Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 20
Filtrar
1.
Br J Nutr ; 113(5): 849-58, 2015 Mar 14.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25690300

RESUMEN

Individual lifestyle factors have been associated with lifestyle diseases and premature mortality by an accumulating body of evidence. The impact of a combination of lifestyle factors on mortality has been investigated in several studies, but few have applied a simple index taking national guidelines into account. The objective of the present prospective cohort study was to investigate the combined impact of adherence to five lifestyle factors (smoking, alcohol intake, physical activity, waist circumference and diet) on all-cause, cancer and cardiovascular mortality based on international and national health recommendations. A Cox proportional hazards model was used to estimate hazard ratios (HR) with 95 % CI. During a median follow-up of 14 years, 3941 men and 2827 women died. Among men, adherence to one additional health recommendation was associated with an adjusted HR of 0·73 (95 % CI 0·71, 0·75) for all-cause mortality, 0·74 (95 % CI 0·71, 0·78) for cancer mortality and 0·70 (95 % CI 0·65, 0·75) for cardiovascular mortality. Among women, the corresponding HR was 0·72 (95 % CI 0·70, 0·75) for all-cause mortality, 0·76 (95 % CI 0·73, 0·80) for cancer mortality and 0·63 (95 % CI 0·57, 0·70) for cardiovascular mortality. In the present study, adherence to merely one additional health recommendation had a protective effect on mortality risk, indicating a huge potential in enhancing healthy lifestyle behaviours of the population.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/prevención & control , Promoción de la Salud , Estilo de Vida , Neoplasias/prevención & control , Política Nutricional , Cooperación del Paciente , Abstinencia de Alcohol , Consumo de Bebidas Alcohólicas/efectos adversos , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/etiología , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/mortalidad , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/terapia , Estudios de Cohortes , Terapia Combinada , Dinamarca/epidemiología , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Mortalidad , Actividad Motora , Neoplasias/etiología , Neoplasias/mortalidad , Neoplasias/terapia , Sobrepeso/fisiopatología , Sobrepeso/prevención & control , Sobrepeso/terapia , Estudios Prospectivos , Cese del Hábito de Fumar , Circunferencia de la Cintura , Pérdida de Peso
2.
BMC Med ; 11: 63, 2013 Mar 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23497300

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Recently, some US cohorts have shown a moderate association between red and processed meat consumption and mortality supporting the results of previous studies among vegetarians. The aim of this study was to examine the association of red meat, processed meat, and poultry consumption with the risk of early death in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC). METHODS: Included in the analysis were 448,568 men and women without prevalent cancer, stroke, or myocardial infarction, and with complete information on diet, smoking, physical activity and body mass index, who were between 35 and 69 years old at baseline. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to examine the association of meat consumption with all-cause and cause-specific mortality. RESULTS: As of June 2009, 26,344 deaths were observed. After multivariate adjustment, a high consumption of red meat was related to higher all-cause mortality (hazard ratio (HR) = 1.14, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.01 to 1.28, 160+ versus 10 to 19.9 g/day), and the association was stronger for processed meat (HR = 1.44, 95% CI 1.24 to 1.66, 160+ versus 10 to 19.9 g/day). After correction for measurement error, higher all-cause mortality remained significant only for processed meat (HR = 1.18, 95% CI 1.11 to 1.25, per 50 g/d). We estimated that 3.3% (95% CI 1.5% to 5.0%) of deaths could be prevented if all participants had a processed meat consumption of less than 20 g/day. Significant associations with processed meat intake were observed for cardiovascular diseases, cancer, and 'other causes of death'. The consumption of poultry was not related to all-cause mortality. CONCLUSIONS: The results of our analysis support a moderate positive association between processed meat consumption and mortality, in particular due to cardiovascular diseases, but also to cancer.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/mortalidad , Dieta/efectos adversos , Conducta Alimentaria , Carne , Neoplasias/mortalidad , Adulto , Anciano , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/epidemiología , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias/epidemiología , Encuestas Nutricionales , Estudios Prospectivos , Análisis de Supervivencia , Estados Unidos
3.
J Nutr ; 143(4): 464-72, 2013 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23427329

RESUMEN

Cancer prevention guidelines recommend limiting intake of red meat and avoiding processed meat; however, few studies have been conducted on the effects of specific red meat subtypes on colon cancer or rectal cancer risk. The study aim was to evaluate associations between intake of red meat and its subtypes, processed meat, fish, and poultry and risk for colon cancer or rectal cancer in the Danish Diet, Cancer and Health cohort study. We also evaluated whether fish or poultry should replace red meat intake to prevent colon cancer or rectal cancer. During follow-up (13.4 y), 644 cases of colon cancer and 345 cases of rectal cancer occurred among 53,988 participants. Cox proportional hazards models were used to compute incidence rate ratio (IRRs) and 95% CIs. No associations were found between intake of red meat, processed meat, fish, or poultry and risk for colon cancer or rectal cancer. The risk associated with specific red meat subtypes depended on the animal of origin and cancer subsite; thus, the risk for colon cancer was significantly elevated for higher intake of lamb [IRR(per 5g/d) = 1.07 (95% CI: 1.02-1.13)], whereas the risk for rectal cancer was elevated for higher intake of pork [IRR(per 25g/d) = 1.18 (95% CI: 1.02-1.36)]. Substitution of fish for red meat was associated with a significantly lower risk for colon cancer [IRR(per 25g/d) = 0.89 (95% CI: 0.80-0.99)] but not rectal cancer. Substitution of poultry for red meat did not reduce either risk. This study suggests that the risks for colon cancer and potentially for rectal cancer differ according to the specific red meat subtype consumed.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias del Colon/epidemiología , Carne/efectos adversos , Neoplasias del Recto/epidemiología , Animales , Bovinos , Estudios de Cohortes , Neoplasias del Colon/etiología , Femenino , Peces , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Productos de la Carne , Persona de Mediana Edad , Aves de Corral , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Estudios Prospectivos , Neoplasias del Recto/etiología , Factores de Riesgo , Ovinos , Porcinos
4.
Int J Cancer ; 132(3): 617-24, 2013 Feb 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22610753

RESUMEN

Pancreatic cancer is the fourth most common cause of cancer death worldwide with large geographical variation, which implies the contribution of diet and lifestyle in its etiology. We examined the association of meat and fish consumption with risk of pancreatic cancer in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC). A total of 477,202 EPIC participants from 10 European countries recruited between 1992 and 2000 were included in our analysis. Until 2008, 865 nonendocrine pancreatic cancer cases have been observed. Calibrated relative risks (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were computed using multivariable-adjusted Cox hazard regression models. The consumption of red meat (RR per 50 g increase per day = 1.03, 95% CI = 0.93-1.14) and processed meat (RR per 50 g increase per day = 0.93, 95% CI = 0.71-1.23) were not associated with an increased pancreatic cancer risk. Poultry consumption tended to be associated with an increased pancreatic cancer risk (RR per 50 g increase per day = 1.72, 95% CI = 1.04-2.84); however, there was no association with fish consumption (RR per 50 g increase per day = 1.22, 95% CI = 0.92-1.62). Our results do not support the conclusion of the World Cancer Research Fund that red or processed meat consumption may possibly increase the risk of pancreatic cancer. The positive association of poultry consumption with pancreatic cancer might be a chance finding as it contradicts most previous findings.


Asunto(s)
Conducta Alimentaria , Productos Pesqueros , Carne , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/epidemiología , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/etiología , Animales , Estudios de Cohortes , Dieta , Femenino , Peces , Humanos , Estilo de Vida , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estado Nutricional , Aves de Corral , Estudios Prospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo
5.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev ; 21(12): 2138-48, 2012 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23033453

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Evidence from prospective studies on intake of meat and fish and risk of squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the upper aero-digestive tract (UADT) is scarce. We prospectively investigated the association of meat and fish intake with risk of SCC of the UADT and the possible mechanism via heme iron in the large multicenter European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) study. METHODS: Multivariable proportional hazards models were used to estimate relative risks (RR) of SCC of the UADT in relation to intake of total meat, as well as subtypes of meat, fish, and heme iron among 348,738 individuals from 7 European countries. RESULTS: During an average follow-up of 11.8 years, a total of 682 incident cases of UADT SCC were accrued. Intake of processed meat was positively associated with risk of SCC of the UADT in the total cohort [highest vs. lowest quintile: RR = 1.41; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.03-1.94], however, in stratified analyses, this association was confined to the group of current smokers (highest vs. lowest quintile: RR = 1.89; 95% CI = 1.22-2.93). Red meat, poultry, fish, and heme iron were not consistently related to UADT SCC. CONCLUSION: Higher intake of processed meat was positively associated with SCC of the UADT among smokers. Although this finding was stable in various sensitivity analyses, we cannot rule out residual confounding by smoking. Confirmation in future studies and identification of biologic mechanisms is warranted. IMPACT: Smokers may further increase their risk for SCC of the UADT if they additionally consume large amounts of processed meat.


Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/epidemiología , Hemo/administración & dosificación , Hierro de la Dieta/administración & dosificación , Neoplasias Laríngeas/epidemiología , Carne , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/etiología , Estudios de Cohortes , Europa (Continente)/epidemiología , Conducta Alimentaria , Femenino , Hemo/efectos adversos , Humanos , Hierro de la Dieta/efectos adversos , Neoplasias Laríngeas/etiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Estudios Prospectivos , Riesgo , Medición de Riesgo
6.
BMC Cancer ; 12: 183, 2012 May 17.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22594912

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: More than 50% of the colorectal cancer (CRC) etiology has been attributed to diet. Established or suspected dietary factors modifying risk of CRC are red meat, cereals, fish, and fibre. Diet and lifestyle may be linked to cancer through inflammation. Interleukin-10 (IL-10) is an anti-inflammatory cytokine. We wanted to test if dietary factors and IL10 polymorphisms interact in relation to colorectal carcinogenesis. METHODS: The functional IL10 polymorphism C-592A (rs1800872) and the marker rs3024505 were assessed in relation to diet and lifestyle in a nested case-cohort study of 378 CRC cases and 775 randomly selected participants from a prospective study of 57,053 persons. Genotyping data on the IL10 polymorphism C-592A, smoking and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID) was retrieved from Vogel et al. (Mutat Res, 2007; 624:88). Incidence rate ratios (IRR) and 95% Confidence Interval (95% CI) were calculated. RESULTS: No associations were found between the IL10 rs3024505 polymorphism and risk of CRC. There was interaction between rs3024505 and dietary fibre (P-value for interaction = 0.01). IL10 rs3024505 homozygous wildtype carriers were at 27% reduced risk of CRC per 10 g fibre per day (95% CI: 0.60-0.88) whereas variant carriers had no risk reduction by fibre intake. Also, interaction between IL10 C-592A and intake of fibre was found (P-value for interaction = 0.02). Among those eating <17.0 grams of fibre per day, carriers of an C-592A variant allele had a statistically significantly higher risk of colorectal cancer compared to homozygous wildtypes. No significant differences in colorectal cancer risk were observed between the reference group (CC and <17.0 g/day) and carriers of one C-592A variant allele eating 17.0 or more grams of dietary fibre per day. This suggests that the increased risk due to carrying the variant allele can be overcome by higher fibre intake. No interactions between IL10 polymorphisms and dietary meat, cereal, or fish intake, or between IL10 rs3024505 and smoking or NSAID use were found. CONCLUSIONS: In this northern Caucasian cohort we found interaction between IL10 and dietary fibre in CRC carcinogenesis. High intake of fibre seems to protect against CRC among individuals with IL10 related genetic susceptibility to CRC. This finding should be evaluated in other prospective and population-based cohorts with different ethnic groups.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Colorrectales/etiología , Fibras de la Dieta , Interleucina-10/genética , Polimorfismo de Nucleótido Simple , Población Blanca , Estudios de Cohortes , Neoplasias Colorrectales/epidemiología , Neoplasias Colorrectales/genética , Dinamarca/epidemiología , Femenino , Interacción Gen-Ambiente , Genotipo , Humanos , Incidencia , Estilo de Vida , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Riesgo , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
8.
Int J Cancer ; 131(2): 469-78, 2012 Jul 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21866547

RESUMEN

The role of dietary fiber on the risk of colon and rectal cancer has been investigated in numerous studies, but findings have been inconsistent. The purpose of this study was to examine associations between intake of dietary fiber and risk of incident colon (including distal and proximal colon) and rectal cancer in the prospective Scandinavian HELGA cohort and to determine if fiber source (vegetables, fruits, potatoes, cereals) impacted the association. We included 1,168 incident cases (691 colon, 477 rectal cancer), diagnosed during a median of 11.3 years, among 108,081 cohort members. Sex-specific incidence rate ratios (IRRs) of colon and rectal cancer were related to intake of total or specific fiber source using Cox proportional hazards models. For men, an inverse association was observed between intake of total fiber and the risk of colon cancer per an incremental increase of 10 g day(-1) , IRR (95% CI): 0.74 (0.64-0.86). Intake of cereal fiber per 2 g day(-1) was associated with an IRR of 0.94 (0.91-0.98), which was also seen for intake of cereal fiber from foods with high fiber content (≥ 5 g per 100 g product), where the IRR per 2 g day(-1) was 0.94 (0.90-0.98). In women, intake of cereal fiber per 2 g day(-1) was also associated with lower risk of colon cancer, 0.97 (0.93-1.00). No clear associations were seen for rectal cancer. Our data indicate a protective role of total and cereal fiber intake, particularly from cereal foods with high fiber content, in the prevention of colon cancer.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias del Colon/epidemiología , Fibras de la Dieta/administración & dosificación , Grano Comestible , Adulto , Estudios de Cohortes , Neoplasias del Colon/etiología , Neoplasias del Colon/prevención & control , Ingestión de Alimentos , Conducta Alimentaria , Femenino , Frutas , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias del Recto/epidemiología , Factores de Riesgo , Países Escandinavos y Nórdicos/epidemiología , Verduras
9.
Am J Clin Nutr ; 94(5): 1266-75, 2011 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21993435

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Gastric cancer (GC) is the second leading cause of cancer death worldwide. The association between alcohol consumption and GC has been investigated in numerous epidemiologic studies with inconsistent results. OBJECTIVE: We evaluated the association between alcohol consumption and GC risk. DESIGN: We conducted a prospective analysis in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) cohort, which included 444 cases of first primary gastric adenocarcinoma. HRs and 95% CIs for GC were estimated by using multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression for consumption of pure ethanol in grams per day, with stratification by smoking status, anatomic subsite (cardia, noncardia), and histologic subtype (diffuse, intestinal). In a subset of participants, results were further adjusted for baseline Helicobacter pylori serostatus. RESULTS: Heavy (compared with very light) alcohol consumption (≥60 compared with 0.1-4.9 g/d) at baseline was positively associated with GC risk (HR: 1.65; 95% CI: 1.06, 2.58), whereas lower consumption amounts (<60 g/d) were not. When we analyzed GC risk by type of alcoholic beverage, there was a positive association for beer (≥30 g/d; HR: 1.75; 95% CI: 1.13, 2.73) but not for wine or liquor. Associations were primarily observed at the highest amounts of drinking in men and limited to noncardia subsite and intestinal histology; no statistically significant linear dose-response trends with GC risk were observed. CONCLUSION: Heavy (but not light or moderate) consumption of alcohol at baseline (mainly from beer) is associated with intestinal-type noncardia GC risk in men from the EPIC cohort.


Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma/epidemiología , Consumo de Bebidas Alcohólicas/epidemiología , Neoplasias Gástricas/epidemiología , Adulto , Anciano , Estudios de Cohortes , Europa (Continente)/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Estudios Prospectivos , Factores de Riesgo
10.
Am J Clin Nutr ; 94(5): 1304-13, 2011 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21993438

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Epidemiologic data suggest that diet is a risk factor in the etiology of gastric cancer. However, the role of dietary fatty acids, a modifiable risk factor, remains relatively unexplored. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to determine the association of plasma phospholipid fatty acid concentrations, as biomarkers of exogenous and endogenously derived fatty acids, with the risk of gastric adenocarcinoma in a case-control study nested within the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition-Europe Gastric Cancer (EPIC-EURGAST). DESIGN: Fatty acids were measured by gas chromatography in prediagnostic plasma phospholipids from 238 cases matched to 626 controls by age, sex, study center, and date of blood donation. Conditional logistic regression models adjusted for Helicobacter pylori infection status, BMI, smoking, physical activity, education, and energy intake were used to estimate relative cancer risks. RESULTS: Positive risk associations for gastric cancer were observed in the highest compared with the lowest quartiles of plasma oleic acid (OR: 1.72; 95% CI: 1.01, 2.94), di-homo-γ-linolenic acid (OR: 1.92; 95% CI: 1.10, 3.35), α-linolenic acid (OR: 3.20; 95% CI: 1.70, 6.06), and the ratio of MUFAs to saturated fatty acids, as an indicator of stearoyl-CoA desaturase-1 enzyme activity (OR: 1.40; 95% CI: 0.81, 2.43). An inverse risk association was observed with the ratio of linoleic to α-linolenic acid (OR: 0.37; 95% CI: 0.20, 0.66). CONCLUSION: These data suggest that a specific prediagnostic plasma phospholipid fatty acid profile, characterized mainly by high concentrations of oleic acid, α-linolenic acid, and di-homo-γ-linolenic acid, which presumably reflect both a complex dietary pattern and altered fatty acid metabolism, may be related to increased gastric cancer risk.


Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma/sangre , Ácidos Grasos/sangre , Fosfolípidos/sangre , Neoplasias Gástricas/sangre , Adenocarcinoma/epidemiología , Adulto , Anciano , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Estudios de Cohortes , Europa (Continente)/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Factores de Riesgo , Neoplasias Gástricas/epidemiología , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
11.
Cancer Causes Control ; 22(8): 1133-9, 2011 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21656162

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: High intake of whole-grain products may protect against prostate cancer, but overall evidence is limited and inconclusive. The aim of the present study was to investigate the relationship between the intake of whole-grain products and risk of prostate cancer in a large prospective cohort. METHODS: A total of 26,691 men aged 50-64 years participated in the Diet, Cancer and Health cohort study and provided information about diet and potential prostate cancer risk factors. During a median follow-up of 12.4 years, we identified 1,081 prostate cancer cases. Associations between whole-grain product intake and prostate cancer incidence were analyzed using Cox's regression model. RESULTS: Overall, there was no association between total intake of whole-grain products and prostate cancer risk (adjusted incidence rate ratio per 50 g day(-1): 1.00 (95% confidence interval: 0.96, 1.05)) as well as between intake of the specific whole-grain products: whole-grain rye bread, whole-grain bread, and oatmeal, and risk of prostate cancer. No risk estimates did differ according to either stage or grade of disease. CONCLUSIONS: Results from this prospective study suggest that higher intakes of total or specific whole-grain products are not associated with risk of prostate cancer in a population of Danish middle-aged men.


Asunto(s)
Dieta/estadística & datos numéricos , Fibras de la Dieta/administración & dosificación , Grano Comestible , Neoplasias de la Próstata/epidemiología , Estudios de Cohortes , Dinamarca/epidemiología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
12.
Cancer Causes Control ; 22(6): 909-18, 2011 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21479828

RESUMEN

Evidence from case-control studies, but less so from cohort studies, suggests a positive association between meat intake and risk of lung cancer. Therefore, this association was evaluated in the frame of the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition, EPIC. Data from 478,021 participants, recruited from 10 European countries, who completed a dietary questionnaire in 1992-2000 were evaluated; 1,822 incident primary lung cancer cases were included in the present evaluation. Relative risk estimates were calculated for categories of meat intake using multi-variably adjusted Cox proportional hazard models. In addition, the continuous intake variables were calibrated by means of 24-h diet recall data to account for part of the measurement error. There were no consistent associations between meat consumption and the risk of lung cancer. Neither red meat (RR = 1.06, 95% CI 0.89-1.27 per 50 g intake/day; calibrated model) nor processed meat (RR = 1.13, 95% CI 0.95-1.34 per 50 g/day; calibrated model) was significantly related to an increased risk of lung cancer. Also, consumption of white meat and fish was not associated with the risk of lung cancer. These findings do not support the hypothesis that a high intake of red and processed meat is a risk factor for lung cancer.


Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma/etiología , Ingestión de Alimentos/fisiología , Conducta Alimentaria/fisiología , Peces , Neoplasias Pulmonares/etiología , Carne , Adenocarcinoma/epidemiología , Adulto , Anciano , Animales , Estudios de Cohortes , Europa (Continente)/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Estilo de Vida , Neoplasias Pulmonares/epidemiología , Masculino , Carne/efectos adversos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Encuestas Nutricionales , Factores de Riesgo
13.
J Nutr ; 141(4): 639-44, 2011 Apr 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21346102

RESUMEN

Health-promoting effects of the Mediterranean diet have been in focus for decades, whereas less interest has been given to existing healthy dietary habits within other Western cultures. The aim of the study was to develop a food index based on traditional Nordic food items with expected health-promoting effects and relate this to all-cause mortality in a cohort of Danes. Detailed information about diet, lifestyle, and anthropometry was provided by 57,053 Danes aged 50-64 y. During 12 y of follow-up, 4126 of the cohort participants died. A healthy Nordic food index, consisting of traditional Nordic food items with expected health-promoting effects (fish, cabbages, rye bread, oatmeal, apples and pears, and root vegetables), was extracted and associated with mortality by Cox proportional hazard models. Mortality rate ratios (MRR) with 95% CI were used to associate the index to mortality. In an adjusted model, a 1-point higher index score was associated with a significantly lower MRR for both men [0.96 (0.92-0.99)] and women [0.96 (0.92-1.00)] (P = 0.03). When the index components were evaluated separately, whole grain rye bread intake was the factor most consistently associated with lower mortality in men. In conclusion, an index based on traditional healthy Nordic foods was found to be related to lower mortality among middle-aged Danes, in particular among men. This study indicates that traditional, healthy food items should be considered before public recommendations for major dietary changes are made.


Asunto(s)
Conducta Alimentaria , Promoción de la Salud , Mortalidad , Dinamarca , Dieta Mediterránea , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos
14.
Br J Nutr ; 105(9): 1381-7, 2011 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21272397

RESUMEN

Acrylamide (AA) is a probable human carcinogen that is formed in heat-treated carbohydrate-rich foods. The validity of FFQ to assess AA exposure has been questioned. The aim of the present cross-sectional study was to investigate dietary determinants of Hb-AA and Hb-glycidamide (GA) adducts. The study included 537 non-smoking women aged 50-65 years who participated in the Diet, Cancer and Health cohort (1993-97). At study baseline, blood samples and information on dietary and lifestyle variables obtained from self-administered questionnaires were collected. From blood samples, Hb-AA and Hb-GA in erythrocytes were analysed by liquid chromatography/MS/MS. Dietary determinants were evaluated by multiple linear regression analyses adjusted for age and smoking behaviour among ex-smokers. The median for Hb-AA was 35 pmol/g globin (5th percentile 17, 95th percentile 89) and for Hb-GA 21 pmol/g globin (5th percentile 8, 95th percentile 49). Of the dietary factors studied, intakes of coffee and chips were statistically significantly associated with a 4 % per 200 g/d (95 % CI 2, 7; P < 0·0001) and an 18 % per 5 g/d (95 % CI 6, 31; P = 0·002) higher Hb-AA, respectively. This model explained 17 % of the variation in Hb-AA. Intakes of coffee and biscuits/crackers were statistically significantly associated with a 3 % per 200 g/d (95 % CI 1, 6; P = 0·005) and 12 % per 10 g/d (95 % CI 3, 23; P = 0·01) higher Hb-GA, respectively. This model explained 12 % of the variation in Hb-GA. In conclusion, only a few dietary determinants of Hb-AA and Hb-GA were identified. Thus, the present study implies that dietary intake measured by an FFQ explains only to a limited extent the variation in Hb-AA and Hb-GA concentrations.


Asunto(s)
Acrilamida/metabolismo , Dieta , Compuestos Epoxi/metabolismo , Conducta Alimentaria , Hemoglobinas/metabolismo , Acrilamida/química , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Dinamarca , Compuestos Epoxi/química , Femenino , Hemoglobinas/química , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Posmenopausia , Factores de Riesgo
15.
Cancer Causes Control ; 21(1): 153-62, 2010 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19844797

RESUMEN

This case-cohort study examined the association between plasma enterolactone concentration and incidence of colon and rectal cancer in the Diet, Cancer and Health cohort, which enrolled 57,053 participants aged 50-64. Information about diet and lifestyle was obtained by questionnaire, and data on prescriptions of antibiotics were obtained from the Danish Prescription Registry. Cases diagnosed during 5.9 years of follow-up and a randomly selected sample of the cohort had a plasma sample analyzed for enterolactone by time-resolved fluoro-immuno assay. Associations were analyzed by Cox proportional hazards model. A total of 244 colon cancer cases, 137 rectal cancer cases, and 370 sub-cohort members were included in the statistical analyses. For each doubling in enterolactone concentration, we found lower risk of colon cancer among women [IRR (95% CI) = 0.76 (0.60-0.96)] and a tendency toward lower risk of rectal cancer [IRR (95% CI) = 0.83 (0.60-1.14)]. Among men, a doubling in enterolactone tended to be associated with higher risk of colon cancer [IRR (95% CI) = 1.09 (0.89-1.34)] and was associated with statistically significantly higher risk of rectal cancer [IRR (95% CI) = 1.74 (1.25-2.44)]. Exclusion of antibiotics users strengthened the results slightly. In conclusion, with higher enterolactone levels, we found lower risk of colon cancer among women and higher risk of rectal cancer among men.


Asunto(s)
4-Butirolactona/análogos & derivados , Neoplasias del Colon/epidemiología , Lignanos/sangre , Fitoestrógenos/sangre , Neoplasias del Recto/epidemiología , 4-Butirolactona/sangre , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Estudios de Cohortes , Dinamarca , Conducta Alimentaria , Femenino , Humanos , Estilo de Vida , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Factores de Riesgo
17.
Public Health Nutr ; 12(9): 1519-30, 2009 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19195420

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the association between wholegrain products intake and other dietary, lifestyle, anthropometric and socio-economic factors. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study, with data on diet, lifestyle and socio-economic factors obtained from questionnaires. Anthropometric measurements were collected by trained professionals. Multiple linear and principal components regression analyses were used in statistical analyses. SETTING: Part of the Diet, Cancer and Health study, a prospective cohort study to evaluate the aetiological role of diet on cancer risk, conducted in the greater Copenhagen and Aarhus area, Denmark. SUBJECTS: Men and women (n 54,720) aged 50-64 years. RESULTS: In multiple linear regression analyses focusing on individual dietary factors, intake of wholegrain products was associated with intake of all dietary factors studied (fish, red meat, poultry, processed meat, dairy products, fruits, vegetables, cakes and refined-grain products). The strongest positive associations were seen for intake of vegetables and processed meat, whereas the strongest negative associations were seen for intake of red meat and refined-grain products. Regression analyses on dietary patterns identified by principal components analysis yielded similar results. Also, wholegrain products intake was positively associated with cycling, taking dietary supplements and high school education, and negatively associated with intake of alcohol, BMI and smoking. CONCLUSIONS: Intake of wholegrain products is associated with other dietary factors, healthier lifestyle habits and higher socio-economic status. Therefore future studies need to account for the possible confounding by other dietary and lifestyle-related parameters when investigating relationships between wholegrain products intake and disease risk.


Asunto(s)
Antropometría , Dieta , Grano Comestible , Estilo de Vida , Índice de Masa Corporal , Estudios de Cohortes , Estudios Transversales , Dinamarca , Encuestas sobre Dietas , Femenino , Humanos , Modelos Lineales , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis de Componente Principal , Clase Social , Factores Socioeconómicos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
18.
Int J Cancer ; 124(3): 745-50, 2009 Feb 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19004010

RESUMEN

No clear relationship between whole grain products and risk of breast cancer has been established. In a large prospective cohort study, we investigated the association between intake of whole grain products and risk of breast cancer by tumour receptor status [oestrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR)] and tumour histology (ductal/lobular). It was further investigated whether the association differed by use of hormone replacement therapy (HRT). The study included 25,278 postmenopausal women participating in the Danish Diet, Cancer and Health cohort study (1993-1997). During a mean follow-up time of 9.6 years, 978 breast cancer cases were diagnosed. Associations between intake of whole grain products and the breast cancer rate were analysed using Cox's regression model. A higher intake of whole grain products was not associated with a lower risk of breast cancer. Per an increment in intake of total whole grain products of 50 g per day the adjusted incidence rate ratio (95% confidence interval) was 1.01 (0.96-1.07). Intake of rye bread, oatmeal and whole grain bread was not associated with breast cancer risk. No association was observed between the intake of total or specific whole grain products and the risk of developing ER+, ER-, PR+, PR-, combined ER/PR status, ductal or lobular breast cancer. Furthermore, there was no interaction between intake of whole grain products and use of HRT on risk of breast cancer. In conclusion, intake of whole grain products was not associated with risk of breast cancer in a cohort of Danish postmenopausal women.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama/epidemiología , Neoplasias de la Mama/metabolismo , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Dieta , Grano Comestible , Posmenopausia , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Terapia de Reemplazo de Hormonas , Humanos , Incidencia , Persona de Mediana Edad , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Receptores de Estrógenos/metabolismo , Receptores de Progesterona/metabolismo , Factores de Riesgo
19.
Eur J Cancer ; 44(14): 1978-88, 2008 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18667301

RESUMEN

We investigated the effects of socioeconomic indicators, demographic indicators and health-related indicators on the incidence of and survival from colon cancer and rectal cancer diagnosed in 1994-2003 with follow-up through 2006 in Denmark using information from nationwide registers. The analyses were based on data on 9958 patients with colon cancer and 7411 patients with rectal cancer in a cohort of 3.22 million people born between 1925 and 1973 and aged >or=30 years. Higher incidences of colon and rectal cancers were associated with greater social disadvantage, predominantly amongst men, in regard to cohabiting status, housing tenure, dwelling size and affiliation to the work market. Comorbidity was associated with a higher incidence of colon cancer in both sexes. Short- and long-term relative survival from both colon and rectal cancers decreased with poorer education, disposable income, affiliation to the work market, housing tenure, dwelling size and cohabiting status.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias del Colon/epidemiología , Neoplasias del Recto/epidemiología , Factores Socioeconómicos , Adulto , Anciano , Estudios de Cohortes , Neoplasias del Colon/mortalidad , Demografía , Dinamarca/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias del Recto/mortalidad , Análisis de Supervivencia
20.
Eur J Cancer Prev ; 17(1): 39-47, 2008 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18090909

RESUMEN

The aim of this study was to investigate whether polymorphisms in N-acetyl transferase 1 and 2 modify the association between meat consumption and risk of breast cancer. A nested case-control study was conducted among 24 697 postmenopausal women included in the 'Diet, Cancer and Health' cohort study (1993-2000). Three hundred and seventy-eight breast cancer cases were identified and matched to 378 controls. The incidence rate ratio (95% confidence interval) for breast cancer was 1.09 (1.02-1.17) for total meat, 1.15 (1.01-1.31) for red meat and 1.23 (1.04-1.45) for processed meat per 25 g daily increment in intake. Compared with slow acetylators, the IRR (95% confidence interval) among fast N-acetyl transferase 1 acetylators was 1.43 (1.03-1.99) and 1.13 (0.83-1.54) among intermediate/fast N-acetyl transferase 2 acetylators. Interaction analyses revealed that the positive associations between total meat intake and red meat intake and breast cancer risk were confined to intermediate/fast N-acetyl transferase 2 acetylators (Pinteraction = 0.03 and 0.04). Our findings support an association between meat consumption and breast cancer risk and that N-acetyl transferase 2 polymorphism has a modifying effect on the association, indicating that the association is confined to only genetically susceptible women.


Asunto(s)
Arilamina N-Acetiltransferasa/genética , Neoplasias de la Mama/epidemiología , Isoenzimas/genética , Carne , Polimorfismo Genético/genética , Neoplasias de la Mama/genética , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Estudios de Cohortes , Dinamarca , Femenino , Genotipo , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Posmenopausia , Factores de Riesgo
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...