RESUMEN
Bone allografts are clinically used in a variety of surgical procedures, and tissue banks are responsible for harvesting, processing, quality testing, storing, and delivering these materials for transplantation. In tissue banks, the bone is processed for the removal of all organic content, remaining only the tissue structure (scaffold). However, several studies have shown that even after using different processing methods, viable cells, functional proteins, and DNA may still persist in the tissue, which constitute the main causes of graft rejection. Therefore, the objective of this study was to establish techniques and biological parameters for quality validation of allografts. To this end, we propose the use of 3 combined methods such as microscopy, histology, and molecular biology techniques to evaluate the quality of allografts harvested and processed by the Brazilian National Institute of Traumatology and Orthopedics (INTO) tissue bank according to the donation criteria of the Brazilian National Health Surveillance Agency and the Brazilian National Transplant System. Bone fragments from different processing stages showed no viable cells on histology, an intact extracellular matrix on scanning electron microscopy, and gradual reduction in DNA amount. Different techniques were used to demonstrate the quality of allografts produced by the INTO tissue bank and to establish biological parameters for ensuring the safety and quality of these products. Future studies need to be undertaken to assess and validate the efficacy of the decellularization process in larger bone grafts with diverse architectural configurations.
Asunto(s)
Aloinjertos , Trasplante Óseo , Bancos de Tejidos , Brasil , Humanos , Ortopedia , Traumatología , Control de Calidad , HuesosRESUMEN
The treatment of severe musculoskeletal injuries, such as loss of bone tissue and consolidation disorders, requires bone transplantation, and the success of this bone reconstruction depends on the grafts transplant's osteogenic, osteoconductive, and osteoinductive properties. Although the gold standard is autograft, it is limited by availability, morbidity, and infection risk. Despite their low capacity for osteoinduction and osteogenesis, decellularized bone allografts have been used in the search for alternative therapeutic strategies to improve bone regeneration. Considering that bone marrow stromal cells (BMSCs) are responsible for the maintenance of bone turnover throughout life, we believe that associating BMSCs with allograft could produce a material that is biologically similar to autologous bone graft. For this reason, this study evaluated the osteogenic potential of bone allograft cellularized with BMSCs. First, BMSC was characterized and allograft decellularization was confirmed by histology, scanning electron microscopy, and DNA quantification. Subsequently, the BMSCs and allografts were associated and evaluated for adhesion, proliferation, and in vitro and in vivo osteogenic potential. We demonstrated that, after 2 hours, BMSCs had already adhered to the surface of allografts and remained viable for 14 days. In vitro osteogenic assays indicated increased osteogenic potential of allografts compared with beta-tricalcium phosphate (ß-TCP). In vivo transplantation assays in immunodeficient mice confirmed the allograft's potential to induce bone formation, with significantly better results than ß-TCP. Finally, our results indicate that allograft can provide structural support for BMSC adhesion, offering a favorable microenvironment for cell survival and differentiation and inducing new bone formation. Taken together, our data indicate that this rapid methodology for cellularization of allograft with BMSCs might be a new therapeutic alternative in regenerative medicine and bone bioengineering.