Safety of mucous fistula refeeding in neonates with functional short bowel syndrome: A retrospective review.

PURPOSE: Mucous fistula (MF) refeeding of proximal stoma effluent in neonates after small bowel resection can promote nutrient absorption and prevent atrophy of the unused distal bowel. This study aimed to assess the safety of this practice in neonates. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of all patients admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) between 2009 and 2015 who underwent a laparotomy with creation of an enterostomy and mucous fistula was performed. Patients were included if they were refed proximal stoma effluent into the MF. RESULTS: Thirty-one patients were identified that were refed. There were no major complications (perforation, stricture, death) related to refeeding. Patients were refed for an average of 41 days (± 22), with patients gaining an average of 25.7 g/day (± 10.1) while being refed. Total parental nutrition (TPN) was administered for an average of 55 days (± 31.4) between resection and reanastomosis, with only 7 (23%) developing cholestasis and 15 (48%) reaching full feeds in this time. Mean time to full feeds after reanastomosis was 36 days (± 58.6) with two patients having anastomotic leaks. CONCLUSION: MF refeeding is a safe technique that has the potential to contribute to significant weight gain and a decreased dependence on total parenteral nutrition. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.

Evaluating complication rates and outcomes among infants less than 5kg undergoing traditional percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy insertion: A retrospective chart review.

PURPOSE: Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) enables enteral nutrition for patients with inadequate oral intake. Laparoscopic guidance of PEG insertion is used for high-risk populations, including in infants less than 5kg at insertion. This study aimed to assess complication rates with traditional PEG tube insertion in infants less than 5kg at a single tertiary care center. METHODS: A retrospective review of patients less than 5kg who underwent PEG insertion was conducted. PEG insertion-related complications, up to four years following insertion, were collected. Outcomes were reported as counts and percentages, or median with minimum and maximum values. RESULTS: 480 pediatric gastrostomy procedures between January 1, 2009 and February 1, 2017, were screened, with 129 included for analysis. Median weight at PEG insertion was 3800g. Superficial surgical site infection (SSI) occurred in 6 (4.7%) patients, and 1 (0.8%) required readmission for intravenous antibiotics. One (0.8%) required endoscopic management for retained foreign body, 1 (0.8%) required operative management for gastrocolic fistula, and 1 (0.8%) for persistent gastrocutaneous fistula. No deep space SSI, procedure-related hemorrhage requiring readmission or transfusion, buried bumper syndrome, or procedure-related mortality occurred. CONCLUSION: Traditional PEG tube insertion in infants less than 5kg results in complication rates comparable to pediatric literature standards. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II, retrospective prognosis study.

The Effect of Sitting on Stability Balls on Nonspecific Lower Back Pain, Disability, and Core Endurance: A Randomized Controlled Crossover Study.

STUDY DESIGN: Experimental randomized crossover. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to determine whether sitting on a ball for 90 min/d instead of a chair has an effect on low back pain (LBP), low back disability, and/or core muscle endurance. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: LBP may result from prolonged sitting. It has been proposed that replacing chairs with stability balls can diminish LBP in those who sit for prolonged periods. Research on the topic is sparse and inconclusive. METHODS: A total of 90 subjects (university students, staff, and faculty, ages 18-65, who sit ≥4 hr/d) were randomly assigned to the intervention or control group for the first part of the study. Baseline data were collected: Oswestry Disability Index, a numerical pain rating scale for LBP, and four core muscle endurance tests. For 8 weeks, the control group sat on their usual chair. The intervention group sat on stability balls 5 d/wk, increasing up to 90 min/d. Baseline measurements were repeated postintervention. After a washout period, subjects switched groups, and the procedures were repeated-70 completed participation in control group and 76 in intervention group. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences for pain or disability in either group (P > 0.05). Changes in isometric trunk flexion (P = 0.001), nondominant side plank (P = 0.008), and Sorensen (P = 0.006) endurance scores were significant within the intervention group but not the control group. Between-group comparisons revealed a significant difference for isometric trunk flexion (P = 0.005) and Sorensen endurance times (P = 0.010). Analysis also showed that ball-sitting did not prevent an increase in LBP over the 8-week period. CONCLUSION: Ball-sitting had no significant effects on LBP or associated disability, but did improve core endurance in the sagittal plane. Although ball-sitting may be useful as an adjunct treatment for LBP when core muscles are involved, clinicians should rely on other, evidence-based treatments for LBP.