Evaluation of patient and staff exposure with state of the art X-ray technology in cardiac catheterization: A randomized controlled trial.

INTRODUCTION: Cardiac catheterization procedures result in high patient radiation exposure and corresponding staff doses are reported to be among the highest for medical staff. The purpose of current randomized controlled study was to quantify the potential radiation dose reduction for both patient and staff, enabled by recent X-ray technology. This technology is equipped with advanced image processing algorithms, real-time dose monitoring, and an acquisition chain optimized for cardiac catheterization applications. METHODS: A total of 122 adult patients were randomly assigned to one of two cath labs, either the reference X-ray modality (Allura Xper FD10, Philips Healthcare, the Netherlands) or the new X-ray system (AlluraClarity FD20/10 Philips Healthcare, the Netherlands). Exposure parameters and staff dosimeter readings were recorded for each exposure. Technical measurements were performed to define the radiation scatter behavior. RESULTS: With the newer equipment, patient radiation dose is reduced (as total dose-area product) by 67% based on geometric means with 95%CI of 53%, 77% for diagnostic and interventional procedures. The C-arm and leg dosimeter readings were both reduced with 65% (P < 0.001), while for the collar and chest dosimeter readings no statistically significant reduction was noticed. CONCLUSION: The new x-ray and image processing technology, significantly reduces patient dose in coronary angiographies, and PCIs by 67%. In general, scatter dose was also reduced, yet for some dosimeters the reduction was limited and not statistically significant. This study clearly indicates that the scatter behavior is highly dependent on C-arm rotation, operator movement and height, dosimeter position, beam filtration, clinical procedure type and system geometry.

Organ Doses and Radiation Risk of Computed Tomographic Coronary Angiography in a Clinical Patient Population: How Do Low-Dose Acquisition Modes Compare?

OBJECTIVE: To compare the organ doses and lifetime-attributable risk of cancer for electrocardiogram-triggered sequential and high-pitch helical scanning in a clinical patient population. METHODS: Phantom thermoluminiscence dosimeter measurements were used as a model for the organ dose assessment of 314 individual patients who underwent coronary computed tomographic angiography. Patient-specific lifetime-attributable cancer risks were calculated. RESULTS: Phantom measurements showed that heart rate had a significant influence on the delivered radiation exposure in sequential mode, and calcium scoring and contrast bolus tracking scans make a nonnegligible contribution to patients' dose. Therefore, they should be taken into account for patients' organ dose estimations. Median cancer induction risks are low, with 0.008% (0.0016%) and 0.022% (0.056%) for high-pitch and sequential scanning for men (women), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The use of high-pitch helical scanning leads to 65% and 72% lower lifetime-attributable risk values for men and women, respectively, compared with sequential scanning.

Novel X-ray imaging technology enables significant patient dose reduction in interventional cardiology while maintaining diagnostic image quality.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to quantify the reduction in patient radiation dose during coronary angiography (CA) by a new X-ray technology, and to assess its impact on diagnostic image quality. BACKGROUND: Recently, a novel X-ray imaging technology has become available for interventional cardiology, using advanced image processing and an optimized acquisition chain for radiation dose reduction. METHODS: 70 adult patients were randomly assigned to a reference X-ray system or the novel X-ray system. Patient demographics were registered and exposure parameters were recorded for each radiation event. Clinical image quality was assessed for both patient groups. RESULTS: With the same angiographic technique and a comparable patient population, the new imaging technology was associated with a 75% reduction in total kerma-area product (KAP) value (decrease from 47 Gycm2 to 12 Gycm2, P<0.001). Clinical image quality showed an equivalent detail and contrast for both imaging systems. On the other hand, the subjective appreciation of noise was more apparent in images of the new image processing system, acquired at lower doses, compared to the reference system. However, the higher noise content did not affect the overall image quality score, which was adequate for diagnosis in both systems. CONCLUSIONS: For the first time, we present a new X-ray imaging technology, combining advanced noise reduction algorithms and an optimized acquisition chain, which reduces patient radiation dose in CA drastically (75%), while maintaining diagnostic image quality. Use of this technology may further improve the radiation safety of cardiac angiography and interventions.

Three-dimensional rotational X-ray acquisition technique is reducing patients' cancer risk in coronary angiography.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to assess patient-specific organ doses and cancer risk with 3D-rotational acquisitions versus the current standard of multiple single-plane coronary angiography (CA). BACKGROUND: Catheter-based CA remains one of the most commonly performed diagnostic invasive procedures delivering a relatively high radiation dose to the patient. With the introduction of flat-panel technology, three-dimensional rotational angiography became an alternative for the conventional two-dimensional angiography. However, limited information is available on the difference in patient radiation exposure with both acquisition techniques. METHODS: Eighty adult patients (45 males, age 38-93 years) were randomly assigned to the rotational or standard angiography group. Exposure parameters were registered and skin dose distribution was measured during the procedure. Patient-specific organ doses and related cancer risks were assessed with dedicated software. RESULTS: Rotational angiograms were associated with 33% lower KAP-values (decrease from 49.99 Gycm(2) to 33.37 Gycm(2), P < 0.001). A significant (P < 0.001) lower peak skin dose was measured with rotational acquisitions (80 mGy, median) versus planar imaging (172 mGy, median). Moreover, the skin dose was smoothed over the whole chest of the patient. Contrast medium consumption decreased from 104 mL to 73 mL (P < 0.001) with the use of 3D-imaging. The reduction in radiation exposure resulted in a corresponding decrease of organ doses. The latter contributed to an overall cancer risk reduction of 21% for males and 50% for females. CONCLUSIONS: The current study demonstrates that in CA radiation risk reduction is feasible by using a rotational acquisition technique.