Complicated anorectal sepsis: Validation of scoring system for predicting anorectal sepsis severity.

Anorectal sepsis is a common and potentially serious medical condition characterized by infection and inflammation of the anal canal and surrounding tissues. However, the lack of standardized and comprehensive scoring systems specifically tailored for predicting the severity of anorectal sepsis poses challenges in clinical practice. This study aimed to develop and validate a scoring system for predicting the severity of anorectal sepsis by incorporating relevant patient factors. A retrospective cohort study was conducted at Mansoura University Hospital, a tertiary care center, over a period of 5 years. The study population consisted of 330 patients diagnosed with anorectal sepsis during the study period. A scoring system was developed using multiple variables, with each variable assigned a specific score based on its clinical significance and weight in predicting disease severity. The developed scoring system's predictive performance was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, calculating the area under the ROC curve to assess discriminative ability. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the demographic and clinical characteristics of the study population. Chi-square tests or t tests were performed to assess differences between non-severe and severe anal sepsis groups. The scoring system consisted of 12 variables, with a maximum total score of 18. The logistic regression analysis revealed significant associations between localized swelling, presentation within 72 hours, multiple drainage sessions, and severe anorectal sepsis. The ROC analysis showed an area under the curve of 0.85, indicating good discriminative ability of the scoring system. The scoring system was developed and validated in a single center, which may limit its generalizability to other settings. The scoring system demonstrated good predictive performance and can be a valuable tool for clinicians in assessing disease severity, guiding treatment decisions, and identifying high-risk patients.

Comparing stapler and sutured mesh fixation techniques for laparoscopic TAPP repair: a study on chronic groin pain on 3-year follow-up.

Trans-abdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) and totally extraperitoneal (TEP) repairs are the available surgeries for inguinal hernias, with both methods of laparoscopic repairs requiring mesh applications. This study analyzes the correlation between sutured versus stapler mesh fixation in a laparoscopic TAPP for unilateral groin hernia regarding chronic pain during 3-year follow-up. A total of 130 patients with laparoscopic hernia undergoing TAPP repair were randomized into 2 groups based on their fixation technique-one with sutures and the other with stapler. Postoperative complications and chronic groin pain were noted for each technique. Equal number of participants was present in the stapler and suture groups, with the majority having an ASA score of one. The mean age was 42.50 ± 13.86 years, and the body mass index (BMI) was 27.47 ± 5.88. The stapler group presented a shorter mean operative time than the suture group. However, the stapler group had a significantly higher mean VAS score than the suture group. Most participants in the suture group (89.2%) had LOS for 1 day, while a 2-day LOS was significantly higher in the stapler group (12.3%) than in the suture group (9.2%). No patient reported mesh erosion, conversion, recurrence, testicular atrophy, and mesh infection. Early postoperative pain was more in stapler group along with long hospital stay, but both were non-significant. Chronic postoperative pain results and recurrence incidences over 3-year follow-up were also similar. Re-admission rates were minimal, no significant complications occurred.

Examining the Applicability of Surgical Coaching Rules for Resident Autonomy in Non-teaching Hospitals.

INTRODUCTION: This retrospective study aims to analyze the impact of standardized rules for teaching in university hospitals on surgical resident autonomy and patient safety, as measured by patient outcomes, and also examines the learning curves for residents and their impact on patient outcomes in a non-teaching hospital. METHODS: The data for the study was collected retrospectively from medical records of 2000 adult patients who went through surgical procedures from January 2020 to December 2022. Participants were categorized into two groups based on the supervision level provided by attending surgeons and residents. Appropriate statistical methods were used to analyze the data. RESULTS: It was observed that operative times of cases handled by both attending and resident surgeons were less than those handled by residents alone. On the other hand, the former group had a significantly higher burden of comorbidities and higher rate of perioperative complications than the latter. These results have important implications for the training of medical residents and the overall delivery of healthcare services in university hospitals. CONCLUSION: The findings will also help towards better understanding of the effectiveness of these rules and their potential for improving the quality of care provided by residents in these settings.