Invasive fungal rhinosinusitis associated with COVID-19: Course changes and prognosis predictors / Rinosinusitis fúngica invasiva asociada con COVID-19: cambios clínicos y predictores de pronóstico

Background This study aimed to analyze the behavior of acute invasive fungal rhinosinusitis (AIFRS) associated with COVID-19 infection as there has been an increase in the rate of AIFRS cases in the last two years, and many reports connected this rising with the COVID-19 infection. We studied most factors that may impact the prognosis as a trial to find the most affecting factors to improve the outcomes. Methods It was a retrospective observational study that included cases from four tertiary referral institutions between November 2020 to February 2022. We included sixty-six patients who suffered from AIFRS associated with confirmed COVID-19. We observed the prognosis of all included patients with a six-month follow-up. We correlated the prognosis with many factors, such as demographic data, medical conditions, blood investigations, the features of fungal infections, and management. Results Forty-two patients (64%) survived after the AIFRS associated with COVID-19, and twenty-two patients (36%) died. High doses of corticosteroids with prolonged use were the main factors that affected the behavior of the AIFRS associated with COVID-19. HbA1c was a good predictor of the prognosis; a level less than 9.35% may indicate survival with 87.5% sensitivity. Conclusions According to this multi-center study, the mortality of the AIFRS associated with COVID-19 was high. The behavior was affected by glycemic control, the type of fungal species, and the type of antifungal therapy. Early surgical debridement, a combination of Amphotericin B with Voriconazole, and anticoagulants helped improve the prognosis. (AU)

Antecedentes Durante el periodo de la pandemia de COVID19, ha habido un aumento en la tasa de casos de rinosinusitis fúngica invasiva aguda (RSFIA), siendo cada vez más evidente la asociación entre ambas entidades. EL objetivo de este estudio ha sido analizar la evolución de los pacientes con rinosinusitis fúngica invasiva aguda asociado con la infección por COVID-19, analizando los factores determinantes en la evolución y pronóstico de la enfermedad. Métodos Fue un estudio observacional retrospectivo que incluyó casos de cuatro instituciones de referencia de tercer nivel entre noviembre de 2020 y febrero de 2022. Se incluyeron sesenta y seis pacientes que padecían RSFIA asociado a COVID-19 confirmado. Observamos el pronóstico de todos los pacientes incluidos con un seguimiento de seis meses. Correlacionamos el pronóstico con muchos factores, como los datos demográficos, las condiciones médicas, las investigaciones de sangre, las características de las infecciones fúngicas y el manejo. Resultados Cuarenta y dos pacientes (64%) sobrevivieron después de la RSFIA asociada a COVID-19, y veintidós pacientes (36%) fallecieron. Las dosis altas de corticoides con uso prolongado fueron los principales factores que afectaron el comportamiento de la RSFIA asociada a la COVID-19. HbA1c fue un buen predictor del pronóstico; un nivel inferior al 9,35 % puede indicar supervivencia con una sensibilidad del 87.5%. Conclusiones Según este estudio multicéntrico, la mortalidad de la RSFIA asociada a la COVID-19 fue alta. El comportamiento se vio afectado por el control glucémico, el tipo de especie fúngica y el tipo de terapia antifúngica. El desbridamiento quirúrgico temprano, una combinación de Amphotericin B con Voriconazole y anticoagulantes ayudaron a mejorar el pronóstico. (AU)

Arabic translation, cultural adaptation, and validation of the BDDQ-AS for rhinoplasty patients.

BACKGROUND: Body Dysmorphic Disorder (BDD) is a significant aspect that compromises patient satisfaction after rhinoplasty. BDDQ-AS (Body Dysmorphic Disorder Questionnaire-Aesthetic Surgery) is a validated, simple, reliable patient-reported outcome measure. It is a screening tool to detect body dysmorphic disorder in rhinoplasty patients. This study aimed to translate, culturally adapt, and validate BDDQ-AS to Arabic as a novel tool for screening and detecting BDD in Arabic rhinoplasty individuals. METHODS: BDDQ-AS was translated from English to Arabic following the international consensus guidelines. We tested the translation on ten Arabic-speaking rhinoplasty patients to ensure that the final version was understandable and acceptable. The proposed Arabic version was then completed by 112 patients whose average age was 28.79 ± 9.32 years. The screening is assumed positive if the patients expressed bother and preoccupation about their appearance (questions 1 and 2 "yes"), as well as a moderately disrupted everyday life (question 7 "yes" or questions 3, 4, 5, or 6 are equal to or greater than "3''). The internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and item-response theory (IRT) were used to evaluate psychometric validations. RESULTS: The Arabic BDDQ had a high level of internal consistency, as measured by Cronbach's alpha 0.995. The A-BDDQ-AS was deemed reliable with an Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) of 0.989. A-BDDQ had good discrimination scores (above 2.0) with adequate difficulty parameters. The overall scale content validity average was 0.83, affirming that all items were relevant, clear, and straightforward. CONCLUSION: The Arabic version of the BDDQ-AS is reliable, culturally adapted, and psychometrically validated to be readily used and incorporated into clinical practice. It is a beneficial tool that can guide the screening of Arabic rhinoplasty patients suffering from body dysmorphic disorder and be utilized in further studies to optimize patient outcomes.

Invasive fungal rhinosinusitis associated with COVID-19: Course changes and prognosis predictors.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to analyze the behavior of acute invasive fungal rhinosinusitis (AIFRS) associated with COVID-19 infection as there has been an increase in the rate of AIFRS cases in the last two years, and many reports connected this rising with the COVID-19 infection. We studied most factors that may impact the prognosis as a trial to find the most affecting factors to improve the outcomes. METHODS: It was a retrospective observational study that included cases from four tertiary referral institutions between November 2020 to February 2022. We included sixty-six patients who suffered from AIFRS associated with confirmed COVID-19. We observed the prognosis of all included patients with a six-month follow-up. We correlated the prognosis with many factors, such as demographic data, medical conditions, blood investigations, the features of fungal infections, and management. RESULTS: Forty-two patients (64%) survived after the AIFRS associated with COVID-19, and twenty-two patients (36%) died. High doses of corticosteroids with prolonged use were the main factors that affected the behavior of the AIFRS associated with COVID-19. HbA1c was a good predictor of the prognosis; a level less than 9.35% may indicate survival with 87.5% sensitivity. CONCLUSIONS: According to this multi-center study, the mortality of the AIFRS associated with COVID-19 was high. The behavior was affected by glycemic control, the type of fungal species, and the type of antifungal therapy. Early surgical debridement, a combination of Amphotericin B with Voriconazole, and anticoagulants helped improve the prognosis.

What is the most appropriate hemostatic material during pediatric adenoidectomy? A prospective comparative randomized double-blinded controlled study.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effect of different hemostatic materials used in adenoidectomy operations to improve the quality of life with the most negligible hazardous impact on pediatric health. STUDY DESIGN: a prospective, case-series, randomized, controlled, double-blinded study. SETTING: All adenoidectomy surgeries were performed between September 2016 to December 2019 at tertiary referral institutions. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 519 patients were included in five groups. Adenoidectomy was performed under general anesthesia, with the following hemostatic procedures: adrenaline, tranexamic acid, hydrogen peroxide, xylometazoline, and saline (as a control group). The five groups were compared regarding the intraoperative blood loss, surgery duration, need for more hemostatic steps, postoperative reactionary and secondary bleedings, postoperative pain and halitosis, and one-year outcome. RESULTS: The four procedures were effective in reducing the blood loss by 19.86%, 11.7%, 30.95%, and 18.91%, respectively, in comparison to the control group. The surgical duration was reduced by 27.65%, 17.86%, 48.11%, and 23.88%, respectively. The need for other hemostatic steps was the least in the hydrogen peroxide group. There was no significant difference between the five groups regarding reactionary bleeding, secondary bleeding, one-week pain, one-month pain, one-month halitosis, and one-year complications. On the other side, hydrogen peroxide had the least one-week halitosis and first-day pain among the five groups. Also, it had the least intraoperative blood loss and surgery duration. CONCLUSIONS: Hydrogen peroxide showed to be the best choice to control hemostasis during an adenoidectomy. It can decrease blood loss and surgery duration with less need for other hemostatic steps. It can improve the patient's quality of life without significant postoperative complications. Xylometazoline was studied for the first time as a hemostatic material during adenoidectomy with good satisfying results.

Trans-oral endoscopic assisted radio-frequency for adenoid ablation; A randomized prospective comparative clinical study.

OBJECTIVE: This study compared the efficacy and safety of conventional adenoidectomy using a curette and the Radio-frequency (RF) adenoid ablation using endoscope via the trans-oral technique. METHODS: A randomized prospective comparative study was conducted in a tertiary care hospital. The study included 80 patients with a diagnosis of adenoid hypertrophy, which was confirmed by X-ray of a lateral view of the skull. The patients were submitted into two groups 40 for each: curettage group and Radiofrequency group. Patients with bleeding diathesis, congenital anomalies, previous adenoidectomy, and morbid illness were excluded from the study. We evaluated the time consumption, the adenoid tissue remnant by the endoscope, blood loss, and clinical correlations like pain by Visual Analog Scale, halitosis, and secondary bleeding in both study groups. RESULTS: Intra-operative blood loss was 20-40 ml in the Radio-frequency (RF) group, but in the curettage group was 36 - 55 ml. Post-operative pain in the (RF) group was lower than the curettage group. Secondary bleeding was reported mostly in the curettage group (15%). The duration of the operation in (RF) group was relatively long. Halitosis decreased mainly after curettage adenoidectomy. CONCLUSION: The endoscopic radio-frequency adenoid ablation surpassed the conventional method. We encourage using Radio-frequency in adenoid surgery as a replacement for the traditional method.

Early recovery patterns of olfactory disorders in COVID-19 patients; a clinical cohort study.

INTRODUCTION: A rapidly evolving evidence suggests that smell dysfunction is a common symptom in COVID-19 infection with paucity of data on its duration and recovery rate. OBJECTIVES: Delineate the different patterns of olfactory disorders recovery in patients with COVID-19. METHODS: This cross-sectional cohort study included 96 patients with olfactory complaint confirmed to be COVID-19 positive with recent onset of anosmia. All patients were inquired for smell recovery patterns using self-assessment questionnaires. RESULTS: Ninety six patients completed the study with mean age 34.26 ±â€¯11.91 years. Most patients had sudden anosmia 83%. Loss of smell was accompanied by nonspecific inflammatory symptoms as low-grade fever (17%) and generalized body ache (25%). Nasal symptoms were reported by 33% of patients. Some patients reported comorbidities as D.M (16%), hypertension (8%) or associated allergic rhinitis (25%), different patterns of olfactory recovery showed 32 patients experiencing full recovery (33.3%) while, 40 patients showed partial recovery (41.7%) after a mean of 11 days while 24 patients (25%) showed no recovery within one month from onset of anosmia. CONCLUSION: The sudden olfactory dysfunction is a common symptom in patients with COVID-19. Hyposmia patients recover more rapidly than anosmic ones while the middle age group carried the best prognosis in olfactory recovery. Females possess better potentiality in regaining smell after recovery and the association of comorbidities worsen the recovery rate of olfactory dysfunction in patients with COVID19. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 2b a cross-sectional cohort study.

The safety of bipolar mode radiofrequency (BMRF) on cochlear implant integrity test; a clinical prospective study.

PURPOSE: We aimed to assess the effect of bipolar mode radiofrequency (BMRF) tonsillectomy as a model of oro-pharyngeal surgical maneuver on the integrity of the internal device in patients with cochlear implants (CIs). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This prospective case series included 15 consecutive pediatric patients with CIs (age range 4 to 8 years, mean 5.2 years) who underwent BMRF tonsillectomy. The postoperative integrity of the internal device was evaluated by comparing the electric current response tested preoperatively with that tested 2 days postoperatively. RESULTS: There were differences in the current levels in the main regions of the cochlea; (the apical, mid-turn, and basal) after comparing preoperative and postoperative values, but they were not statically significant. CONCLUSION: BMRF seems to be safe for tonsillectomy in children with CIs without negative impact on the integrity of the internal device.

Endoscopic Management of Chronic Frontal Sinusitis: Prospective Quality of Life Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies of endoscopic frontal sinus surgery have been primarily retrospective and focused on symptom relief only. OBJECTIVES: To prospectively assess the impact of endoscopic frontal sinus surgery on frontal sinus ostium patency and disease-specific quality of life as measured by the Rhinosinusitis Disability Index (RSDI). STUDY DESIGN: A 60-patient cohort with chronic frontal sinusitis (100 diseased frontal sinuses) was prospectively evaluated using the RSDI, computed tomography (CT) imaging, and endoscopic examination. Image-guided endoscopic frontal sinusotomy (Draf 2a) was performed in each case. Patients were assessed with RSDI and endoscopic assessment at least 6 months postoperatively. RESULTS: At a mean follow-up of 10 months, endoscopic assessment revealed patent frontal recesses in 90 of 100 frontal sinuses (90%), with significant improvement in the total RSDI score (41.98 ± 26.48 preoperatively to 17.15 ± 15.66 postoperatively) as well as each of its physical, emotional, and functional subscales from 16.3 ± 9.03, 12.23 ± 10.55, 13.45 ± 9.59 preoperatively to 5.95 ± 5.71, 5.55 ± 5.66, 5.65 ± 5.72 postoperatively, respectively. Similar improvement was seen in patients with asthma, polyps, and those undergoing revision sinus surgeries. CONCLUSIONS: With frontal recess mucosal preservation and meticulous postoperative endoscopic surveillance, endoscopic frontal sinusotomy results in high rates of frontal sinus ostium patency with significant improvement in quality of life.

Mitomycin C-enhanced revision endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy: a prospective randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVES: (1) To conduct an adequately powered randomized controlled trial investigating the safety and efficacy of mitomycin C-enhanced revision endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR) and (2) to analyze causes of failure after primary endoscopic DCR. STUDY DESIGN: A randomized controlled study. SETTING: General hospital. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Seventy-six revision endoscopic DCRs were randomized into 2 groups: endoscopic DCR with mitomycin (group I), where 0.5 mg/mL mitomycin C was applied for 10 minutes, and endoscopic DCR without mitomycin (group II). Follow-up settings were done to document the patient's subjective improvement, to judge ostium patency on irrigation, and to record any complications. RESULTS: Causes of failure in the original 92 patients included canalicular obstruction (14%), small misplaced bony window (43%), very small nasolacrimal stoma due to development of synechia (23%), and complete closure of nasolacrimal stoma with tough fibrous tissue (63%). There was no significant difference between the 2 groups in subjective and objective success rates and adverse events. Group I demonstrated a significantly longer operative time and a significantly lower number of debridement sessions (mean of 1.2 vs 1.9). CONCLUSIONS: Recurrent nasolacrimal duct obstruction after primary endoscopic DCR is mainly due to reclosure of the nasolacrimal stoma with synechia and fashioning of the small misplaced bony window. Mitomycin C does not increase the success rate of revision endoscopic DCR. It is a safe procedure and may be of value only in patients inaccessible to strict follow-up because it induces a better healing profile in terms of mucosal recovery, wound healing, and less need for debridement sessions.