Amifostine reduces mucosal damage after high-dose melphalan conditioning and autologous peripheral blood progenitor cell transplantation for patients with multiple myeloma.

High-dose melphalan (HDM) has been adopted as standard therapy in the treatment of multiple myeloma. This treatment is associated with non-selective cytotoxicity, causing oral mucositis as the major non-hematological side-effect. Amifostine is a cytoprotector which prevents toxicity induced by anticancer therapy. We prospectively compared two groups of patients who either received (group A, n = 21) or did not receive (group B, n = 20) amifostine (740 mg/m(2)) before HDM (200 mg/m(2)) followed by autologous peripheral blood progenitor cell transplantation. The occurrence of severe oral mucositis was significantly decreased in group A in comparison to group B (33% vs 65%, P < 0.05). Six patients in group A required opioid analgesic therapy during a mean period of 4.8 days as compared to eight patients for 6.5 days in group B (P = NS). Delayed vomiting was less frequent in group A (43% vs 70%, P = 0.07) and significantly less severe in group A (grade 2-4) vomiting: two patients vs nine patients, P < 0.02). No difference was observed between the two groups in either hematological toxicity after HDM or in response rate. Grade I emesis was the only immediate side-effect observed after amifostine administration. We conclude that amifostine can reduce mucositis induced by HDM.

Factors associated with successful mobilization of peripheral blood progenitor cells in 200 patients with lymphoid malignancies.

Peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPC) were mobilized and harvested in 200 patients treated for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (n = 148), Hodgkin's disease (n = 22) and multiple myeloma (n = 30). The variables predicting the collection of a minimal (>2.5 x 10(6)/kg) or a high (>10 x 10(6)/kg) CD34+ cell count were analysed. Patients were mobilized with haemopoietic growth factors following either standard chemotherapy (n = 49) or high-dose cyclophosphamide, given alone (n = 55) or combined with high-dose VP16 (n = 86). 10 patients received haemopoietic growth factors only. The first mobilization resulted in a PBPC harvest with enough CD34+ cells in 179/200 patients (90%). High-dose cyclophosphamide, with or without VP16, did not mobilize a higher progenitor cell yield than standard chemotherapy. When performing multiple regression analysis in the 190 patients who received chemotherapy-containing mobilization, only the number of previous chemotherapy regimens and the exposure to fludarabine predicted for a failure to collect a minimal PBPC count (P=0.06 and 0.0008 respectively). The target to collect a high CD34+ cell count was negatively associated with the number of previous chemotherapy regimens (P=0.002). When only non-Hodgkin's lymphoma patients were considered for multivariate analysis, low-grade histology with fludarabine appeared to be associated with poor PBPC cell yield (P=0.08 and 0.005 respectively). This data confirms that PBPC harvest should be planned early in the disease course in transplant candidates, and can be obtained after a standard course of chemotherapy.

High CD34(+) cell counts decrease hematologic toxicity of autologous peripheral blood progenitor cell transplantation.

Optimal numbers of CD34(+) cells to be reinfused in patients undergoing peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) transplantation after high-dose chemotherapy are still unknown. Hematologic reconstitution of 168 transplantations performed in patients with lymphoproliferative diseases was analyzed according to the number of CD34(+) cells reinfused. The number of days from PBPC reinfusion until neutrophil recovery (>1.0 x 10(9)/L) and unsustained platelet recovery (>50 x 10(9)/L) were analyzed in three groups defined by the number of CD34(+) cells reinfused: a low group with less than or equal to 2.5 x 10(6) CD34(+) cells/kg, a high group with greater than 15 x 10(6) CD34(+) cells/kg, and an intermediate group to which the former two groups were compared. The 22 low-group patients had a significantly delayed neutrophil (P < .0001) and platelet recovery (P < .0001). The 41 high-group patients experienced significantly shorter engraftment compared with the intermediate group with a median of 11 (range, 8 to 16) versus 12 (range, 7 to 17) days for neutrophil recovery (P = .003), and a median of 11 (range, 7 to 24) versus 14 (range, 8 to 180+) days for platelet recovery (P < .0001). These patients required significantly less platelet transfusions (P = .002). In a multivariate analysis, the amount of CD34(+) cells reinfused was the only variable showing significance for neutrophil and platelet recovery. High-group patients had a shorter hospital stay (P = .01) and tended to need fewer days of antibotic administration (P = .12). In conclusion, these results suggest that reinfusion of greater than 15 x 10(6) CD34(+) cells/kg after high-dose chemotherapy for lymphoproliferative diseases further shortens hematopoietic reconstitution, reduces platelet requirements, and may improve patients' quality of life.