GnRH agonist supplementation in hormone replacement therapy-frozen embryo transfer cycles: a randomized controlled trial.

RESEARCH QUESTION: Will two boluses of gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) during hormone replacement therapy-frozen embryo transfer (HRT-FET) cycles reduce the total pregnancy loss rate? DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial including a total of 287 HRT-FET cycles performed between 2013 and 2019. After randomization participants allocated to the GnRHa group (n = 144) underwent a standard HRT protocol, supplemented with a total of two boluses of triptorelin 0.1 mg; one bolus 2 days before starting vaginal progesterone and one bolus on the 7th day of progesterone. The control group (n = 143) underwent a standard HRT-FET protocol only. RESULTS: The intention-to-treat analysis showed no significant difference in total pregnancy loss between the GnRHa group and the control group (21% versus 33%; relative risk [RR] 0.63, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.35-1.11), nor was the biochemical pregnancy loss per positive human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG) significantly lower in the GnRHa group (12%, 8/67) compared with the control group (25%, 18/72) (RR 0.48, 95% CI 0.22-1.02). Participants with a live birth had a significantly higher mean progesterone concentration compared with participants without a live birth (25.0 ± 12.2 versus 23.8 ± 8.9 nmol/l; P = 0.001). Furthermore, a trend for a higher live birth rate (LBR) correlated with the highest oestradiol quartile concentration (oestradiol >0.957 nmol/l). CONCLUSIONS: Although a difference of 14% in biochemical loss and 12% in total pregnancy loss in favour of GnRHa supplementation was seen this did not reach statistical difference. Luteal progesterone and oestradiol concentrations correlate with LBR in the HRT-FET cycle, emphasizing the importance of luteal serum progesterone and oestradiol monitoring.

Dual stimulation using corifollitropin alfa in 54 Bologna criteria poor ovarian responders - a case series.

RESEARCH QUESTION: What are the reproductive outcomes of Bologna criteria poor responders undergoing dual stimulation (DuoStim) and subsequent cryopreserved embryo transfer? DESIGN: Case series of patients treated during the period August 2015 to March 2018 in a public fertility clinic. The study included 54 Bologna criteria poor responder IVF patients younger than 42 years receiving a follicular stimulation (DuoStim 1) followed by a luteal phase stimulation (DuoStim 2) within the same cycle, both stimulations being performed with corifollitropin alfa followed by a subsequent cryopreserved embryo transfer cycle. The primary endpoint was the number of oocytes retrieved in DuoStim 1 compared with DuoStim 2. The secondary endpoint was ongoing pregnancy rate (OPR) at 12 weeks of gestation. RESULTS: The mean number of oocytes retrieved in DuoStim 1 and DuoStim 2 was 2.4 ± 2.1 versus 3.7 ± 2.6, respectively; thus, a total of 1.2 (95% CI, 0.46-1.96) more oocytes was retrieved in DuoStim 2 compared with DuoStim 1 (P = 0.002). The OPR at 12 weeks was 20% (11/54) in this poor ovarian response population with a mean age of 36.7 years. CONCLUSIONS: Luteal phase stimulation results in more oocytes in poor responders compared with follicular phase stimulation. DuoStim, using corifollitropin alfa followed by individualized FSH dosing, appears to be an alternative to conventional follicular phase stimulation, decreasing the risk of cycle cancellation.

Progesterone levels on pregnancy test day after hormone replacement therapy-cryopreserved embryo transfer cycles and related reproductive outcomes.

RESEARCH QUESTION: Do serum progesterone levels determine ongoing pregnancy rates (OPR) in hormone replacement therapy frozen-thawed embryo transfer (HRT-FET) cycles? DESIGN: A cohort study of 244 HRT-FET cycles from a Danish public fertility centre. Data from patients undergoing HRT-FET from January 2016 to December 2017 were extracted from a clinical database. All patients had transfer in HRT cycles of autologous embryos frozen on day 5 or 6. Endometrial preparation was performed using 6 mg oestradiol valerate daily from the second day of the cycle followed by vaginal micronized progesterone (90 mg/8 h). All patients had serum progesterone measurement during the artificial luteal phase. RESULTS: The optimal cut-off for ongoing pregnancy was 35 nmol/l based on sensitivity analysis of different progesterone levels as a factor variable and its association with ongoing pregnancy. No significant differences regarding number of embryos transferred, embryo quality, age, body mass index (BMI) or smoking were found in the two groups of progesterone < 35 nmol/l and ≥ 35 nmol/l, respectively. A total of 51% of patients had a serum progesterone < 35 nmol/l. The range of all measurements was 0.3 to 110 nmol/l. The unadjusted OPR was significantly lower in the < 35 nmol/l group compared with the ≥ 35 nmol/l group (38% versus 51%;P = 0.04). A logistic regression analysis, adjusting for smoking, age, BMI, number of embryos transferred and blastocyst age showed a significant decrease in OPR when progesterone was < 35 nmol/l of 44% (95% confidence interval [CI] 35-54%) compared with ≥ 35 nmol/l of 58% (95% CI 48-68%), risk difference of 14% (95% CI 2-26%,P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Serum progesterone levels < 35 nmol/l decrease the chance of OPR in HRT-FET cycles.

Treatment of Abnormal Vaginal Microbiota before Frozen Embryo Transfer: Case-Report and Minireview to Discuss the Longitudinal Treatment Efficacy of Oral Clindamycin.

Abnormal vaginal microbiota (AVM) or bacterial vaginosis (BV) might negatively impact reproductive outcomes of in vitro fertilization (IVF). However, before randomized controlled trials are initiated to investigate cause and effect, it is necessary to establish the optimal treatment for AVM. Metronidazole seems ineffective to treat the biofilm in AVM; thus, clindamycin could be suggested as a relevant antibiotic agent for future intervention based studies. In the present case report, we present the first longitudinal follow-up of the vaginal microbiota with molecular methods during and after oral clindamycin treatment. Furthermore, we review the recent literature with the aim to discuss the optimal AVM treatment in a fertility setting. The patient was 40 years old suffering from unexplained secondary infertility. Prior to the present transfer cycle, she had had two failed IVF cycles. The tentative explanation of failed treatment was age-related aneuploidy. However, the patient asked for AVM diagnosis and she was subsequently diagnosed and treated successfully. Unfortunately, the patient did not achieve pregnancy after clindamycin treatment and two subsequent frozen embryo transfer cycles. Taken together, we report an excellent AVM treatment efficacy both short-term and long-term following oral clindamycin treatment. We discuss the potential impact on the vaginal microbiota of co-treatment with estrogen patches in the stimulated frozen embryo transfer cycle. Furthermore, we discuss future aspects of AVM treatment such as the potential impact of estrogen and live biotherapeutic products to positively modulate the microbiota of the reproductive tract.