Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
J Vasc Surg ; 69(1): 201-209, 2019 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29941317

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Postoperative delirium (POD) has a high prevalence among vascular surgery patients, increasing morbidity, mortality, and length of stay. We prospectively studied preoperative risk factors for delirium that can be assessed by the surgical team to identify high-risk patients and assessed its impact on hospital costs. METHODS: There were 173 elective vascular surgery patients assessed preoperatively for cognitive function using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) and the Confusion Assessment Method for POD, which was verified by chart and clinical review. Demographic information, medications, and a history of substance abuse, psychiatric disorders, and previous delirium were prospectively recorded. An accompanying retrospective chart review of an additional 434 (elective and emergency) vascular surgery patients provided supplemental cost information related to sitter use and prolonged hospitalization secondary to three factors: delirium alone, dementia alone, and delirium and dementia. RESULTS: Prospective screening of 173 patients (73.4% male; age, 69.9 ± 10.97 years) identified that 119 (68.8%) had MoCA scores <24, indicating cognitive impairment, with 7.5% having severe impairment (dementia). Patients who underwent amputation had significantly (P < .000) lower MoCA scores (17 of 30) compared with open surgery and endovascular aneurysm repair patients (23.7 of 30). The incidence of delirium was 11.6% in the elective cohort. Regression analysis identified predictors of delirium to be type of surgical procedure, including lower limb amputation (odds ratio [OR], 16.67; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.41-71.54; P < .000) and open aortic repair (OR, 5.33; 95% CI, 1.91-14.89; P < .000); cognitive variables (dementia: OR, 5.63; 95% CI, 2.08-15.01; P < .001); MoCA scores ≤15, indicating moderate to severe impairment (OR, 6.13; 95% CI, 1.56-24.02; P = .02); and previous delirium (OR, 2.98; 95% CI, 1.11-7.96; P = .03). Retrospective review (N = 434) identified differences in sitter needs for patients with both delirium and dementia (mean, 13.6 days), delirium alone (mean, 3.9 days), or dementia alone (mean, <1 day [17.7 hours]). Fifteen patients required >200 hours (8.3 days), accounting for 69.7% of sitter costs for the surgical unit; 43.7% of costs were accounted for by patients with pre-existing cognitive impairment. CONCLUSIONS: POD is predicted by type of vascular surgery procedure, impaired cognition (MoCA), and previous delirium. Costs and morbidity related to delirium are greatest for those with impaired cognitive burden. Preoperative MoCA screening can identify those at highest risk, allowing procedure modification and informed care.


Asunto(s)
Trastornos del Conocimiento/complicaciones , Trastornos del Conocimiento/economía , Cognición , Delirio/economía , Delirio/etiología , Costos de Hospital , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Vasculares/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Vasculares/economía , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Trastornos del Conocimiento/psicología , Trastornos del Conocimiento/terapia , Delirio/psicología , Delirio/terapia , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
2.
J Cardiovasc Nurs ; 26(4): 312-20, 2011.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21099695

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND RESEARCH OBJECTIVE: Inadequate knowledge among health care providers is a key barrier to good pain management, and nurses have a major role to provide education to patients. The purpose of this study was to identify nurses' learning needs to prepare patients for managing pain before and after discharge home from cardiac surgery. The overall aim is to develop a pain education intervention for nurses working with cardiac surgical patients. SUBJECT AND METHODS: This was a focus groups study. Participants (N=22) were asked about their perceptions of patients' education needs for pain management after cardiac surgery and approaches to help nurses meet these needs. The Pain Beliefs Scale was used to capture nurses' own misbeliefs about pain that would need clarification in a successful pain education intervention. RESULTS: Nurses identified pain management challenges in the hospital, particularly related to patients' age, patient concerns about the use of opioids, the need to use multiple management strategies, and preparing patients to manage pain at home. Pain Beliefs Scale scores were low related to opioid dosing and adverse effects. Participants identified their most helpful educational approaches being brief in-services, hands-on learning, lunch-and-learn sessions, and designated education days. CONCLUSION: Participants identified the most common pain knowledge gaps for patients before and after discharge after cardiac surgery. These data will be used to develop an education intervention for nurses to help their cardiac surgery patients with more effective pain management strategies before and after discharge home.


Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Cardíacos/enfermería , Capacitación en Servicio , Evaluación de Necesidades , Personal de Enfermería en Hospital/educación , Dolor Postoperatorio/enfermería , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapéutico , Grupos Focales , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Humanos , Ontario , Alta del Paciente , Educación del Paciente como Asunto
3.
J Contin Educ Nurs ; 41(7): 323-8, 2010 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20411876

RESUMEN

An audience response system (ARS) is an interactive teaching tool that permits an instructor to poll an audience, either anonymously or in a tracked manner, in response to questions. The instructor can then display the responses to the audience. An ARS can be used in hospital-based education programs to assess group learning. The instructor receives immediate feedback that allows review of concepts that were not grasped by the majority of students. This article reviews systems currently on the market and offers tips for choosing an ARS for hospital-based use. Survey data of nurses attending in-service education sessions show that participants overwhelmingly favor the use of an ARS and the nonthreatening learning environment that these systems create. Instructor survey data show positive responses regarding the benefits of ARS use in hospital-based education programs.


Asunto(s)
Instrucción por Computador , Evaluación Educacional/métodos , Capacitación en Servicio , Personal de Enfermería en Hospital/educación , Enseñanza/métodos , Humanos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA