Comparative effectiveness of novel oral anticoagulants for atrial fibrillation: evidence from pair-wise and warfarin-controlled network meta-analyses.

INTRODUCTION: Novel oral anticoagulants have been tested against warfarin for atrial fibrillation, yet no direct comparison is available. We thus aimed to perform pair-wise (direct) and warfarin-adjusted network (i.e. indirect) meta-analyses of novel oral anticoagulants for atrial fibrillation. METHODS: Databases were searched for randomized warfarin-controlled trials of novel anticoagulants for non-valvular atrial fibrillation. The primary end-point was long-term stroke/systemic embolism. Odds ratios (95% intervals) were computed with RevMan and WinBUGS. RESULTS: Seven trials (52701 patients) were included, focusing on apixaban, dabigatran, edoxaban and rivaroxaban. Pair-wise meta-analysis showed that after a weighted average of 23 months these novel anticoagulants lead to significant reductions in the risk of stroke/systemic embolism (odds ratio=0.81 [0.71-0.92], I2=23%) and all cause death (odds ratio=0.88 [0.82-0.95], I2=0%) in comparison to warfarin. Network meta-analysis showed that apixaban and dabigatran proved similarly superior to warfarin in preventing stroke/systemic embolism (odds ratio=0.78 [0.62-0.96] for apixaban vs warfarin; odds ratio=0.66 [0.52-0.84] for high-dose dabigatran vs warfarin; odds ratio for apixaban vs high-dose dabigatran=1.17 [0.85-1.63]), but apixaban was associated with fewer major bleedings (odds ratio=0.73 [0.57-0.93]) and drug discontinuations (odds ratio=0.64 [0.52-0.78]) than dabigatran. Rivaroxaban did not reduce stroke/systemic embolism (odds ratio=0.87 [0.71-1.07]) or major bleedings in comparison to warfarin (odds ratio=0.87 [0.71-1.07]) and was associated with more major bleedings in comparison to apixaban (odds ratio=1.52 [1.19-1.92]). Data for edoxaban were inconclusive. CONCLUSIONS: Novel oral anticoagulants appear as a very promising treatment option for atrial fibrillation.

Electrophysiologic effects of a novel selective adenosine A1 agonist (CVT-510) on atrioventricular nodal conduction in humans.

BACKGROUND: CVT-510, N-(3(R)-tetrahydrofuranyl)-6-aminopurine riboside, is a selective A(1)-adenosine receptor agonist with potential potent antiarrhythmic effects in tachycardias involving the atrioventricular (AV) node. This study, the first in humans, was designed to determine the effects of CVT-510 on AV nodal conduction and hemodynamics. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients in sinus rhythm with normal AV nodal function at electrophysiologic study (n = 32) received a single intravenous bolus of CVT-510. AH and HV intervals were measured during sinus rhythm and during atrial pacing at 1, 5, 10, 15, 20, 30, 45, and 60 minutes after the bolus. Increasing doses of CVT-510 (0.3 to 10 microg/kg) caused a dose-dependent increase in the AH interval. At 1 minute, a dose of 10 microg/kg increased the AH interval during sinus rhythm from 93 +/- 23 msec to 114 +/- 37 msec, p = 0.01 and from 114 +/- 31 msec to 146 +/- 44 msec during atrial pacing at 600 msec, p = 0.003). The AH interval returned to baseline by 20 minutes. CVT-510 at doses of 0.3 to 10 microg/kg had no effect on sinus rate, HV interval, or systemic blood pressure, and was not associated with serious adverse effects. At doses of 15 and 30 microg/kg, CVT-510 produced transient second/third degree AV heart block in all four patients treated. One of these patients also had a prolonged sedative effect that was reversed with aminophylline. CONCLUSIONS: CVT-510 promptly prolongs AV nodal conduction and does not affect sinus rate or blood pressure. Selective stimulation of the A(1)-adenosine receptor by CVT-510 may be useful for immediate control of heart rate in atrial fibrillation/flutter and to convert paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia to sinus rhythm, while avoiding vasodilatation mediated by the A(2)-adenosine receptor, as well as the vasodepressor and negative inotropic effects associated with beta-adrenergic receptor blockade and/or calcium channel blockers.

Life after pacemaker implantation: management of common problems and environmental interactions.

Patients with permanent pacemakers have become an increasingly common clinical entity for physicians. Many patients who receive pacemakers are active people who leave the hospital expecting to return to fully functional, normal lives. These patients need to be aware of potential pacemaker interactions at work and in other environments. One location in which many patients with pacemakers find themselves is the hospital environment, which is host to an abundant array of diagnostic and therapeutic sources of electromagnetic interference that are capable of disrupting normal pacemaker function. Previous studies have addressed issues ranging from these patients' use of cellular telephones to the dangers of magnetic resonance imaging. This article reviews the medical literature on the management of patients with permanent pacemakers and the problems that these patients may encounter because of electromagnetic interference.

Multicenter study of principles-based waveforms for external defibrillation.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: The efficacy of a shock waveform for external defibrillation depends on the waveform characteristics. Recently, design principles based on cardiac electrophysiology have been developed to determine optimal waveform characteristics. The objective of this clinical trial was to evaluate the efficacy of principles-based monophasic and biphasic waveforms for external defibrillation. METHODS: A prospective, randomized, blinded, multicenter study of 118 patients undergoing electrophysiologic testing or receiving an implantable defibrillator was conducted. Ventricular fibrillation was induced, and defibrillation was attempted in each patient with a biphasic and a monophasic waveform. Patients were randomly placed into 2 groups: group 1 received shocks of escalating energy, and group 2 received only high-energy shocks. RESULTS: The biphasic waveform achieved a first-shock success rate of 100% in group 1 (95% confidence interval [CI] 95.1% to 100%) and group 2 (95% CI 94.6% to 100%), with average delivered energies of 201+/-17 J and 295+/-28 J, respectively. The monophasic waveform demonstrated a 96.7% (95% CI 89.1% to 100%) first-shock success rate and average delivered energy of 215+/-12 J for group 1 and a 98.2% (95% CI 91.7% to 100%) first-shock success rate and average delivered energy of 352+/-13 J for group 2. CONCLUSION: Using principles of electrophysiology, it is possible to design both biphasic and monophasic waveforms for external defibrillation that achieve a high first-shock efficacy.

Implantable cardioverter defibrillator T wave oversensing caused by hyperglycemia.

This case report highlights a previously unreported cause of T wave oversensing in a patient with an ICD and recent onset diabetes. Consistent T wave oversensing was observed at elevated serum glucose levels and this finding was reproduced with a glucose challenge. No T wave oversensing was seen during treatment of hyperglycemia. Alterations in serum chemistry may account for intermittent T wave oversensing in patients with ICDs.

Influence of autothreshold sensing and sinus rate on mode switching algorithm behavior.

Mode switching is beneficial to pacemaker patients with paroxysmal atrial tachyarrhythmias. However, the optimal mode switching algorithm is still in evolution. Mode switching algorithms and atrial sensing circuitry can influence mode switching behavior. This study compared the mode switching behavior of four Medtronic, Inc. implantable devices: Thera DR model 7960 pacemaker, Kappa 700 model KDR701 pacemaker, Gem DR model 7271 dual chamber pacing defibrillator, and Jewel AF model 7250 dual chamber pacemaker atrial and ventricular defibrillator. The Thera and Gem DR use the same mean atrial rate mode switch algorithm. The Kappa and Jewel AF use four of seven short atrial intervals and an atrial fibrillation evidence counter algorithm, respectively. The Thera and Kappa devices use fixed gain sensing and the Gem DR and Jewel AF use autothreshold atrial sensing. Digitally recorded atrial electrograms from 52 episodes of human atrial fibrillation were fed into each device with differing simulated sinus rates before and after the atrial fibrillation. The percent of appropriate mode switching was highest for the Kappa 700 (94%) and lowest for the Thera (85%) (P = 0.046). The time to mode switching was significantly longer for the Thera and Gem DR compared to the Kappa 700 or Jewel AF (all P < 0.05). The time to mode switching was shorter for the Gem DR (9.0 +/- 1.6 s) using autothreshold atrial sensing than for the fixed gain Thera (11.1 +/- 2.1 s, P < 0.05). The mean atrial electrogram amplitude and cycle length were not correlated with the time to mode switching for any device. Faster sinus rates shortened the time to mode switching and prolonged the time to resynchronization in the two devices using the mean atrial interval algorithm. In conclusion, (1) mode switching function among these devices is influenced by algorithms and sensing circuitry, (2) the time to mode switching among these devices is influenced by the algorithm and use of autothreshold atrial sensing, and (3) the sinus rate before and after episodes of atrial fibrillation greatly influences the times to mode switching and resynchronization in devices using the mean atrial interval algorithm.

A prospective randomized-controlled trial of ventricular fibrillation detection time in a DDDR ventricular defibrillator. Ventak AV II DR Study Investigators.

Implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) with dual chamber and dual chamber rate responsive pacing may offer hemodynamic advantages for some ICD patients. Separate ICDs and DDDR pacemakers can result in device to device interactions, inappropriate shocks, and underdetection of ventricular fibrillation (VF). The objectives of this study were to compare the VF detection times between the Ventak AV II DR and the Ventak AV during high rate DDDR and DDD pacing and to test the safety of dynamic ventricular refractory period shortening. Patients receiving an ICD were randomized in a paired comparison to pacing at 150 beats/min (DDD pacing) or 175 beats/min (DDDR pacing) during ICD threshold testing to create a "worst case scenario" for VF detection. The VF detection rate was set to 180 beats/min, and VF was induced during high rate pacing with alternating current. The device was then allowed to detect and treat VF. The induction was repeated for each patient at each programmed setting so that all patients were tested at both programmed settings. Paired analysis was performed. Patient characteristics were a mean age of 69 +/- 11 years, 78% were men, coronary artery disease was present in 85%, and a mean left ventricular ejection fraction of 0.34 +/- 0.11. Fifty-two episodes of VF were induced in 26 patients. Despite the high pacing rate, all VF episodes were appropriately detected. The mean VF detection time was 2.4 +/- 1.0 seconds during DDD pacing and 2.9 +/- 1.9 seconds during DDDR pacing (P = NS). DDD and DDDR programming resulted in appropriate detection of all episodes of VF with similar detection times despite the "worst case scenario" tested. Delays in detection may be seen with long programmed ventricular refractory periods which shorten the VF sensing window and may be avoided with dynamic ventricular refractory period shortening.

Tachycardia-related cardiomyopathy: a common cause of ventricular dysfunction in patients with atrial fibrillation referred for atrioventricular ablation.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the frequency of tachycardia-related cardiomyopathy in patients with atrial fibrillation and systolic dysfunction referred for atrioventricular node ablation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This prospective multicenter cohort study was conducted at 16 tertiary care centers. The ejection fraction was measured before and 3 and 12 months after atrioventricular node ablation. Patients with reduced systolic function (ejection fraction < or = 45%) before atrioventricular ablation were included in this study. Patients whose ejection fraction increased by at least 15 percentage points and to higher than 45% were considered to have tachycardia-related cardiomyopathy. RESULTS: Of 63 patients with systolic dysfunction, 48 had at least 1 adequate follow-up echocardiographic study. Sixteen (25%) of the 63 had marked improvement in the ejection fraction (mean +/- SD change, 27 +/- 8 percentage points) to a value higher than 45% after ablation. CONCLUSIONS: Tachycardia-related cardiomyopathy is common in patients with atrial fibrillation and systolic dysfunction referred for atrioventricular node ablation. This diagnosis should be considered in all patients in whom systolic dysfunction occurs subsequent to or concomitant with onset of atrial fibrillation.

Left ventricular tachycardia originating near the left main coronary artery.

Eight patients with idiopathic ventricular tachycardia (VT) underwent mapping and radiofrequency ablation. Mapping showed VT originating in the high posterolateral left ventricular outflow tract in proximity to the left main and proximal circumflex coronary arteries. Ablation was not attempted due to this proximity to the left main and proximal circumflex coronary arteries. Ablation was not attempted due to this proximity in 2 patients and limited in 1 patient. It was successful in VT suppression in 5 of 6 patients.

The acute effects of biatrial pacing on atrial depolarization and repolarization.

Permanent biatrial and/or multisite atrial pacing may prevent atrial fibrillation (AF), but the effects on atrial electrophysiology remain incompletely understood. Acute biatrial pacing was studied in 20 patients with and 28 without (controls) a history of atrial fibrillation and/or flutter. Twelve-lead electrocardiograms were recorded during pacing from the high right atrium (RA), from the distal coronary sinus (LA), and biatrial pacing. P wave duration was measured in each lead and the difference between maximum and minimum P duration was termed P wave dispersion. Effective refractory periods (ERPs) were measured during each pacing mode. The dispersion of P wave duration was 35 +/- 14 ms in controls and 40 +/- 29 ms in AF patients (P = 0.17). Compared to RA pacing, LA pacing shortened P duration in controls (127 +/- 18 to 107 +/- 16 ms, P < 0.05) and biatrial pacing markedly shortened P duration in controls (127 +/- 18 to 93 +/- 14 ms, P < 0.05) and AF patients (114 +/- 43 to 97 +/- 21 ms, P < 0.05). P wave dispersion was unaffected. In controls, the LA ERP was longer than the RA ERP. This phenomenon was not present in AF patients, whose LA ERP was shorter than that of controls. Biatrial pacing had no effect on atrial ERPs or the dispersion of atrial refractoriness. In conclusion, acute biatrial pacing does not affect atrial repolarization but it does cause a marked shortening of global biatrial depolarization. Distal coronary sinus pacing produces a shorter P wave than RA pacing. There is substantial dispersion in the surface P wave of the electrocardiogram, the significance of which awaits further study.

Clinical characteristics of patients intolerant to VVIR pacing.

The incidence and clinical predictors of the development of intolerance to VVIR pacing have not been extensively studied in prospective long-term randomized trials comparing different pacing modes. The frequency and clinical factors predicting intolerance to ventricular pacing are controversial. The Pacemaker Selection in the Elderly (PASE) Trial enrolled 407 patients aged >/=65 years in a 30-month, single-blind, randomized, controlled comparison of quality of life and clinical outcomes with ventricular pacing and dual-chamber pacing in patients undergoing dual-chamber pacemaker implantation for standard clinically accepted indications. We reviewed the clinical, hemodynamic, and electrophysiologic variables at the time of pacemaker implantation in 204 patients enrolled in the PASE trial and randomized to the VVIR mode, some of whom subsequently required crossover (reprogramming) to DDDR pacing. During a median follow-up of 555 days, 53 patients (26%) crossed over from VVIR to DDDR pacing. A decrease in systolic blood pressure during ventricular pacing at the time of pacemaker implantation (p = 0.001), use of beta blockers at the time of randomization (p = 0.01), and nonischemic cardiomyopathy (p = 0.04) were the only variables that predicted crossover in the Cox multivariate regression model. After reprogramming to the dual-chamber mode, patients showed improvement in all aspects of quality of life, with significant improvements in physical and emotional role. The high incidence of crossover from VVIR to DDDR pacing along with significant improvements in quality of life after crossover to DDDR pacing strongly favors dual-chamber pacing compared with single-chamber ventricular pacing in elderly patients requiring permanent pacing.

Clinical outcomes after ablation and pacing therapy for atrial fibrillation : a meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Radiofrequency ablation of the atrioventricular node and permanent pacing are used for symptomatic relief in patients with medically refractory atrial fibrillation. In this study, meta-analysis was used to clarify clinical outcomes and survival after ablation and pacing therapy using data from the published literature. METHODS AND RESULTS: We used 21 studies with a total of 1181 patients in the meta-analysis. All patients had medically refractory atrial tachyarrhythmias, primarily atrial fibrillation (97%). Nineteen measures of clinical outcome, encompassing quality of life, ventricular function, exercise duration, and healthcare use, were derived from the studies. The meta-analysis demonstrated significant improvement after ablation and pacing therapy in all outcome measures except fractional shortening, which demonstrated a trend toward improvement (P=0.08). Ejection fraction did show significant improvement (P<0.001). The calculated 1-year total and sudden death mortality rates after ablation and pacing therapy were 6.3% and 2.0%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Ablation and pacing therapy improves a broad range of clinical outcomes for patients with medically refractory atrial fibrillation. The calculated 1-year mortality rates after this therapy are low and comparable with medical therapy.

Management of atrial tachyarrhythmias in patients with implantable devices.

The incidence of atrial fibrillation in patients with conduction system disease is high and the management of patients with pacemakers and atrial fibrillation is discussed. The use of mode switch algorithms to avoid tracking of atrial arrhythmias is explained in detail and programming and evaluation of different mode switch algorithms is presented.

Optimal cardiac pacing after heart transplantation.

The transplanted heart is characterized physiologically by autonomic denervation, chronotropic incompetence, intermittent episodes of allograft rejection, and frequently by diastolic dysfunction. Sinus node dysfunction resulting in bradycardia is common in the early postoperative period following standard orthotopic cardiac transplantation. Bradycardia tends to remit spontaneously but there are no factors that accurately identify patients who will need long-term pacing. Patients in whom bradycardia persists beyond the second postoperative week despite treatment with theophylline require permanent pacemaker implantation. It has been observed that chronotropic incompetence and diastolic dysfunction are important determinants of exercise capacity following heart transplantation. Pacing that restores chronotropic competence improves exercise capacity, confirming the importance of impaired heart rate response. As in other settings, pacing that preserves atrioventricular (AV) synchrony results in increased cardiac output. For these reasons when pacing is necessary we recommend the DDDR mode (AAIR if intact AV nodal conduction is present) so that the 30%-50% of patients who remain pacemaker-dependent long-term obtain maximal benefit from their transplant.

Diagnostic utility of mechanical, pharmacological and orthostatic stimulation of the carotid sinus in patients with unexplained syncope.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of the present study was to systematically evaluate the diagnostic utility of mechanical, pharmacological and orthostatic stimulation of the carotid sinus in a consecutive series of patients with recurrent unexplained syncope. BACKGROUND: Carotid sinus hypersensitivity (CSH) is an infrequently recognized cause of recurrent unexplained syncope usually diagnosed by carotid sinus massage (CSM) in the supine position. The diagnostic utility of systematic assessment of mechanical, pharmacological and orthostatic stimulation of the carotid sinus has not been clearly established. METHODS: Eighty consecutive patients (63 +/- 12 years) with a history of recurrent unexplained syncope (mean episodes: 6 +/- 3); 30 age-matched controls (65 +/- 14 years) and 16 patients (59 +/- 12 years) with syncope not related to CSH were studied. Pharmacological stimulation of the carotid sinus was achieved by randomly administering bolus injections of nitroprusside and phenylephrine. Mechanical stimulation of the carotid sinus was performed by CSM applied for 5 s in the supine position and after 2 min at 60 degrees. A 60 degree low-dose isoproterenol head-up tilt test (HUTT) was also performed for a total duration of 30 min. RESULTS: Carotid sinus hypersensitivity was elicited by CSM in the supine position in seven (8.7%) patients, two (6.6%) controls and one (6.3%) patient with syncope unrelated to CSH, compared with 48 (60%) patients, two (6.6%) controls and one (6.3%) syncope unrelated to CSH patient after 60 degree HUTT, increasing the diagnostic yield by 51%. Baroreceptor gain was significantly reduced in the CSH group. Head-up tilt test was positive in 12 (25%) patients with CSH, two (6.6%) controls and two (12%) with documented syncope but not positive in any of the patients in which syncope remained unexplained. Diagnostic accuracy was enhanced by 38% (31% supine vs. 69% upright) when CSM was performed at 60 degrees. CONCLUSIONS: CSH was documented in 68% of patients, 8.7% in the supine position and 60% in the upright position. Sensitivity was increased by 51%, and diagnostic accuracy was enhanced by 38% by performing CSM in the upright position. Decreased baroreceptor gain was documented and may play a role in the pathophysiology of CSH.

Induction of ventricular fibrillation by T wave shocks: observations from monophasic action potential recordings.

INTRODUCTION: Shocks given during the vulnerable period of cardiac repolarization may induce ventricular fibrillation (VF). However, the relationship of the vulnerable period and the monophasic action potential (MAP) has not yet been reported in humans. The purpose of this study was, therefore, to determine how the monophasic action potential recorded from the right ventricle correlates with inducibility of VF using T wave shocks during ventricular pacing. METHODS: Eleven patients undergoing implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) implantation had a MAP catheter positioned in the right ventricle (RV). The local monophasic action potential duration at 90% repolarization (MAP90) duration was measured during pacing at 400 ms. VF induction was attempted by pacing at 400 ms for 10 cycles and then giving a 1.0 joule monophasic T wave shock at varying coupling intervals (CI) to the last paced stimulus. The maximum and minimum CI that induced VF were determined and mapped in relation to the MAP90 recording. RESULTS: The average paced MAP duration was 275 +/- 20 ms. The minimum and maximum CI to induce VF were 255 +/- 24 ms and 325 +/- 36 ms respectively. This ranged from 93% to 118% of the MAP90 duration but because of delay in conduction time to the MAP catheter, shocks that induced ventricular fibrillation occurred between 74% and 99% of local repolarization time. CONCLUSION: VF is inducible with low energy T wave shocks falling during the last 25% of the right ventricular MAP90 recording. This corresponds with VF initiation during phase III repolarization.