Advanced cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma: Impact of age on the safety and efficacy of cemiplimab and the prognostic significance of blood biomarkers.

INTRODUCTION: Age-related differences in the safety profile of cemiplimab for patients with locally advanced or metastatic cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) have not been well described. We investigated the association of increasing age with immune related adverse events (irAE) from cemiplimab, efficacy outcomes, and the prognostic significance of pre-treatment blood biomarkers in contemporary practice. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients starting first-line cemiplimab for locally advanced or metastatic cSCC at British Columbia Cancer between April 2019 and January 2023 were identified. Landmark four-month logistic regression analysis compared the odds of developing irAE or sequelae amongst patients aged <75 years to those aged 75-84 or ≥ 85. Objective responses were determined using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1. Univariable Cox proportional hazard (PH) regression modelling of factors associated with overall survival (OS) was performed. RESULTS: Of 106 patients, the proportions aged <75, 75-84, and ≥ 85 years were 34%, 45%, and 21%, respectively. Overall, the proportion of patients with irAE ≥ grade 3, cemiplimab discontinuation, and hospitalization for immune toxicity was 27.4%, 31.1%, and 11.3%, respectively. There was no clear association between age and the odds of high grade irAE. However, increased odds of cemiplimab discontinuation was observed in patients aged 75-84 years (p = 0.05). Patients ≥85 years had increased hospitalizations due to irAE (OR = 5.00, 95% CI = 0.97-37.52) with two treatment-related deaths. Objective responses were similar across age cohorts (50.0%, 60.4%, and 54.5%) but progressive disease was higher in the age ≥ 85 group (22.2%, 18.8%, and 31.8%). On Cox PH regression analysis, age ≥ 85 years (vs. <75), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 2-3 (vs. 0-1), and neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) ≥7.80 (vs. <7.80) were associated with shorter survival. DISCUSSION: While the odds of high grade irAE were similar across age groups, significant age-related differences in treatment discontinuation and hospitalization due to immune toxicity were observed. Despite a higher incidence of primary progression and shorter OS in the oldest cohort, cemiplimab yielded robust objective responses regardless of age. Higher pre-treatment NLR was associated with shorter survival and the cut-point identified requires further study.

First-line osimertinib for patients with EGFR-mutated advanced non-small cell lung cancer: efficacy and safety during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Background: The FLAURA trial demonstrated improved overall survival (OS) with first-line osimertinib for patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutated advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We studied the efficacy and safety of osimertinib in a cohort treated during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Methods: Patients diagnosed with EGFR-mutated advanced NSCLC between 11 March 2020 to 31 December 2021 who received first-line osimertinib in British Columbia, Canada were identified retrospectively. Kaplan-Meier curves of OS and progression-free survival (PFS) from the start of osimertinib were plotted. The associations of baseline characteristics with PFS, and development of pneumonitis or dose reductions due to toxicity with OS were evaluated with hazard ratios estimated using univariable and multivariable Cox models. Results: The cohort comprised 231 individuals. 58.7% of patients with de novo advanced NSCLC were initially diagnosed after presentation to the Emergency Room. At osimertinib initiation, 31.6% were aged ≥75 years and 45.5% had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) ≥2. Median PFS and OS were 18.0 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 16.1-26.2] and 25.4 months (95% CI: 20.3-not reached), respectively. On multivariable analysis, age ≥75 years (vs. <75), ECOG PS 2/3 (vs. 0/1), ECOG PS 4 (vs. 0/1), current smokers (vs. never smokers), programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression ≥50% (vs. <1%), and L858R mutation (vs. exon 19 deletion) were associated with shorter PFS. Among 110 patients who progressed, 33.6% received subsequent therapy. A proportion of 16.5% of the cohort developed grade ≥3 adverse events. Pneumonitis from osimertinib (3.9% incidence) was weakly associated with shorter OS (hazard ratio: 2.59, 95% CI: 0.94-7.12, P=0.066); dose reductions were not associated with worse OS. 10.8% of patients developed COVID-19. Conclusions: In a cohort receiving first-line osimertinib during the COVID-19 pandemic, ECOG PS ≥2 was observed in nearly half of patients at treatment initiation contributing to a median OS shorter than in FLAURA. The incidence of severe adverse events was low and dose reduction for drug toxicity did not impact OS. Identifying and reducing barriers to the diagnosis of NSCLC during the COVID-19 pandemic are required.

Fit for Work and Life-an eight-week program for improvement of functionality and quality of life : A two-stage study.

BACKGROUND: The current two-stage study focused on work integration and quality of life of patients in an acute psychiatric day care unit. There is evidence that a longer absence from work due to illness negatively affects job retention, life satisfaction and clinical prognosis. Furthermore, there are individual supportive methods that proved to be effective in work integration. We therefore developed a specific group program Fit for Work and Life (FWL) for patients in an acute psychiatric day care unit focusing on work integration in the first labor market (in contrast to work in institutions for people with disabilities/second labor market). METHODS: Between 2018 and 2020, 62 patients (intervention group; IG) were enrolled in an 8­week prospective job integration program and compared to 74 patients (control group; CG) who received treatment as usual (partly retrospective survey). Patients of both groups held a job when entering treatment. Main outcome was defined as their working status 4 weeks after the end of treatment as well as self-reported life satisfaction. RESULTS: At the end of treatment (i.e. the week prior to discharge), the IG participants reported higher overall life satisfaction as well as higher health-, self- and living condition-related satisfaction than controls. Functional and clinical improvement during treatment was linked to subsequently returning to work. Functional improvement was further linked to higher life satisfaction. Mediational analysis revealed an indirect path from functional improvement on life satisfaction via working status, i.e. the higher functional improvement during treatment, the higher the chance of successfully returning to work, which in turn increased life satisfaction. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that programs such as FWL are useful interventions for employed patients to improve reintegration into work and life and to help to increase life satisfaction.