FDG-PET predicted unfavorable tumor histology in living donor liver transplant recipients; a retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Tumor histology affects outcome after liver transplantation (LT) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). This study explores the association between F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) and tumor histology in living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) recipients and their outcome. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two hundred fifty-eight patients with primary liver tumors who underwent FDG-PET before LDLT were enrolled in this retrospective study. Unfavorable tumor histology was defined as primary liver tumor other than a well- or moderately differentiated HCC. Thirteen patients had unfavorable tumor histology, including 2 poorly differentiated HCC, 2 sarcomatoid HCC, 5 combined hepatocellular cholangiocarcinoma, 3 intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, and 1 hilar cholangiocarcinoma. RESULTS: FDG-PET positivity was significantly associated with unfavorable tumor histology (P < 0.001). Both FDG-PET positivity and unfavorable tumor histology were significant independent predictors of tumor recurrence and overall survival. In a subgroup analysis of patients with FDG-PET-positive tumors, unfavorable tumor histology was a significant independent predictor of tumor recurrence and overall survival. High FDG uptake (tumor to non-tumor uptake ratio ≥ 2) was a significant predictor of unfavorable tumor histology. Patients with high FDG uptake and/or unfavorable tumors had significantly higher 3-year cumulative recurrence rate (70.8% versus 26.2%, P = 0.004) and worse 3-year overall survival (34.1% versus 70.8%, P = 0.012) compared to those with low FDG uptake favorable tumors. CONCLUSIONS: The expression of FDG-PET is highly associated with histology of explanted HCC and predicts the recurrence. FDG-PET-positive tumors with high FDG uptake may be considered contraindication for LDLT due to high recurrence rate except when pathology proves favorable histology.

Coagulation factor VII gene polymorphisms are not associated with the occurrence or the survival of hepatocellular carcinoma: a report of 37 cases.

OBJECTIVE: : Coagulation factor VII (FVII) triggers the extrinsic pathway of blood coagulation. In our previous study, we showed that FVII plays an important role in tumorigenesis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, the role of FVII polymorphism in HCC is still unknown. The present study aimed to investigate the relationship between HCC carcinogenesis and single nucleotide polymorphism of FVII. METHODS: : Thirty-seven HCC patients and 30 healthy donors were recruited in this study. Four common FVII gene polymorphisms - a decanucleotide insertion at position -323 (-323ins10-bp), a G to T substitution at position -401 (-401G/T), a G to A substitution at position -402 (-402G/A), and a T to C substitution at position -122 (-122T/C) - were analyzed by sequencing or commercialized assays using genomic DNA isolated from blood samples. Clinicopathological parameters between control and HCC subjects were compared according to the specific genotypes. RESULTS: : The most common nucleotide variation was -402G/A. However, no statistically significant difference was observed between healthy controls and HCC subjects for all four polymorphisms in terms of genotype distribution and allele frequencies, indicating that these polymorphisms may not affect HCC tumorigenesis. Furthermore, no association was found between -402G/A polymorphisms and tumor stage, recurrence, and overall survival. CONCLUSIONS: : Our results indicate that FVII polymorphisms may not be a key factor that clinically impact tumorigenesis and outcomes of HCC, although further investigations should be conducted to confirm our findings.

Rebound thymic hyperplasia after liver transplantation for a child with biliary atresia; a case report.

The thymus gland possesses the ability to regrow in children leading to a newly developed anterior mediastinal mass. This condition may represent a rebound phenomenon during recovery from a stressful event such as post-chemotherapy and hence was described as RTH. RTH after LT has not been well documented. We are reporting an infant with BA who underwent LT and presented with a symptomless anterior mediastinal mass, detected on follow-up imaging 6 months thereafter. Surgical partial excision was performed to rule out other differential diagnoses of a solid mass in the anterior mediastinum of an infant particularly lymphoma-that may arise as post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder-and teratoma, as well as the other aggressive lesions such as thymoma and thymic carcinoma. The final pathological analysis revealed true thymic hyperplasia, consistent with RTH. The diagnosis of RTH should be considered for a child presenting by anterior mediastinal mass after LT.

The surgical challenges of salvage living donor liver transplantation for Hepatocellular carcinoma; The cumulative experience of 100 cases - A retrospective cohort study and a propensity score analysis.

BACKGROUND: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is increasingly managed by liver resection first then salvage liver transplantation in case of recurrence within accepted criteria. Many reports compared the safety of the salvage against the primary surgery in the setting of deceased donation but the difference in case of living donation is not sufficiently defined. Salvage living donor liver transplantation (SLDLT) is believed to be a more challenging surgery than primary living donor liver transplantation (PLDLT) due to operative field adhesions, in addition to the inherent difficulties particularly short vasculobiliary stumps. In this report, we compared both pathways from a surgical perspective in a homogenous LDLT-only cohort. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Over 15 years, 448 LDLTs for HCC were performed in a single liver transplant institution in Taiwan, including PLDLT (n = 348) and SLDLT (n = 100). A retrospective comparative review of the surgical outcomes of both pathways using a propensity score matching model (1-1, 100 pairs) was performed with adjustment for age, Child score and MELD score. The surgical outcome and survival were compared across 2 time eras. RESULTS: The operative data showed that SLDLT surgery encountered more extensive adhesions (57% vs. 0%, p < 0.001), longer operative duration (650 vs. 618 min, p=0.04), and was followed by more incidence of re-exploration (16% vs. 5%, p=0.01), than the PLDLT surgery. There was no significant difference regarding the incidence of in-hospital mortality, vascular and biliary complications, or overall survival (OS). The 1-year OS of SLDLT was inferior to PLDLT in the first 50 cases (90% vs. 98%, p=0.03), then the same OS was found in the 2nd 50 cases (96% vs. 96%, p=0.9). CONCLUSIONS: The SLDLT surgery is a demanding lengthy procedure with extensive adhesions and possibility of frequent re-explorations. Significant case load and high centre volume are important factors for safe practice of SLDLT and better cumulative OS.

Prediction of the Development of Persistent Massive Ascites After Living Donor Liver Transplantation Using a Perioperative Risk Score.

BACKGROUND: Persistent massive ascites (PMAS) longer than 14 days after living donor liver transplantation is not uncommon and associated with worse outcome. A predictive risk scoring system was constructed after analysis of recipient, graft, and surgery-related factors. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed adult living donor liver transplantation recipients from 2005 to 2011 after excluding cases that experienced any intervention for perioperative vascular-related events. Two groups were identified, PMAS and non-PMAS. The score was constructed from significant factors using weighted odds ratios (OR). RESULTS: The study population included 439 recipients. Persistent massive ascites was evident in 74 cases (17%). Five significant risk predictors were identified in multivariate analysis: pretransplant serum creatinine greater than 1.5 mg/dL (OR, 5.693; weighted OR, 2), recipient spleen to graft volume ratio greater than 1.3 (OR, 4.466; weighted OR, 2), left lobe graft (OR, 3.196; weighted OR, 1), more than 1000 mL ascites at laparotomy (OR, 2.541; weighted OR, 1), and graft recipient weight ratio less than 0.8 (OR, 2.419; weighted OR, 1). The clinical scoring system was constructed and ranged from 0 to 7. Receiver operating characteristic analysis showed an area under the curve (0.778, P < 0.001). Internal validation of the score showed an area under the curve of 0.783. The 5- and 10-year survival rates for the non-PMAS versus the PMAS groups were 89% and 84% versus 81% and 48%, respectively (P = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The PMAS score is a predictive pretransplant clinical tool. A Clinical cutoff score of 4 might be decision-changing. Pretransplant correction of renal functions, deciding to harvest a large graft and/or consideration of splenic artery embolization could reduce the risk of PMAS.

Liver Transplantation for High Risk Hepatocellular Carcinoma After Liver Resection: A Sequential or Salvage Approach?

BACKGROUND Liver transplantation (LT) is the best radical treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Salvage liver transplantation (SalvLT) provides good outcomes for recurrent HCC cases after initial curative liver resection (LR). However, the salvage strategy is not feasible in all situations due to aggressive recurrences. Recently, sequential liver transplantation (SeqLT) was proposed for cases that show adverse pathological features after LR, thus LT is performed pre-emptively before recurrence. In this report, we compared the outcomes of SalvLT and SeqLT for surgical treatment of HCC. MATERIAL AND METHODS One hundred and ten cases underwent LR for HCC, then were subjected to either SalvLT (n=91) or SeqLT (n=19), from January 2001 to December 2015. For cases that underwent several LR before LT, we collected the data of the last LR before transplantation. A comparison was made according to pre- and post-transplant clinical and pathological variables. Survival analysis and comparison between both pathways are provided. RESULTS The median interval (months) between LR and LT for the SeqLT group and the SalvLT group were 9.6 and 22.2, respectively. (p=0.01). The LR histopathological features were similar in both groups. In the SalvLT group, the histopathological comparison between the criteria of last LR and the criteria of liver explants revealed that 14 cases advanced from stage I to stage II, one cases from stage I to stage IIIa, one case from stage I to stage IIIb, one case from stage I to stage IIIc, three cases from stage II to stage IIIb and one case from stage II to stage IIIc. The overall rate of pathological upstaging in the SalvLT group was 27%. The incidence of post-transplant HCC recurrence was 5% (1/19) and 11% (10/91) for the SeqLT and SalvLT groups, respectively (p=0.4). The incidence of post-LT in-hospital mortality was 0% among the SeqLT group and 2% (2/91) among the SalvLT group. The estimated rates of five-year overall survival and cancer specific survival for the SeqLT group versus the SalvLT group were (92.3% versus 87.6%; p=0.4) and (92.3% versus 91.9%; p=0.7), respectively. CONCLUSIONS The SeqLT approach might be associated with low incidence of cancer recurrence, better overall survival, and less operative mortality. Another possible benefit is the avoidance of aggressive non-transplantable HCC recurrences. More studies and/or randomization are required for highre evidence conclusions.