Evaluation of YouTube videos as a source of information on facial paralysis exercises.

BACKGROUND: YouTube has emerged as an important source for obtaining information regarding health issues. OBJECTIVE: The study aimed to assess the reliability and quality of facial paralysis exercise videos that are accessible on the YouTube platform. METHODS: The investigation was carried out on Youtube, utilizing the keyword "facial paralysis exercises". We listed the first 100 videos based on relevancy. The quality and reliability of the videos were assessed using DISCERN, the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) Benchmark Criteria, the Global Quality Scale (GQS), and the Video Power Index (VPI). RESULTS: Out of 100 studies, we excluded 52 and included the remaining 48. The scores we obtained for the videos were as follows: DISCERN Quality (2.92±0.91), DISCERN Total (39.16±6.75), JAMA (2.09±0.55), and GQS (3.00±0.89). Our study also revealed that videos uploaded by healthcare professionals had significantly higher DISCERN total, JAMA and VPI scores compared to those uploaded by non-healthcare professionals (p = 0.018, 0.001 and 0.023, respectively). Additionally, we observed a positive and statistically significant correlation between the DISCERN quality score, total score, JAMA, and video features. CONCLUSION: The facial paralysis exercise videos were determined to be of medium to low quality. Higher-quality videos need to be produced.

Evaluation of YouTube videos as a source of information in traumatic brain injury rehabilitation: A cross-sectional study.

Due to the lengthy and challenging nature of traumatic brain injury (TBI) rehabilitation, patients and carers increasingly rely on YouTube for information. However, no previous research has assessed the quality and reliability of these TBI rehabilitation videos on this platform. This study aims to assess the quality and reliability of YouTube videos on TBI rehabilitation. In this cross-sectional study, a YouTube search with the keyword "traumatic brain injury rehabilitation" was performed, and the first 100 videos were listed according to relevancy. After applying exclusion criteria, a total of 72 videos were included in the analysis. DISCERN, Journal of the American Medical Association, and Global Quality Score were used to evaluate the quality and reliability of the videos. Video characteristics, including the number of likes, dislikes, duration, and source of upload, were recorded. The mean DISCERN total score was determined to be 39.56 ±â€…8.4. Additionally, the mean Journal of the American Medical Association score was 1.93 ±â€…0.57, the Global Quality Score was 2.6 ±â€…0.81, and the DISCERN quality score was 2.55 ±â€…0.79. Analysis showed that videos with a longer duration (P < .001) and those uploaded earlier (P = .002) were more likely to be of higher quality. Videos produced by healthcare professionals had higher DISCERN scores (P = .049) than those uploaded by non-healthcare professionals. Examination of YouTube videos on TBI rehabilitation indicates a moderate overall quality. The study revealed that videos uploaded by healthcare professionals have higher quality. For obtaining reliable information on TBI rehabilitation, it is also advisable to prioritize videos with longer durations and earlier upload dates. Given the significant role of social media platforms in educational outreach for rehabilitation, it is crucial to enhance the quality of these videos through appropriate measures.

Reliability and Validity of the Turkish Version of the ABILHAND-Kids Survey in Children with Cerebral Palsy.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of the present study is to develop a Turkish version of the ABILHAND-Kids Survey, which evaluates upper extremity function in children with cerebral palsy (CP), and to carry out a validity and reliability study of the survey for Turkish CP patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between November 2016 and March 2017, a total of 109 pediatric CP patients (62 males, 47 females; mean age 9.3±2.9 years; range, 6 to 15 years) followed in our outpatient clinic were included. The demographic characteristics and type of CP of the patients were recorded. A functional evaluation was made using the ABILHAND-Kids and Manual Ability Classification System (MACS) surveys. The reliability of the surveys was tested based on internal consistency (Cronbach's α) and test-retest (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC]) methods. The validity of the approach was evaluated using converted scores from an ABILHAND-Kids Rasch analysis and a correlation of the MACS levels. RESULTS: The ICC value for the test/retest reliability was 0.98 and internal consistency was 0.94. A strong negative correlation was found between the Turkish version of the ABILHAND-Kids and MACS surveys (r=-0.849; p<0.001). A Rasch analysis indicated good item fit, unidimensionality, and model fit. CONCLUSION: The Turkish version of the ABILHAND-Kids survey is a reliable and valid scale for the assessment of manual ability in Turkish children with CP.

Easy Volumeter in Detection of Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema: A Validity Study.

Aim and Hypothesis: The standard volumeter is heavy and fragile, and using the same volumeter for different patients can result in hygiene problems. These disadvantages point to the need for the development of a new model of volumeter. The new volumeter put forward in this study is lighter, smaller, sturdier, and easier to clean, while also having its own scale. In this study, the validity of this newly designed volumeter is investigated. Materials and Methods: In the first step, the volume of standard cylinders was measured thrice using a standard volumeter and an easy-measurement volumeter, after which a total of 30 arm volumes of 15 volunteers were measured. In the final stage, the arms of 28 patients with breast cancer-related lymphedema were measured once with both volumeters and the mean results were compared. Results: There was a high degree of consistency between the measured volumes of cylinders of known volume when measured with a standard volumeter and the "Easy volumeter." The measured mean volumes with the two volumeters were assessed with paired sample t-test, resulting in a significance (p value) of 0.927, indicating no difference between the measurements of the two volumeters. The variance of measurement of the devices was assessed with a Levene's test, and the significance (p value) was obtained as 0.981. Based on this result, the null hypothesis cannot be rejected, meaning that there is no difference in the variances of measurements of the two volumeters. Likewise, a paired sample t-test was used to evaluate the differences between the mean measurements of the healthy volunteers group, and no difference was detected between the mean arm volumes measured with each volumeter (significance=0.105). The measurements between the two volumeters were also consistent in the lymphedema patient group (involved arm significance = 0.842 and normal arm significance = 0.075). Conclusion: Our study revealed the validity of the newly designed "Easy Volumeter" for the measurement of arm volumes, indicating its appropriateness for use in daily practice.

Is Continuous Passive Motion Effective in Patients with Lymphedema? A Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: In this randomized controlled study, we aimed to evaluate the effect of shoulder flexion exercise using continuous passive motion (CPM) on lymphedema during the treatment of breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL). METHODS: Thirty patients with BCRL were enrolled and completed the study. Fourteen patients were treated with complete decongestive therapy (CDT) and CPM in the intervention group, and 16 patients were treated with CDT alone (control group) for 15 sessions. The main outcome measures were included; the shoulder range of motion (ROM) assessed with a goniometer, limb volume difference measured using the water immersion method, function with the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH), and the quality of life using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy for Breast Cancer (FACT-B4). Lymphedema volume measures were taken at baseline, on days 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 10, and 15; and shoulder ROM, FACT-B4, and DASH were taken at baseline and on day 15. RESULTS: All subjects were similar at baseline. After treatment significant improvement was found in ROM, volumetric differences, DASH, and FACT-B4 scores in both groups. No significant differences were observed in the volumetric differences, ROM, and the DASH, and FACT-B4 scores between the groups, except for the FACT-B4 physical well-being subscores, which were better in intervention group. CONCLUSION: Our study results showed that CPM did not contribute to the reduction of BCRL.