A new method for predicting alcohol relapse in patients undergoing liver transplantation for alcohol-related liver failure: Barratt scale.

Background and Aim: Alcohol-induced liver disease has become one of the major causes of chronic liver disease worldwide with the increasing use of alcohol in society. The most important step in treatment is cessation of alcohol consumption. In patients with advanced liver disease, the most effective treatment is liver transplantation. Careful evaluation of patients with alcoholic liver disease before transplantation can help identify those at high risk of relapsing. Materials and Methods: Of a total of 42 patients who underwent liver transplantation for alcohol-related liver failure in our hospital between 2011 and 2022, 26 surviving patients were included in the study. Patient data were analyzed retrospectively. Demographic data, MELD score, history of alcohol consumption, alcohol treatment, post-transplant prognosis and survival were analyzed. The Barratt Impulsivity Scale-11 Short Form (BIS-11 SF) was applied to the surviving patients for impulsivity analysis to predict the possibility of relapse. Results: Of the 26 patients who were included in the study, all were male. The mean age at transplantation was 53 (31-71) years. Mean MELD score was 22.31 (9-36). 12 patients (46.2%) received living donor liver transplantation and 14 patients (53.8%) received cadaveric liver transplantation. 25 patients (96.2%) had no post-transplant dependence, while 1 patient (3.8%) had post-transplant dependence. 5 patients (19.2%) continued to consume alcohol after transplantation. Conclusion: In our study, we observed that patients with high motor impulsivity tendency according to BSI-11 SF had alcohol relapse. We believe that revising this scale with more detailed questions for alcohol-dependent liver patients and applying it to patients before transplantation will be effective in better selection for transplantation and guiding patients to appropriate therapy and thus preventing relapse after transplantation.

The first 4-way liver paired exchange from an interdisciplinary collaboration between health care professionals and design economists.

We report initial results of a liver paired exchange (LPE) program established at the Liver Transplant Institute at Inonu University through collaboration with design economists. Since June 2022, the program has been using a matching procedure that maximizes the number of living donor liver transplants (LDLTs) to the patients in the pool subject to the ethical framework and the logistical constraints of the program. In 1 4-way and 4 2-way exchanges, 12 LDLTs have been performed via LPE in 2022. The 4-way exchange, generated in the same match run with a 2-way exchange, is a first worldwide. This match run generated LDLTs for 6 patients, revealing the value of the capacity to carry out larger than 2-way exchanges. With only 2-way exchanges, only 4 of these patients would receive a LDLT. The number of LDLTs from LPE can be increased by developing the capacity to perform larger than 2-way exchanges in either high-volume centers or multicenter programs.

Predictive Value of Red Blood Cell Distribution Width, Platelet Count to Lymphocyte Count Ratio, and Neutrophil Count to Lymphocyte Count Ratio Values for the Detection of Postoperative Infection in Patients Undergoing Liver Transplantation.

BACKGROUND: The red blood cell distribution width (RDW) value is a simple and fast parameter that shows an elevation in the presence of infectious disease. It is thought that proinflammatory signals cause changes in the cell wall of the erythrocytes. In our study, we aimed to investigate the prognostic value of RDW and other parameters in patients undergoing liver transplantation. METHODS: We retrospectively investigated 200 patients who underwent liver transplantation (LT) in our center. The study group was 100 patients who underwent LT and developed a postoperative abdominal or catheter-related infection in the early period between the first and second weeks of hospitalization. The control group comprises 100 patients who underwent LT and were discharged without complications. In 4 different periods, inflammatory markers and RDW, platelet count to lymphocyte count ratio, and neutrophil count to lymphocyte count ratio (NLR) values were compared in the 2 groups. RESULTS: In our study, we found RDW and NLR parameters to be elevated in correlation with infection in patients who underwent LT (P < .05). Other markers were elevated but not significantly correlated with infection. CONCLUSIONS: These parameters can be simple and effective additional tools to implement in patients suspected of infection. Further prospective studies with larger patient groups and varying infection states are required for validating RDW and NLR as additional diagnostic markers.

Advances and innovations in living donor liver transplant techniques, matching and surgical training: Meeting report from the living donor liver transplant consensus conference.

The practice of LDLT currently delivers limited impact in western transplant centers. The American Society of Transplantation organized a virtual consensus conference in October 2021 to identify barriers and gaps to LDLT growth, and to provide evidence-based recommendations to foster safe expansion of LDLT in the United States. This article reports the findings and recommendations regarding innovations and advances in approaches to donor-recipient matching challenges, the technical aspects of the donor and recipient operations, and surgical training. Among these themes, the barriers deemed most influential/detrimental to LDLT expansion in the United States included: (1) prohibitive issues related to donor age, graft size, insufficient donor remnant, and ABO incompatibility; (2) lack of acknowledgment and awareness of the excellent outcomes and benefits of LDLT; (3) ambiguous messaging regarding LDLT to patients and hospital leadership; and (4) a limited number of proficient LDLT surgeons across the United States. Donor-recipient mismatching may be circumvented by way of liver paired exchange. The creation of a national registry to generate granular data on donor-recipient matching will guide the practice of liver paired exchange. The surgical challenges to LDLT are addressed herein and focuses on the development of robust training pathways resulting in proficiency in donor and recipient surgery. Utilizing strong mentorship/collaboration programs with novel training practices under the auspices of established training and certification bodies will add to the breadth and depth of training.

Living donor liver transplantation: A multi-disciplinary collaboration towards growth, consensus, and a change in culture.

INTRODUCTION: Living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) reduces liver transplant waitlist mortality and provides excellent long-term outcomes for persons with end stage liver disease. Yet, utilization of LDLT has been limited in the United States (US). METHODS: In October 2021, the American Society of Transplantation held a consensus conference to identify important barriers to broader expansion of LDLT in the US, including data gaps, and make recommendations for impactful and feasible mitigation strategies to overcome these barriers. Domains addressed encompassed the entirety of the LDLT process. Representation from international centers and living donor kidney transplantation were included for their perspective/experience in addition to members across disciplines within the US liver transplantation community. A modified Delphi approach was employed as the consensus methodology. RESULTS: The predominant theme permeating discussion and polling results centered on culture; the beliefs and behaviors of a group of people perpetuated over time. CONCLUSIONS: Creating a culture of support for LDLT in the US is key for expansion and includes engagement and education of stakeholders across the spectrum of the process of LDLT. A shift from awareness of LDLT to acknowledgement of benefit of LDLT is the primary goal. Propagation of the maxim "LDLT is the best option" is pivotal.

Multiple Swaps Tested: Rehearsal for Triple and Five-Liver Paired Exchanges.

Despite several advances in living donor liver transplant (LDLT), many potential living liver donors cannot donate their organs to their relatives because of blood group incompatibility and unsuitable anatomy. Liver paired exchange (LPE) can be used to overcome incompatibilities between living donor-recipient pairs. In this study, we report the early and late results of 3 and 5 LDLTs performed simultaneously to initiate the more complex LPE program. By demonstrating that our center is capable of performing up to 5 LDLTs, we have taken an essential step for establishing a complex LPE program.

A survey of transplant providers regarding attitudes, barriers, and facilitators to living donor liver transplantation in the United States.

INTRODUCTION: A successful living donor liver transplant (LDLT) is the culmination of a multifaceted process coordinated among key stakeholders. METHODS: We conducted an electronic survey of US liver transplant (LT) centers (August 26, 2021-October 10, 2021) regarding attitudes, barriers, and facilitators of LDLT to learn how to expand LDLT safely and effectively in preparation for the American Society of Transplantation Living Donor Liver Transplant Consensus Conference. RESULTS: Responses were received from staff at 58 programs (40.1% of US LT centers). There is interest in broadening LDLT (100% of LDLT centers, 66.7% of non-LDLT centers) with high level of agreement that LDLT mitigates donor shortage (93.3% of respondents) and that it should be offered to all suitable candidates (87.5% of respondents), though LDLT was less often endorsed as the best first option (29.5% of respondents). Key barriers at non-LDLT centers were institutional factors and surgical expertise, whereas those at LDLT centers focused on waitlist candidate and donor factors. Heterogeneity in candidate selection for LDLT, candidate reluctance to pursue LDLT, high donor exclusion rate, and disparities in access were important barriers. CONCLUSION: Findings from this study may help guide current and future expansion of LDLT more efficiently in the US. These efforts require clear and cohesive messaging regarding LDLT benefits, engagement of the public community, and dedicated resources to equitably increase LDLT access.

Variation in adult living donor liver transplantation in the United States: Identifying opportunities for increased utilization.

In the United States, living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) is limited to transplant centers with specific experience. However, the impact of recipient characteristics on procedure selection (LDLT vs. deceased donor liver transplant [DDLT]) within these centers has not been described. Transplant registry data for centers that performed ≥1 LDLT in 2002-2019 were analyzed using hierarchal regression modeling to quantify the impact of patient and center factors on the adjusted odds ratio (aOR) of LDLT (vs DDLT). Among 73,681 adult recipients, only 4% underwent LDLT, varying from <1% to >60% of total liver transplants. After risk adjustment, the likelihood of receiving an LDLT rose by 73% in recent years (aOR 1.73 for 2014-2019 vs. 2002-2007) but remained lower for older adults, men, racial and ethnic minorities, and obese patients. LDLT was less commonly used in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma or alcoholic cirrhosis, and more frequently in those with hepatitis C and with lower severity of illness (Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score < 15). Patients with public insurance, lower educational achievement, and residence in the Northwest and Southeast had decreased access. While some differences in access to LDLT reflect clinical factors, further exploration into disparities in LDLT utilization based on center practice and socioeconomic determinants of health is needed.

Preliminary Report of the ministry of health working group on standardization of living donor liver transplantation in Turkiye.

Liver transplantation is successfully achieved all over the world and in Turkiye. Similar to many middle and far east countries, donation from deceased donors has not reached the desired level in Turkiye. Therefore, in Turkiye, living donors have been frequently used for liver transplantation. Although Turkiye is the leading country in Europe and one of the top three countries in the world executing LDLT, nationwide standardization of LDLT protocols, including donor and recipient evaluation and acceptance criteria, donor and recipient follow-up and reporting rules, and routine periodic audits by the ministry of health authorities, has not been established. Therefore, we created a working group to study reviewing regulations of LDLT operation in Europe and the USA. The establishment and implementation of standardization of LDLT operation will serve to improve the donor and recipient outcomes while preventing incomplete or incorrect practices. The guide prepared on this subject is presented in the Appendix.

Epidemiology and outcomes of surgical site infections among pediatric liver transplant recipients.

INTRODUCTION: Surgical site infections (SSI) are a significant cause of morbidity in liver transplant recipients, and the current data in the pediatric population are limited. The goal of this study was to identify the incidence, classification, risk factors, and outcomes of SSIs among children undergoing liver transplantation (LT). METHODS: A single-center, retrospective descriptive analysis was performed of patients age ≤18 years undergoing LT between September 2007 and April 2017. SSI identified within the first 30 days were analyzed. Primary endpoints included incidence, classification, risk factors, and outcomes associated with SSIs. RESULTS: We included 86 patients, eight patients (9.3%) developed SSIs. Among segmental grafts (SG) recipients, 7/61 (11.4%) developed SSI. Among whole grafts recipients, 1/25 (4%) developed SSI. SSIs were associated with the presence of biliary complications (35% vs. 3%, p < .01; odds ratios 24, 95% CI: 3.41-487.37, p<.01). There were no differences in long term graft or patient survival associated with SSI. Patients who developed SSI were more likely to undergo reoperation (50% vs. 16.7%, p = .045) and had an increased total number of hospital days in the first 60 days post-transplant (30.5 vs. 12.5 days, p = .001). CONCLUSIONS: SSIs after pediatric LT was less frequent than what has been previously reported in literature. SSIs were associated with the presence of biliary complications without an increase in mortality. SG had an increased rate of biliary complications without an association to SSIs but, considering its positive impact on organ shortage barriers, should not be a deterrent to the utilization of SGs.

The use of nondirected donor organs in living donor liver transplantation: Perspectives and guidance.

Interest in anonymous nondirected living organ donation is increasing in the United States and a small number of transplantation centers are accumulating an experience regarding nondirected donation in living donor liver transplantation. Herein, we review current transplant policy, discuss emerging data, draw parallels from nondirected kidney donation, and examine relevant considerations in nondirected living liver donation. We aim to provide a consensus guidance to ensure safe evaluation and selection of nondirected living liver donors and a schema for just allocation of nondirected grafts.

Left lateral segment pediatric liver transplantation: a 25 year experience at Mount Sinai.

BACKGROUND: Outcomes of left lateral segment (LLS) grafts in pediatric recipients were compared between living (LD-LLS) and deceased donor (DD-LLS) grafts. METHODS: 195 LLS grafts (99DD-LLS-96LD-LLS) were analyzed with a median follow-up of 9.1years. The primary endpoints were overall patient/graft survival. RESULTS: LD-LLS grafts were younger (0.9vs.1.4years, p = 0.039), more likely to have a fulminant liver failure (17.9%vs.5.3%,p = 0.002), less likely to have a metabolic disorder (6.3%vs.25.5%,p = 0.002), and less likely to be undergoing retransplantation (5.3% vs.16.2%,p = 0.015). There was a trend toward decreased hepatic artery thrombosis in LD-LLS grafts (6.6% vs. 15.5%,p = 0.054). No differences in the overall biliary complications occurred. The LD-LLS group had prolonged survival compared to the DD-LLS group with 10-year survival rates of 81%, and 74% (p = 0.005), respectively. LD-LLS grafts had longer graft survival compared to DD-LLS grafts (10-year graft survival 85%vs.67%,p = 0.005). Recipient age >1year (HR 2.39,p = 0.026), aortic reconstruction (HR 2.12,p = 0.046) and vascular complication (HR 3.12,p < 0.001) were independent predictors of poor patient survival. Non-biliary liver disease (HR 2.17,p = 0.015), DD-LLS (HR 2.06,p = 0.034) and vascular complication (HR 4.61,p < 0.001) were independent predictors of poor graft survival. CONCLUSION: The use of SLT remains a viable option with excellent long-term outcomes. We show improved graft and patient survival with living donor grafts.

Expansion of Patient Education Programming Regarding Live Donor Liver Transplantation via Virtual Group Encounters During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

During the coronavirus 2019 pandemic we converted our liver transplant waitlist candidate education and support program to a virtual format and expanded it to include ongoing engagement sessions aimed to educate and empower patients to maximize opportunity for live donor liver transplantation. Over a period of 6 months from April 2020 to Sept 2020 we included 21 patients in this pilot quality improvement program. We collected data regarding patient response and potential donor referral activity. Overall, patient response was positive, and some patients saw progress toward live donor liver transplantation by fostering inquiry of potential live liver donors. Optimization of logistical aspects of the program including program flow, technology access, and utilization is required to enhance patient experience. Long-term follow-up is needed to assess impact on the outcome of transplantation rates. Future data collection and analysis should focus on assessment of any potential disparity that may result from utilization of virtual programming. Herein we provide a framework for this type of virtual program and describe our experience.

Frailty in liver transplantation: A comprehensive review.

Frailty, a global impairment of multiple organ systems resulting in increased vulnerability to health stressors, is common in end-stage liver disease, multifactorial in etiology, and impacts overall mortality as well as outcomes in liver transplantation. This is a review of the currently available data, a synopsis of expert consensus, and a framework for transplant centers to approach frailty. We suggest that centers use a multidisciplinary team of healthcare providers and approach frailty in a programmatic fashion to provide effective patient care and ensure optimal transplant outcomes. The utilization of standardized protocols to address both malnutrition and physical debility is ideal and can help ensure safety. A toolbox of resources has been made available by experts in the field to facilitate this approach. The incorporation of new technology tailored to overcome barriers is another resource under investigation.

Author Correction: Liver Transplantation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Malatya Experience and Proposals for Expanded Criteria.

The original version of this article unfortunately contained a mistake in the author group section.

Liver Transplantation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Malatya Experience and Proposals for Expanded Criteria.

Survival was examined from a Turkish liver transplant center of patients with HCC, to identify prognostic factors. Data from 215 patients who underwent predominantly live donor liver transplant for HCC at our institute over 12 years were included in the study and prospectively recorded. They were 152 patients within and 63 patients beyond Milan criteria. Patients beyond Milan criteria were divided into two groups according to presence or absence of tumor recurrence. Recurrence-associated factors were analyzed. These factors were then applied to the total cohort for survival analysis. We identified four factors, using multivariate analysis, that were significantly associated with tumor recurrence. These were maximum tumor diameter, degree of tumor differentiation, and serum AFP and GGT levels. A model that included all four of these factors was constructed, the 'Malatya criteria.' Using these Malatya criteria, we estimated DFS and cumulative survival, for patients within and beyond these criteria, and found statistically significant differences with improved survival in patients within Malatya criteria of 1, 5, and 10-year overall survival rates of 90.1%, 79.7%, and 72.8% respectively, which compared favorably with other extra-Milan extended criteria. Survival of our patients within the newly defined Malatya criteria compared favorably with other extra-Milan extended criteria and highlight the usefulness of serum AFP and GGT levels in decision-making.

Frequency of whole-organ in lieu of split-liver transplantation over the last decade: Children experienced increased wait time and death.

Organ shortage is a barrier to liver transplantation (LT). Split LT (SLT) increases organ utilization, saving 2 recipients. A simulation of Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network/United Network for Organ Sharing data (2007-2017) was performed to identify whole-organ LT grafts (WLT) that met the criteria for being splittable to 2 recipients. Waitlist consequences presented. Deceased donor (DD) livers transplanted as whole organs were evaluated for suitability to split. Of these DD organs, we identified the adolescent and adult recipients of WLT who were suitable for SLT. Pediatric candidates suitable to share the SLT were ascertained from DD match-run lists, and 1342 splittable DD organs were identified; 438 WLT recipients met the criteria for accepting a SLT. Review of the 438 DD match-run lists identified 420 children next on the list suitable for SLT. Three hundred thirty-three children (79%) underwent LT, but had longer wait-times compared to 591 actual pediatric SLT recipients (median 147 days vs 44 days, P  < 0.001). Thirty-three of 420 children died on waitlist after a mean 206 days (standard deviation 317). Sharing organs suitable for splitting increases the number of LT, saving more lives. With careful patient selection, SLT will not be a disadvantage to the adult recipients. With a children-first allocation scheme, SLT will naturally increase the number of allografts because adult organs are too large for small children.

Body Image in Liver Transplantation Recipients.

Body image (BI) concerns have been reported to play a significant role in the psychological adaptation after organ transplantation. There is a paucity of data about BI beliefs in liver transplant recipients. We report the results of a cross-sectional study of 177 liver transplant recipients for whom we assessed BI, anxiety, depression, and quality of life (QOL) using validated instruments. Our results indicate that higher BI concerns correlated with higher levels of anxiety and depression. BI concerns were more elevated in females, younger patients, and patients with a lower income. Patients with chronic liver disease had more BI concerns than patients who received liver transplantation for acute liver failure. Specific BI concerns also correlated independently with QOL scores. We conclude that BI concerns are significant in liver transplant recipients and should be evaluated by clinicians involved in the mental health care of this population.