How will early onset scoliosis surgery affect my child's future as a young adult? A follow-up study using patient-reported outcome measures.

PURPOSE: Using patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), this study was undertaken to determine how well patients with early onset scoliosis (EOS) fare in adulthood. METHODS: Among eight healthcare centers, 272 patients (≥ 18 years) surgically managed for EOS (≥ 5 years) completed the Scoliosis Research Society (SRS)-22r, Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-10 (FACIT-Dyspnea-10), and Short Form (SF)-12. Functional and demographic data were collected. RESULTS: The response rate was 40% (108/272). EOS etiologies were congenital (45%), neuromuscular (20%), idiopathic (20%) syndromic (11%), and unknown (4%). All patients scored within normal limits on the FACIT-Dyspnea-10 pulmonary (no breathing aids, 78%; no oxygen, 92%). SF-12 physical health scores and most SRS-22r domains were significantly decreased (p < 0.05 and p < 0.001, respectively) compared with normative values. SF-12 and SRS-22r mental health scores (MHS) were lower than normative values (p < 0.05 and p < 0.02, respectively). Physical health PROMs varied between etiologies. Treatment varied by etiology. Patients with congenital EOS were half as likely to undergo definitive fusion. There was no difference between EOS etiologies in SF-12 MHS, with t scores being slightly lower than normative peers. CONCLUSION: Good long-term physical and social function and patient-reported quality of life were noted in surgically managed patients. Patients with idiopathic EOS physically outperformed those with other etiologies in objective and PROM categories but had similar MHS PROMs. Compared to normative values, EOS patients demonstrated decreased long-term physical capacity, slightly lower MHS, and preserved cardiopulmonary function. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV Case Series.

A Comparative Analysis of Revision Surgery Before or After 2 Years After Graduation From Growth-friendly Surgery for Early Onset Scoliosis.

INTRODUCTION: After discontinuation of growth-friendly (GF) surgery for early onset scoliosis, patients are termed graduates: they undergo a spinal fusion, are observed after final lengthening with GF implant maintenance, or are observed after GF implant removal. The purpose of this study was to compare the rates of and reasons for revision surgery in two cohorts of GF graduates: before or after 2 years of follow-up from graduation. METHODS: A pediatric spine registry was queried for patients who underwent GF spine surgery with a minimum of 2 years of follow-ups after graduation by clinical and/or radiographic evidence. Scoliosis etiology, graduation strategy, number of, and reasons for revision surgery were queried. RESULTS: There were 834 patients with a minimum of 2-year follow-up after graduation who were analyzed. There were 241 (29%) congenital, 271 (33%) neuromuscular, 168 (20%) syndromic, and 154 (18%) idiopathic. 803 (96%) had traditional growing rod/vertical expandable titanium rib as their GF construct and 31 (4%) had magnetically controlled growing rod. Five hundred ninety-six patients (71%) underwent spinal fusion at graduation, 208 (25%) had GF implants retained, and 30 (4%) had GF implants removed.In the entire cohort, there were 108/834 (13%) patients who underwent revision surgery. Of the revisions, 71/108 (66%) occurred as acute revisions (ARs) between 0 and 2 years from graduation (mean 0.6 y), and the most common AR indication was infection (26/71, 37%). The remaining 37/108 (34%) patients underwent delayed revision (DR) surgery >2 years (mean 3.8 y) from graduation, and the most common DR indication was implant issues (17/37, 46%).Graduation strategy affected revision rates. Of the 596 patients with spinal fusion as a graduation strategy, 98/596 (16%) underwent revision, compared with only 8/208 (4%) patients who had their GF implants retained, and 2/30 (7%) that had their GF implants removed ( P ≤ 0.001).A significantly higher percentage of the ARs had a spinal fusion as the graduation strategy (68/71, 96%) compared with 30/37 DRs, (81%, P = 0.015). In addition, the 71 patients who underwent AR undergo more revision surgeries (mean: 2, range: 1 to 7) than 37 patients who underwent DR (mean: 1, range: 1 to 2) ( P = 0.001). CONCLUSION: In this largest reported series of GF graduates to date, the overall risk of revision was 13%. Patients who undergo a revision at any time, as well as ARs in particular, are more likely to have a spinal fusion as their graduation strategy. Patients who underwent AR, on average, undergo more revision surgeries than patients who underwent DR. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, comparative.

Is spinal height gain associated with rod orientation and the use of cross-links in magnetically controlled growing rods in early-onset scoliosis?

Optimal orientation for magnetically controlled growing rods (MCGRs) is unclear. The objective of this study was to investigate associations of rod orientation with implant-related complications (IRCs) and spinal height gains. Using an international early-onset scoliosis (EOS) database, we retrospectively reviewed 57 patients treated with dual MCGRs from May 2013 to July 2015 with minimum 2-year follow-up. Outcomes of interest were IRCs and left/right rod length gains and thoracic (T1-T12) and spinal (T1-S1) heights. We compared patients with two rods lengthened in the cephalad ( standard; n  = 18) versus opposite ( offset; n  = 39) directions. Groups did not differ in age, sex, BMI, duration of follow-up, EOS cause, ambulatory status, primary curve magnitude, baseline thoracic height, or number of distractions/year. We compared patients whose constructs used ≥1 cross-link (CL group; n  = 22) versus no CLs (NCL group; n  = 35), analyzing thoracic height gains per distraction ( α  = 0.05). Offset and standard groups did not differ in left or right rod length gains overall or per year or in thoracic or spinal height gain. Per distraction, the CL and NCL groups did not differ significantly in left or right rod length or thoracic or spinal height gain. Complications did not differ significantly between rod orientation groups or between CL groups. MCGR orientation and presence of cross-links were not associated with differences in rod length gain, thoracic height, spinal height, or IRCs at 2-year follow-up. Surgeons should feel comfortable using either MCGR orientation. Level of evidence: 3, retrospective.

Consensus-Based Best Practice Guidelines for the Management of Spinal Deformity and Associated Tumors in Pediatric Neurofibromatosis Type 1: Screening and Surveillance, Surgical Intervention, and Medical Therapy.

BACKGROUND: Spinal conditions, such as scoliosis and spinal tumors, are prevalent in neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1). Despite the recognized importance of their early detection and treatment, there remain knowledge gaps in how to approach these manifestations. The purpose of this study was to utilize the experience of a multidisciplinary committee of experts to establish consensus-based best practice guidelines (BPGs) for spinal screening and surveillance, surgical intervention, and medical therapy in pediatric patients with NF1. METHODS: Using the results of a prior systematic review, 10 key questions that required further assessment were first identified. A committee of 20 experts across medical specialties was then chosen based on their clinical experience with spinal deformity and tumors in NF1. These were 9 orthopaedic surgeons, 4 neuro-oncologists/oncologists, 3 neurosurgeons, 2 neurologists, 1 pulmonologist, and 1 clinical geneticist. An initial online survey on current practices and opinions was conducted, followed by 2 additional surveys via a formal consensus-based modified Delphi method. The final survey involved voting on agreement or disagreement with 35 recommendations. Items reaching consensus (≥70% agreement or disagreement) were included in the final BPGs. RESULTS: Consensus was reached for 30 total recommendations on the management of spinal deformity and tumors in NF1. These were 11 recommendations on screening and surveillance, 16 on surgical intervention, and 3 on medical therapy. Five recommendations did not achieve consensus and were excluded from the BPGs. CONCLUSION: We present a set of consensus-based BPGs comprised of 30 recommendations for spinal screening and surveillance, surgical intervention, and medical therapy in pediatric NF1.

Definition of Tweener: Consensus Among Experts in Treating Early-onset Scoliosis.

BACKGROUND: The term "Tweener" is colloquially used to refer to early-onset scoliosis (EOS) patients whose age and development make them candidates for multiple surgical options. The purpose of this study was to establish expert consensus on a definition to formally characterize the Tweener population. METHODS: A 3-round survey of surgeons in an international EOS study group was conducted. Surgeons were provided with various patient characteristics and asked if each was part of their definition for Tweener patients. Responses were analyzed for consensus (≥70%), near-consensus (60% to 69%), and no consensus (<60%). RESULTS: Consensus was reached (89% of respondents) for including chronological age in the Tweener definition; 8 to 10 years for females and 9 to 11 years for males. Surgeons agreed for inclusion of Sanders score, particularly Sanders 2 (86.0%). Patients who have reached Sanders 4, postmenarche, or have closed triradiate cartilage should not be considered Tweeners. Bone age range of 8 years and 10 months to 10 years and 10 months for females (12 y for males) could be part of the Tweener definition. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that the Tweener definition could be the following: patients with open triradiate cartilage who are not postmenarche and have not reached Sanders 4, and if they have one of the following: Sanders 2 or chronological age 8 to 10 years for females (9 to 11 y for males) or bone age 8 years and 10 months to 10 years and 10 months for females (12 y for males). This definition will allow for more focused and comparative research on this population. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level V-expert opinion.

Re-evaluating consensus and uncertainty among treatment options for early onset scoliosis: a 10-year update.

PURPOSE: Consensus and uncertainty in early onset scoliosis (EOS) treatment were evaluated in 2010. It is currently unknown how treatment preferences have evolved over the past decade. The purpose of this study was to re-evaluate consensus and uncertainty among treatment options for EOS patients to understand how they compare to 10 years ago. METHODS: 11 pediatric spinal surgeons (similar participants as in 2010) were invited to complete a survey of 315 idiopathic and neuromuscular EOS cases (same cases as in 2010). Treatment options included the following: conservative management, distraction-based methods, growth guidance/modulation, and arthrodesis. Consensus was defined as ≥ 70% agreement, and uncertainty was < 70%. Associations between case characteristics and consensus for treatments were assessed via chi-squared and multiple regression analyses. Case characteristics associated with uncertainty were described. RESULTS: Eleven surgeons [31.7 ± 7.8 years of experience] in the original 2010 cohort completed the survey. Consensus for conservative management was found in idiopathic patients aged ≤ 3, whereas in 2010, some of these cases were selected for surgery. There is currently consensus for casting idiopathic patients aged 1 or 2 with moderate curves, whereas in 2010, there was uncertainty between casting and bracing. Among neuromuscular cases with consensus for surgery, arthrodesis was chosen for patients aged 9 with larger curves. CONCLUSION: Presently, preferences for conservative management have increased in comparison to 2010, and casting appears to be preferred over bracing in select infantile cases. Future research efforts with higher levels-of-evidence should be devoted to elucidate the areas of uncertainty to improve care in the EOS population. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level V.

Early Adherence to Prescribed Brace Wear for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Is Associated With Future Brace Wear.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVE: To assess if initial adherence to prescribed brace wear for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) predicts future adherence and curve improvement. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: AIS bracing can be effective if patients adhere to prescribed brace wear. Previous research has associated age, sex, and brace prescription length with future adherence. We hypothesize that a patient's initial adherence to brace wear may be associated with future adherence and outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Consecutive AIS patients who met the Scoliosis Research Society (SRS) criteria for bracing from 2015 to 2019 at a single center were reviewed. Patients were stratified into groups based on their adherence during the initial one-month brace wean-in period-adherent patients were defined as wearing the brace >80% of the daily prescribed amount. Brace wear was recorded by a thermosensor and assessed during the wean-in period, six-, 12-, and 24-month postbracing appointments. Statistical testing was conducted to analyze if initial adherence was associated with future adherence, curve change, and bracing success -defined as reaching Risser stage 4 with a Cobb angle <40°. RESULTS: Sixty patients (mean age=12.5 yr) were included, of which the majority were females (83%) with thoracic curves (70%). Thirty-two patients were considered adherent, and this cohort demonstrated improved adherence relative to the nonadherent group at the six-, 12-, and 24-month appointments ( P <0.001). Adherent patients also showed a significant reduction in their scoliosis at the 12-month appointment, unlike nonadherent patients ( P <0.001). Ninety-seven percent of adherent patients achieved bracing success compared with 71% of nonadherent ( P =0.016). Females were more likely to be adherent than males. CONCLUSIONS: Initial adherence to prescribed AIS brace wear was associated with future adherence, bracing success, and curve improvement. Early recognition of nonadherence may offer an opportunity for supportive intervention to improve brace wear behavior.

Bracing for juvenile idiopathic scoliosis: retrospective review from bracing to skeletal maturity.

BACKGROUND: Juvenile idiopathic scoliosis (JIS) outcomes with brace treatment are limited with poorly described bracing protocols. Between 49 and 100% of children with JIS will progress to surgery, however, young age, long follow-up, and varying treatment methods make studying this population difficult. The purpose of this study is to report the outcomes of bracing in JIS treated with a Boston brace™ and identify risk factors for progression and surgical intervention. METHODS: This is a single-center retrospective review of 175 patients with JIS who initiated brace treatment between the age of 4 and 9 years. A cohort of 140 children reached skeletal maturity; 91 children had surgery or at least 2 year follow-up after brace completion. Standard in-brace protocol for scoliosis 320° was a Boston brace for 18-20 h/day after MRI (n = 82). Family history, MRI abnormalities, comorbidities, curve type, curve magnitude, bracing duration, number of braces, compliance by report, and surgical interventions were recorded. RESULTS: Children were average 7.9 years old (range 4.1-9.8) at the initiation of bracing. The Boston brace™ was prescribed in 82 patients and nine used night bending brace. Mid-thoracic curves (53%) was the most frequent deformity. Maximum curve at presentation was on average 30 ± 9 degrees, in-brace curve angle was 16 ± 8 degrees, and in-brace correction was 58 ± 24 percent. Patients were braced an average of 4.6 ± 1.9 years. 61/91 (67%) went on to posterior spinal fusion at 13.3 ± 2.1 (range 9.3-20.9) years and curve magnitude of 61 ± 12 degrees. Of those that underwent surgery, 49/55 (86%) progressed > 10°, 6/55 (11%) stabilized within 10°, and 0/55 (0%) improved > 10° with brace wear. No children underwent growth-friendly posterior instrumentation. Of the 28 who did not have surgical correction, 3 (11%) progressed > 10°, 13/28 (46%) stabilized within 10°, and 12/28 (43%) improved > 10° with brace wear. CONCLUSIONS: This large series of JIS patients with bracing followed to skeletal maturity with long-term follow-up. Surgery was avoided in 33% of children with minimal to no progression, and no child underwent posterior growth-friendly constructs. Risk factors of needing surgery were noncompliance and larger curves at presentation.

Contraindications to magnetically controlled growing rods: consensus among experts in treating early onset scoliosis.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to describe contraindications to the magnetically controlled growing rod (MCGR) in patients with early onset scoliosis (EOS) by establishing consensus amongst expert surgeons who treat these patients frequently. METHODS: Nine pediatric spine surgeons from an international EOS study group participated in semi-structured interviews via email to identify factors that influence decision making in the use of MCGR. A 39-question survey was then developed to specify these factors as contraindications for MCGR-these included patient age and size, etiology, medical comorbidities, coronal and sagittal curve profiles, and skin and soft tissue characteristics. Pediatric spine surgeons from the EOS international study group were invited to complete the survey. A second 29-item survey was created to determine details and clarify results from the first survey. Responses were analyzed for consensus (> 70%), near consensus (60-69%), and no consensus/variability (< 60%) for MCGR contraindication. RESULTS: 56 surgeons of 173 invited (32%) completed the first survey, and 64 (37%) completed the second survey. Responders had a mean of over 15 years in practice (range 1-45) with over 6 years of experience with using MCGR (range 2-12). 71.4% of respondents agreed that patient size characteristics should be considered as contraindications, including BMI (81.3%) and spinal height (84.4%), although a specific BMI range or a specific minimum spinal height were not agreed upon. Among surgeons who agreed that skin and soft tissue problems were contraindications (78.6%), insufficient soft tissue (98%) and skin (89%) to cover MCGR were specified. Among surgeons who reported curve stiffness as a contraindication (85.9%), there was agreement that this curve stiffness should be defined by clinical evaluation (78.2%) and by traction films (72.3%). Among surgeons who reported sagittal curve characteristics as contraindications, hyperkyphosis (95.3%) and sagittal curve apex above T3 (70%) were specified. Surgeons who indicated the need for repetitive MRI as a contraindication (79.7%) agreed that image quality (72.9%) and not patient safety (13.6%) was the concern. In the entire cohort, consensus was not achieved on the following factors: patient age (57.4%), medical comorbidities (46.4%), etiology (53.6%), and coronal curve characteristics (58.9%). CONCLUSION: Surgeon consensus suggests that MCGR should be avoided in patients who have insufficient spinal height to accommodate the MCGR, have potential skin and soft tissue inadequacy, have too stiff a spinal curve, have too much kyphosis, and require repetitive MRI, particularly of the spine. Future data-driven studies using this framework are warranted to generate more specific criteria (e.g. specific degrees of kyphosis) to facilitate clinical decision making for EOS patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level V-expert opinion.

Spinal Fusion in Pediatric Patients With Low Bone Density: Defining the Value of DXA.

BACKGROUND: Children with medical complexity are at increased risk of low bone mineral density (BMD) and complications after spinal fusion compared with idiopathic scoliosis patients. Our aim was to compare treatments and outcomes of children with medical complexity undergoing spinal fusion in those who had dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scans versus those who did not in an effort to standardize the workup of these patients before undergoing spinal surgery. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of patients with low BMD who underwent spinal fusion at a tertiary care pediatric hospital between 2004 and 2016. We consulted with a pediatric endocrinologist to create standard definitions for low BMD to classify each subject. Regardless of DXA status, all patients were given a clinical diagnosis of osteoporosis [at least 2 long bone or 1 vertebral pathologic fracture(s)], osteopenia (stated on radiograph or by the physician), or clinically low bone density belonging to neither category. The last classification was used for patients whose clinicians had documented low bone density not meeting the criteria for osteoporosis or osteopenia. Fifty-nine patients met the criteria, and 314 were excluded for insufficient follow-up and/or not meeting a diagnosis definition. BMD Z -scores compare bone density ascertained by DXA to an age-matched and sex-matched average. Patients who had a DXA scan were also given a DXA diagnosis of low bone density (≤-2 SD), slightly low bone density (-1.0 to -1.9 SD), or neither (>-1.0 SD) based on the lowest BMD Z -score recorded. RESULTS: Fifty-nine patients were analyzed. Fifty-four percent had at least 1 DXA scan preoperatively. Eighty-one percent of DXA patients received some form of treatment compared with 52% of non-DXA patients ( P =0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Patients referred for DXA scans were more likely to be treated for low BMD, although there is no standardized system in place to determine which patients should get scans. Our research highlights the need to implement clinical protocols to optimize bone health preoperatively. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II-retrospective prognostic study.

Mortality in Early-Onset Scoliosis During the Growth-friendly Surgery Era.

INTRODUCTION: Early-onset scoliosis (EOS) is a spinal deformity that occurs in patients 9 years of age or younger. Severe deformity may result in thoracic insufficiency, respiratory failure, and premature death. The purpose of this study is to describe the modern-day natural history of mortality in patients with EOS. METHODS: The multicenter Pediatric Spine Study Group database was queried for all patients with EOS who are deceased, without exclusion. Demographics, underlying diagnoses, EOS etiology, operative and nonoperative treatments or observation, complications, and date of death were retrieved. Descriptive statistics and survival analysis with Kaplan-Meier curves were performed. RESULTS: There were 130/8009 patients identified as deceased for a registry mortality rate of 16 per 1000 patients. The mean age at death was 10.6 years (range: 1.0 to 30.2 y) and the most common EOS etiology was neuromuscular (73/130, 56.2%; P<0.001). Deceased patients were more likely be treated operatively than nonoperatively or observed (P<0.001). The mean age of death for patients treated operatively (12.3 y) was older than those treated nonoperatively (7.0 y) or observed (6.3 y) (P<0.001) despite a larger deformity and similar index visit body mass index and ventilation requirements. Kaplan-Meier analysis confirmed an increased survival time in patients with a history of any spine operation compared with patients without a history of spine operation (P<0.0001). Operatively treated patients experienced a median of 3.0 complications from diagnosis to death. Overall, cardiopulmonary related complications were the most common (129/271, 47.6%; P<0.001), followed by implant-related (57/271, 21.0%) and wound-related (26/271, 9.6%). The primary cause of death was identified for 78/130 (60.0%) patients, of which 57/78 (73.1%) were cardiopulmonary related. CONCLUSIONS: This study represents the largest collection of EOS mortality to date, providing surgeons with a modern-day examination of the effects of surgical intervention to better council patients and families. Both fatal and nonfatal complications in children with EOS are most likely to involve the cardiopulmonary system. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV-therapeutic.

Early outcomes of growth friendly instrumentation in children with Williams syndrome.

PURPOSE: Although scoliosis and kyphosis have been associated with Williams Syndrome (WS), no previous literature has reported on surgical treatment for early onset scoliosis (EOS) in WS. The aim of this case series is to report on the outcomes of spine deformity surgery in patients with EOS and WS and any perioperative anesthetic or cardiovascular complications. METHODS: One multicenter database was queried for all patients with WS who underwent growth-friendly (GF) treatment before age 12 between 2000 and 2017. Demographics, surgical, and growth-friendly data were queried. Radiographs were measured for curve magnitude, T1-T12 length, and T1-S1 length. RESULTS: Seven patients were analyzed (3 males, 4 females). Patients were at a median age of 2.8 years at initial surgery with median follow-up 3.6 years (range 2.0-12 years) after index surgery. The initial surgical treatments were as follows: 2 traditional growing rods (TGR), 2 magnetically controlled growing rods (MCGR), and 3 vertical expandable prosthetic titanium ribs (VEPTR). The median duration of growth-friendly treatment was 5.0 years (range, 2.6-10.4 years) with a median number of 9 device lengthenings. The median improvement in coronal curve magnitude from preoperative to most recent follow-up was 19° (range, 54°-9°). Three patients have completed GF treatment: one underwent definitive fusion, and two are under observation with apparent spontaneous fusion and retain the original GF implants. No peri-operative anesthetic or cardiovascular complications occurred. CONCLUSIONS: Few studies have reported on surgical outcomes in WS patients with EOS. In this case series, 6/7 patients experienced curve improvement with growth-friendly spine instrumentation. This study suggests that growth-friendly instrumentation for severe EOS in WS can be used for control of spinal deformity while allowing for further growth. Associated complications were typical of distraction-based EOS surgical treatment. There were 62 total procedures with general anesthesia, but no perioperative cardiac complications occurred.

The Impact of Unplanned Return to the Operating Room on Health-related Quality of Life at the End of Growth-friendly Surgical Treatment for Early-onset Scoliosis.

BACKGROUND: Limiting complications, especially unplanned return to the operating room (UPROR), is a major focus in the surgical management of early-onset scoliosis (EOS). Although UPROR remains common in this population, its effect on long-term health-related quality of life (HRQoL) remains unclear. The purpose of this study was to investigate the association between UPROR and end-of-treatment HRQoL in EOS patients treated with growth-friendly instrumentation. METHODS: Patients with EOS who underwent growth-friendly instrumentation at age less than 10 years from 1993 to 2018, and completed treatment, were identified in a multicenter EOS registry. UPROR events were recorded, and end-of-treatment (defined as skeletal maturity and/or definitive spinal fusion) HRQoL was assessed via the 24-item Early-Onset Scoliosis Questionnaire (EOSQ-24). RESULTS: A total of 825 patients were identified, and 325 patients (age at surgery: 6.4 y, follow-up: 8.1 y) had end-of-treatment HRQoL data necessary for our investigation. Overall, 129/325 (39.7%) patients experienced 264 UPROR events; the majority (54.2%) were implant-related. Aside from age and etiology, no other variables were determined to be confounders or effect modifiers. Congenital patients with UPROR had worse pain/discomfort by 10.4 points (P=0.057) and worse pulmonary function by 7.8 points (P=0.102) compared with non-UPROR patients adjusting for age. Neuromuscular patients with UPROR had worse pulmonary function by 10.1 points compared with non-UPROR patients adjusting for age (P=0.037). Idiopathic and syndromic patients with UPROR reported consistently worse domain scores than their non-UPROR counterparts, but smaller (<5-point) differences were seen. CONCLUSIONS: UPROR during growth-friendly surgical treatment for EOS is associated with worse HRQoL in all patients, but particularly in those with neuromuscular or congenital etiologies. Ongoing efforts to avoid UPROR are critical. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II. This is a multicenter retrospective cohort study investigating the effect of UPROR on HRQoL (prognostic study).

Treatment of Early-onset Scoliosis: Similar Outcomes Despite Different Etiologic Subtypes in Traditional Growing Rod Graduates.

BACKGROUND: It is unclear whether traditional growing rod (TGR) treatment outcomes vary by early-onset scoliosis (EOS) subtype. The goal of this study was to compare radiographic outcomes and complications of TGR treatment by EOS subtype. METHODS: We queried an international database of EOS patients from 20 centers to identify "graduates" who had (1) undergone primary TGR treatment from 1993 to 2014; (2) completed TGR treatment; and (3) had an uneventful clinical examination within 6 months after completion of TGR treatment with no anticipated further intervention. We included 202 patients in 4 etiologic subgroups: neuromuscular (n=65), syndromic (n=57), idiopathic (n=52), and congenital (n=28). Mean age at surgery was 7.1 years (range, 1.6 to 14.9 y); mean duration of follow-up was 8 years (range, 2 to 18.6 y). The groups did not differ by mean age, body mass index, sex, number of lengthenings, or duration of follow-up. The following preoperative differences were significant: (1) greater mean major curve in the neuromuscular versus idiopathic subgroup; (2) shorter spinal height (T1-S1) in the congenital versus idiopathic subgroup; and (3) smaller proportion of ambulatory patients in the neuromuscular subgroup versus all other subgroups. RESULTS: We found no significant differences among subgroups in mean major curve correction or changes in thoracic height (T1-T12), spinal height, or global kyphosis at any point. Rates of deep surgical site infection, implant-related complications, and neurological complications were not different among subgroups. The medical complication rate was significantly lower in the idiopathic group compared with the other groups. CONCLUSIONS: Major curve correction and spinal and thoracic height increases did not differ significantly at any point by EOS subtype. Rates of deep surgical site infection, implant-related complications, and neurological complications did not differ by subtype. Except for the lower rate of medical complications in the idiopathic group, our findings suggest that, after TGR treatment, patients can expect similar outcomes regardless of their EOS subtype. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, therapeutic.

Matched Comparison of Magnetically Controlled Growing Rods with Traditional Growing Rods in Severe Early-Onset Scoliosis of ≥90°: An Interim Report on Outcomes 2 Years After Treatment.

BACKGROUND: Severe early-onset scoliosis (EOS) is managed surgically but represents a challenge due to limited implant fixation points, large curve size, and fragile patients with comorbidities. Magnetically controlled growing rods (MCGRs) have the advantage of avoiding surgical intervention for routine lengthening, but their ability to address severe EOS has not been studied, to our knowledge. METHODS: A retrospective review of a prospectively collected international database identified 44 children with severe (≥90°) EOS treated with MCGRs who met our study criteria. Etiology, age, and sex-matched patients treated with traditional growing rods (TGRs) were identified from the same database. Patients were evaluated at a 2-year follow-up. No patients with vertically expandable prosthetic titanium ribs (VEPTRs) were included. The health-related quality of life was evaluated with the 24-Item Early Onset Scoliosis Questionnaire (EOSQ-24). RESULTS: The mean preoperative major coronal curve was 104° in the MCGR group and 104° in the TGR group. At the 2-year follow-up, the mean major coronal curves were 52° and 66° (p = 0.001), respectively. The mean T1-T12 heights were 155 mm and 152 mm preoperatively and 202 mm and 192 mm at the 2-year follow-up (p = 0.088). According to Kaplan-Meier analysis, the 2-year unplanned-revision-free survival was 91% in the MCGR group and 71% in the TGR group (p < 0.005). The 2-year score in the EOSQ-24 pulmonary function domain was better in the MCGR group. There were no other significant differences in the EOSQ-24 scores between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: MCGRs for severe EOS provided significantly better major curve correction with significantly fewer unplanned revisions than TGRs at a 2-year follow-up. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

The Effect of Surgeon Experience on Outcomes Following Growth Friendly Instrumentation for Early Onset Scoliosis.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to utilize a multicenter, multisurgeon cohort to assess the effect of surgeon experience on outcomes of growth friendly instrumentation (GFI) in early onset scoliosis (EOS). We hypothesized that unplanned return to the operating room (UPROR), estimated blood loss (EBL), and surgical time would be greater amongst early career surgeons (ECSs) when compared with advanced career surgeons (ACSs). METHODS: An international pediatric spine database was queried for patients ages 2 to 10 years treated by posterior distraction-based GFI with at least of 2-year follow up. Two groups were created for analysis based on surgeon experience: ECSs (with ≤10 y of experience) and ACSs (with >10 y of experience). The primary outcome was UPROR. Additional outcomes included: operating room time, EBL, neurological deficits, infection rate, hardware failure, and the Early Onset Scoliosis Questionnaire (EOSQ-24). Subgroup analysis was performed for further assessment based on procedure type, superior anchor type, etiology, and curve severity. RESULTS: A total of 960 patients met inclusion criteria including 243 (25.3%) treated by ECS. Etiology, sex, superior anchor, and EOSQ-24 scores were similar between groups (P>0.05). There were no clinically significant differences in patient age or preoperative major coronal curve. UPROR (35.8% vs. 32.7%, P=0.532), infection (17.0% vs. 15.6%, P=0.698), operating room time (235 vs. 231 min, P=0.755), and EBL (151 vs. 155 mL, P=0.833) were comparable between ECS and ACS groups. The frequency of having at least 1 complication was relatively high but comparable among groups (60.7% vs. 62.6%, P=0.709). EOSQ-24 subdomain scores were similar between groups at 2-year follow-up (P>0.05). Subgroup analysis revealed that ECS had increased surgical time compared with ACS in severe curves >90 degrees (270 vs. 229 min, P=0.05). CONCLUSIONS: This study represents the first multicenter assessment of surgeon experience on outcomes in EOS. Overall, surgeon experience did not significantly influence UPROR, complication rates, EBL, or surgical time associated with GFI in this cohort of EOS patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Variability in Antibiotic Treatment of Pediatric Surgical Site Infection After Spinal Fusion at A Single Institution.

BACKGROUND: Recent focus on surgical site infections (SSIs) after posterior spine fusion (PSF) has lowered infection rates by standardizing perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis. However, efforts have neglected to detail antibiotic treatment of SSIs. Our aim was to document variability in antibiotic regimens prescribed for acute and latent SSIs following PSF in children with idiopathic, neuromuscular, and syndromic scoliosis. METHODS: This study included patients who developed a SSI after PSF for scoliosis at a pediatric tertiary care hospital between 2004 and 2019. Patients had to be 21 years or younger at surgery. Exclusion criteria included growing rods, staged surgery, and revision or removal before SSI diagnosis. Infection was classified as acute (within 90 d) or latent. Clinical resolution of SSI was measured by return to normal lab values. Each antibiotic was categorized as empiric or tailored. RESULTS: Eighty subjects were identified. The average age at fusion was 14.7 years and 40% of the cohort was male. Most diagnoses were neuromuscular (53%) or idiopathic (41%).Sixty-three percent of patients had an acute infection and 88% had a deep infection. The majority (54%) of subjects began on tailored antibiotic therapy versus empiric (46%). Patients with a neuromuscular diagnosis had 4.0 times the odds of receiving initial empiric treatment compared with patients with an idiopathic diagnosis, controlling for infection type and time (P=0.01). Ninety-two percent of patients with acute SSI retained implants at the time of infection and 76% retained them as of August 2020. In the latent cohort, 27% retained implants at infection and 17% retained them as of August 2020. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with acute infections were on antibiotics longer than patients with latent infections. Those with retained implants were on antibiotics longer than those who underwent removal. By providing averages of antibiotic duration and lab normalization, we hope to standardize regimens moving forward and develop SSI-reducing pathways encompassing low-risk patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Vitamin D levels and pain outcomes in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients undergoing spine fusion.

PURPOSE: Prior research has indicated adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) patients have lower bone mineral density and lower vitamin D levels than healthy peers. Vitamin D deficiency has been associated with higher levels of pain. This study investigated whether vitamin D-deficient AIS patients had higher pain before or immediately after posterior spine fusion (PSF) surgery. METHODS: 25-Hydroxy vitamin D levels were tested in all AIS patients at their pre-operative appointment. Patients were grouped by serum 25-hydroxy vitamin D level: deficient, < 20 ng/mL; insufficient, 20-29 ng/mL; sufficient, ≥ 30 ng/mL. Primary outcomes included pre-operative Scoliosis Research Society Health-Related Quality of Life (SRS-30) and numeric rating scale (NRS) scores (0-10) up to 72 h post-operatively, and analyzed using ANOVA and linear mixed modeling, respectively. 176 patients undergoing PSF were included. Intra-operative characteristics by vitamin D status were also assessed. The cohort was 82% female and an average of 15.2 years (range 10.6-25.3 years) at fusion. Average major curve was 60 (range 40-104) degrees pre-operatively. RESULTS: Forty-five (26%) patients were deficient in vitamin D, 75 (43%) were insufficient, and 56 (32%) were sufficient. Patients with vitamin D deficiency had lower average household income by zip code (p < 0.01) and higher secondhand smoke exposure (p < 0.001). There were no differences in pre-operative SRS-30 score, pre- and post-operative major curve angles, or estimated blood loss across vitamin D groups. Trajectories of NRS indicated no differences in pain during the first 72 h after surgery. CONCLUSION: Vitamin D deficiency in this population is associated with potential markers of lower socioeconomic status; however, it does not influence AIS PSF patients' experience of pain before or immediately after spine fusion surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.

Scoliosis with Chiari I malformation without associated syringomyelia.

PURPOSE: Many patients with presumed idiopathic scoliosis are found to have Chiari I malformation (CM-I) on MRI. The objective of this study is to report on scoliosis progression in CM-I with no syringomyelia. METHODS: A retrospective review of patients with scoliosis and CM-I was conducted from 1997 to 2015. Patients with syringomyelia and/or non-idiopathic scoliosis were excluded. Clinical and radiographic characteristics were recorded at presentation and latest follow-up. CM-I was defined as the cerebellar tonsil extending 5 mm or more below the foramen magnum on MRI. RESULTS: Thirty-two patients (72% female) with a mean age of 11 years (range 1-16) at scoliosis diagnosis were included. The average initial curve was 30.3° ± SD 16.3. The mean initial Chiari size was 9.6 mm SD ± 4.0. Fifteen (46.9%) experienced Chiari-related symptoms, and three (9%) patients underwent Posterior Fossa Decompression (PFD) to treat these symptoms. 10 (31%) patients went on to fusion, progressing on average 13.6° (95% CI 1.6-25.6°). No association was detected between decompression and either curve progression or fusion (p = 0.46, 0.60). For those who did not undergo fusion, curve magnitude progressed on average 1.0° (95% CI - 4.0 to 5.9°). There was no association between age, Chiari size, presence of symptoms, initial curve shape, or bracing treatment and fusion. CONCLUSION: Patients with CM-I and scoliosis may not require surgical treatment, including PFD and fusion. Scoliosis curvature stabilized in the non-surgical population at an average progression of 1.0°. These results suggest that CM-I with no syringomyelia has minimal effect on scoliosis progression.