A comparison of the pharmacokinetics and NMDAR antagonism-associated neurotoxicity of ketamine, (2R,6R)-hydroxynorketamine and MK-801.

With the increasing use of ketamine as an off-label treatment for depression and the recent FDA approval of (S)-ketamine for treatment-resistant depression, there is an increased need to understand the long-term safety profile of chronic ketamine administration. Of particular concern is the neurotoxicity previously observed in rat models following acute exposure to high doses of ketamine, broadly referred to as 'Olney's lesions'. This type of toxicity presents as abnormal neuronal cellular vacuolization, followed by neuronal death and has been associated with ketamine's inhibition of the N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor (NMDAR). In this study, a pharmacological and neuropathological analysis of ketamine, the potent NMDAR antagonist MK-801, and the ketamine metabolite (2R,6R)-hydroxynorketamine [(2R,6R)-HNK)] in rats is described following both single dose and repeat dose drug exposures. Ketamine dosing was studied up to 20 mg/kg intravenously for the single-dose neuropathology study and up to 60 mg/kg intraperitoneally for the multiple-dose neuropathology study. MK-801 dosing was studied up to 0.8 mg/kg subcutaneously for both the single and multiple-dose neuropathology studies, while (2R,6R)-HNK dosing was studied up to 160 mg/kg intravenously in both studies. These studies confirm dose-dependent induction of 'Olney's lesions' following both single dose and repeat dosing of MK-801. Ketamine exposure, while showing common behavioral effects, did not induce wide-spread Olney's lesions. Treatment with (2R,6R)-HNK did not produce behavioral effects, toxicity or any evidence of Olney's lesion formation. Based on these results, future NMDAR-antagonist neurotoxicity studies should strongly consider taking pharmacokinetics more thoroughly into account.

An FDA/CDER perspective on nonclinical testing strategies: Classical toxicology approaches and new approach methodologies (NAMs).

Nonclinical testing of human pharmaceuticals is conducted to assess the safety of compounds to be studied in human clinical trials and for marketing of new drugs. Although there is no exact number and type of nonclinical studies required for safety assessments, as there is inherent flexibility for each new compound, the traditional approach is outlined in various FDA and ICH guidance documents and involves a combination of in vitro assays and whole animal testing methods. Recent advances in science have led to the emergence of numerous new approach methodologies (NAMs) for nonclinical testing that are currently being used in various aspects of drug development. Traditional nonclinical testing methods can predict clinical outcomes, although improvements in these methods that can increase predictivity of clinical outcomes are encouraged and needed. This paper discusses FDA/CDER's view on the opportunities and challenges of using NAMs in drug development especially for regulatory purposes, and also includes examples where NAMs are currently being used in nonclinical safety assessments and where they may supplement and/or enhance current testing methods. FDA/CDER also encourages communication with stakeholders regarding NAMs and is committed to exploring the use of NAMs to improve regulatory efficiency and potentially expedite drug development.

CDER Experience With Juvenile Animal Studies for CNS Drugs.

A survey was undertaken to evaluate juvenile animal studies conducted for drug applications reviewed by the Center for Drug Evaluation and Research between 2009 and 2014. Some conclusions about the nonclinical pediatric safety assessment based on studies performed in support of central nervous system-active compounds are presented here. A total of 44 completed studies from 32 New Drug Applications submitted to the Divisions of Psychiatry and Neurology Products were evaluated. Data on animal species and age range used, endpoints evaluated, and outcomes included in labeling were analyzed. Of the drugs evaluated, all but one had studies conducted in rats. In some cases, a second study in a nonrodent species (dog) was also conducted. Indices of growth and development and standard general toxicity parameters were included in all of the studies. Expanded neurohistopathology evaluations, bone mineral density measurements, and reproductive and neurobehavioral functional assessments were also generally carried out. A variety of neurological and neurobehavioral tests were employed. In the majority of rat studies, the potential for long-term cognitive impairment was evaluated using a complex water maze. Juvenile animal studies provided safety information considered relevant to drug use in children and that was included in labeling for 78% of the applications surveyed. The most commonly reported findings in labeling were for neurobehavioral effects, including changes in locomotor activity, auditory startle habituation, and learning and memory. Of the studies described in labeling with neurobehavioral effects, 54% found these effects to be persistent and to provide evidence of developmental neurotoxicity.

Effects of Cyclophosphamide and/or Doxorubicin in a Murine Model of Postchemotherapy Cognitive Impairment.

Postchemotherapy cognitive impairment, or PCCI, is a common complaint, particularly among breast cancer patients. However, the exact nature of PCCI appears complex. To model the human condition, ovariectomized C57BL/6J mice were treated intravenous weekly for 4 weeks with saline, 2 mg/kg doxorubicin (DOX), 50 mg/kg cyclophosphamide (CYP), or DOX + CYP. For the subsequent 10 weeks, mice were assessed on several behavioral tests, including those measuring spatial learning and memory. After sacrifice, hippocampal spine density and morphology in the dentate gyrus, CA1, and CA3 regions were measured. Additionally, hippocampal levels of total glutathione, glutathione disulfide, MnSOD, CuZnSOD, and cytokines were measured. Body weight decreased in all groups during treatment, but recovered post-treatment. Most behaviors were unaffected by drug treatment: Open field activity, motor coordination, grip strength, water maze and Barnes maze performance, buried food test performance, and novel object and object location recognition tests. There were some significant effects of CYP and DOX + CYP treatment during the initial test of home cage behavior, but these did not persist into the second and third test times. Density of stubby spines, but not mushroom or thin spines, in the dentate gyrus was significantly decreased in the DOX, CYP, and DOX + CYP treatment groups. There were no significant effects in the CA1 or CA3 regions. CuZnSOD levels were significantly increased in DOX + CYP-treated mice; other hippocampal antioxidant levels were unaffected. Most cytokines showed no treatment-related effects, but IL-1ß, IL-6, and IL-12 were slightly reduced in mice treated with DOX + CYP. Although the animal model, route of exposure, and DOX and CYP doses used here were reflective of human exposure, there were only sporadic effects due to chemotherapeutic treatment.

Current Topics in Postnatal Behavioral Testing.

The study of developmental neurotoxicity (DNT) continues to be an important component of safety evaluation of candidate therapeutic agents and of industrial and environmental chemicals. Developmental neurotoxicity is considered to be an adverse change in the central and/or peripheral nervous system during development of an organism and has been primarily evaluated by studying functional outcomes, such as changes in behavior, neuropathology, neurochemistry, and/or neurophysiology. Neurobehavioral evaluations are a component of a wide range of toxicology studies in laboratory animal models, whereas neurochemistry and neurophysiology are less commonly employed. Although the primary focus of this article is on neurobehavioral evaluation in pre- and postnatal development and juvenile toxicology studies used in pharmaceutical development, concepts may also apply to adult nonclinical safety studies and Environmental Protection Agency/chemical assessments. This article summarizes the proceedings of a symposium held during the 2015 American College of Toxicology annual meeting and includes a discussion of the current status of DNT testing as well as potential issues and recommendations. Topics include the regulatory context for DNT testing; study design and interpretation; behavioral test selection, including a comparison of core learning and memory systems; age of testing; repeated testing of the same animals; use of alternative animal models; impact of findings; and extrapolation of animal results to humans. Integration of the regulatory experience and scientific concepts presented during this symposium, as well as from subsequent discussion and input, provides a synopsis of the current state of DNT testing in safety assessment, as well as a potential roadmap for future advancement.

Juvenile animal studies and pediatric drug development retrospective review: use in regulatory decisions and labeling.

Juvenile animal toxicity studies are conducted to support applications for drugs intended for use in children. They are designed to address specific questions of potential toxicity in the growing animal or provide data about long-term safety effects of drugs that cannot be obtained from clinical trials. Decisions to conduct a juvenile animal study are based on existing data, such as a safety signal already identified in adult studies, or previous knowledge of the drug or chemical class for its potential to impair growth or developmental milestones. In 2006, the FDA issued an industry guidance in which considerations for determining when a juvenile animal study is warranted were outlined. A retrospective study was conducted covering years both before and after the issued guideline to examine the contribution of juvenile animal toxicity studies to the risk/benefit assessment of pediatric drugs at the FDA. The initial findings were presented as part of the May 2010 HESI workshop on the value of juvenile animal studies. The objective of the review was to better understand the value that the juvenile animal study contributes to regulatory decision making for pediatric drug development by looking at when the studies have been included in the product assessment; what, if any, impact the studies had on the regulatory decisions made; and whether the data were incorporated into the label. The data described below represent a first look at impact of the juvenile animal study since the pediatric legislation and the juvenile animal guidance were issued in the US.