The Role of Aquaporin 4 in Lacrimal Gland Ductal Fluid Secretion in Mice.

Purpose: Earlier reports highlighted the predominant presence of aquaporin 4 (AQP4) in the duct cells of rabbit lacrimal glands (LGs). Whereas significant alterations in AQP4 mRNA levels have been observed in experimental dry eye and during pregnancy, the impact of AQP4 in LG ductal fluid production remains unclear. In our recent work, the role of AQP4 in LG ductal fluid secretion was investigated utilizing wild type (WT) and AQP4 knock out (KO) mice. Methods: Tear production was assessed in both WT and KO animals. Immunostaining was used to identify AQP4 protein. Duct segments were harvested from LGs of WT and KO mice. Fluid secretion and filtration permeability (Pf) were quantified using video-microscopy. Ductal tear production, elicited by a cell-permeable cAMP analogue (8-bromo cAMP), carbachol, vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP), and phenylephrine (PHE), were assessed in both WT and KO ducts. Results: A higher expression of AQP4 protein was noted in the duct cells from WT mice when compared to acinar cells. Pf did not show notable alterations between WT and AQP4 KO ducts. Carbachol elicited comparable secretory responses in ducts from both WT and KO animals. However, 8-bromo cAMP, VIP, and PHE stimulation resulted in decreased secretion in ducts from AQP4 KO LGs. Conclusions: Our findings underscore the functional relevance of AQP4 in the fluid production of mouse LG ducts. AQP4 seems to play different roles in fluid secretions elicited by different secretagogues. Specifically, cAMP-mediated, and adrenergic agonist-related secretions were reduced in AQP4 KO ducts.

The regulatory role of vasoactive intestinal peptide in lacrimal gland ductal fluid secretion: A new piece of the puzzle in tear production.

Purpose: Vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP) is an important regulator of lacrimal gland (LG) function although the effect of VIP on ductal fluid secretion is unknown. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to investigate the role of VIP in the regulation of fluid secretion of isolated LG ducts and to analyze the underlying intracellular mechanisms. Methods: LGs from wild-type (WT) and cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) knockout (KO) mice were used. Immunofluorescence was applied to confirm the presence of VIP receptors termed VPAC1 and VPAC2 in LG duct cells. Ductal fluid secretion evoked by VIP (100 nM) was measured in isolated ducts using videomicroscopy. Intracellular Ca2+ signaling underlying VIP stimulation was investigated with microfluorometry. Results: VIP stimulation resulted in a robust and continuous fluid secretory response in isolated duct segments originated from WT mice. In contrast, CFTR KO ducts exhibited only a weak pulse-like secretion. A small but statistically significant increase was detected in the intracellular Ca2+ level [Ca2+]i during VIP stimulation in the WT and in CFTR KO ducts. VIP-evoked changes in [Ca2+]i did not differ considerably between the WT and CFTR KO ducts. Conclusions: These results suggest the importance of VIP in the regulation of ductal fluid secretion and the determining role of the adenylyl cyclase-cAMP-CFTR route in this process.

Alpha-Adrenergic Agonists Stimulate Fluid Secretion in Lacrimal Gland Ducts.

Purpose: The role of adrenergic innervation in the regulation of lacrimal gland (LG) ductal fluid secretion is unknown. The Aim of the present study was to investigate the effect of adrenergic stimulation on fluid secretion in isolated LG duct segments and to study the underlying intracellular mechanisms. Methods: Fluid secretion of isolated mouse LG ducts was measured using video-microscopy. Effect of various adrenergic agonists (norepinephrine, phenylephrine, and isoproterenol) on fluid secretion as well as inhibitory effects of specific antagonists on adrenergic agonist-stimulated secretory response were analyzed. Changes in intracellular Ca2+ level [Ca2+i] were investigated with microfluorometry. Results: Both norepinephrine and phenylephrine initiated a rapid and robust fluid secretory response, whereas isoproterenol did not cause any secretion. Phenylephrine-induced secretion was completely blocked by α1D-adrenergic receptor blocker BMY-7378. The endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) inhibitor L-NAME or guanylyl cyclase inhibitor ODQ reduced but not completely abolished the phenylephrine-induced fluid secretion, whereas co-administration of Ca2+-chelator BAPTA-AM resulted in a complete blockade. Phenylephrine stimulation induced a small, but statistically significant elevation in [\(Ca_i^{2 + }\)]. Conclusions: Our results prove the direct role of α1-adrenergic stimulation on LG ductal fluid secretion. Lack of isoproterenol-induced fluid secretory response suggests the absence of ß-receptor mediated pathway in mouse LG ducts. Complete blockade of phenylephrine-induced fluid secretion by BMY-7378 and predominant inhibition of the secretory response either by L-NAME or ODQ suggest that α-adrenergic agonists use the NO/cGMP pathway through α1D receptor. Ca2+ signaling independent from NO/cGMP pathway may also play an at least partial role in α-adrenergic induced ductal fluid secretion.