The use of CO2 removal devices in patients awaiting lung transplantation: an initial experience.

BACKGROUND: Lung transplantation is the treatment of choice for patients with end-stage lung failure. Limitations are presented by the shortage of donors and the long waiting list periods. New techniques, such as extracorporeal membrane ventilator devices with or without pump support, have been developed as bridges to transplantation for patients with severe, unresponsive respiratory insufficiency. METHODS: Between November 2005 and September 2009, 12 patients (7 males and 5 females), of overall mean age of 43.3 +/- 15.5 years underwent decapneization with extracorporeal devices. In 6 cases, a NovaLung system was used; in the remaining 6 patients, it was a Decap device. Causes of respiratory failure that led to implantation of such devices were cystic fibrosis (n = 6), pulmonary emphysema (n = 5), and chronic rejection of a previous double lung transplant (n = 1). RESULTS: Mean time on extracorporeal decapneization was 13.5 +/- 14.2 days. Eight patients died on the device. Three patients were bridged to lung transplantation; 1 recovered and was weaned from the device after 11 days. Mean PaCO(2) on the extracorporeal gas exchanger was significantly lower for both the devices at 24, 48, and 72 hours after implantation (P < .05). No significant difference was observed for the 2 systems. CONCLUSION: In our initial experience, decapneization devices have been simple, efficient methods to support patients with mild hypoxia and severe hypercapnia that is refractory to mechanical ventilation. This could represent a valid bridge to lung transplantation in these patients.

Single versus double lung transplantation in pulmonary fibrosis: a debated topic.

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) represents the second most frequent indication for lung transplantation after chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Survival rate after transplantation is poorer compared with other lung diseases for reasons that are not completely clear. Medical therapy with anti-inflammatory drugs may improve symptoms and quality of life, but it does not influence the survival rate. Lung transplantation is the best therapy for end-stage IPF. The debate regarding the superiority of double lung transplantation (DLT) compared with single lung transplantation (SLT) is still ongoing. Until some years ago, SLT was almost uniformly utilized for this indication. In the most recent years, a larger application of DLT has been observed worldwide, probably related to higher 1-year and 5-year survivals. The unanswered question is whether it is ethical to use two lungs for the same patient, considering the donor shortage, when a single lung would suffice. Many reports have demonstrated that SLT offers acceptable pulmonary function and satisfactory early and intermediate survival. Probably DLT should be reserved for younger recipients, for those with concomitant or possible chronic infection of the contralateral lung, or cases of marginal donors. Further studies will be needed to formulate recommendations regarding the preferred surgical approach in IPF.