RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Hyperglycaemia (HG) during an acute ischemic stroke (AIS) is not only associated with unfavourable functional outcomes but also associated with stroke-associated pneumonia (SAP). This study aimed to determine the prevalence of SAP among Malaysian patients with AIS and the predictors of SAP among patients with HG during AIS. METHODS: This is a retrospective cross-sectional study that included patients with AIS admitted to Hospital Sultanah Nur Zahirah, Malaysia from 2017 to 2020. SAP was defined as infection with pneumonia during the first seven days after IS. HG was defined as a blood glucose level > 7.8 mmol/L within 72 h after admission. Patients with SAP were divided into two groups according to HG status. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed using SPSS software, version 22 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY) to identify SAP predictors among patients with HG. Kaplan-Meier log-rank test was used to compare the survival rate from unfavourable functional outcomes between hyperglycaemic patients with and without SAP. RESULTS: Among 412 patients with AIS, 69 (16.74%) had SAP. The prevalence of SAP among patients with HG and normoglycemia during AIS was 20.98%, and 10.65%, respectively. Age above 60 years, leucocytosis, and National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) > 14 on admission were independent predictors of SAP with aOR of 2.08 (95% CI;1.01-4.30), 2.83 (95% CI; 1.41-5.67), and 3.67 (95% CI; 1.53-8.80), respectively. No significant difference in unfavourable functional outcomes survival was found among patients with and without SAP (p = 0.653). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated the prevalence of SAP was higher among patients with HG compared to normoglycemia during AIS. The patient being old, leucocytosis and severe stroke upon admission predict the occurrence of SAP among patients with HG during AIS.
RESUMEN
Background: There are established correlations between risk factors and ischemic stroke (IS) recurrence; however, does the hazard of recurrent IS change over time? What is the predicted baseline hazard of recurrent IS if there is no influence of variable predictors? This study aimed to quantify the hazard of recurrent IS when the variable predictors were set to zero and quantify the secondary prevention influence on the hazard of recurrent ischemic stroke. Methods: In the population cohort involved in this study, data were extracted from 7,697 patients with a history of first IS attack registered with the National Neurology Registry of Malaysia from 2009 to 2016. A time-to-recurrent IS model was developed using NONMEM version 7.5. Three baseline hazard models were fitted into the data. The best model was selected using maximum likelihood estimation, clinical plausibility, and visual predictive checks. Results: Within the maximum 7.37 years of follow-up, 333 (4.32%) patients had at least one incident of recurrent IS. The data were well described by the Gompertz hazard model. Within the first 6 months after the index IS, the hazard of recurrent IS was predicted to be 0.238, and 6 months after the index attack, it reduced to 0.001. The presence of typical risk factors such as hyperlipidemia [HR, 2.22 (95%CI: 1.81-2.72)], hypertension [HR, 2.03 (95%CI: 1.52-2.71)], and ischemic heart disease [HR, 2.10 (95%CI: 1.64-2.69)] accelerated the hazard of recurrent IS, but receiving antiplatelets (APLTs) upon stroke decreased this hazard [HR, 0.59 (95%CI: 0.79-0.44)]. Conclusion: The hazard of recurrent IS magnitude differs during different time intervals based on the concomitant risk factors and secondary prevention.
RESUMEN
Objectives Compared with the first stroke, neurological impairment caused by stroke recurrence is more serious, more difficult to treat, and has a higher mortality rate, especially among ischemic stroke (IS) patients with diabetes mellitus (DM). Although there are established correlations between factors and IS recurrence, there were some issues regarding the naive hazard of IS recurrence with no risk factor influence, and how does the baseline hazard differ among patients with DM and non-DM? To answer all these questions, two time-to-event (TTE) models of recurrent IS after the index IS were developed among IS patients with DM and non-DM. Method A total of 7697 patients with an index IS attack were extracted from the Malaysian Registry of Neurology and stratified according to DM status. Several parametric survival models were evaluated using nonlinear mixed-effect modeling software (NONMEM 7.5). The final model was determined according to the lowest objective function value, graphical evaluation, numerical diagnostics, and clinical plausibility. Additionally, the final model was validated internally and temporally using Kaplan-Meier visual predictive checks (KM-VPCs). Results One hundred ninety-five (5.82%) of 3493 DM patients and 138 (3.28%) of 4204 non-DM patients developed a recurrent IS with a maximum follow-up of 7.37 years. Gompertz's model best fitted the data. With no influence on risk factors, the index IS attack was predicted to contribute to the hazard of recurrent IS by 0.356 and 0.253 within the first six months after the index IS among patients with and without DM, respectively. Even after six months of index IS, the recurrent IS baseline hazard was not equal to zero among both groups (0.0023, 0.0018). Moreover, after incorporating the time and risk factors, the recurrent hazards increased exponentially during the first three years after the index IS followed by an exponential reduction afterward. The recurrent IS predictors among DM patients were ischemic heart disease (IHD) and hyperlipidemia (HPLD). IHD and HPLD increased the hazard of recurrent IS by 2.40 and 1.88 times, respectively, compared to those without IHD and HPLD before index IS (HR, 2.40 (1.79-3.20)), and (HR, 1.88 (1.44-2.45)) respectively. Conclusion The baseline hazard was the highest during the first six months after the index IS. Moreover, receiving medications for secondary prevention failed to demonstrate a significant association with reducing IS recurrence among IS patients with DM, suggesting a need for more intensive patient screening and new strategies for secondary prevention among IS patients with DM.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Factors associated with ischemic stroke (IS) recurrence and the contribution of pharmacological treatment as secondary preventions among nondiabetics especially in the non-elderly population are unclear and not widely investigated. This was a population-based study that aimed to identify recurrent IS predictors and to determine the possible impact of secondary preventive medications on the IS recurrence in non-elderly adults with or without diabetes. METHODS: Data of 3386 patients <60 years old who had a history of index IS were extracted from the Malaysian National Neurology Registry (NNEUR) from 2009 to 2016. Recurrent IS was defined as any IS event recorded after the index IS in the NNEUR database. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed by using SPSS version 22. RESULTS: Ischemic heart disease (IHD) was the significant predictor of IS recurrence in non-elderly adults both with or without diabetes (adjusted odds ratio (AOR) of 3.210; 95%CI: 1.909-5.398 and 2.989; 95%CI: 1.515-5.894) respectively). Receiving antiplatelet as secondary stroke prevention (AOR: 0.194; 95%CI: 0.046-0.817) and continuation of antidiabetic medication after the index IS event (AOR: 0.510; 95%CI: 0.298-0.872) reduced the odds of IS recurrence only in non-elderly diabetic adults. Among non-elderly adults without diabetes, hyperlipidemia and every increased in 1 mmHg of systolic blood pressure significantly increased the odds of IS recurrence following the indexing event (AOR: 1.796; 95%CI: 1.058-3.051 and 1.009; 95%CI: 1.002-1.016 respectively). CONCLUSION: IHD was found as the main predictor of IS recurrence regardless of diabetes status in non-elderly adults after the index IS event. Receiving antidiabetic and antiplatelet medications upon discharge after index IS were significant predictors of recurrent IS in non-elderly diabetic adults. A proper randomized clinical trial may be required to determine the impact of secondary preventive medication on IS recurrence, especially in non-elderly adults.