Olfactory dysfunction in essential tremor versus tremor dominant Parkinson disease.

BACKGROUND: Essential tremor (ET) and tremor dominant Parkinson disease (TDPD) variant constitute the main causes of geriatric tremor which differentiation is not always an easy mission. The objective of this work was to study the olfactory performance in ET and PD patients for possible consideration as a differentiating biomarker. METHODS: This study was performed on 36ET, 22 TDPD variant and 24 healthy controls subjects (HCS) submitted to extended n-butanol Sniffin' Sticks test (SST) and olfactory bulbs volumetry (OBV). RESULTS: There were significant decreases in SST threshold, discrimination, identification and TDI variables in TDPD patients compared to ET and HCS. ET patients showed significant decrease in the same variables compared to HCS. Regarding OBV, there were significant decreases in TDPD patients compared to ET and HCS with nonsignificant difference between the 2-latter groups. Our results showed that TDI score of 25 can differentiate between TDPD and ET patients with sensitivity and specificity (94 %, 91 %) respectively. CONCLUSION: Olfactory assessment is a rapid, safe, and easily applicable biomarker that could differentiate TDPD from ET in doubtful cases.

Stroke onset to needle delay: Where these golden hours are lost? An Egyptian center experience.

BACKGROUND: The use of intravenous recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (IV r-tPA) in early acute ischemic stroke (AIS) management faces a lot of difficulties in developing countries due to lessened guideline development with consecutive pre- and intra-hospital delay. OBJECTIVES: The objective was to identify the barriers facing proper utilization of IV r-tPA for AIS in Tanta University Hospitals. METHODS: The study was conducted on 4124 AIS patients eligible to use IV r-tPA divided to group-I consisting of 442 patients who arrived the hospital within <3.5 h from the stroke onset and group-II consisting of 3682 patients who arrived >3.5 h from the stroke onset. The former group was further subdivided to 238 patients who received IV r-tPA (group-Ia) and 204 patients who did not receive IV r-tPA (group-Ib) due to different obstacles. RESULTS: The main causes of pre-hospital onset to arrival delay were stroke unawareness, long travel time, incorrect beliefs, non-available neurologists, stroke onset during sleep and multiple causes (18.2%, 20.5%, 12.7%, 9.1%, 16% and 23.5% of cases, respectively). Causes of non-administration of IV r-tPA in eligible patients includes prolonged door-to-needle time, financial restraints, minor strokes, unavailable beds and fear of complications (41.2%, 26%, 12.7%, 11.3% and 8.8%, respectively). CONCLUSION: Increasing the chance of utilizing IV r-tPA for AIS patients' needs regular updating of the stroke chain of survival system to get the highest benefits from the available resources.