RESUMEN
Multiple sclerosis is a disease that affects the central nervous system, resulting in various symptoms such as vision, physical activity, and stability. Central positional vertigo as initial multiple sclerosis symptoms are a rare case. It increases the attention of doctors to follow accurate measurements to diagnose multi sclerosis regarding the initial symptoms.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Deep learning enables accurate high-resolution mapping of cells and tissue structures that can serve as the foundation of interpretable machine-learning models for computational pathology. However, generating adequate labels for these structures is a critical barrier, given the time and effort required from pathologists. RESULTS: This article describes a novel collaborative framework for engaging crowds of medical students and pathologists to produce quality labels for cell nuclei. We used this approach to produce the NuCLS dataset, containing >220,000 annotations of cell nuclei in breast cancers. This builds on prior work labeling tissue regions to produce an integrated tissue region- and cell-level annotation dataset for training that is the largest such resource for multi-scale analysis of breast cancer histology. This article presents data and analysis results for single and multi-rater annotations from both non-experts and pathologists. We present a novel workflow that uses algorithmic suggestions to collect accurate segmentation data without the need for laborious manual tracing of nuclei. Our results indicate that even noisy algorithmic suggestions do not adversely affect pathologist accuracy and can help non-experts improve annotation quality. We also present a new approach for inferring truth from multiple raters and show that non-experts can produce accurate annotations for visually distinctive classes. CONCLUSIONS: This study is the most extensive systematic exploration of the large-scale use of wisdom-of-the-crowd approaches to generate data for computational pathology applications.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama , Colaboración de las Masas , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Núcleo Celular , Colaboración de las Masas/métodos , Femenino , Humanos , Aprendizaje AutomáticoRESUMEN
Objective: Systematic reviews are increasingly used as sources of evidence in clinical cardiology guidelines. In the present study, we aimed to assess the quality of published systematic reviews in high impact cardiology journals. Methods: We searched PubMed for systematic reviews published between 2010 and 2019 in five general cardiology journals with the highest impact factor (according to Clarivate Analytics 2019). We extracted data on eligibility criteria, methodological characteristics, bias assessments, and sources of funding. Further, we assessed the quality of retrieved reviews using the AMSTAR tool. Results: A total of 352 systematic reviews were assessed. The AMSTAR quality score was low or critically low in 71% (95% CI: 65.7-75.4) of the assessed reviews. Sixty-four reviews (18.2%, 95% CI: 14.5-22.6) registered/published their protocol. Only 221 reviews (62.8%, 95% CI: 57.6-67.7) reported adherence to the EQUATOR checklists, 208 reviews (58.4%, 95% CI: 53.9-64.1) assessed the risk of bias in the included studies, and 177 reviews (52.3%, 95% CI: 45.1-55.5) assessed the risk of publication bias in their primary outcome analysis. The primary outcome was statistically significant in 274 (79.6%, 95% CI: 75.1-83.6) and had statistical heterogeneity in 167 (48.5%, 95% CI: 43.3-53.8) reviews. The use and sources of external funding was not disclosed in 87 reviews (24.7%, 95% CI: 20.5-29.5). Data analysis showed that the existence of publication bias was significantly associated with statistical heterogeneity of the primary outcome and that complex design, larger sample size, and higher AMSTAR quality score were associated with higher citation metrics. Conclusion: Our analysis uncovered widespread gaps in conducting and reporting systematic reviews in cardiology. These findings highlight the importance of rigorous editorial and peer review policies in systematic review publishing, as well as education of the investigators and clinicians on the synthesis and interpretation of evidence.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Postpartum Hemorrhage (PPH) is one of the primary causes of maternal mortality and morbidity during the third stage of labor. Oxytocin is the gold standard uterotonic agent for the prevention of PPH. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to compare the efficacy of oxytocin administered Intramuscularly (IM) or Intravenously (IV) for the preventive management of PPH. METHODS: We searched six databases for relevant clinical trials evaluating the administration of oxytocin for the prevention against PPH through July 2019. Data on blood loss, PPH (≥500 ml), severe PPH (≥1000 ml), blood transfusion, the change in hemoglobin, the use of additional uterotonics, and the incidence of retained placenta were extracted and pooled in a meta-analysis model using RevMan version 5.3. RESULTS: Seven studies with a total of 6996 participants were included. IM oxytocin group was associated with higher incidence rates of PPH (≥500 ml) (RR=1.35; p=0.003), severe PPH (≥1000 ml) (RR=1.58; p=0.04), and blood transfusion (RR=2.43; p=0.005). In terms of blood loss, the IV route was superior to the IM route (SMD= 0.15; p=0.00001). However, we observed no statistically significant difference between the two routes regarding the change in Hb (SMD=-0.02; p=0.72) and the use of additional uterotonics (RR=0.96, p= 0.94). CONCLUSION: IV oxytocin infusion is maybe superior to IM injection for the management of PPH. Further studies with larger sample sizes are still needed to support these findings.
Asunto(s)
Oxitócicos/administración & dosificación , Oxitocina/administración & dosificación , Hemorragia Posparto/prevención & control , Administración Intravenosa , Transfusión Sanguínea/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Inyecciones Intramusculares , Retención de la Placenta/epidemiología , Hemorragia Posparto/epidemiología , EmbarazoAsunto(s)
Neoplasias Encefálicas/psicología , Glioblastoma/psicología , Suicidio/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Etnicidad , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Factores de Riesgo , Programa de VERF , Factores Sexuales , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
Aggregation of particular proteins in the form of inclusion bodies or plaques followed by neuronal death is a hallmark of neurodegenerative proteopathies such as primary Parkinsonism, Alzheimer's disease, Lou Gehrig's disease, and Huntington's chorea. Complex polygenic and environmental factors implicated in these proteopathies. Accumulation of proteins in these disorders indicates a substantial disruption in protein homeostasis (proteostasis). Proteostasis or cellular proteome homeostasis is attained by the synchronization of a group of cellular mechanisms called the proteostasis network (PN), which is responsible for the stability of the proteome and achieves the equilibrium between synthesis, folding, and degradation of proteins. In this review, we will discuss the different types of PN and the impact of PN component dysfunction on the four major neurodegenerative diseases mentioned earlier. Graphical abstract.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Neurodegenerativas , Enfermedad de Parkinson , Deficiencias en la Proteostasis , Homeostasis , Humanos , ProteostasisRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of infliximab biosimilar, CT-P13, for patients with inflammatory bowel disease. METHODS: We searched PubMed, Scopus, Ovid, and Web of Science for relevant clinical trials discussing CT-P31 administration for IBD patients either naïve to biological therapy or switched from IFX therapy. Data of the rates of clinical response, clinical remission, and adverse events were extracted and pooled in a random effect model meta-analysis using CMA version 2. RESULTS: Thirty-two studies with a total of 3464 IBD patients treated with CT-P13 were identified. The pooled rates of clinical response among Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) at 8-14 weeks were 0.81 (95% CI = 0.72 to 0.87) and 0.68 (95% CI = 0.63 to 0.72), respectively, and at 48-63 weeks were 0.69 (95% CI = 0.48 to 0.85) and 0.54 (95% CI = 0.45 to 0.63) respectively. After switching from IFX to CT-P13, the pooled rates of sustained clinical response among CD and UC at 30-32 weeks were 0.84 (95% CI = 0.57 to 0.96) and 0.96 (95% CI = 0.58 to 0.99), respectively, and at 48-63 weeks were 0.51 (95% CI = 0.22 to 0.79) and 0.83 (95% CI = 0.19 to 0.99) respectively. Moreover, adverse events were reported (CD = 0.10, 95% CI 0.04 to 0.22; UC = 0.18, 95% CI 0.05 to 0.15). CONCLUSION: CT-P13 is effective and well tolerated in short and long-term periods. Switching to CT-P13 is recommended for the management of IBD.
Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Monoclonales/efectos adversos , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/uso terapéutico , Biosimilares Farmacéuticos/efectos adversos , Biosimilares Farmacéuticos/uso terapéutico , Enfermedades Inflamatorias del Intestino/tratamiento farmacológico , Infliximab/efectos adversos , Infliximab/uso terapéutico , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Mucosa Intestinal/efectos de los fármacos , Mucosa Intestinal/patología , Estudios Observacionales como Asunto , Inducción de Remisión , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Resultado del Tratamiento , Cicatrización de Heridas/efectos de los fármacosRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Previous studies of ethnic disparities in colorectal cancer (CRC) have focused mainly on patients of Caucasian and African-American descent. We aimed to evaluate outcomes for a range of races, representing a broader demographic of the US population. METHODS: The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database was queried to identify patients with CRC diagnosed between 1994 and 2014. We performed unadjusted Kaplan-Meier test and multivariable covariate-adjusted Cox models to calculate the overall and CRC-specific survival of patients according to their race. RESULTS: We identified 401,723 patients diagnosed with CRC between 1994 and 2014. Overall survival (OS) and CRC-specific survival were compared across different races stratified by age, sex, marital status, disease stage and grade, and undergoing surgery as a treatment. Overall, Asian/Pacific Islanders and Hispanics had improved CRC-specific survival compared to Whites (HR = 0.873, 95%CI 0.853-0.893, P < .001, and HR = 0.958, 95%CI 0.937-0.979, P < .001, respectively). Blacks had the worst CRC-specific survival outcomes when compared to Whites (HR = 1.215, 95%CI 1.192-1.238, P < .001). Racial disparity persisted when looking at two different time periods (1994-2003 and 2004-2014). CONCLUSIONS: Asians/Pacific Islanders have improved outcomes from CRC compared to other races. Multifactorial, including genetic, environmental, and socioeconomic factors appear to influence outcomes and need to be addressed separately in order to reduce racial disparities among patients with CRC.