RESUMEN
Problem: Cultural safety is an approach to patient care designed to facilitate respect of patients' cultural needs and address inequities in care in culturally diverse situations. Background: Much literature considers culturally safe care during the perinatal period, yet little is known about how patients experience and understand cultural safety. This is despite patient-defined care being one of the definitions of cultural safety. Question Hypothesis or Aim: This scoping review investigates what is known from existing qualitative literature about patients' experience of cultural safety frameworks in perinatal interventions. Methods: A search for "cultural safety" OR "culturally safe" in PubMed, Ovid Medline, Ovid Embase, Cumulated Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Scopus, Scielo, and Latin America and the Caribbean Literature on Health Sciences returned 2233 results after deduplication. Title-abstract and full-text screenings were conducted to identify qualitative studies of cultural safety from perinatal patients' perspectives. Seven studies were included in the final analysis. Data were open coded using NVivo. Findings: Three themes were identified: (1) care that acknowledged that their lives were different from patients in the dominant culture, (2) receiving care in community, and (3) care providers who respected their choices and culturally specific knowledge. Discussion: This research shows how cultural safety intersects with other equity-based frameworks used in midwifery and obstetrics. Conclusion: Building on this research could lead to new protocols that address complex social and physical needs of marginalized people during the perinatal period.
RESUMEN
Background: Postnatal care is recommended as a means of preventing maternal mortality during the postpartum period, but many women in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) do not access care during this period. We set out to examine sociocultural preferences that have been portrayed as barriers to care. Methods: We performed an abductive analysis of 63 semi-structured interviews with women who had recently given birth in three regions of Ethiopia using the Health Equity Implementation Framework (HEIF) and an inductive-deductive codebook to understand why women in Ethiopia do not use recommended postnatal care. Results: We found that, in many cases, health providers do not consider women's cultural safety a primary need, but rather as a barrier to care. However, women's perceived refusal to participate in postnatal visits was, for many, an expression of agency and asserting their needs for cultural safety. Trial registration: n/a. Conclusions: We propose adding cultural safety to HEIF as a process outcome, so that implementers consider cultural needs in a dynamic manner that does not ask patients to choose between meeting their cultural needs and receiving necessary health care during the postnatal period.
RESUMEN
Introduction Clinical reasoning is a core skill for physicians; most doctors do not attain the level of expertise associated with that of an expert clinician (EC). The purpose of this study is to identify the clinical reasoning strategies ECs prioritize when reasoning through complex cases. Methods We interviewed 14 ECs and performed a thematic analysis to identify strategies ECs prioritize when reasoning through complex clinical cases. The authors chose ECs based on the recognition of clinical and teaching expertise by trainees and other faculty members (ECs within our institution) and institutional recognition of high achievement in medicine and medical education (ECs outside our institution). We used a semi-structured guide to interview each EC, then reviewed and coded the interview transcriptions. We developed themes based on agreements between all transcript reviewers. Results We interviewed 11 male and three female ECs, one from outside the study institution. Two (14%) ECs were primary care physicians, and the remaining were sub-specialists. The authors organized strategies for clinical reasoning through complex cases around four themes, which were as follows: (1) connecting clinical reasoning to patient context; (2) embracing uncertainty, then reducing it; (3) returning to the patient's bedside; and (4) remaining humble to limit diagnostic errors. Conclusion Clinical reasoning is a core clinical skill of physicians, and this article describes clinical reasoning strategies prioritized by ECs for complex clinical cases. Recognition and integration of these strategies into medical training and clinical educator practice may facilitate the evolution of clinical reasoning skills and reduce diagnostic errors.
RESUMEN
Access to maternal health services has increased in Ethiopia during the past decades. However, increasing the demand for government birthing facility use remains challenging. In Ethiopia's Afar Region, these challenges are amplified given the poorly developed infrastructure, pastoral nature of communities, distinct cultural traditions, and the more nascent health system. This paper features semi-structured interviews with 22 women who were purposively sampled to explore their experiences giving birth in government health facilities in Afar. We used thematic analysis informed by a cultural safety framework to interpret findings. Our findings highlight how women understand, wield, and relinquish power and agency in the delivery room in government health facilities in Afar, Ethiopia. We found that Afari women are treated as 'others', that they manipulate their care as they negotiate 'cultural safety' in the health system, and that they use trust as a pathway towards more cultural safety. As the cultural safety framework calls for recognizing and navigating the diverse and fluid power dynamics of healthcare settings, the onus of negotiating power dynamics cannot be placed on Afari women, who are already multiply marginalized due to their ethnicity and gender. Health systems must adopt cultural safety in order to ensure health quality. Providers, particularly in regions with rich cultural diversity, must be trained in the cultural safety framework in order to be aware of and challenge the multidimensional power dynamics present in health encounters.
Asunto(s)
Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud , Servicios de Salud Materna , Embarazo , Femenino , Humanos , Etiopía , Parto , Parto Obstétrico , Investigación CualitativaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Contact tracing is a vital public health tool used to prevent the spread of infectious diseases. However, traditional interview-format contact tracing (TCT) is labor-intensive and time-consuming and may be unsustainable for large-scale pandemics such as COVID-19. OBJECTIVE: In this study, we aimed to address the limitations of TCT. The Yale School of Engineering developed a Hardware-Assisted Bluetooth-based Infection Tracking (HABIT) device. Following the successful implementation of HABIT in a university setting, this study sought to evaluate the performance and implementation of HABIT in a high school setting using an embedded mixed methods design. METHODS: In this pilot implementation study, we first assessed the performance of HABIT using mock case simulations in which we compared contact tracing data collected from mock case interviews (TCT) versus Bluetooth devices (HABIT). For each method, we compared the number of close contacts identified and identification of unique contacts. We then conducted an embedded mixed methods evaluation of the implementation outcomes of HABIT devices using pre- and postimplementation quantitative surveys and qualitative focus group discussions with users and implementers according to the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance framework. RESULTS: In total, 17 students and staff completed mock case simulations in which 161 close contact interactions were detected by interview or Bluetooth devices. We detected significant differences in the number of close contacts detected by interview versus Bluetooth devices (P<.001), with most (127/161, 78.9%) contacts being reported by interview only. However, a significant number (26/161, 16.1%; P<.001) of contacts were uniquely identified by Bluetooth devices. The interface, ease of use, coherence, and appropriateness were highly rated by both faculty and students. HABIT provided emotional security to users. However, the prototype design and technical difficulties presented barriers to the uptake and sustained use of HABIT. CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of HABIT in a high school was impeded by technical difficulties leading to decreased engagement and adherence. Nonetheless, HABIT identified a significant number of unique contacts not reported by interview, indicating that electronic technologies may augment traditional contact tracing once user preferences are accommodated and technical glitches are overcome. Participants indicated a high degree of acceptance, citing emotional reassurance and a sense of security with the device.