A Pilot Study on Proteomic Predictors of Mortality in Stable COPD.

Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) is the third leading cause of global mortality. Despite clinical predictors (age, severity, comorbidities, etc.) being established, proteomics offers comprehensive biological profiling to obtain deeper insights into COPD pathophysiology and survival prognoses. This pilot study aimed to identify proteomic footprints that could be potentially useful in predicting mortality in stable COPD patients. Plasma samples from 40 patients were subjected to both blind (liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry) and hypothesis-driven (multiplex immunoassays) proteomic analyses supported by artificial intelligence (AI) before a 4-year clinical follow-up. Among the 34 patients whose survival status was confirmed (mean age 69 ± 9 years, 29.5% women, FEV1 42 ± 15.3% ref.), 32% were dead in the fourth year. The analysis identified 363 proteins/peptides, with 31 showing significant differences between the survivors and non-survivors. These proteins predominantly belonged to different aspects of the immune response (12 proteins), hemostasis (9), and proinflammatory cytokines (5). The predictive modeling achieved excellent accuracy for mortality (90%) but a weaker performance for days of survival (Q2 0.18), improving mildly with AI-mediated blind selection of proteins (accuracy of 95%, Q2 of 0.52). Further stratification by protein groups highlighted the predictive value for mortality of either hemostasis or pro-inflammatory markers alone (accuracies of 95 and 89%, respectively). Therefore, stable COPD patients' proteomic footprints can effectively forecast 4-year mortality, emphasizing the role of inflammatory, immune, and cardiovascular events. Future applications may enhance the prognostic precision and guide preventive interventions.

Proteomic Blood Profiles Obtained by Totally Blind Biological Clustering in Stable and Exacerbated COPD Patients.

Although Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) is highly prevalent, it is often underdiagnosed. One of the main characteristics of this heterogeneous disease is the presence of periods of acute clinical impairment (exacerbations). Obtaining blood biomarkers for either COPD as a chronic entity or its exacerbations (AECOPD) will be particularly useful for the clinical management of patients. However, most of the earlier studies have been characterized by potential biases derived from pre-existing hypotheses in one or more of their analysis steps: some studies have only targeted molecules already suggested by pre-existing knowledge, and others had initially carried out a blind search but later compared the detected biomarkers among well-predefined clinical groups. We hypothesized that a clinically blind cluster analysis on the results of a non-hypothesis-driven wide proteomic search would determine an unbiased grouping of patients, potentially reflecting their endotypes and/or clinical characteristics. To check this hypothesis, we included the plasma samples from 24 clinically stable COPD patients, 10 additional patients with AECOPD, and 10 healthy controls. The samples were analyzed through label-free liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry. Subsequently, the Scikit-learn machine learning module and K-means were used for clustering the individuals based solely on their proteomic profiles. The obtained clusters were confronted with clinical groups only at the end of the entire procedure. Although our clusters were unable to differentiate stable COPD patients from healthy individuals, they segregated those patients with AECOPD from the patients in stable conditions (sensitivity 80%, specificity 79%, and global accuracy, 79.4%). Moreover, the proteins involved in the blind grouping process to identify AECOPD were associated with five biological processes: inflammation, humoral immune response, blood coagulation, modulation of lipid metabolism, and complement system pathways. Even though the present results merit an external validation, our results suggest that the present blinded approach may be useful to segregate AECOPD from stability in both the clinical setting and trials, favoring more personalized medicine and clinical research.

COPD: systemic proteomic profiles in frequent and infrequent exacerbators.

Background: Some patients with COPD suffer frequent exacerbations (FE). We hypothesised that their systemic proteomic profile would be different from that of non-frequent exacerbators (NFE). The objective of the present study was to contrast the systemic proteomic profile in FE versus NFE. As a reference, we also determined the systemic proteomic profile of healthy controls (HC) and COPD patients during an actual episode of exacerbation (AE). Methods: In the analysis we included 40 clinically stable COPD patients (20 FE and 20 NFE), and 20 HC and 10 AE patients. Their plasma samples were analysed by combining two complementary proteomic approaches: label-free liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry and multiplex immunoassays. Gene Ontology annotation, pathway enrichment and network analyses were used to investigate molecular pathways associated with differentially abundant proteins/peptides (DAPs). Results: Compared with HC, we identified 40 DAPs in FE, 10 in NFE and 63 in AE. Also compared to HC, pathway functional and protein-protein network analyses revealed dysregulation of inflammatory responses involving innate and antibody-mediated immunity in COPD, particularly in the FE group, as well as during an AE episode. Besides, we only identified alterations in the complement and coagulation cascades in AE. Conclusion: There are specific plasma proteome profiles associated with FE, which are partially shared with findings observed during AE, albeit others are uniquely present during the actual episode of AE.