UPLC-PDA factorial design assisted method for simultaneous determination of oseltamivir, dexamethasone, and remdesivir in human plasma.

A green and simple UPLC method was developed and optimized, adopting a factorial design for simultaneous determination of oseltamivir phosphate and remdesivir with dexamethasone as a co-administered drug in human plasma and using daclatasvir dihydrochloride as an internal standard within 5 min. The separation was established on UPLC column BEH C18 1.7 µm (2.1 × 100.0 mm) connected to UPLC pre-column BEH 1.7 µm (2.1 × 5.0 mm) at 50 °C with an injection volume of 10 µL. The photodiode array detector (PDA) was set at three wavelengths of 220, 315, and 245 nm for oseltamivir phosphate, the internal standard, and both dexamethasone and remdesivir, respectively. The mobile phase consisted of methanol and ammonium acetate solution (40 mM) adjusted to pH 4 in a ratio of 61.5:38.5 (v/v) with a flow rate of 0.25 mL min-1. The calibration curves were linear over 500.0-5000.0 ng mL-1 for oseltamivir phosphate, over 10.0-500.0 ng mL-1 and 500.0-5000.0 ng mL-1 for dexamethasone, and over 20.0-500 ng mL-1 and 500.0-5000.0 ng mL-1 for remdesivir. The Gibbs free energy and Van't Hoff plots were used to investigate the effect of column oven temperatures on retention times. Fluoride-EDTA anticoagulant showed inhibition activity on the esterase enzyme in plasma. The proposed method was validated according to the M10 ICH, FDA, and EMA's bioanalytical guidelines. According to Eco-score, GAPI, and AGREE criteria, the proposed method was considered acceptable green.

Development of UPLC method for simultaneous assay of some COVID-19 drugs utilizing novel instrumental standard addition and factorial design.

A green, rapid, and simple RP-UPLC method was developed and optimized by full factorial design for the simultaneous separation of oseltamivir phosphate, daclatasivir dihydrochloride, and remdesivir, with dexamethasone as a co-administered drug. The separation was established on a UPLC column BEH C18 1.7 µm (2.1 × 100.0 mm) connected with a UPLC pre-column BEH 1.7 µm (2.1 × 5.0 mm) at 25 °C with an injection volume of 10 µL. The detector (PDA) was set at 239 nm. The mobile phase consisted of methanol and ammonium acetate (8.1818 mM) in a ratio of 75.7: 24.3 (v/v). The flow rate was set at 0.048 mL min-1. The overall separation time was 9.5 min. The retention times of oseltamivir phosphate, dexamethasone, daclatasivir dihydrochloride, and remdesivir were 6.323 ± 0.145, 7.166 ± 0.036, 8.078 ± 0.124, and 8.572 ± 0.166 min (eight replicates), respectively. The proposed method demonstrated linearity in the ranges of 10.0-500.0 (ng mL-1) and 0.5-30.0 (µg mL-1) for oseltamivir phosphate, 50.0-5000.0 (ng mL-1) for dexamethasone, 25.0-1000.0 (ng mL-1) and 0.5-25.0 (µg mL-1) for daclatasvir dihydrochlorde, and 10.0-500.0 (ng mL-1) and 0.5-30.0 (µg mL-1) for remdesivir. The coefficients of determination (R2) were greater than 0.9999, with percentage recoveries greater than 99.5% for each drug. The limits of quantitation were 6.4, 1.8, 7.8, and 1.6 ng mL-1, and the limits of detection were 1.9, 0.5, 2.0, and 0.5 ng mL-1 for oseltamivir phosphate, dexamethasone, daclatasivir dihydrochloride, and remdesivir, respectively. The proposed method was highly precise, as indicated by the low percentage of relative standard deviation values of less than 1.2% for each drug. The average content and uniformity of dosage units in the studied drugs' dosage forms were determined. The average contents of oseltamivir phosphate, dexamethasone, daclatasivir dihydrochloride, and remdesivir were nearly 93%, 102%, 99%, and 95%, respectively, while the uniformity of dosage unit values were nearly 92%, 102%, 101%, and 97%. Two novel methods were established in this work. The first method was used to assess the stability of standard solutions. This novel method was based on the slope of regression equations. The second was to evaluate the excipient's interference using an innovative instrumental standard addition method. The novel instrumental standard addition method was performed using the UPLC instrument program. It was more accurate, sensitive, time-saving, economical, and eco-friendly than the classic standard addition method. The results showed that the proposed method can estimate the tested drugs' concentrations without interference from their dosage form excipients. According to the Eco-score (more than 75), the Green Analytical Procedure Index (GAPI), and the AGREE criteria (total score of 0.77), the suggested method was considered eco-friendly.

Innovative derivative/zero ratio spectrophotometric method for simultaneous determination of sofosbuvir and ledipasvir: Application to average content and uniformity of dosage units.

An innovative simple, rapid and sensitive spectrophotometric method was developed for the simultaneous analysis of sofosbuvir (SOF) and ledipasvir (LED) in their combined dosage forms. Sofosbuvir with ledipasvir (SOF/LED) as a combined dosage form was tried at the pandemic COVID 19 crisis. This technique has the advantages of both zero order and first order spectrophotometry. The zero and first derivative amplitudes were measured at 274.2 nm for SOF (zero crossing point of LED in first derivative spectrum) and 314 nm for LED (zero crossing point of SOF in first derivative spectrum) over the concentration range of 2.0-50.0 µg mL-1 with coefficients of determination (R2) > 0.9999 for both drugs and mean percentage recoveries of 100.25 ± 1.61 and 99.85 ± 0.99 for SOF and LED; respectively. This original method was validated according to ICH requirements and statistically compared to published comparison methods. This method was applied to estimate the average content and the uniformity of dosage units of SOF/LED combined dosage form according to British Pharmacopeia requirements.

Earth-friendly spectrophotometric methods for simultaneous determination of ledipasvir and sofosbuvir: Application to average content and uniformity of dosage unit testing.

Simple, rapid, sensitive, accurate, precise and earth-friendly spectrophotometric methods were developed for the simultaneous analysis of ledipasvir (LED) and sofosbuvir (SOF) without interference of both sunset yellow dye and copovidone excipients (the most probable interferents) in their combined dosage form. These proposed methods were based on measurement of LED in synthetic mixtures and combined dosage form by first derivative (1D) spectrophotometry at 314 nm over the concentration range of 2-50 µg mL-1 with coefficient of determination (R2) > 0.9999, mean percentage recovery of 99.98 ±â€¯0.62. On the other hand, SOF in synthetic mixtures and combined dosage form was determined by five methods. Method I is based on the use of 1D spectrophotometry at 274.2 nm (zero crossing point of LED). Method II involves the application of conventional dual wavelength method (DW) at the absolute difference between SOF zero order amplitudes at 261 nm (λmax of SOF) and 364.7 nm. At these wavelengths, the absolute difference between LED zero order amplitudes was observed to equal zero. Method III depends on isosbestic point method (ISP) in which the total concentration of both drugs was measured at isosbestic point at 262.7 nm. Concentration of SOF could be obtained by subtraction of LED concentration. While, method IV depends on absorbance correction method (absorption factor method), which is based on determination of SOF concentration at 262.7 nm (λISP) and LED at 333 nm (λmax of LED). Finally, method V depends on absorbance ratio method (Q-analysis) in which 262.7 nm (λISP) and 261 nm (λmax of SOF) were selected to determine SOF concentration. The linearity range for all methods for SOF determination was 2-50 µg mL-1 with coefficient of determination (R2) > 0.9999. Methods I, II & III were also applied for determination of SOF concentration in single dosage form. Their mean percentage recoveries were 100.35 ±â€¯1.85, 99.97 ±â€¯0.54 and 100.03 ±â€¯0.49, for the three methods respectively. The proposed methods were validated according to international conference of harmonization (ICH) requirements and statistically compared to published reference methods. The ANOVA test confirmed that there is no significant differences between the proposed methods, and can be used for routine analysis of LED and SOF in commercial tablets. These developed methods were applied to estimate the average content and uniformity of dosage unit for LED/SOF combined dosage form and SOF single dosage form according to British pharmacopeia (BP) requirements.