Long-Term Male Sexual Function and Fecal Incontinence Outcomes for Adult Patients with Hirschsprung Disease or Anorectal Malformation.

BACKGROUND: This study sought to characterize sexual function and fecal incontinence related quality of life (QOL) outcomes for adult males with anorectal malformation (ARM) or Hirschsprung's Disease (HD). METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional survey study of male patients ≥18 years with ARM or HD. Patients were identified from our institutional database, contacted and consented by telephone, and sent a REDCap survey via email. The International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5) and Male Sexual Health Questionnaire (MSHQ) evaluated erectile dysfunction (ED) and ejaculatory dysfunction (EjD), respectively. The Cleveland Clinic Incontinence Score (CCIS) and the Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life Scale (FIQLS) assessed fecal incontinence-related outcomes. A linear regression analysis of IIEF-5 scores compared to CCIS scores was used to evaluate for an association between ED and incontinence. RESULTS: Of 63 patients contacted, 48 completed the survey. The median age for respondents was 22.5 years (IQR 20-25). There were 19 patients with HD and 29 patients with ARM. On the IIEF-5 survey, 35.3% report some level of ED. On the MSHQ-EjD survey, the median score was 14 out of 15 (IQR 10.75-15), indicating few EjD concerns. The median CCIS was 5 (IQR 2.25-7.75) and the median FIQL scores ranged from 2.7 to 3.5 depending on the domain assessed, demonstrating some QOL challenges secondary to fecal incontinence. On linear regression analysis, IIEF-5 and CCIS scores were weakly associated (B = -0.55, p = 0.045). CONCLUSIONS: Male adult patients with ARM or HD may have ongoing concerns with sexual function and fecal incontinence. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 4. TYPE OF STUDY: Cross-Sectional Survey Study.

Hirschsprung-Associated Enterocolitis at a Referral Institution: A Retrospective Review.

BACKGROUND: Hirschsprung-associated enterocolitis (HAEC) is the most common cause of morbidity and mortality amongst patients with Hirschsprung disease (HD); rectal Botulinum toxin (Botox) has been reported a possible prevention strategy. We aimed to evaluate our institution's historic cohort of HD patients, first to determine our incidence of HAEC and second to begin assessing the effect of Botox on HAEC incidence. METHODS: Patients with HD seen at our institution between 2005 and 2019 were reviewed. Incidence of HD and frequencies of HAEC and Botox injections were tallied. Associations between initial Botox treatment or transition zone and HAEC incidence were evaluated. RESULTS: We reviewed 221 patients; 200 were included for analysis. One hundred thirteen (56.5%) patients underwent primary pull-through at a median age of 24 days (IQR 91). Eighty-seven (43.5%) patients with initial ostomy had their intestinal continuity reestablished at a median of 318 days (IQR 595). Ninety-four (49.5%) experienced at least one episode of HAEC and 62 (66%) experienced multiple episodes of HAEC. Nineteen (9.6%) patients had total colonic HD and had an increased total incidence of HAEC compared to patients without total colonic HD (89% vs 44%, p < 0.001). Six (2.9%) patients received Botox injections at the time of pull-through or ostomy takedown; one experienced an episode of HAEC (versus 50.7% of the patients who were confirmed to have not received Botox injections at their surgery, p = 0.102). CONCLUSION: Further prospective study on Botox's effect on Hirschsprung-associated enterocolitis is required and is the next step in our investigation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Enteral access and reflux management in neonates with severe univentricular congenital heart disease: literature review and proposed algorithm.

Neonates with severe congenital heart disease undergoing surgical repair may face various complications, including failure to thrive. Feeding tube placement and fundoplication are often performed to combat poor growth in neonates. With the variety of feeding tubes available and controversy surrounding when fundoplication is appropriate, there is no current protocol to determine which intervention is necessary for this patient population. We aim to provide an evidence-based feeding algorithm for this patient population. Initial searches for relevant publications yielded 696 publications; after review of these studies and inclusion of additional studies through external searches, a total of 38 studies were included for qualitative synthesis. Many of the studies utilized did not directly compare the different feeding modalities. Of the 38 studies included, five studies were randomized control trials, three studies were literature reviews, one study was an online survey, and the remaining twenty-nine studies were observational. There is no current evidence to suggest that this specific patient population should be treated differently regarding enteral feeding. We propose an algorithm to assist optimal feeding for neonates with congenital heart disease. Conclusion: Nutrition remains a vital component of the care of neonates with congenital heart disease; determining the optimal feeding strategy for these patients can be approached like other neonates.

Improving Health-Related Quality of Life of Patients With an Ostomy Using a Novel Digital Wearable Device: Protocol for a Pilot Study.

BACKGROUND: Ostomy surgeries involving the placement of an ostomy bag (eg, colostomy, ileostomy, urostomy, etc) have been shown to have a negative impact on health-related quality of life. To date, no studies have been conducted examining what impact, if any, wearable biosensors have on the health-related quality of life of ostomy patients. OBJECTIVE: In the present study, we plan to assess the quality of life of ostomy patients using the Ostom-i alert sensor, a portable, wearable, Bluetooth-linked biosensor that facilitates easier ostomy bag output measurements. We hypothesize that using the Ostom-i alert sensor will result in an improved, ostomy-specific, health-related quality of life as compared to baseline measurement before the use of the sensor. METHODS: A total of 20 ostomy patients will be screened and recruited to participate in this prospective, observational, cross-over pilot study using an Ostom-i alert sensor for one month. The primary outcome of this study will compare ostomy-specific, health-related quality of life at baseline (prior to Ostom-i alert sensor use) to ostomy-specific, health-related quality of life after 2 and 4 weeks of Ostom-i use by utilizing the City of Hope Quality of Life Questionnaire for Patients with an Ostomy. Secondary outcomes of general health-related quality of life and adjustment to ostomy will be evaluated using the Medical Outcomes Study 36-item short form health survey and the Olbrisch Ostomy Adjustment Scale Short Form 2. RESULTS: The project was funded by the Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine at Stanford University School of Medicine. Enrollment is currently underway and data analysis is expected to be completed in 2018. CONCLUSIONS: Proposed benefits of mobile, internet-linked personal health monitors, such as the Ostom-i, include a reduction in the cost of care by reducing resource utilization and infection rates, improving patient-provider communication, reducing time spent as an inpatient as well as improved quality of life. Prior studies have demonstrated decreased health-related quality of life in patients with an ostomy bag. We aim to examine the extent to which the Ostom-i alert sensor affects the health-related quality of life of its users. The Ostom-i alert sensor has the potential to improve quality of life of users by giving them the freedom and confidence to partake in daily activities with the knowledge that they can check how full their ostomy bag is in a private, discrete manner. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02319434; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02319434 (Archived at WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/6xhFDThmq).

Ondansetron does not prevent physical dependence in patients taking opioid medications chronically for pain control.

OBJECTIVES: In this study, we investigated the co-administration of ondansetron with morphine, and whether it could prevent the development of physical dependence in patients taking opioids for the treatment of chronic pain. METHODS: A total of 48 chronic back pain patients (N = 48) participated in this double-blinded, placebo-controlled, randomized study. Patients were titrated onto sustained-release oral morphine and randomized to take 8 mg ondansetron or placebo three times daily concurrently with morphine during the 30-day titration. Following titration, patients underwent Naloxone induced opioid withdrawal. Opioid withdrawal signs and symptoms were then assessed by a blinded research assistant (objective opioid withdrawal score: OOWS) and by the research participant (subjective opioid withdrawal score: SOWS). RESULTS: We observed clinically significant signs of naloxone-precipitated opioid withdrawal in all participants (ΔOOWS = 4.3 ±â€¯2.4, p < 0.0001; ΔSOWS = 14.1 ±â€¯11.7, p < 0.0001), however no significant differences in withdrawal scores were detected between treatment groups. CONCLUSION: We hypothesized that ondansetron would prevent the development of physical dependence in human subjects when co-administered with opioids, but found no difference in naloxone-precipitated opioid withdrawal scores between ondansetron and placebo treatment groups. These results suggest that further studies are needed to determine if 5HT3 receptor antagonists are useful in preventing opioid physical dependence.

Ondansetron Does Not Reduce Withdrawal in Patients With Physical Dependence on Chronic Opioid Therapy.

OBJECTIVES: Individuals taking opioids for an extended period of time may become physically dependent, and will therefore experience opioid withdrawal should they stop taking the medication. Previous work in animal and human models has shown that the serotonin (5-HT3) receptor may be implicated in opioid withdrawal. In this study, we investigated if ondansetron, a 5-HT3-receptor antagonist, could reduce the symptoms of opioid withdrawal after chronic opioid exposure in humans. METHODS: In this double-blinded, randomized, crossover study, 33 chronic back pain patients (N = 33) were titrated onto sustained-release oral morphine for 30 days. After titration, participants attended 2 study sessions, 1 week apart, in which opioid withdrawal was induced with intravenous naloxone, with or without 8 mg intravenous ondansetron pretreatment. Opioid withdrawal symptoms were assessed by a blinded research assistant (objective opioid withdrawal score [OOWS]) and by the research participant (subjective opioid withdrawal score [SOWS]). RESULTS: Clinically significant signs of withdrawal were observed during both the ondansetron (ΔOOWS = 3.58 ±â€Š2.22, P < 0.0001; ΔSOWS = 12.48 ±â€Š11.18, P < 0.0001) and placebo sessions (ΔOOWS = 3.55 ±â€Š2.39, P < 0.0001; ΔSOWS = 12.21 ±â€Š10.72, P < 0.0001), but no significant differences were seen between the treatment sessions in either the OOWS or SOWS scores. CONCLUSION: We hypothesized that ondansetron would reduce opioid withdrawal symptoms in human subjects, but found no difference in withdrawal severity between ondansetron and placebo sessions. These findings suggest that more investigation may be necessary to determine if 5-HT3-receptor antagonists are suitable treatment options for opioid withdrawal.

Palonosetron and hydroxyzine pre-treatment reduces the objective signs of experimentally-induced acute opioid withdrawal in humans: a double-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled crossover study.

BACKGROUND: Treatments for reducing opioid withdrawal are limited and prone to problematic side effects. Laboratory studies, clinical observations, and limited human trial data suggest 5-HT3-receptor antagonists and antihistamines may be effective. OBJECTIVES: This double-blind, crossover, placebo-controlled study employing an acute physical dependence model evaluated whether (i) treatment with a 5-HT3-receptor antagonist (palonosetron) would reduce opioid withdrawal symptoms, and (ii) co-administration of an antihistamine (hydroxyzine) would enhance any treatment effect. METHODS: At timepoint T = 0, healthy (non-opioid dependent, non-substance abuser) male volunteers (N = 10) were pre-treated with either a) placebo, b) palonosetron IV (0.75 mg), or c) palonosetron IV (0.75 mg) and hydroxyzine PO (100 mg) in a crossover study design. This was followed at T = 30 by intravenous morphine (10 mg/70kg). At T = 165, 10 mg/70kg naloxone IV was given to precipitate opioid withdrawal. The objective opioid withdrawal score (OOWS) and subjective opioid withdrawal score (SOWS) were determined 5 and 15 minutes after naloxone administration (T = 170, 180, respectively). Baseline measurements were recorded at T = -30 and T = -15. RESULTS: Comparison of average baseline OOWS scores with OOWS scores obtained 15 minutes after naloxone was significant (p = 0.0001). Scores from 15 minutes post-naloxone infusion showed significant differences in OOWS scores between treatment groups: placebo, 3.7 ± 2.4; palonosetron, 1.5 ± 0.97; and palonosetron with hydroxyzine, 0.2 ± 0.1333. CONCLUSIONS: Pretreatment with palonosetron significantly reduced many signs of experimentally-induced opioid withdrawal. Co-administration with hydroxyzine further reduced opioid withdrawal severity. These results suggest that 5-HT3 receptor antagonists, alone or in combination with an antihistamine, may be useful in the treatment of opioid withdrawal.