Using Computer-aided Optical Diagnosis and Expert Review to Evaluate Colorectal Polyps Diagnosed as Normal Mucosa in Pathology.

Pathological assessment of colorectal polyps is considered the current reference standard for histologic diagnosis. About 10% of polyps sent to the pathology lab are returned with the diagnosis of mucosal folds, mucosal prolapse, or normal mucosa.1,2 Two recent publications have indicated that disagreements between endoscopic optical diagnosis and the subsequent pathological diagnoses might be due to misdiagnosis in pathology.3,4 We were therefore interested in re-evaluating pathology-based diagnosis of "mucosal polyps" using expert endoscopists and computer-assisted diagnosis (CADx) evaluation.

The impact of kidney stone disease on quality of life in high-risk stone formers.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of kidney stone disease (KSD) and its treatment on the health-related quality of life (HRQOL) of high-risk stone formers with hyperparathyroidism, renal tubular acidosis, malabsorptive disease, and medullary sponge kidney. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The Wisconsin Stone Quality of Life questionnaire was used to evaluate HRQOL in 3301 patients with a history of KSD from 16 institutions in North America between 2014 and 2020. Baseline characteristics and medical history were collected from patients, while active KSD was confirmed through radiological imaging. The high-risk group was compared to the remaining patients (control group) using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test. RESULTS: Of 1499 patients with active KSD included in the study, the high-risk group included 120 patients. The high-risk group had significantly lower HRQOL scores compared to the control group (P < 0.01). In the multivariable analyses, medullary sponge kidney disease and renal tubular acidosis were independent predictors of poorer HRQOL, while alkali therapy was an independent predictor of better HRQOL (all P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with active KSD, high-risk stone formers had impaired HRQOL with medullary sponge kidney disease and renal tubular acidosis being independent predictors of poorer HRQOL. Clinicians should seek to identify these patients earlier as they would benefit from prompt treatment and prevention.

Compliance to follow-up care after urban diabetic retinopathy tele-screening.

BACKGROUND: Although many diabetic retinopathy (DR) tele-screening projects have shown effectiveness for DR, timely follow-up care after screening is essential to achieve the expected visual benefits of screening. OBJECTIVE: To better understand the possible factors of non-compliance to follow-up care in diabetics after tele-screening for DR. METHOD: This cross-sectional retrospective descriptive study analyses the data of 148 diabetics referred to follow-up care following screening of 1185 diabetics through an urban community-based DR Teleophthalmology Project aimed at Type 2 diabetes. A telephone survey was conducted to assess the screening program appreciation and the sociodemographic characteristics of that population. RESULTS: This study achieved a 91,9% (n=136) compliance rate to follow-up care. Female sex, type 2 diabetes, lower general and DR education, telephone unreachability, age less than 60 years, knowledge of a visually impaired acquaintance and more severe DR were more prevalent in non-compliant patients. Age, ethnicity, economic status, level of precariousness, distance from home to the screening/examination sites, and previous adherence to the DR screening guidelines were similar in both compliants and noncompliants. A high satisfaction score (4,8/5, n=96) to the tele-screening program was measured. CONCLUSION: This study is applicable to other screening programs and suggests that an increase in the number of recall letters and a greater flexibility in the organization of follow-up care appointments as well as the addition of multilingual members to the recalling team may have further improved compliance to follow-up care. It measures a high level of satisfaction provided by this model of urban teleophthalmology screening.

Urban diabetic retinopathy teleophthalmology screening: results and impact at the service corridor.

OBJECTIVE: To assess real-world results and the impact on a hospital service corridor for screening for DR through an urban community teleophthalmology service. METHODS: Retrospective analysis at the hospital service corridor of 148 diabetics referred to it following DR teleophthalmology screening of 1185 type II diabetics. RESULTS: Of the screened diabetics, 87.4% (n = 1036) were exempted from face-to-face clinical examination (FFCE) in a traditional hospital eye care pathway and continued monitoring through teleophthalmology under a watch-and-wait attitude, while 12.5% (n = 148) were recommended for an FFCE. The FFCEs revealed that significant DR was present in 48.2% or in 5.6% of this screened diabetic population. Reasons for referral were findings of significant DR in 40.5%, of which diabetic macular edema (DME) represented 86.6%, other incidental significant sight-threatening findings represented 32.4% (4% of the screened diabetics), and insufficient image quality was obtained for the other 27.0%. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) imaging at FFCE confirmed DME in 26.4% and led to treatment. Patients referred for insufficient image quality showed significant pathology in 90.2%, of whom 63.4% underwent further monitoring or treatment. The readers requested the FFCEs for 148 patients within 1 month of the reading in 19.6%, 3 months in 26.3%, 4-12 months in 47.3%, and 12 months in 6.7% over the 34 months of the study. Compliance with FFCEs was 91.9%, absolute in 78.4% and relative in 21.5%. The availability of OCT at the imaging site would have impacted 4.5% of the screened diabetics by enabling teleophthalmology monitoring of 91.6%, identifying just-in-time interventions for DME treatments in 26.4% and reducing by 25% the need for referral of OCT-negative reader-identified DME. CONCLUSION: The FFCEs generated at the hospital service corridor by an urban community DR screening teleophthalmology project did not impact negatively on its services; moreover, the service corridor was exempted from providing FFCEs to 87.4% of the diabetic population it serves. This study may help provide cost-efficiency indications for a screening protocol that would include OCT availability at the imaging site and measure its positive effects. While DR of which DME was the main cause of referral for FFCE, incidental significant sight-threatening findings were significant and approached DR as a cause of referral; this supports the recommendation of continued human intervention in DR teleophthalmology screening at this time and for this population, until automatic computer-aided diagnosis systems can recognise biomarkers associated with other significant fundus diseases. As a secondary gain this project benefited individuals in need of care who were lost to the traditional eye care pathway. Good compliance with the follow-up FFCE further supports teleophthalmology in its effort to provide better access to DR screening.