Contemporary Outcomes and Patterns of Injury Associated With Parachuting Accidents.

BACKGROUND: Skydiving is an increasingly popular recreational activity in the United States and worldwide. While it is considered a high-risk sport, the United States Parachute Association reported a fatality of .28 per 100 000 jumps in 2022. Although mortality rates are low, the true rate of survivable injuries is unknown. Injuries requiring hospitalization are not uncommon and may be underreported in the literature. Anticipating these injuries and analyzing short-term outcomes following parachuting accidents would be useful for the development of mitigation strategies and to increase the safety of jumpers. METHODS: A retrospective cohort review of 126 consecutive patients presenting to a Level II Trauma Center after skydiving accidents between 2016 and 2023. Patient baseline characteristics, patterns of injury, surgical procedures, and in-hospital outcomes were reviewed. RESULTS: A total of 126 patients were included. One hundred and seventeen patients (93%) presented immediately following the accident, 65 (51.6%) were trauma activations, and 14 (11.1%) patients experienced loss of consciousness. Fractures of the lower extremity occurred in 57 (45%), fractures of the spine 48 (38%), upper extremity 13 (10%), pelvis 11 (9%). Of the spinal injuries, 10 injuries occurred in the cervical spine, 16 thoracic, 22 lumbar, 5 sacral, and 3 coccygeal spine. Eleven patients (9%) suffered multilevel spine injuries. Mean injury severity score was 7 (range 0-75). A third of patients required at least 1 surgical procedure (n = 43, 34%). Median length stay was 2 days (IQR 1, 5). Of patients who survived to our trauma center, there were two mortalities, both due to catastrophic intracranial hemorrhage. DISCUSSION: Although the 30-day mortality rate for patient who presented to our trauma center is low, it can bear significant risks including major injury. The most common injuries were lower extremity and spinal in origin with a third of patients overall requiring at least one operation.

Morbidity and Mortality in Adult Congenital Heart Surgery: Physiologic Component Augments Risk Prediction.

BACKGROUND: We sought to evaluate whether the anatomic and physiologic stratification system (ACAP score), released as part of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association updated guidelines for management of adult congenital heart disease (ACHD) in 2018, better estimated mortality and morbidity after cardiac operations for ACHD. METHODS: The ACAP score was determined for 318 patients (age ≥18 years) with ACHD undergoing heart surgery at our institution between December 2001 and August 2019. The primary end point was perioperative mortality. The secondary aim was to evaluate the performance of the ACAP, The Society of Thoracic Surgeons-European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (STAT) Congenital Heart Surgery Mortality Categories, and ACHS mortality scores/categories at predicting a composite adverse outcome of perioperative mortality, prolonged ventilation, and renal failure requiring replacement therapy. Logistic regression models were built to estimate mortality and the composite outcome using anatomic and physiologic components independently and together. Receiver operating characteristic curves were created, and area under the curves were compared using the Delong test. RESULTS: The median age was 37 years (interquartile range, 26.3-50.0 years). There were 9 perioperative mortalities (2.8%). With respect to perioperative mortality, the area under the curve using the anatomic component only was 0.74, which improved to 0.81 after including physiologic severity (P = .05). When physiologic severity was added to the model for the composite outcome, the discriminatory abilities of the ACHS mortality score and the STAT categories increased significantly to 0.83 (95% CI, 0.75-0.91; P = .02) and 0.82 (95% CI, 0.73-0.90; P = .04), comparable to the predictive power of ACAP. CONCLUSIONS: Physiologic severity augments ability to predict mortality and morbidity after cardiac surgery for ACHD. There is need for more robust ACHD-specific risk models.

Branch-first aortic arch replacement strategy decreases perioperative mortality.

OBJECTIVE: Sparce evidence suggests superiority of total arch replacement with the branch-first technique and antegrade cerebral perfusion over conventional techniques with respect to morbidity and mortality. Thus, we aimed to compare perioperative outcomes of patients undergoing traditional total arch replacement versus branch-first total arch replacement. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 144 patients undergoing total arch replacement from January 2017 to December 2021. Patients were dichotomized based on technique, either traditional total arch replacement or branch-first total arch replacement. Primary end points were 30-day mortality and adverse events. Branch-first total arch replacement and traditional total arch replacement cohorts were compared using Student t tests and chi-square tests. Univariable and multivariable logistic regressions were performed to identify risk factors associated with 30-day mortality. RESULTS: A total of 68 patients (47.2%) underwent traditional total arch replacement, and 76 patients (52.8%) underwent branch-first total arch replacement. The branch-first total arch replacement cohort had higher rates of chronic kidney disease, hypertension, atrial fibrillation, and previous myocardial infarction (P = .04, .002, .035, and .031 respectively). The majority of total arch replacements (78, 55%) were performed for aneurysmal disease. Median antegrade cerebral perfusion times were significantly shorter in the branch-first total arch replacement cohort (P = .001). There were no significant differences in rates of stroke, reintubation, postoperative lumbar drainage, renal failure, reoperation for bleeding, or prolonged ventilation between total arch replacement cohorts. The branch-first total arch replacement group had significantly lower 30-day mortality compared with the traditional total arch replacement group (4% vs 19%, P = .004). After adjustment for chronic kidney disease, nonelective status, antegrade cerebral perfusion time, rates of dissections arriving in extremis or with malperfusion, and primary surgeon, undergoing a branch-first total arch replacement was associated with a 93% reduced odds of 30-day mortality (odds ratio, 0.07, 95% CI, 0.009-0.48, P = .007). CONCLUSIONS: We provide evidence that branch-first total arch replacement significantly reduces 30-day mortality compared with traditional total arch replacement.

Contemporary outcomes of mitral valve repair for degenerative disease in the era of increased penetrance of percutaneous mitral valve technology.

Objective: The study objective was to evaluate the surgical outcomes of mitral valve repair in the era of percutaneous technology. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 452 patients who underwent mitral valve repair for degenerative disease between 2010 and 2021. Survival, mitral valve reoperation, and mitral regurgitation recurrence were assessed using Cox regression, dichotomized for those aged more than or less than 60 years. Results: Median age in years (interquartile range) was 52 (47-57) in the younger cohort and 67 (63-73) in the older cohort (P < .0001). Preoperative comorbidities and leaflet pathology were comparable between groups. After adjustment for sex, prior sternotomy, diabetes, atrial fibrillation, and type of leaflet repair, age 60 years or more was not associated with increased mortality (hazard ratio, 6.96, 95% confidence interval, 0.85-56.8, P = .07). Considering death as a competing outcome, cumulative incidence of mitral valve reoperation at 1, 3, and 5 years was 0.9%, 1.4%, and 1.8% in the younger cohort, respectively, and 2.7%, 4.0%, and 5.1% in the older cohort, respectively (subhazard ratio, 2.95, 95% confidence interval, 0.84-10.4, P = .09). Cumulative incidence of mitral regurgitation recurrence with moderate-severe or greater mitral regurgitation at 1, 3, and 5 years was 1.4%, 3.6%, and 5.1%, and 2.7%, 3.5%, and 4.7% in the younger and older cohorts, respectively (subhazard ratio, 0.85, 95% confidence interval, 0.29-2.50, P = .76). Subgroup analysis focusing on isolated mitral valve repairs (n = 388) showed equivalent results with respect to mortality (hazard ratio, 5.31, 95% confidence interval, 0.64-44.0, P = .12), mitral valve reoperation (subhazard ratio, 4.04, 95% confidence interval, 0.89-18.4, P = .07), and mitral regurgitation recurrence (subhazard ratio, 0.98, 95% confidence interval, 0.30-3.15, P = .97). Conclusions: Mitral valve repair outcomes continue to be excellent, even in low-risk patients aged more than 60 years.

Long-term outcomes with the pulmonary autograft inclusion technique in adults with bicuspid aortic valves undergoing the Ross procedure.

OBJECTIVE: To compare outcomes with wrapped (pulmonary autograft inclusion) versus unwrapped techniques in adults with bicuspid aortic valves undergoing the Ross procedure. METHODS: Between 1992 and 2019, 129 adults with bicuspid aortic valves (aged ≥18 years) underwent the Ross procedure by a single surgeon. Patients were divided into those without autograft inclusion (unwrapped, n = 71) and those with autograft inclusion (wrapped, n = 58). Median follow-up was 10.3 years (interquartile range, 3.0-16.8 years). Need for autograft reintervention was analyzed using competing risks. RESULTS: Pre- and intraoperative characteristics as well as 30-day morbidity or mortality did not differ between cohorts. Survival at 1, 5, and 10 years, respectively, was 97.2%, 97.2%, and 95.6% in the unwrapped cohort and 100%, 100%, and 100% in the wrapped cohort (P = .15). Autograft valve failure occurred in 25 (35.2%) of the unwrapped and 3 (5.2%) of the wrapped patients. Competing risks analysis demonstrated the wrapped cohort to have a lower need for autograft reintervention (subhazard ratio, 0.28, 95% confidence interval, 0.08-0.91; P = .035). The cumulative incidence of autograft reintervention (death as a competing outcome) at 1, 5, and 10 years, respectively, was 10.2%, 14.9%, and 26.8% in the unwrapped cohort and 4.0%, 4.0%, and 4.0% in the wrapped cohort. CONCLUSIONS: In adults with bicuspid aortic valves, the Ross procedure with pulmonary autograft inclusion stabilizes the aortic root preventing dilatation and reduces the need for reoperation. The autograft inclusion technique allows the Ross procedure to be performed in this population with excellent long-term outcomes.

Surgical Outcomes After Reconstruction of the Aortomitral Curtain.

Repair of concomitant aortic and mitral valvular disease with involvement of the aortomitral curtain requires a technically complex operation colloquially termed the commando procedure. Surgical outcomes of this procedure are not well described. The objective of this study was to examine outcomes of the commando procedure at our center. We identified all patients undergoing concomitant aortic and mitral valve replacements from 2004-2021. Of 363 patients, 41 underwent reconstruction of the aortomitral curtain. Survival analysis and multivariable modeling were used to examine outcomes and risk factors for mortality. The median age was 52 (IQR 44-71) years. Preoperatively, 4 of 41 (9.8%) patients had renal failure, and 10 of 41 (24.4%) had a stroke. The most common surgical indication was endocarditis in 25 of 41 (61.0%) patients. 25 of 41 (61.0%) patients underwent redo sternotomy, and 23 of 41 (56.1%) had previous prosthetic valves. Operative mortality was 14 of 41 (34.1%), and 8 of 41 (9.5%) patients received a permanent pacemaker. Survival at 1, 3, and 5 years was 55.4% (95% confidence interval (CI), 40.6-75.5%), 50.3% (35.0-72.3%), and 37.7% (19.3-73.9%) respectively. Cox proportional hazards regression identified previous sternotomy (HR 4.76, 95% CI 1.21-18.73), and female gender (HR 1.39, 95% CI 1.17-13.82) as risk factors for mortality. Patients undergoing reconstruction of the aortomitral curtain represent a high-risk population with complex surgical indications. Due to high perioperative morbidity and mortality, this procedure should be performed only when necessary. Despite a high up front morbidity burden, outcomes remain favorable for patients who survive the initial hospitalization.

Early onset of deep sternal wound infection after cardiac surgery is associated with decreased survival: A propensity weighted analysis.

OBJECTIVES: To compare outcomes after the development of early (≤30 days) versus delayed (>30 days) deep sternal wound infection (DSWI) after cardiac surgery. METHODS: Between 2005 and 2016, 64 patients were treated surgically for DSWI following cardiac surgery. Thirty-three developed early DSWI, while 31 developed late DSWI. The mean follow-up was 34.1 ± 32.3 months. RESULTS: Survival for the entire cohort at 1, 3, and 5 years was 93.9%, 85.1%, and 80.8%, respectively. DSWI diagnosed early and attempted medical management was strongly associated with overall mortality (hazard ratio [HR], 25.0 and 9.9; 95% confidence intervals [CIs], 1.18-52.8 and 1.28-76.5; p-value .04 and .04, respectively). Survival was 88.1%, 77.0%, 70.6% and 100%, 94.0% and 94.0% at 1, 3, and 5 years in the early and late DSWI groups, respectively (log-rank = 0.074). Those diagnosed early were more likely to have a positive wound culture (odds ratio [OR], 0.06; 95% CI, 0.01-0.69; p = .024) and diagnosed late were more likely to be female (OR, 8.75; 95% CI, 2.0-38.4; p = .004) and require an urgent DSWI procedure (OR, 9.25; 95% CI, 1.86-45.9; p = .007). Both early diagnosis of DSWI and initial attempted medial management were strongly associated with mortality (HR, 7.48; 95% CI, 1.38-40.4; p = .019 and HR, 7.76; 95% CI, 1.67-35.9; p = .009, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Early aggressive surgical therapy for DSWI after cardiac surgery results in excellent outcomes. Those diagnosed with DSWI early and who have failed initial medical management have increased mortality.

Equivalent outcomes with minimally invasive and sternotomy mitral valve repair for degenerative mitral valve disease.

BACKGROUND: Debate continues in regard to the optimal surgical approach to the mitral valve for degenerative disease. METHODS: Between February 2004 and July 2015, 363 patients underwent mitral valve repair for degenerative mitral valve disease via either sternotomy (sternotomy, n = 109) or small right anterior thoracotomy (minimally invasive, n = 259). Survival, need for mitral valve reoperation, and progression of mitral regurgitation more than two grades were compared between cohorts using time-based statistical methods and inverse probability weighting. RESULTS: Survival at 1, 5, and 10 years were 99.2, 98.3, and 96.8 for the sternotomy group and 98.1, 94.9, and 94.9 for the minimally invasive group (hazard ratio: 0.39, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.11-1.30, p = .14). The cumulative incidence of need for mitral valve reoperation with death as a competing outcome at 1, 3, and 5 years were 2.7%, 2.7%, and 2.7% in the sternotomy cohort and 1.5%, 3.3%, and 4.1% for the minimally invasive group (subhazard ratio (SHR) 1.17, 95% CI: 0.33-4.20, p = .81). Cumulative incidence of progression of mitral regurgitation more than two grades with death as a competing outcome at 1, 3, and 5 years were 5.5%, 14.4%, and 44.5% for the sternotomy cohort and 4.2%, 9.7%, and 20.5% for the minimally invasive cohort (SHR: 0.67, 95% CI: 0.28-1.63, p = .38). Inverse probability weighted time-based analyses based on preoperative cohort assignment also demonstrated equivalent outcomes between surgical approaches. CONCLUSIONS: Minimally invasive and sternotomy mitral valve repair in patients with degenerative mitral valve disease is associated with equivalent survival and repair durability.

The Ross procedure utilizing the pulmonary autograft inclusion technique in adults.

A retrospective cohort study was conducted in which 129 adult patients with bicuspid aortic valves underwent the Ross procedure with either a standard root inclusion technique or a modified technique whereby the pulmonary autograft is wrapped in a vascular conduit. Primary outcomes were survival and the need for pulmonary autograft reintervention. Competing risk analysis demonstrated the wrapped technique reduced pulmonary autograft reintervention.

Predictors of Major Adverse Limb Events after Open Forefoot Amputation in Patients with Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia.

BACKGROUND: Management of patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) and extensive foot necrosis presents a challenge for limb salvage. Our study evaluates preoperative risk factors that contributed to durability and efficacy of limb salvage after open transmetatarsal amputation (TMA) in patients with critical limb-threatening ischemia. METHODS: We abstracted data from patients who underwent open TMA at Los Angeles County-University of Southern California Medical Center and Keck Hospital of University of Southern California from 2009 to 2018. Multivariable logistic regression analysis, adjusting for preoperative risk factors, was used to examine predictors of major adverse limb events (MALE). The aim was to evaluate outcomes following open TMA with MALE as the primary outcome. Our hypotheses were that outcomes would be worse for patients with foot infections and renal failure. RESULTS: Forty-three open TMAs were done in 39 patients during the study period. The cohort had a mean age of 63 ± 11.6 years, 89% had a history of diabetes, 95% hypertension (HTN), 54% had end-stage renal disease (ESRD), and 26% were current smokers. MALE occurred in 39% of the cohort. Sex, race, indication, HTN, smoking status, and history of prior ipsilateral revascularization or minor amputations were not associated with MALE (P > 0.05). Multivariate logistic regression found ESRD to be an independent predictor of MALE (odds ratio 7.43, 95% confidence interval 1.12-49.17, P = 0.038) after adjusting for clinically significant covariates. CONCLUSIONS: Open TMA provides acceptable rates of limb salvage for complex patients with CLTI. ESRD is an independent risk factor for MALE following open TMA in these patients. Vigilant follow-up is essential for this morbid patient population given poorer outcomes after forefoot amputation.

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus portends a poor prognosis after endovascular repair of mycotic aortic aneurysms and aortic graft infections.

OBJECTIVE: Mycotic aortic aneurysms and aortic graft infections (aortic infections [AIs]) are rare but highly morbid conditions. Open surgical repair is the "gold standard" treatment, but endovascular repair (EVR) is increasingly being used in the management of AI because of the lower operative morbidity. Multiple organisms are associated with AI, and bacteriology may be an important indication of mortality. We describe the bacteriology and associated outcomes of a group of patients treated with an EVR-first approach for AI. METHODS: All patients who underwent EVR for native aortic or aortic graft infections between 2005 and 2016 were retrospectively reviewed. Primary end points were 30-day mortality and overall mortality. The primary exposure variable was bacteria species. Logistic regression analysis was used to determine association with mortality. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was used to estimate survival. RESULTS: A total of 2038 EVRs were performed in 1989 unique and consecutive patients. Of those, 27 patients had undergone EVR for AI. Thirteen presented ruptured (48%). Eighteen (67%) were hemodynamically unstable. Ten had a gastrointestinal bleed (37%), whereas others presented with abdominal pain (33%), fever (22%), chest or back pain (18.5%), and hemothorax (3.7%). Twenty patients had a positive blood culture (74%), with the most common organism being methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) isolated in 37% (10). Other organisms were Escherichia coli (3), Staphylococcus epidermidis (2), Streptococcus (2), Enterococcus faecalis (1), vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus (1), and Klebsiella (1). Thirteen patients had 4 to 6 weeks of postoperative antibiotic therapy, six of whom died after therapy. Fourteen were prescribed lifelong therapy; 10 died while receiving antibiotics. On univariate analysis for mortality, smoking history (P = .061) and aerodigestive bleeding on presentation (P = .109) approached significance, whereas MRSA infection (P = .001) was strongly associated with increased mortality. On multivariate analysis, MRSA remained a strong, independent predictor of mortality (adjusted odds ratio, 93.2; 95% confidence interval, 1.9-4643; P = .023). Overall 30-day mortality was 11%, all MRSA positive. At mean follow-up of 17.4 ± 28 months, overall mortality was 59%. Overall survival at 1 year, 3 years, and 5 years was 49%, 31%, and 23%. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis demonstrated that MRSA-positive patients had a significantly lower survival compared with other pathogens (1-year, 20% vs 71%; 5-year, 0% vs 44%; P = .0009). CONCLUSIONS: In our series of AI, the most commonly isolated organism was MRSA. MRSA is highly virulent and is associated with increased mortality compared with all other organisms, regardless of treatment. Given our results, EVR for MRSA-positive AI was not a durable treatment option.

Selective Aortic Arch and Root Replacement in Repair of Acute Type A Aortic Dissection.

BACKGROUND: Controversy exists regarding the optimal extent of repair for type A aortic dissection. Our approach is to replace the ascending aorta, and only replace the aortic root or arch when intimal tears are present in those areas. We examined intermediate outcomes with this approach to acute type A aortic dissection repair. METHODS: Between March 2005 and October 2016, 195 patients underwent repair of acute type A aortic dissection. Repair was categorized by site of proximal and distal anastomosis and extent of repair. Mean follow-up was 31.0 ± 30.9 months. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to assess survival. Multiple variable Cox proportional hazards modeling was utilized to identify factors associated with overall mortality. RESULTS: Overall survival was 85.1%, 83.9%, 79.1%, and 74.4% at 6, 12, 36, and 60 months, respectively. Eight patients required reintervention. The cumulative incidence of aortic reintervention at 1 year with death as a competing outcome was 3.95%. Multiple variable regression analysis identified factors such as age, preoperative renal failure, concomitant thoracic endograft, postoperative myocardial infarction and sepsis, and need for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation as predictive of overall mortality. Neither proximal or distal extent of repair, nor need for reintervention affected overall survival (proximal: hazard ratio 1.63, 95% confidence interval: 0.75 to 3.51, p = 0.22; distal: hazard ratio 1.12, 95% confidence interval: 0.43 to 2.97, p = 0.81; reintervention: hazard ratio 0.03, 95% confidence interval: 0.002 to 0.490, p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: A selective approach to root and arch repair in acute type A aortic dissection is safe. If aortic reintervention is needed, survival does not appear to be affected.

Surgery for Diseases of the Aortic Root.

The aortic root is the junction between the heart and aorta, containing the aortic valve and the coronary artery ostia. Various pathologic conditions arise in this region requiring complex surgical correction. These include aneurysmal dilatation with and without aortic regurgitation, acute aortic dissection extending below the sinotubular junction, and infective endocarditis with valve and periannular destruction. Multiple strategies for correction of these complex surgical issues exist, with excellent early results and long-term survival.

Acute Type A Aortic Dissection.

Type A aortic dissection is a surgical emergency occurring when an intimal tear in the aorta creates a false lumen in the ascending aorta. Prompt diagnosis and surgical treatment are imperative to optimize outcomes. Surgical repair requires replacement of the ascending aorta with or without aortic root or aortic arch replacement. Surgical outcomes for this highly lethal diagnosis have improved, with contemporary survival to discharge at Centers of Excellence of 85% to 90%. Survival is related to prompt treatment, preexisting medical comorbidities, presence or absence of end organ malperfusion, extent of aortic repair required, and the development of postoperative complications.

Comparison of intravascular ultrasound- and centerline computed tomography-determined aortic diameters during thoracic endovascular aortic repair.

BACKGROUND: Accurate sizing of stent grafts during thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) is critical for a successful outcome. Centerline measurements using three-dimensional reconstruction of preoperative computed tomography angiography (CTA) is the current standard for stent graft sizing. However, this technique is predicated on an idealized straightened aorta and does not account for the variability in the aortic diameter during the cardiac cycle or the overall status of the patient's volume. Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) offers real-time cross-sectional imaging of the aorta orthogonal to the support wire, thereby providing an adjunctive method for aortic diameter determination at the time of TEVAR. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed on all patients who underwent TEVAR for nontraumatic aortic pathology from July 2015 to December 2015. Preoperative CTA images were reconstructed on a dedicated three-dimensional workstation. CTA centerline aortic diameter measurements were performed in major and minor axes at 1-cm intervals from the left subclavian origin to 20 cm distally. The IVUS images were acquired intraoperatively through 1-cm stepwise pullback along the aorta from the left subclavian origin to 20 cm. IVUS aortic diameters were measured at the maximum phase during the cardiac cycle. The average values of major and minor axes diameters from both modalities were calculated at each location for comparison. Linear regression analysis was performed to evaluate correlation, and Bland-Altman plots assessed agreement between different imaging modalities. RESULTS: During the study period, 26 patients underwent TEVAR. Of these, 20 patients had adequate CTA and IVUS images, providing 355 paired measurements. There was a high correlation between CTA- and IVUS-determined aortic diameters (R = 0.62; P < .001). However, Bland-Altman analysis showed that, compared with CT, IVUS resulted in larger aortic diameters, with the mean difference of 3.09 mm. There was a significant variability between IVUS and CTA with the standard deviation of difference (SD diff) of 4.56 mm. When stratified by the aortic position, a high degree of agreement was observed at the base of the left subclavian (position 0), with a mean difference of -2.69 mm and an SD diff of 4 mm. The agreement was the lowest at the angulated aortic segments (2 cm to 7 cm distal to the subclavian origin) with a mean difference up to 7.96 mm and an SD diff up to 8.27 mm. CONCLUSIONS: IVUS imaging and centerline CTA may provide significantly different aortic diameter measurements, particularly in angulated aortic segments. Caution must be taken when sizing a stent graft using CTA alone, particularly in an angulated proximal landing zone.