Effect of power arm length combined with additional anterior torque on the axial orientation of the maxillary incisors during en-masse retraction: A finite element analysis.

INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to clarify the effect of power arm length combined with additional torque incorporated into the archwire on the controlled movement of the anterior teeth using the finite element method. METHODS: An adult patient requiring medium anchorage after extraction of the maxillary first premolars was selected for this study. The power arms were placed between the lateral incisor and the canine at 3 levels: 3 mm, 6 mm, and 9 mm. A 150 g of retraction force was applied from each height of the anterior hook to the first molar tube, with 0°, 5°, and 10° of applied lingual root torque on the incisors. RESULTS: A 3-mm hook with 10° of applied torque, a 6-mm hook with 5° of applied torque, or a 9-mm hook with no extra torque constituted the best combinations targeted at controlling the inclination of incisors during retraction. Extrusion and distal tipping of the canine were observed. Moreover, mesial tipping and mesiopalatal rotation of the molar were unavoidable. Finally, intercanine and intermolar widths were decreased. CONCLUSIONS: Adding extra torque on the incisors or using high torque brackets is recommended for patients with maxillary first premolar extraction.

Three-dimensional comparison of continuous and segmented arch techniques in the traction of palatally impacted canines using a non-linear finite element analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the three-dimensional (3D) effects of canine traction on the maxillary teeth when using two different traction methods, the continuous and the segmented arch wire techniques; then to test whether adding a transpalatal arch (TPA) would affect their response to traction. DESIGN: Finite element analysis. METHODS: A cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scan of a patient with bilateral palatally impacted canines was chosen, from which a 3D model was derived and imported into ABAQUS. Two arch wires were modelled, a continuous round one and a segmented rectangular one. Four models were obtained by adding a TPA to both techniques. A 100° imposed rotation was then applied at the intersection between the vertical loop and the horizontal segment of each wire. Initial displacement of the maxillary tooth in the labio-lingual and in the vertical directions was measured. The absolute maximum principal stress of the periodontal ligament (PDL) was also assessed. RESULTS: Traction using a continuous arch wire led to different movement patterns of all teeth, some of them were tipped in a labial direction while others were lingually tipped. Traction using a segmented arch wire resulted in a retroclination of the posterior teeth and a proclination of the anterior teeth with a high level of stress on the premolars' PDL. Adding the TPA only affected the displacement of the first molars. The right side showed a maximum displacement of the first premolar, while the left side showed it on the lateral. The total displacement on the right side was higher than the left side. CONCLUSION: The segmented technique caused a uniform displacement of all teeth while the continuous one showed a non-uniform displacement. The angulation and position of the vertical loop affected the displacement of the maxillary teeth. The addition of a TPA acted only on the first molars.

Three-dimensional comparison of the effects of sliding mechanics in labial and lingual orthodontics using the finite element method.

INTRODUCTION: The extraction of maxillary first premolars is usually the treatment of choice to resolve crowding, alveolar protrusion, or Class II malocclusion. The demand for a lingual orthodontic treatment is increasing because of its esthetic value; therefore, understanding lingual biomechanics is essential to every clinician. This study compared the 3-dimensional (3D) effects of sliding mechanics in labial and lingual orthodontics using the finite element method. METHODS: Twelve 3D finite element models were created with different power arm heights and miniscrew positions. A 150 g of retraction force was applied from the head of the miniscrew to the power arm. The 3D displacement of the original nodes was measured, and the stress distribution on defined element zones of the periodontal ligament. RESULTS: Different force directions led to different movement patterns and stress distribution. The lingual models showed a more important lingual crown tipping, extrusion, and higher stress values than the labial models. Results were not affected by the vertical position of the miniscrew. CONCLUSIONS: Bodily en-masse retraction was not achieved in all models. Adding extra torque to the archwires is essential to prevent excessive lingual crown tipping. The lingual appliance induced more lingual tipping and extrusion of the anterior teeth. Expanding the archwire is important to minimize the risk of intercanine width reduction. The vertical position of the miniscrew does not affect the results of en-masse retraction.