The Fate of Residual Fragments After Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: Results from the Endourologic Disease Group for Excellence Research Consortium.

Background: Residual fragments (RFs) after percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) have a significant impact on patients' quality of life and clinical course. There is a paucity of studies that evaluate the natural history of RFs after PCNL. The objective of this study is to compare rates of reintervention, complications, stone growth, and passage in patients with RFs >4, ≤4, and ≤2 mm after PCNL. Methods: Sites from the Endourologic Disease Group for Excellence (EDGE) research consortium examined data of PCNL patients from 2015 to 2019 with at least 1-year follow-up. RF passage, regrowth, reintervention, and complications were recorded and RFs were stratified into >4 and ≤4 mm groups, as well as >2 and ≤2 mm groups. Potential predictors for stone-related events after PCNL were determined using multivariable logistic regression analysis. It was hypothesized that larger RF thresholds would result in lower passage rates, faster regrowth, and greater clinically significant events (complications and reinterventions) than smaller RF thresholds. Results: A total of 439 patients with RFs >1 mm on CT postoperative day 1 were included in this study. For RFs >4 mm, rates of reintervention were found to be significantly higher and Kaplan-Meier curve analysis showed significantly higher rates of stone-related events. Passage and RF regrowth were not found to be significantly different compared with RFs ≤4 mm. However, RFs ≤2 mm had significantly higher rates of passage, and significantly lower rates of fragment regrowth (>1 mm), complications, and reintervention compared with RFs >2 mm. On multivariable analysis, older age, body mass index, and RF size were found to be predictive of stone-related events. Conclusions: With the largest cohort to date, this study by the EDGE research consortium further confirms that clinically insignificant residual fragment is problematic for patients after PCNL, particularly in older more obese patients with larger RFs. Our study underscores the importance of complete stone clearance post-PCNL and challenges the use of Clinically insignificant residual fragment (CIFR).

Hybrid guidewires: Analysis and comparison of the mechanical properties and safety profiles.

INTRODUCTION: Hybrid guidewires are commonly used in urology due to the advantage of an atraumatic hydrophilic tip, which facilitates negotiating tight areas, coupled with an unkinkable nitinol core shaft that is easy to work over due to the Teflon coating. Our aim was to compare the physical and mechanical properties of five commercially available hybrid guidewires to assess their characteristics and functionality. METHODS: In vitro testing was performed on the following straight-tipped 0.035 inch guidewires: Sensor™ (Boston Scientific), Solo™ Plus (Bard), UltraTrack (Olympus), Rio Tracer™ (Rocamed), and Motion™ (Cook). We evaluated characteristics impacting function (tip flexibility, shaft stiffness, lubricity) and safety (perforation force). Measurements included tip flexibility, lubricity, shaft buckling, and force required to perforate a sheet of aluminum foil. RESULTS: The Motion had the highest tip-bending force (p<0.00001). The Rio Tracer had the stiffest shaft (p<0.00001), followed by the Solo Plus and the Motion, which were significantly stiffer than the Sensor and UltraTrack (p<0.00001). The Solo Plus and UltraTrack had the greatest perforation force (p=0.00023), and the Rio Tracer had the lowest perforation force (p=0.016) when compared to the Sensor. There was no significant difference in frictional force between the five guidewires (p=0.1516). CONCLUSIONS: The Solo Plus and UltraTrack required the greatest force to perforate, which conveys a higher safety margin. The RioTracer is the stiffest guidewire, which may be beneficial for instrument insertion with the tradeoff of having a lower perforation force. The clinical significance of higher tip-bending forces (unfavourable) and higher shaft-bending forces (favourable) deserve further investigation.

Complications, Re-Intervention Rates, and Natural History of Residual Stone Fragments After Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy.

INTRODUCTION: The management of residual fragments (RFs) that persist after percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) has been poorly studied. Fragments have the potential to grow or cause symptoms. The aim of this study was to follow patients with fragments after PCNL to identify predictors of stone-related events (re-interventions and complications) after PCNL. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data were retrospectively collected from patients who underwent surgery from 2008 to 2013 at our hospital. Patients with fragments of any size on postoperative day 1 computed tomography of the kidney, ureter, and bladder radiograph (CT-KUB) were included, and patients with planned secondary interventions were excluded. Subgroup analysis was performed on subjects with CT-plain X-ray to determine fragment growth or passage. RESULTS: Of the 658 patients who received a postoperative CT-KUB on day 1, 299 patients (45%) had fragments that were 1 mm or larger. From this, 263 patients met the study criteria and were included. The size of fragments, using a 4 mm cutoff, did not predict the passage of fragments (p = 0.173) or growth (p = 0.572). On multivariable logistic regression analysis, previous history of renal stones and size of fragment were found to be predictive for stone-related events (p = 0.002 and 0.027, respectively). Kaplan-Meier analysis identified patients with fragments >4 mm having a shorter survival time before the occurrence of stone-related events (p = 0.044). CONCLUSIONS: The true stone-free rate was 55% after PCNL. However, 82.5% were stone free or had RFs 4 mm or less, which correlates with previous studies. Larger RFs had higher rates of stone-related events and shorter time to occurrence of stone-related events. The growth and spontaneous passage of RFs was independent of RF size, emphasizing the importance of obtaining a stone-free status after PCNL.

Validity of Simplified Versus Standard Self-Report Measures of Pain Intensity in Preschool-Aged Children Undergoing Venipuncture.

There are inadequate age-specific data to support the use of current self-report pain scales in 3- and 4-year-old children. Most preschool-aged children also lack the necessary cognitive development to use standard scales. We aimed to evaluate the validity and feasibility of 2 novel simplified scales (Simplified Faces Pain Scale, S-FPS; Simplified Concrete Ordinal Scale, S-COS) for preschool-aged children. These simplified scales used a 2-step self-report method: children were first asked whether they have pain (yes/no); only if yes, then pain intensity was self-reported using a 3-point scale with visual aids signifying mild/moderate/severe. We recruited 180 3- to 6-year-old children undergoing routine blood collection. Each child was randomly assigned 2 of 3 scales-S-FPS, S-COS, Faces Pain Scale-Revised (FPS-R)-to self-report pain before venipuncture, immediately after, and 5 minutes later, using both scales at each time-point. Pain was also assessed using observation (Face Legs Activity Cry Consolability) at each time point. The ability to discriminate pain from no pain was improved with S-FPS and S-COS, compared with the FPS-R, among 4-year-olds, but not 3-year-olds. Correlation with Face Legs Activity Cry Consolability was moderate to strong and cooperation rates were similar for all self-report scales. The simplified scales can improve and simplify pain assessment for 4-year-olds. Quantitative pain rating remains challenging for 3-year-olds. PERSPECTIVE: This study evaluated 2 novel simplified pain assessment tools for preschool-aged children undergoing blood sampling. These scales demonstrated good validity and feasibility compared with the FPS-R, suggesting these simplified pain scales may have a role in clinical practice for children as young as 4 years.