mg x 5) by inhalation from a pMDI with a Nebuhaler, with or without concomitant oral charcoal intake to prevent gastrointestinal absorption. Charcoal intake did not significantly affect the systemic availability or deposition of budesonide. The systemic availability was 36+/-14% (metered dose, mean+/-SD) with charcoal and 35+/-10% without. The pulmonary deposition was 36+/-14% with charcoal and 34+/-11% without. Erroneous administration, in which the canister was shaken only before the first of the five actuations, halved the systemic availability. In conclusion, the pulmonary deposition of budesonide from a pressurized metered-dose inhaler with Nebuhaler is high under optimum conditions. The small discrepancy between the systemic availability and pulmonary deposition indicates that the contribution from deposition in the oropharynx and subsequent absorption from the gastrointestinal tract is negligible. The marked reduction in the systemic availability of budesonide with the unshaken canisters confirms that the performance of a pressurized metered-dose inhaler is very much dependent on proper handling.

Pharmacokinetics and systemic effects of inhaled fluticasone propionate in healthy subjects.

AIMS: The present study was undertaken to see whether the difference in plasma cortisol suppression between single and repeated dosing of fluticasone propionate (FP) can be explained by systemic accumulation. METHODS: Twelve healthy subjects (six women) were given, in a crossover fashion, a single dose inhalation (1000 micrograms) of FP via Diskhaler and repeated inhalations (1000 micrograms twice daily) every 12 h during 7 days. There was a washout period of 2 weeks between the treatments. An intravenous dose of 20 micrograms FP was given as a reference. Plasma concentrations of FP for each treatment were determined by liquid chromatography plus tandem mass spectrometry. Plasma cortisol after the inhaled doses was determined using an immunoassay and was compared with baseline values. RESULTS: The average plasma concentration of FP was about 1.7 times higher after multiple inhalations than after a single dose. Systemic availability, mainly attributable to pulmonary deposition, was 15.6 [13.6-18.0]% of the nominal dose. Daytime plasma cortisol suppression vs baseline was 47 [20-65]% and 95 [93-97]% for the single and repeated doses, respectivley. CONCLUSIONS: To conclude, a slow elimination of FP leads to accumulation during repeated dosing. This accumulation may explain the marked decrease in plasma cortisol seen during treatment with fluticasone propionate within the clinical dose range.